in the citadel were still shown to strangers.
The guides, of course, gave them out to be a device
of Semiramis, but the well-informed knew that they
had been constructed by Nebuchadrezzar for one of
his wives the daughter of Oyaxares, who pined for
the verdure of her native mountains. “They
were square in shape, each side being four hundred
feet long; one approached them by steps leading to
terraces placed one above the other, the arrangement
of the whole, resembling that of an amphitheatre.
Each terrace rested on pillars which, gradually increasing
in size, supported the weight of the soil and its
produce. The loftiest pillar attained a height
of fifty feet; it reached to the upper part of the
garden, its capital being on a level with the balustrades
of the boundary wall. The terraces were covered
with a layer of soil of sufficient depth for the roots
of the largest trees; plants of all kinds that delight
the eye by their shape or beauty were grown there.
One of the columns was hollowed from top to bottom;
it contained hydraulic engines which pumped up quantities
of water, no part of the mechanism being visible from
the outside.” Many travellers were content
to note down only such marvels as they considered
likely to make their narratives more amusing, but others
took pains to collect information of a more solid
character, and before they had carried their researches
very far, were at once astounded and delighted with
the glimpses they obtained of Chaldaean genius.
No doubt, they exaggerated when they went so far as
to maintain that all their learning came to them originally
from Babylon, and that the most famous scholars of
Greece, Pherecydes of Scyros, Democritus of Abdera,
and Pythagoras,* owed the rudiments of philosophy,
mathematics, physics, and astrology to the school
of the
Magi.
* The story which asserts that Pythagoras
served under Nergilos, King of Assyria, is probably
based on some similarity of names: thus
among the Greek kings of Cyprus, and in the time
of Assur-bani-pal, we find one whose name would
recall that of Pythagoras, if the accuracy of the
reading were beyond question.
Yet it is not surprising that they should have believed
this to be the case, when increasing familiarity with
the priestly seminaries revealed to them the existence
of those libraries of clay tablets in which, side
by side with theoretic treatises dating from two thousand
years back and more, were to be found examples of
applied mechanics, observations, reckonings, and novel
solutions of problems, which generations of scribes
had accumulated in the course of centuries. The
Greek astronomers took full advantage of these documents,
but it was their astrologers and soothsayers who were
specially indebted to them. The latter acknowledged
their own inferiority the moment they came into contact
with their Euphratean colleagues, and endeavoured to
make good their deficiencies by taking lessons from
the latter or persuading them to migrate to Greece.
A hundred years later saw the Babylonian Berosus opening
at Cos a public school of divination by the stars.
From thenceforward “Chaldaean” came to
be synonymous with “astrologer” or “sorcerer,”
and Chaldaean magic became supreme throughout the world
at the very moment when Chaldaea itself was in its
death-throes.