The duty of a sovereign in cases of rebellion, as laid down in the Hedaya, agrees with the general practice in India.  It was usual, except in cases of notorious injustice and oppression, whenever a rebellion or a suspicion of a rebellion existed, to admonish the rebellious party and persuade him to return to his duty.  Causes of complaint were removed and misunderstandings explained, and, to save the effusion of blood, severe measures were not adopted until they were rendered indispensable.  This wise and provident law is or ought to be the law in all countries:  it was in fact the law in that country, but Mr. Hastings did not attend to it.  His unfortunate victim was goaded to revolt and driven from his subjects, although he endeavored by message after message to reconcile this cruel tyrant to him.  He is told in reply, “You have shed the blood of Englishmen, and I will never be reconciled to you.”  Your Lordships will observe that the reason he gives for such an infernal determination (for it cannot be justly qualified by any other word) is of a nature to make tyranny the very foundation of our government.  I do not say here upon what occasion people may or may not resist; but surely, if ever there was an occasion on which people, from love to their sovereign and regard to their country, might take up arms, it was this.  They saw a tyrant violent in his demands and weak in his power.  They saw their prince imprisoned and insulted, after he had made every offer of submission, and had laid his turban three times in the lap of his oppressor.  They saw him, instead of availing himself of the means he possessed of cutting off his adversary, (for the life of Mr. Hastings was entirely in his power,) betaking himself to flight.  They then thronged round him, took up arms in his defence, and shed the blood of some of his insulters.  Is this resistance, so excited, so provoked, a plea for irreconcilable vengeance?

I must beg pardon for having omitted to lay before your Lordships in its proper place a most extraordinary paper, which will show you in what manner judicial inquiries are conducted, upon what grounds charges are made, by what sort of evidence they are supported, and, in short, to what perils the lives and fortunes of men are subjected in that country.  This paper is in the printed Minutes, page 1608.  It was given in agreeably to the retrograde order which they have established in their judicial proceedings.  It was produced to prove the truth of a charge of rebellion which was made some months before the paper in evidence was known to the accuser.

    “To the Honorable Warren Hastings.