superior to the organ of touch as an instrument of
perception, is first of all the range of its action,
taking in simultaneously a large number of impressions
from objects at a distance as well as near; and secondly,
though this may seem paradoxical, the fact that it
gives us so much indirectly, that is, by way of association
and suggestion. This is the interesting side
of visual perception, that, owing to the vast complex
of distinguishable sensations of light and colour
of various qualities and intensities, together with
the muscular sensations attending the varying positions
of the organ, the eye is able to recognize at any
instant a whole external world with its fundamental
properties and relations. The ear comes next
to the eye in this respect, but only after a long interval,
since its sensations (even in the case of musical
combinations) do not simultaneously order themselves
in an indefinitely large group of distinguishable
elements, and since even the comparatively few sensations
which it is capable of simultaneously receiving, being
altogether passive—that is to say, having
no muscular accompaniments—impart but little
and vague information respecting the external order.
It is plain, then, that in the study of illusion, where
the indirectly known elements are the thing to be considered,
the eye, and after this the ear, will mostly engage
our attention.[14]
So much it seemed needful to say about the mechanism
of perception, in order to understand the slight disturbances
of this mechanism that manifest themselves in sense-illusion.
It may be added that our study of these illusions
will help still further to elucidate the exact nature
of perception. Normal mental life, as a whole,
at once illustrates, and is illustrated by, abnormal.
And while we need a rough provisional theory of accurate
perception in order to explain illusory perception
at all, the investigation of this latter cannot fail
to verify and even render more complete the theory
which it thus temporarily adopts.
Illusions of Perception.
With this brief psychological analysis of perception
to help us, let us now pass to the consideration of
the errors incident to the process, with a view to
classify them according to their psychological nature
and origin.
And here there naturally arises the question, How
shall we define an illusion of perception? When
trying to fix the definition of illusion in general,
I practically disposed of this question. Nevertheless,
as the point appears to me to be of some importance,
I shall reproduce and expand one or two of the considerations
then brought forward.