Prehistoric Textile Fabrics Of The United States, Derived From Impressions On Pottery eBook

William Henry Holmes
This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 26 pages of information about Prehistoric Textile Fabrics Of The United States, Derived From Impressions On Pottery.

Prehistoric Textile Fabrics Of The United States, Derived From Impressions On Pottery eBook

William Henry Holmes
This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 26 pages of information about Prehistoric Textile Fabrics Of The United States, Derived From Impressions On Pottery.

The nets or other fabrics used have generally been removed before the vessel was burned or even dried.  Professor Wyman, in speaking casually of the cord-marked pottery of Tennessee, says: 

“It seems incredible that even an Indian would be so prodigal of time and labor as to make the necessary quantity of well-twisted cord or thread, and weave it into shape for the mere purpose of serving as a mold which must be destroyed in making a single copy.”

This remark is, however, based upon a false assumption.  The fact that the net or fabric has generally been removed while the clay was still soft being susceptible of easy proof.  I have observed in many cases that handles and ornaments have been added, and that impressed and incised designs have been made in the soft clay after the removal of the woven fabric; besides this there would be no need of the support of a net after the vessel had been fully finished and slightly hardened.  Furthermore, I have no doubt that these textilia were employed as much for the purpose of enhancing the appearance of the vessel as for supporting it during the process of construction.  I have observed, in relation to this point, that in a number of cases, notably the great salt vessels of Saline River, Illinois, the fabric has been applied after the vessel was finished.  I arrive at this conclusion from having noticed that the loose threads of the net-like cover sag or festoon toward the rim as if applied to the inverted vessel, Fig. 82.  If the net had been used to suspend the vessel while building, the threads would necessarily have hung in the opposite direction.

In support of the idea that ornament was a leading consideration in the employment of these coarse fabrics, we have the well-known fact that simple cord-markings, arranged to form patterns, have been employed by many peoples for embellishment alone.  This was a common practice of the ancient inhabitants of Great Britain, as shown by Jewett.  The accompanying cut (Fig. 60) is copied from his work.[1]

  [Illustration:  Fig. 60.—­Ancient British vase with cord
  ornamentation.]

    [Footnote 1:  Jewett, Llewellynn:  Grave mounds and their contents,
    p. 92.]

It is a remarkable fact that very few entire cord-marked vessels have been obtained in this country, although fragments of such are very plentiful.

In Fig. 61 we have an ancient vase from Pennsylvania.  It presents a combination of net or basket markings and of separate cord-markings.  The regularity of the impressions upon the globular body indicates almost unbroken contact with the interior surface of the woven vessel.  The neck and rim have apparently received finishing touches by separately impressing cords or narrow bands of some woven fabric.

  [Illustration:  Fig. 61.—­Ancient fabric marked vessel, Pennsylvania.]

Many examples show very irregular markings such as might have been made by rolling the plastic vessel irregularly upon a woven surface, or by molding it in an improvised sack made by tying up the margins of a piece of cloth.

Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
Prehistoric Textile Fabrics Of The United States, Derived From Impressions On Pottery from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.