his right threatened by the entire host of the enemy, which might have lapped round it and attacked it in front, in flank, and in rear.  To escape this peril he was about to wheel his line and make it rest alone its whole extent upon the river, when the Persians passed him and resumed the position which they had occupied at the beginning of the battle.  They were then about to attack, when once more the Greeks anticipated them and charged.  The effect was again ludicrous.  The Persians would not abide the onset, but fled faster than before.  The Greeks pursued them to a village, close by which was a knoll or mound, whither the fugitives had betaken themselves.  Again the Greeks made a movement in advance, and immediately the flight recommenced.  The last rays of the setting sun fell on scattered masses of Persian horse and foot flying in all directions over the plain from the little band of Greeks.

The battle of Cunaxa was a double blow to the Persian power.  By the death of Cyrus there was lost the sole chance that existed of such a re-invigoration of the Empire as might have enabled it to start again on a new lease of life, with ability to held its own, and strength to resume once more the aggressive attitude of former times.  The talents of Cyrus have perhaps been overrated, but he was certainly very superior to most Orientals; and there can be no doubt that the Empire would have greatly gained by the substitution of his rule for that of his brother.  He was active, energetic, prompt indeed, ready in speech, faithful in the observance of his engagements, brave, liberal—­he had more foresight and more self-contro than most Asiatics; he knew how to deal with different classes of men; he had a great power of inspiring affection and retaining it; he was free from the folly of national prejudice, and could appreciate as they deserved both the character and the institutions of foreigners.  It is likely that he would have proved a better administrator and ruler than any king of Persia since Darius Hystaspis.  He would, therefore, undoubtedly have raised his country to some extent.  Whether he could really have arrested its decline, and enabled it to avenge the humiliations of Marathon, Salamis, and the peace of Callias, is, however, exceedingly doubtful.  For Cyrus, though he had considerable merits, was not without great and grievous defects.  As the Tartar is said always to underlie the Russ, so the true Oriental underlay that coating of Grecian manners and modes of thought and act, with which a real admiration of the Hellenic race induced Cyrus to conceal his native barbarism.  When he slew his cousins for an act which he chose to construe as disrespect, and when he executed Orontes for contemplated desertion, secretly and silently, so that no one knew his fate, when transported with jealous rage he rushed madly upon his brother, exposing to hazard the success of all his carefully formed plans, and in fact ruining his cause, the acquired