refuses to acknowledge the visible situation.  Vanity blinds his one eye, love of self-indulgence blinds the other.  Observe now how I speak in the high moral tone of a reformed offender, which is the way of reformed offenders and other reformers the world over.  We are always most virtuous in retrospect, as the fact of the crime recedes.  Moreover, he who has not erred has but little to gloat over.

There are two sorts of evidence upon which many judges look askance—­that sort of evidence which is circumstantial and that sort which purely is hearsay.  In this connection, and departing for the space of a paragraph or so from the main theme, I am reminded of the incident through which a certain picturesque gentleman of the early days in California acquired a name which he was destined to wear forever after, and under which his memory is still affectionately encysted in the traditions of our great Far West.  I refer to the late Liver-Eating Watkins.  Mr. Watkins entered into active life and passed through a good part of it bearing the unilluminative and commonplace first name of Elmer or Lemuel, or perhaps it was Jasper.  Just which one of these or some other I forgot now, but no matter; at least it was some such.  One evening a low-down terra-cotta-colored Piute swiped two of Mr. Watkins’ paint ponies and by stealth, under cover of the cloaking twilight, went away with them into the far mysterious spaces of the purpling sage.

To these ponies the owner was deeply attached, not alone on account of the intrinsic value, but for sentimental reasons likewise.  So immediately on discovering the loss the next morning, Mr. Watkins took steps.  He saddled a third pony which the thief had somehow overlooked in the haste of departure, and he girded on him both cutlery and shootlery, and he mounted and soon was off and away across the desert upon the trail of the vanished malefactor.  Now when Mr. Watkins fared forth thus accoutered it was a sign he was not out for his health or anybody else’s.

Friends and well-wishers volunteered to accompany him upon the chase, for they foresaw brisk doings.  But he declined their company.  Folklore, descending from his generation to ours, has it that he said this was his own business and he preferred handling it alone in his own way.  He did add, however, that on overtaking the fugitive it was his intention, as an earnest or token of his displeasure, to eat that Injun’s liver raw.  Some versions say he mentioned liver rare, but the commonly accepted legend has it that the word used was raw.  With this he put the spur to his steed’s flank and was soon but a mere moving speck in the distance.