[168] [M. Crapelet says—this bust
was modelled after the life by PIGALLE:
and was, in turn, the model
of that belonging to the figure of
Voltaire in the library of
the Institute: see p. 195 ante.]
[169] [The result—judging from the comparative
prices obtained at the
sale—has confirmed
the propriety of my predilection. It brought 5000
francs. In the sale catalogue,
is the following observation attached:
“On admire dans ce precieux
tableau de chevalet la facilite
surprenante de pinceau et
cette harmonic parfaite de couleur qui
faisaient dire au Tiarini,
peintre contemporain, “Seigneur Guerchin,
vous faites ce que vous voulez,
et nous autres ce que nous pouvons.”
No. 14.]
[170] ["This figure was cast from a model made by
Montoni in 1809. There
were ONLY six copies of it,
of which four were in bronze and
two in silver.”
Cat. No. 717. I have not been able to
learn the price for which
it was sold.]
[171] The OPPOSITE PLATE will best attest the truth
of the above remark. It
exhibits a specimen of that
precise period of art, when a taste for
the gothic was beginning somewhat
to subside. The countenance is yet
hard and severely marked;
but the expression is easy and natural, and
the likeness I should
conceive to be perfect. As such, the picture
is invaluable. [So far in
the preceding edition. The sequel is a
little mortifying. The
above picture, an undoubted original—and
by
a master (the supposed pupil
of John Van Eyk) who introduced the art
of oil-painting into Italy—was
sold for only 162 francs: whereas the
copy of it, in oil,
by Laurent, executed expressly for the
accompanying plate (and executed
with great skill and fidelity) cost
400 francs!]
[172] [What a taste have the Virtuosi at Paris!
This interesting picture
was allowed to be sold for
162 francs only. Who is its fortunate
Possessor?]
[173] [The OPPOSITE PLATE, which exhibits the head
in question, is a
sufficient confirmation of
the above remark.]
[174] [First, of the MARC ANTONIOS. Since the
sale of the Silvestre
Collection, in 1810, nothing
had been seen at Paris like that of M.
Denon. It was begun to
be formed in the eighteenth century: from which
it is clear, that, not only
was every proof at least an hundred years
old, but, at that period,
ZANETTI, the previous possessor of this
Collection, sought far and
wide, and with unremitting diligence, for
the acquisition of the choicest
impressions of the engraver. In fact,
this Collection, (contained
in an imperial folio volume, bound in
morocco—and of
which I necessarily took but a hasty glance) consisted
of 117 original impressions,


