1887.

——­ A review of C.J.  Rockel (De allocutionis usu qualis sit apud Thucydidem, Xenophontem, oratores Atticos, Dionem, Aristidem.).  (Jhrb. of I. Mueller.)

——­ Mention of H. Haupt’s Survey in Philol. 44. (Jhrb. of I. Mueller.)

BR.  KEIL.—­A criticism of Rockel. (Article above cited.  W. Kl.  Ph., May 4.)

W.F.  ALLEN.—­The Monetary Crisis in Rome, A.D. 33. (Containing citations from Dio.  Tr.  A. Ph.  A., Vol. 18.)

E.G.  SIHLER.—­The Tradition of Caesar’s Gallic Wars from Cicero to Orosius. (Containing citations from Dio.  Tr.  A. Ph.  A., Vol. 18.)

LIATYSCHEV.—­(An article containing citations from Dio that contribute to a knowledge of the location of the city of Olbia.—­Journal Ministerstva Narodnavo Prosveschtscheniia, Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4.)

1888.

W.F.  ALLEN.—­Lex Curiata de Imperio. (Containing citations from Dio
XXXIX, 19 and elsewhere.—­Tr.  A. Ph.  A., Vol. 19.)

S.A.  NABER.—­Critical observations. (Including Dio XLVI, 15; LI, 14;
LV, 10; LXIX, 28; LXXVI, 14; LXXVII, 4.  Mnemos., Vol. 16, part 1.)

——­ A review of L.  Poetsch. (Program.  Bei.—­traege zur Kritik der Kaiserbiographien Cassius Dio, Herodian, und AElius Lampridius auf Grund ihrer Berichte ueber den Kaiser Commodus Antoninus.—­Z. oest.  Gymn., 1888, Book 3.)

1889.

BREITUNG.—­A review of Maisel (Observationes in Cassium Dionem.). 
(W.  Kl.  Ph., June 19.)

——­ A review of Maisel. (Do. do.—­The Academy, February.)

J. HILBERG.—­A review of Maisel. (Do. do.—­Z. oest.  Gymn., 1889,
Book 3.)

H. KONTOS.—­Critical note on Dio, XLIX, 12, 2. ([Greek:  ATHENA], Vol. 1, parts 3-4.)

MELBER.—­Contribution to a new order of the Fragments in Cassius Dio.  (Sitzb. d. philos.-philolog. u. hist. d. k.  B. Akademie d.  Wiss. zu Muenchen, Feb. 9.)

NAUCK.—­Analecta Critica. (Proposition to restore six fragments of Cassius Dio to Dio Chrysostom.—­Hermes, Vol. 24, part 3.)

ALEX RIESE.—­Die Sueben (based upon Dio). (Rh.  Mus., Vol. 44, part 3.)

SP.  VASIS.—­Passage of Dio applied to correct conclusions of Willems on Cic. ad Att. 5, 4, 2. ([Greek:  ATHENA], Vol. 1, parts 3-4.)

——­ A review of E.  Cornelius (Quomodo Tacitus historiae scriptor in hominum memoria versatus sit usque ad renascentes litteras saec.  XIV et XV.—­Dio is indirectly involved.). (Jhrb. d. phil.  Ver. zu.  Berlin, 1889.)

——­ A review of C.J.  Rockel. (Title cited under 1887.—­Jhrb. of I. Mueller.)

1890.

U. PH.  BOISSEVAIN.—­A misplaced fragment of Dio (LXXV, 9, 6). (Hermes,
Vol. 25, part 3.)

TH.  HULTZSCH.—­On Dio Cassius (relative to early alteration of the text). (N.  JB. f.  Ph. u.  Pae., Vol. 141, book 3.)

KARL JACOBY.—­A review of Maisel. (Title cited under 1889.—­B.P.W.,
Feb. 15.)