that it had been his intention to dismiss all the prosecutions at the first meeting of the court, and to accompany it with an avowal of his opinion, that they could not be maintained, because the federal court had no jurisdiction over libels.  This was accordingly done.  I did not till then know that there were other prosecutions of the same nature, nor do I now know what were their subjects.  But all went off together; and I afterwards saw, in the hands of Mr. Granger, a letter written by the clergyman, disavowing any personal ill will towards me, and solemnly declaring he had never uttered the words charged.  I think Mr. Granger either showed me, or said there were affidavits of at least half a dozen respectable men who were present at the sermon, and swore no such expressions were uttered, and as many equally respectable who swore the contrary.  But the clergyman expressed his gratification at the dismission of the prosecution.  I write all this from memory, and after too long an interval of time to be certain of the exactness of all the details; but I am sure there is no variation material, and Mr. Granger, correcting small lapses of memory, can confirm every thing substantial.  Certain it is, that the prosecutions had been instituted, and had made considerable progress, without my knowledge; that they were disapproved by me as soon as known, and directed to be discontinued.  The attorney did it on the same ground on which I had acted myself in the cases of Duane, Callender, and others; to wit, that the sedition law was unconstitutional and null, and that my obligation to execute what was law, involved that of not suffering rights secured by valid laws, to be prostrated by what was no law.  I always understood that these prosecutions had been invited, if not instituted, by Judge Edwards, and the marshal, being republican, had summoned a grand jury partly or wholly republican:  but that Mr. Huntington declared from the beginning against the jurisdiction of the court, and had determined to enter nolle-prosequis before he received my directions.

I trouble you with another subject.  The law making my letters post free, goes to those to me only, not those from me.  The bill had got to its passage before this was observed (and first I believe by Mr. Dana), and the house under too much pressure of business near the close of the session to bring in another bill.  As the privilege of freedom was given to the letters from as well as to both my predecessors, I suppose no reason exists for making a distinction.  And in so extensive a correspondence as I am subject to, and still considerably on public matters, it would be a sensible convenience to myself, as well as those who have occasion to receive letters from me.  It happens, too, as I was told at the time (for I have never looked into it myself), that it was done by two distinct acts on both the former occasions.  Mr. Eppes, I think, mentioned this to me.  I know from the Post Master General, that Mr. Adams franks all his letters.  I state this matter to you as being my representative, which must apologize for the trouble of it.  We have been seasonable since you left us.  Yesterday evening and this morning we have had refreshing showers, which will close and confirm the business of planting.  Affectionately yours,