in all ages after Christ.” Far be it from
me to deny it, or the similar horrors which he liberally
shows flow from fanaticism. But then, at other
times, that quintessence of all abstractions which
all religions alike contain—the “absolute
religion”—imparts such perfume and
appetizing relish to the whole composition, that,
like Dominie Sampson in Meg Merrilies’s cuisine,
Mr. P. finds the Devil’s cookery-book not despicable.
The things he so fearfully describes are but perversions
of what is essentially good. The “forms,”
the “accidentals,” of different religions
become of little consequence; whether it be Jehovah
or Jupiter, the infinite Creator or a divine cat,
a holy and gracious God that is loved, or an impure
demon that is feared,—all this is secondary,
provided the principles of faith, simplicity, and
earnestness—that is, blind credulity and
idiotic stupidity—inspire the wretched votary;
as if the perversions he deplores and condemns were
not the necessary consequences of such religions themselves,
or, rather, as if they were aught but the religions!
In virtue of the “absolute religion,”
“many a savage smeared with human sacrifice,”
and the Christian martyr perishing with a prayer for
his persecutors, are hastening together to the celestial
banquet. I hope the “savage” will
not go with “unwashen hands,” I trust
he may be Pharisee enough for that; I also hope the
two will not sit next one another; otherwise the savage
may be tempted to offer up a second sacrifice, and
the Christian martyr be a martyr a second time.
Hear him:—“He that worships truly,
by whatever form,”—that is, who is
sincere in his Fetichism, his idolatry, his sacrifices,
though they may be human, —“worships
the only God; he hears the prayer, whether called Brahma,
Pan, or Lord, or called by no name at all. Each
people has its prophets and its saints; and many a
swarthy Indian who bowed down to wood and stone,—many
a grim-faced Calmuck, who worshipped the great God
of Storms,—many a Grecian peasant who did
homage to Phoebus Apollo when the sun rose or went
down,—yes, many a savage, his hands smeared
all over with human sacrifice,—shall come
from the East and the West, and sit down in the kingdom
of God, with Moses and Zoroaster, with Socrates and
Jesus.” (Discourses, p. 83) The charity which
hopes that men may be forgiven the crime of “religions”
which, if there be a God at all, must be “abominations,”
one can understand; but these maudlin apologies for
the religions themselves, —as if they were
not themselves crimes, and involved crimes in their
very practice,—I do not understand.
According to this, all that man has to do is to be
sincere in any thing, however diabolical, and it is
at once transmuted into a virtue which nothing less
than heaven can reward!


