1. inl’are = the end is bent.
   2. nak’e = another is bent.
   3. t’are = the middle is bent.
   4. dinri = there are no more except this.
   5. se-sunla-re = the row on the hand.
   6. elkke-t’are = 3 from each side.
   7.{ t’a-ye-oyertan = there are still 3 of them.
     { inl’as dinri = on one side there are 4 of them.
   8. elkke-dinri = 4 on each side.
   9. inl’a-ye-oyert’an = there is still 1 more.
  10. onernan = finished on each side.
  11. onernan inl’are ttcharidhel = 1 complete and 1.
  12. onernan nak’e ttcharidhel = 1 complete and 2, etc.

The formation of 6, 7, and 8 of this scale is somewhat different from that ordinarily found.  To express 6, the Montagnais separates the thumb and forefinger from the three remaining fingers of the left hand, and bringing the thumb of the right hand close to them, says:  “3 from each side.”  For 7 he either subtracts from 10, saying:  “there are still 3 of them,” or he brings the thumb and forefinger of the right hand up to the thumb of the left, and says:  “on one side there are 4 of them.”  He calls 8 by the same name as many of the other Canadian tribes, that is, two 4’s; and to show the proper number of fingers, he closes the thumb and little finger of the right hand, and then puts the three remaining fingers beside the thumb of the left hand.  This method is, in some of these particulars, different from any other I have ever examined.

It often happens that the composition of numeral words is less easily understood, and the original meanings more difficult to recover, than in the examples already given.  But in searching for number systems which show in the formation of their words the influence of finger counting, it is not unusual to find those in which the derivation from native words signifying finger, hand, toe, foot, and man, is just as frankly obvious as in the case of the Zuni, the Arawak, the Eskimo, or the Montagnais scale.  Among the Tamanacs,[74] one of the numerous Indian tribes of the Orinoco, the numerals are as strictly digital as in any of the systems already examined.  The general structure of the Tamanac scale is shown by the following numerals: 

5. amgnaitone = 1 hand complete.
6. itacono amgna pona tevinitpe = 1 on the other hand.
10. amgna aceponare = all of the 2 hands.
11. puitta pona tevinitpe = 1 on the foot.
16. itacono puitta pona tevinitpe = 1 on the other foot.
20. tevin itoto = 1 man.
21. itacono itoto jamgnar bona tevinitpe = 1 on the hands of another
man.

In the Guarani[75] language of Paraguay the same method is found, with a different form of expression for 20.  Here the numerals in question are

5. asepopetei = one hand.
10. asepomokoi = two hands.
20. asepo asepi abe = hands and feet.

Another slight variation is furnished by the Kiriri language,[76] which is also one of the numerous South American Indian forms of speech, where we find the words to be