these circumstances gave him a claim to the uncontrolled
exercise of domestic authority; and it might reasonably
be supposed that he would pay a greater regard to a
just economy in his own family than had been observed
by those who were aliens to it. For these reasons
Mr. Hastings recommended to the board that Mahomed
Reza Khan should be immediately divested of the office
of superintendent of the Nabob’s household,
and that the Nabob Mobarek ul Dowlah should be
intrusted with the exclusive and entire receipts and
disbursements of his stipend, and the uncontrolled
management and regulation of his household.
Thus far your Committee are of opinion, that the conclusion
corresponds with the premises; for, supposing the
fact to be established or admitted, that the Nabob,
in point of age, capacity, and judgment, was qualified
to act for himself, it seems reasonable that the management
of his domestic affairs should not be withheld from
him. On this part of the proceeding your Committee
will only observe, that, if it were strictly true
that the Nabob’s understanding had been much
improved
of late by an attention to his education,
(which seems an extraordinary way of describing the
qualifications of a man of six-and-twenty, the father
of many children,) the merit of such improvement must
be attributed to Mahomed Reza Khan, who was the only
person of rank and character connected with him, or
who could be supposed to have any influence over him.
Mr. Hastings himself reproaches the Nabob with
raising
mean men to be his companions, and tells him plainly,
that some persons, both of bad character and base
origin, had found the means of insinuating themselves
into his company and constant fellowship.
In such society it is not likely that either the Nabob’s
morals or his understanding could have been
much
improved; nor could it be deemed prudent to leave
him without any check upon his conduct. Mr. Hastings’s
opinion on this point may be collected from what he
did, but by no means from what he said, on the occasion.
The House will naturally expect to find that the Nabob’s
request was granted, and that the resolution of the
board was conformable to the terms of Mr. Hastings’s
recommendation. Yet the fact is directly the
reverse. Mr. Hastings, after advising that
the Nabob should be intrusted with the exclusive and
entire receipts and disbursements of his stipend,
immediately corrects that advice, being aware that
so sudden and unlimited a disposal of a large revenue
might at first encourage a spirit of dissipation in
the Nabob,—and reserves to himself
a power of establishing, with the Nabob’s
consent, such a plan for the regulation and equal
distribution of the Nabob’s expenses as should
be adapted to the dissimilar appearances of preserving
his interests and his independence at the same time.
On the same complicated principles the subsequent
resolution of the board professes to allow the Nabob
the management of his stipend and expenses,—with
an hope, however, (which, considering the relative
situation of the parties, could be nothing less than
an injunction,) that he would submit to such a plan
as should be agreed on between him and the
Governor-General.