into a
sinking fund for the payment and liquidation
of said loans. The bill, as the title purports,
simply provides for the transfer of the stock
now held by the State in the Planters’ Bank,
and that the same shall be invested in the stock of
the Mississippi Railroad Company, leading from
Natchez to Canton, which has banking privileges
to twice the amount of capital stock paid in.
The transferring of the stock and dividend to another
irresponsible corporation, and the appropriation
of the same to the construction of a road, is
a violation of and impairing the obligation of
the contract made and entered into with the purchasers
or holders of the bonds of the State, under a solemn
act of the Legislature. If it should be
thought that a people, composed of so much virtue,
honor, and chivalry, as the noble and generous Mississippians,
would disdain, and consequently refrain, from repealing
or violating their plighted faith, it may be answered,
that the faith of the State, solemnly and sacredly
pledged by an act of the Legislature, with all
the formality and solemnity of a constitutional
law, is violated by the provisions of this very bill
under consideration. The faith of the State
is pledged to the holders of the bonds, by the
original and subsequent acts incorporating the
Planters’ Bank, as solemnly as national or legislative
pledges can be made, that the stock and dividends
accruing thereon shall be faithfully appropriated
to the redemption and payment of said loans and
all interest thereon, as they respectively become
due; the appropriation of this fund to an other purpose
is, therefore, a violation of the faith of the State.’
(House Jour. 443.)
Thus was it, that the stock of the bank, which for
so many years had been yielding a dividend far exceeding
the interest on the loan, and which stock had been
pledged for the redemption of the loan, was diverted
to the building of a railroad, which never did or could
yield a single dollar, and the company soon became
insolvent. By another clause of this act of 1839,
the Planters’ Bank, which, by the loan act, was
made responsible (together with the State) for the
payment of these bonds, was released from the obligation
to make such payments.
And now, what is the answer of Jefferson Davis on
this subject? He says, in his letter of the 25th
May, 1849, before quoted:
‘A smaller amount is due for
what are termed Planters’ Bank bonds of
Mississippi. These evidences of debt, as well
as the coupons issued to cover accruing interest,
are receivable for State lands, and no one has
a right to assume they will not be provided for otherwise,
by or before the date at which the whole debt becomes
due.’
To this the London Times replied, in its editorial
of the 13th July, 1849, before quoted, as follows: