excitements and hopes of the Russian revolution in
Finland, in Poland, in the Russian cities, in the university
towns. Life had become intensified by the consciousness
of the suffering and starvation of millions of their
fellow subjects. They had been living with a
sense of discipline and of preparation for a coming
struggle which, although grave in import, was vivid
and adventurous. Their minds had been seized
by the first crude forms of social theory and they
had cherished a vague belief that they were the direct
instruments of a final and ideal social reconstruction.
When they come to America they sadly miss this sense
of importance and participation in a great and glorious
conflict against a recognized enemy. Life suddenly
grows stale and unprofitable; the very spirit of tolerance
which characterizes American cities is that which strikes
most unbearably upon their ardent spirits. They
look upon the indifference all about them with an
amazement which rapidly changes to irritation.
Some of them in a short time lose their ardor, others
with incredible rapidity make the adaptation between
American conditions and their store of enthusiasm,
but hundreds of them remain restless and ill at ease.
Their only consolation, almost their only real companionship,
is when they meet in small groups for discussion or
in larger groups to welcome a well known revolutionist
who brings them direct news from the conflict, or
when they arrange for a demonstration in memory of
“The Red Sunday” or the death of Gershuni.
Such demonstrations, however, are held in honor of
men whose sense of justice was obliged to seek an
expression quite outside the regular channels of established
government. Knowing that Russia has forced thousands
of her subjects into this position, one would imagine
that patriotic teachers in America would be most desirous
to turn into governmental channels all that insatiable
desire for juster relations in industrial and political
affairs. A distinct and well directed campaign
is necessary if this gallant enthusiasm is ever to
be made part of that old and still incomplete effort
to embody in law—“the law that abides
and falters not, ages long”—the highest
aspirations for justice.
Unfortunately, we do little or nothing with this splendid
store of youthful ardor and creative enthusiasm.
Through its very isolation it tends to intensify and
turn in upon itself, and no direct effort is made
to moralize it, to discipline it, to make it operative
upon the life of the city. And yet it is, perhaps,
what American cities need above all else, for it is
but too true that Democracy—“a people
ruling”—the very name of which the
Greeks considered so beautiful, no longer stirs the
blood of the American youth, and that the real enthusiasm
for self-government must be found among the groups
of young immigrants who bring over with every ship
a new cargo of democratic aspirations. That many
of these young men look for a consummation of these
aspirations to a social order of the future in which