____
July 19. This morning my friends treated me to a long dialogue in which it was contended
That miracles are impossible, but that it is impossible to prove it.
“I think, Fellowes,” Harrington began, “if there be any point in which you and I are likely to agree, it is in that dogma that miracles are impossible. And yet here, as usual, my sceptical doubts pursue and baffle me. I wish you would try with me whether there be not an escape from them.” Fellowes assented.
“As I have to propose and explain my doubts,” said Harrington, “perhaps you will excuse my taking the ‘lion’s share’ of the conversation. But now, by way of beginning in some way,—what, my dear friend, is a miracle?”
“What is a miracle? Ay, that is the question; but though it may be difficult to find an exact definition of it, it is easily understood by every body.”
“Very likely; then you can with more ease give me your notion of it.”
“If, for example,” said Fellowes, “the sun which has risen so long, every morning, were to rise no more; or if a man, whom we knew to be dead and buried, were to come to life again; or if what we know to be water were at once to become wine, none would hesitate to call that a miracle.”
“You remember, perhaps,” said Harrington, “an amusing little play of Socratic humor in the dialogue of Theaetetus, somewhere in the introduction, when the ironical querist has asked that intelligent youth what science is?
“I cannot say that I do; for though I have read that dialogue, it is some years ago.”


