in their day, and who have left an imperishable glory behind them as the defenders of the country, a brave yeomanry in arms, than on any other spot.  It was probably used as a training field at the first settlement of the village.  From the slaughter of Bloody Brook, the storming of the Narragansett Fort, and all the early Indian wars; from the Heights of Abraham, Lake George, Lexington, Bunker Hill, Brandywine, Pea Ridge, and a hundred other battle-fields, a lustre is reflected back upon this village parade-ground.  It is associated with all the military traditions of the country, down to the late Rebellion.  Lothrop, Davenport, Gardners, Dodges, Raymonds, Putnams, Porters, Hutchinsons, Herricks, Flints, and others, who here taught or learned the manual and drill, are names inscribed on the rolls of history for deeds of heroism and prowess.

There was the usual diversity and variety of character among the people of the village.  John Procter originally lived in Ipswich, where he, as well as his father before him, had a farm of considerable value.  In 1666, or about that time, he removed to Salem, and carried on the Downing farm, which had before been leased to the Flints.  After a while, Procter purchased a part of it.  If a conclusion can be drawn from the prevalent type of his posterity of our day, he was a man of herculean frame.  There is, I think, a tradition to this effect.  At any rate, his character was of that stamp.  He had great native force and energy.  He was bold in his spirit and in his language,—­an upright man, no doubt, as the whole tone of the memorials of him indicate, but free and imprudent in speech, impulsive in feeling, and sometimes rash in action.  He was liable from this cause, as we shall see, to get into contention and give offence.  There was Jeremiah Watts, a representative of a class of men existing in every community where the intellect is stimulated and idiosyncrasies allowed to develop themselves.  By occupation he was a dish-turner, but by temperament an enthusiast, a zealot, and an agitator.  He was not satisfied with things as they were, nor willing to give time an opportunity to improve them.  He took hold of the horns of the altar with daring hands.  He denounced the Church and the world,—­undertook to overturn every thing, and to put all on a new foundation.  He entered on a crusade against what he called “pulpit preaching,” whereby particular persons, called ministers, “may deliver what they please, and none must object; and this we must pay largely for; our bread must be taken out of our mouths, to maintain the beast’s mark; and be wholly deprived of our Christian privileges.  This is the time of Antichrist’s reign, and he must reign this time:  now are the witnesses slain, and the leaders in churches are these slayers.  But I see plainly that it is a vain thing to debate about these things with our fellow-brethren; for they are all for lording it, and trampling under foot.”  This man imagined