What witnesses are referred to in order to make us believe incredible miracles?  They call as witnesses stupid people, who have ceased to exist for thousands of years, and who, even if they could attest the miracles in question, would be suspected of having been deceived by their own imagination, and of permitting themselves to be seduced by the illusions which skillful impostors performed before their eyes.  But, you will say, these miracles are recorded in books which through constant tradition have been handed down to us.  By whom were these books written?  Who are the men who have transmitted and perpetuated them?  They are either the same people who established these religions, or those who have become their adherents and their assistants.  Thus, in the matter of religion, the testimony of interested parties is irrefragable and can not be contested!

CXXVII.—­If god had spoken, it would be strange that he had spoken differently to all the adherents of the different sects, who damn each other, who accuse each other, with reason, of superstition and impiety.

God has spoken differently to each nation of the globe which we inhabit.  The Indian does not believe one word of what He said to the Chinaman; the Mohammedan considers what He has told to the Christian as fables; the Jew considers the Mohammedan and the Christian as sacrilegious corruptors of the Holy Law, which his God has given to his fathers.  The Christian, proud of his more modern revelation, equally damns the Indian and the Chinaman, the Mohammedan, and even the Jew, whose holy books he holds.  Who is wrong or right?  Each one exclaims:  “It is I!” Every one claims the same proofs; each one speaks of his miracles, his saints, his prophets, his martyrs.  Sensible men answer, that they are all delirious; that God has not spoken, if it is true that He is a Spirit who has neither mouth nor tongue; that the God of the Universe could, without borrowing mortal organism, inspire His creatures with what He desired them to learn, and that, as they are all equally ignorant of what they ought to think about God, it is evident that God did not want to instruct them.  The adherents of the different forms of worship which we see established in this world, accuse each other of superstition and of ungodliness.  The Christians abhor the superstition of the heathen, of the Chinese, of the Mohammedans.  The Roman Catholics treat the Protestant Christians as impious; the latter incessantly declaim against Roman superstition.  They are all right.  To be impious, is to have unjust opinions about the God who is adored; to be superstitious, is to have false ideas of Him.  In accusing each other of superstition, the different religionists resemble humpbacks who taunt each other with their malformation.