On the French side it has been asserted that the German Chancellor in Parliament had acknowledged that Germany was doing wrong in violating Belgian neutrality.  It must, however, not be overlooked that the Chancellor further said: 

     We know that the Allies do not intend to respect Belgian
     neutrality, and Germany, in the position she is in, attacked from
     three sides, cannot wait, while the Allies can wait.

At that time the Belgian archives were not at the disposal of the German Government.  If the Chancellor had known at the time he made his speech that Belgium was not neutral he would certainly have spoken of the alleged Belgian neutrality in a different way.

Germany has violated the frontiers of no really neutral country, while the Allies are on record for disregarding all obligations toward China.

Text of Wireless Message.

Headquarters report German military authorities searching archives of Belgian General Staff at Brussels, found portfolio inscribed “Intervention Anglaise-Belgique,” containing important documents: 

1.  Report to Belgian War Minister, dated April 10, 1906, containing result detailed negotiations between Chief of Belgian General Staff and British Military Attache at Brussels, Lieut.  Col.  Barnardiston.  Plan of English origin sanctioned by Major Gen. Grierson, Chief English General Staff, contains strength, formation, landing places, expeditionary-force 100,000 men; continuing, settles plan Belgian General Staff transport accommodations, feeding in Belgium, Belgian interpreters, gendarmerie, landing places at Dunkirk, Calais, Boulogne.  Details Barnardiston remarks for present Holland cannot be relied upon.  Further confidential communication that English Government after destruction of German Navy will direct supply provision via Antwerp.  Finally suggestion from England military attache that Belgian espionage service should be organized in Prussian Rheinland.

     2.  Map showing strategical drawing up of French Army demonstrating
     existence of French-Belgian agreement.

3.  Report of Baron Greindl, Belgian Minister to Berlin, to Belgian Foreign Office, dated Dec. 23, 1911.  Greindl, commenting on plan of Belgian General Staff for defense of Belgo-German frontier in Franco-German war, points to threatening violation of neutrality by France, saying:  “Danger French attack threatening us, not only near Luxemburg, but on whole length of common frontier, This assertion no guess work, but founded upon positive facts.”

Minister further thoroughly discusses Entente’s plans for passage through Belgium, Calais, and England.  France doubtful protectors, Barnardiston’s insinuations relative Flushing question, both perfidious and naive postulates dressing plan of battle against threatening Franco-British invasion into Belgium in Franco-German war.

* * * * *