to Glasgow, for I could not hope that he could offer you any terms which would tempt you to renounce your professorship; but I missed him.  Mr. Townshend passes for being a little uncertain in his resolutions, so perhaps you need not build much on his sally.

In recompense for so many mortifying things, which nothing but truth could have extorted from me, and which I could easily have multiplied to a greater number, I doubt not but you are so good a Christian as to return good for evil, and to flatter my vanity by telling me that all the godly in Scotland abuse me for my account of John Knox and the Reformation.  I suppose you are glad to see my paper end, and that I am obliged to conclude with—­Your humble servant.[108]

On the 28th of July Hume again writes from London on the same subject:—­

I am very well acquainted with Bourke,[109] who was much taken with your book.  He got your direction from me with a view of writing to you and thanking you for your present, for I made it pass in your name.  I wonder he has not done it.  He is now in Ireland.  I am not acquainted with Jenyns,[110] but he spoke very highly of the book to Oswald, who is his brother in the Board of Trade.  Millar showed me a few days ago a letter from Lord Fitzmaurice,[111] where he tells him that he has carried over a few copies to the Hague for presents.  Mr. York[112] was very much taken with it, as well as several others who had read it.

I am told that you are preparing a new edition, and propose to make some additions and alterations in order to obviate objections.  I shall use the freedom to propose one; which, if it appears to be of any weight, you may have in your eye.  I wish you had more particularly and fully proved that all kinds of sympathy are agreeable.  This is the hinge of your system, and yet you only mention the matter cursorily on p. 20.  Now it would appear that there is a disagreeable sympathy as well as an agreeable.  And, indeed, as the sympathetic passion is a reflex image of the principal, it must partake of its qualities, and be painful when that is so.  Indeed, when we converse with a man with whom we can entirely sympathise, that is when there is a warm and intimate friendship, the cordial openness of such a commerce overbears the pain of a disagreeable sympathy, and renders the whole movement agreeable, but in ordinary cases this cannot have place.  A man tired and disgusted with everything, always ennuie, sickly, complaining, embarrassed, such a one throws an evident damp on company, which I suppose would be accounted for by sympathy, and yet is disagreeable.

It is always thought a difficult problem to account for the pleasure from the tears and grief and sympathy of tragedy, which would not be the case if all sympathy was agreeable.  An hospital would be a more entertaining place than a ball.  I am afraid that on p. 99 and 111