[Footnote 164:  Dryden, Vol.  IX, p. 226.]

  [Footnote 165:  Ibid., Vol.  IX, p. 2.]

[Footnote 166:  In this connection Scott’s review of Todd’s edition of Spenser is interesting.  He takes exception to the lack of an appearance of continuity in the biography, caused by the long quotations included in the body of the narrative; and censures the editor for not having used the history of Italian poetry in elucidating Spenser’s work. (Edinburgh Review, October, 1805.)]

  [Footnote 167:  Review of Todd’s Spenser.]

  [Footnote 168:  Dryden, Vol.  I, p. 6.]

  [Footnote 169:  Familiar Letters, Vol.  I, p. 229; and Dryden, Vol. 
  I, p. 6.]

  [Footnote 170:  Dryden, Vol.  I, pp. 402-3.]

  [Footnote 171:  Dryden, Vol.  I, p. 403.]

[Footnote 172:  Ibid., p. 404.  Mr. Saintsbury thinks that Scott’s prefatory introductions to the plays are often “both meagre and depreciatory”; also that Scott’s judgment on Dryden’s letters is rather harsh, for him, and that after he had begun to write novels he would not have been so impatient of remarks on “turkeys, marrow-puddings, and bacon.”]

  [Footnote 173:  Ibid., Vol.  I, p. 405.]

  [Footnote 174:  Ibid., Vol.  X, p. 307 ff.]

  [Footnote 175:  Ibid., Vol.  XIV, pp. 136 and 146.]

  [Footnote 176:  Ibid., Vol.  I, p. 405.]

[Footnote 177:  In order to give a more specific view of Scott’s methods, two or three of the introductions to well-known poems may be briefly analysed.  The introduction to Absalom and Achitophel occupies 111/2 pages, of which about 21/2 are given to quotation from a tract which Scott thought furnished the argument to Dryden, and which was unnoticed by any former commentator.  Scott’s remarks follow this outline:  Position of the poem in literature, and history of its composition; origin of the particular allegory as applied to modern politics; a parallel use of the allegory (with a quotation from Somers’ Tracts in illustrations); aptness of the allegory; merits of the satire—­treatment of Monmouth and other main characters; changes in the second edition to mitigate the satire; characterization of the poem as having few flights of imagination but much correctness of taste as well as fire and spirit; other objections by Johnson refuted; success of the poem; history of the first publication and of the replies and congratulatory poems; editions, and Latin versions.  The notes on this poem are historical and very full, but the introduction contains as much literary as historical comment. Religio Laici is prefaced by 8 pages of introduction, in which are discussed the motive of the writing, the argument, the title, the purpose of the poem, and its reputation.  Dryden’s style in didactic poetry is compared