behindhand of Christ’s sufferings remaining uncompleted, of which the sufferings of Paul could be in any sense the complement?  He says there was.  Could the sufferings of Paul for the Church in any form of correct expression be said to eke out the sufferings that were complete?  In one sense it is true to say that there is one offering once offered for all.  But it is equally true to say that that one offering is valueless, except so far as it is completed and repeated in the life and self-offering of all.  This is the Christian’s sacrifice.  Not mechanically completed in the miserable materialism of the mass, but spiritually in the life of all in whom the Crucified lives.  The sacrifice of Christ is done over again in every life which is lived, not to self but, to God.

Let one concluding observation be made—­self-denial, self-sacrifice, self-surrender!  Hard doctrines, and impossible!  Whereupon, in silent hours, we sceptically ask, Is this possible? is it natural?  Let preacher and moralist say what they will, I am not here to sacrifice myself for others.  God sent me here for happiness, not misery.  Now introduce one sentence of this text of which we have as yet said nothing, and the dark doctrine becomes illuminated—­“the love of Christ constraineth us.”  Self-denial, for the sake of self-denial, does no good; self-sacrifice for its own sake is no religious act at all.  If you give up a meal for the sake of showing power over self, or for the sake of self-discipline, it is the most miserable of all delusions.  You are not more religious in doing this than before.  This is mere self-culture, and self-culture being occupied for ever about self, leaves you only in that circle of self from which religion is to free you; but to give up a meal that one you love may have it, is properly a religious act—­no hard and dismal duty, because made easy by affection.  To bear pain for the sake of bearing it has in it no moral quality at all, but to bear it rather than surrender truth, or in order to save another, is positive enjoyment as well as ennobling to the soul.  Did you ever receive even a blow meant for another in order to shield that other?  Do you not know that there was actual pleasure in the keen pain far beyond the most rapturous thrill of nerve which could be gained from pleasure in the midst of painlessness?  Is not the mystic yearning of love expressed in words most purely thus, Let me suffer for him?

This element of love is that which makes this doctrine an intelligible and blessed truth.  So sacrifice alone, bare and unrelieved, is ghastly, unnatural, and dead; but self-sacrifice, illuminated by love, is warmth and life; it is the death of Christ, the life of God, the blessedness, and only proper life of man.

 VIII.

 Preached June 30, 1850.

 THE POWER OF SORROW.