Scientific American Supplement, No. 620, November 19,1887 eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 135 pages of information about Scientific American Supplement, No. 620, November 19,1887.

Scientific American Supplement, No. 620, November 19,1887 eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 135 pages of information about Scientific American Supplement, No. 620, November 19,1887.

The second set of experiments took place on October 24 last, in the Monk Bretton colliery, near Barnsley, of which Mr. W. Pepper, of Leeds, is owner.  This gentleman determined to give the new explosive a fair and exhaustive trial, and the following programme was carried out in the presence of a very large gathering of gentlemen interested in coal mining.  The chief inspector of mines for Yorkshire and Lincolnshire, Mr. F.N.  Wardell, was also present, and the Roburite Explosives Company was represented by Lieut.-General Sir John Stokes, K.C.B., R.E., chairman, and several of the directors.

1. Surface Experiments.—­A shot fired on the ground, exposed.  This gave no perceptible flame (70 grammes of roburite was the charge in these experiments).

2.  A shot fired on the ground, bedded in fine coal dust.  No flame nor ignition of the coal dust was perceptible.

3.  A shot fired suspended in a case into which gas was conducted, and the atmospheric air allowed to enter so as to form an explosive mixture.  The gas was not fired.

4.  A shot fired in a boiler flue 16 ft. by 2 ft. 8 in., placed horizontally, in which was a quantity of fine coal dust kept suspended in the air by the action of a fan.  No flame nor ignition of the coal dust took place.

5.  A shot fired as above, except that an explosive mixture of gas and air was flowing into the boiler tube in addition to the coal dust.  That this mixture was firedamp was proved by the introduction of a safety lamp, the flame of which was elongated, showing what miners call the “blue cap.”  There was no explosion of the gas or sign of flames.

6.  A shot of roburite fired in the boiler tube without any gas or suspended coal dust.  The report was quite as loud as in the preceding case; indeed, to several present it seemed more distinct.

7.  A shot of 1/2 lb. gunpowder was fired under the same condition as No. 5, i.e., in an explosive mixture of gas and air with coal dust.  The result was most striking, and appeared to carry conviction of the great comparative safety of roburite to all present.  Not only was there an unmistakable explosion of the firedamp, with very loud report, and a vivid sheet of flame, but the gas flowing into the far end of the boiler tube was ignited and remained burning until turned off.

In the Pit.—­1.  A 2 in. hole was drilled 4 ft. 6 in. deep into coal, having a face 7 yards wide, fast at both ends, and holed under for a depth of 8 ft., end on, thickness of front of coal to be blown down 2 ft. 10 in., plus 9 in. of dirt.  This represented a most difficult shot, having regard to the natural lines of cleavage of the coal—­a “heavy job” as it was locally termed.  The charge was 65 grammes of roburite, which brought down a large quantity of coal, not at all too small in size.  No flame was perceptible, although all the lamps were carefully covered.

2.  A 2 in. hole drilled 4 ft. 6 in. into the side of the coal about 10 in. from the top, fast ends not holed under, width of space 10 ft.  This was purposely a “blowout” shot.  The result was again most satisfactory, the charge exploding in perfect darkness.

Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
Scientific American Supplement, No. 620, November 19,1887 from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.