Now add twenty-seven years.  We find that Defoe left his solitude—­whatever that may have been—­on December 19th, 1714.  Just at that date, as all his biographers record, Defoe was struck down by a fit of apoplexy and lay ill for six weeks.  Compare this again with the story.

You divine what is coming.  Astounding as it may be, Mr. Wright contends that Defoe himself was the original of the story:  that Defoe, provoked by his wife’s irritating tongue, made a kind of vow to live a life of silence—­and kept it for more than twenty-eight years!

So far back as 1859 the egregious Chadwick nibbled at this theory in his Life and Times of Daniel Defoe, with Remarks Digressive and Discursive.  The story, he says, “would be very applicable” to Defoe himself, and again, “is very likely to have been taken from his own life”; but at this point Chadwick maunders off with the remark that “perhaps the domestic fireside of the poet or book-writer is not the place we should go to in search of domestic happiness.”  Perhaps not; but Chadwick, tallyhoing after domestic happiness, misses the scent.  Mr. Wright sticks to the scent and rides boldly; but is he after the real fox?

* * * * *

April 20, 1895.

Can we believe it?  Can we believe that on the 30th of September, 1686, Defoe, provoked by his wife’s nagging tongue, made a vow to live a life of complete silence; that for twenty-eight years and a month or two he never addressed a word to his wife or children; and that his resolution was only broken down by a severe illness in the winter of 1714?

Mr. Aitken on Mr. Wright’s hypothesis.

Mr. Aitken,[B] who has handled this hypothesis of Mr. Wright’s, brings several arguments against it, which, taken together, seem to me quite conclusive.  To begin with, several children were born to Defoe during this period.  He paid much attention to their education, and in 1713, the penultimate year of this supposed silence, we find his sons helping him in his work.  Again, in 1703 Mrs. Defoe was interceding for her husband’s release from Newgate.  Let me add that it was an age in which personalities were freely used in public controversy; that Defoe was continuously occupied with public controversy during these twenty-eight years, and managed to make as many enemies as any man within the four seas; and I think the silence of his adversaries upon a matter which, if proved, would be discreditable in the extreme, is the best of all evidence that Mr. Wright’s hypothesis cannot be sustained.  Nor do I see how Mr. Wright makes it square with his own conception of Defoe’s character.  “Of a forgiving temper himself,” says Mr. Wright on p. 86, “he (Defoe) was quite incapable of understanding how another person could nourish resentment.”  This of a man whom the writer asserts to have sulked in absolute silence with his wife and family for twenty-eight years, two months, and nineteen days!