own confession, Bishop Watson had a clerical income
from his bishopric and professorship of divinity at
Cambridge of 2,000_l._ a year; in return for which,
the work he did in either of these capacities was,
from his own showing, really next to nothing.
In fact, in many respects he seems to have been an
exceptionally lucky man. He was appointed to
two professorships at Cambridge when by his own admission
he was totally unqualified for performing the duties
of either. In 1764, when he was only twenty-seven
years of age, he ’was unanimously elected, by
the Senate assembled in full congregation, Professor
of Chemistry.’ ’At the time this
honour was conferred upon me,’ he tells us with
charming frankness, ’I knew nothing at all of
chemistry, had never read a syllable on the subject,
nor seen a single experiment in it; but I was tired
with mathematics and natural philosophy, and the vehementissima
gloriae cupido stimulated me to try my strength
in a new pursuit, and the kindness of the University
(it was always kind to me) animated me to very extraordinary
exertions.’ A few years later the University
was kinder still. At the early age of thirty-four
he was appointed ’to the first office for honour
in the University, the Regius Professorship of Divinity.’
Then with the same delightful naivete he tells us,
’On being raised to this distinguished office
I immediately applied myself with great eagerness
to the study of divinity.’ One would have
thought that his theological studies should have commenced
before he undertook the duties of a divinity professorship.
But, happily for him, his ideas of what would qualify
him to be a theologian were on the most limited scale.
’I determined to study nothing but my Bible,
being much unconcerned about the opinions of councils,
fathers, churches, bishops, and other men as little
inspired as myself.’ If troublesome people
wanted to argue on theological questions with the Regius
Professor of Divinity, ‘I never,’ he tells
us, ’troubled myself with answering their arguments,
but used on such occasions to say to them, holding
the New Testament in my hand, “En sacrum
codicem."’ This was a simple plan, and it
must be confessed, under the circumstances, a very
convenient and prudent one, but it scarcely justified
the strong claims for preferment which the Bishop
constantly founded upon it, as if he had rendered an
almost priceless service to religion. The compendious
method of silencing a gainsayer or satisfying an anxious
inquirer by flourishing a New Testament in his face,
and crying ‘En sacrum codicem,’
seems hardly likely to have been very effective.
For the first few years of his professorship he attended
to its duties personally, after the fashion that has
been described; but for the greater part of the long
time during which he held that office he employed a
deputy. When he was appointed to the bishopric
of Llandaff he found there was no residence for him
in his diocese, and he does not seem to have particularly


