cases of illness in which we cannot find opportunities to judiciously dispense with medicines.’  Another difficulty in adopting this system may be found in the doctor’s fear, that if he dispenses with medicines, the patient may dispense with him; but we are of Dr Hall’s opinion, that this is quite illusory.  The only difference it will make will be, that patients will learn to trust more to the judgment of their medical attendant, and less to the efficacy of his medicines.

Hydropathy proceeds on the hygienic treatment, although doubtless in a somewhat rough manner.  Air, exercise, rubbing, cold water, simple food—­such are its substitutes both for medicines and globules; and we think the regular doctors might with great advantage take a leaf out of its book, as well as out of the book of homoeopathy.  With this reform, we would suggest—­although with some timidity, for doctors are sensitive on the point—­that a re-examination, on broad scientific principles, even of common diseases, would do some good.  Doctors are too fond of systems of treatment, which are not made to fit the patient, but which the patient is expected to fit.  Diseases run their course, and so do remedies; but it might be well to inquire what relation there is between the course of the one, and that of the other.  The unvarying treatment of a disease looks odd to a thinking bystander.  The same medicines are administered in case after case; the dose follows the symptom with the certainty of fate.  The patient dies—­the patient recovers.  What then?  The doctor has done his best—­everything has been according to rule!

The following are the rules laid down for practitioners on the new system:—­

’1.  Never prescribe medicines when hygiene will do as well and can be enforced.

’2.  Never permit the patient, or those around him, to expect more from medicines than medicines can perform.

’3.  Never prescribe medicines, except avowedly as mere palliatives, when the period is gone by for them to be of ultimate service.

’4.  Never conceal the general intention of the treatment; that is, whether it be adopted with a view to cure, or only to mitigate the disease, or merely to alleviate a symptom or symptoms.

’5.  Never prescribe medicines more powerful than are necessary; or continue a powerful medicine longer, or repeat it oftener, than the disease actually requires.

’6.  Never attribute to the medicine-giving part of the management of a successful case more than its due share of credit.’

We have called this a new system, but a new system is nothing without a name; and we therefore beg leave to suggest one, made up, like the others, of a Greek compound.  First, we have Allopathy, another suffering; then Homoeopathy, the same suffering; then Hydropathy, water-suffering; and now let us have Anapathy, no suffering at all.

APPLICATION OF THE SIRENE TO COUNT THE RATE AT WHICH THE WINGS OF INSECTS MOVE.