Scientific American Supplement, No. 633, February 18, 1888 eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 133 pages of information about Scientific American Supplement, No. 633, February 18, 1888.

Scientific American Supplement, No. 633, February 18, 1888 eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 133 pages of information about Scientific American Supplement, No. 633, February 18, 1888.
means removing a source of weakness in the tube.  In precisely the same way in the shrinkage of gun hoops attention must be paid to the character and value of the stresses which arise in the course of their manufacture; otherwise it will be impossible to hoop the barrel throughout in a proper manner.  If prejudicial stresses exist in the metal of a hoop before it is put in its place, then, when the gun is fired, if it had been shrunk on with the degree of tension usually allowed, the layer situated in the internal radius will be extended beyond admissible limits, thereby causing the resistance of the gun to be less than that prescribed.[4]

[Footnote 4:  When the inner tube is strengthened by means of wire, the initial or natural stresses in the latter may be neglected on account of its thinness; but when the thickness of the hoops is reduced, and the number of layers thereby increased, then the value of the initial stresses in these hoops is a very important factor with respect to the decrease or increase Of the powers of resistance of the gun.]

It is evident, from what has been said, that in order to determine precisely the resistance of hollow cylinders to internal pressures, and to make the correct calculations for hooping tubes, it is absolutely necessary to know whether internal initial stresses exist in the tube and in the hoops, and to ascertain what their nature and intensity may be—­that is to say, whether they are useful or detrimental; yet it is incontestable that in the construction of modern ordnance no attention has been paid to the investigations indicated.  If it be possible to ignore these considerations in the manufacture of guns of small caliber, and where the thickness of metal is not sufficiently great to admit of strongly developed internal stresses, such is by no means the case with the colossal and costly weapons of the present day.  In these the thickness of metal in the tube and hoops is very great; hence the extreme probability of very considerable internal stresses developing themselves.  That the strength of large guns is often far below that anticipated is demonstrated, year by year, by the repeated cases of failure.  Consciousness as to the want of strength in such guns is made evident by the precautionary measures as to their use everywhere adopted.  The heavy artillery produced in the gun factories of Europe is constructed with all the skill, science, and experience which engineers and artillerists can command, and therefore it would seem that instances of defective strength should not arise.  Such cases, however, do occur everywhere, and irresistibly give rise to the suspicion that not only is the system of construction of guns of large caliber faulty, but also that the conditions of their manufacture must be considered as defective.  Bearing in mind the enormous sums of money expended by every nation in order to secure an armament of completely trustworthy guns, this question demands speedy and searching investigation.  The first step in this direction is the study of the internal stresses inherent in the metal; because, if such exist, and are capable of attaining, under certain conditions, considerable magnitudes, then it is absolutely necessary to take advantage of them in order to increase the resistance of the metal, instead of allowing them to act to its detriment.

Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
Scientific American Supplement, No. 633, February 18, 1888 from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.