More than that, they demanded their right, their Christian liberty of expressing their opinions in the church, merely for the sake of exhibiting the Christian graces and spiritual gifts which had been showered upon them so largely; until by degrees those very assemblies became a lamentable exhibition of their own depravity, and led to numerous irregularities which we find severely rebuked by the Apostle Paul.  Their women, rejoicing in the emancipation which had been given to the Christian community, laid aside the old habits of attire which had been consecrated so long by Grecian and Jewish custom, and appeared with their heads uncovered in the Christian community.  Still further than that, the Lord’s Supper exhibited an absence of all solemnity, and seemed more a meeting for licentious gratification, where “one was hungry, and another was drunken”—­a place in which earthly drunkenness, the mere enjoyment of the appetites, had taken the place of Christian charity towards each other.

And the same feeling—­this love of mere liberty—­liberty in itself—­manifested itself in many other directions.  Holding by this freedom, their philosophy taught that the body, that is the flesh, was the only cause of sin; that the soul was holy and pure; and that therefore, to be free from the body would be entire, perfect, Christian emancipation.  And so came in that strange, wrong doctrine, exhibited in Corinth, where immortality was taught separate from, and in opposition to, the doctrine of the resurrection.  And afterwards they went on with their conclusions about liberty, to maintain that the body, justified by the sacrifice of Christ, was no longer capable of sin; and that in the evil which was done by the body, the soul had taken no part.  And therefore sin was to them but as a name, from which a Christian conscience was to be freed altogether.  So that when one of their number had fallen into grievous sin, and had committed fornication, “such as was not so much as named among the Gentiles,” so far from being humbled by it, they were “puffed up,” as if they were exhibiting to the world an enlightened, true, perfect Christianity—­separate from all prejudices.

To such a society and to such a state of mind, the Apostle Paul preached in all its length, breadth, and fulness, the humbling doctrines of the Cross of Christ.  He taught that knowledge was one thing—­that charity was another thing; that “knowledge puffeth up, but charity buildeth up.”  He reminded them that love was the perfection of knowledge.  In other words, his teaching came to this:  there are two kinds of knowledge; the one the knowledge of the intellect, the other the knowledge of the heart.  Intellectually, God never can be known.  He must be known by Love—­for, “if any man love God, the same is known of Him.”  Here then, we have arrived in another way, at precisely the same conclusion at which we arrived last Sunday.  Here