was received with a feeling amounting almost to satisfaction.
The first English Parliament of Queen Anne agreed
to the appointment of commissioners to discuss terms
of union, and the Estates of Scotland chose representatives
to meet them. But the English refused to give
freedom of trade, and so the negotiations broke down.
In reply, the Scottish Parliament removed the restrictions
on the import of wines from France, with which country
England was now at war. In the summer of 1703
the Scots passed an Act of Security, which invested
the Parliament with the power of the crown in case
of the queen’s dying without heirs, and entrusted
to it the choice of a Protestant sovereign “from
the royal line”. It refused to such king
or queen, if also sovereign of England, the power of
declaring war or making peace without the consent
of Parliament, and it enacted that the union of the
crowns should determine after the queen’s death
unless Scotland was admitted to equal trade and navigation
privileges with England. Further, the act provided
for the compulsory training of every Scotsman to bear
arms, in order that the country might, if necessary,
defend its independence by the sword. The queen’s
consent to the Act of Security was refused, and the
bitterness of the national feeling was accentuated
by the suspicion of a Jacobite plot. Parliament
had been adjourned on 16th September, 1703. When
it met in 1704 it again passed the Act of Security,
and an important section began to argue that the royal
assent was merely a usual form, and not an indispensable
authentication of an act. For some time, it seemed
as if the two countries were on the brink of war.
But, as the union of the crowns had been rendered
possible by the self-restraint of a nation who could
accept their hereditary enemy as their hereditary sovereign,
so now Queen Anne’s advisers resolved, with
patient wisdom, to secure, at all hazards, the union
of the kingdoms.
It was not an easy task, even in England, for there
could be no union without complete freedom of trade,
and many Englishmen were most unwilling to yield on
this point. In Scotland the difficulties to be
overcome were much greater. The whole nation,
irrespective of politics and religion, felt bitterly
the indignity of surrendering the independent existence
for which Scotland had fought for four hundred years.
It could not but be difficult to reconcile an ancient
and high-spirited people to incorporation with a larger
and more powerful neighbour, and the whole population
mourned the approaching loss of their Parliament and
their autonomy. Almost every section had special
reasons for opposing the measure. For the Jacobites
an Act of Union meant that Scotland was irretrievably
committed to the Hanoverian succession, and whatever
force the Jacobites might be able to raise after the
queen’s death must take action in the shape of
a rebellion against the de facto government.
It deprived them of all hope of seizing the reins