despatch at once all that may be required to be said
about the meeting-houses of the village, it may be
allowable here to mention, that the original building
did not survive the century. In 1700, partly
because the growth of the society began to require
it, but mainly, no doubt, to escape from the painful
associations which had become connected with it, a
new meeting-house was built on another site.
The old one was dismantled of all its removable parts,
and the site reverted to Joseph Hutchinson. It
is supposed that he removed the frame to the other
side of the road, and converted it into a barn; and
that it was used as such until, in the memory of old
persons now living, it mouldered, crumbled into powder-post,
and sunk to the ground. It stood, after being
converted into a barn, on the south side of the road,
nearly in front of Joseph Hutchinson’s homestead.
Hutchinson’s dwelling-house was probably some
distance further down in the field, where the remains
of an old cellar are still to be seen. Nathaniel
Ingersoll gave the land for the new meeting-house.
The records contain the vote, that it “shall
stand upon Watch-House Hill, before Deacon Ingersoll’s
door.” The meeting-houses of the society
have stood there ever since. At that time, it
was an elevated spot, probably covered with the original
forest; for the work of clearing, levelling, and preparing
it for occupancy was so considerable as to require
a special provision. The labor and expense of
the operation were put on that portion of the congregation
brought nearer to the meeting-house by the change
of the site.
In urging their petition to be set off as an independent
parish, distinct from the First Church in Salem, the
people of the village declared, that, if they could
not have a ministry established among them, they would
soon “become worse than the heathen around them.”
Little did they foresee the immediate, long-continued,
and terrible effects that were to follow the boon
thus prayed for. The establishment of the ministry
among them was not merely an opening of Pandora’s
box: it was emptying and shaking it over their
heads. It led them to a condition of bitterness
and violence, of confusion and convulsion, of horror
and misery, of cruelty and outrage, worse than heathen
ever experienced or savages inflicted.
James Bayley of Newbury, born Sept. 12, 1650, a graduate
of Harvard College in the class of 1669, was employed
to preach at the village. In October, 1671, he
transferred his relations from the church in Newbury
to the First Church in Salem. It seems that several
persons of considerable influence in the village were
dissatisfied with the manner in which he had been
brought forward, and became prejudiced against him.
The disaffection was not removed, but suffered to take
deep root in their minds. The parish soon became
the scene of one of those violent and heated dissensions
to which religious societies are sometimes liable.
The unhappy strife was aggravated from day to day,