I too am struggling with my “Popular Sketch of Darwinism,” and am just now doing a chapter on the great “hybridity” question.  I really think I shall be able to arrange the whole subject more intelligibly than Darwin did, and simplify it immensely by leaving out the endless discussion of collateral details and difficulties which in the “Origin of Species” confuse the main issue....

The most remarkable steps yet made in advance are, I think, the theory of Weismann of the continuity of the germ plasm, and its corollary that acquired modifications are never inherited! and Patrick Geddes’s explanation of the laws of growth in plants on the theory of the antagonism of vegetative and reproductive growth....—­Yours very sincerely,

ALFRED R. WALLACE.

* * * * *

TO PROF.  MELDOLA

Frith Hill, Godalming.  March 20, 1888.

My dear Meldola,—­I have been working away at my hybridity chapters,[15] and am almost disposed to cry “Eureka!” for I have got light on the problem.  When almost in despair of making it clear that Natural Selection could act one way or the other, I luckily routed out an old paper that I wrote twenty years ago, giving a demonstration of the action of Natural Selection.  It did not convince Darwin then, but it has convinced me now, and I think it can be proved that in some cases (and those I think most probable) Natural Selection will accumulate variations in infertility between incipient species.  Many other causes of infertility co-operate, and I really think I have overcome the fundamental difficulties of the question and made it a good deal clearer than Darwin left it....  I think also it completely smashes up Romanes.—­Yours faithfully,

ALFRED R. WALLACE.

* * * * *

The next letter relates to a question which Prof.  Meldola raised as to whether, in view of the extreme importance of “divergence” (in the Darwinian sense) for the separation and maintenance of specific types, it might not be possible that sterility, when of advantage as a check to crossing, had in itself, as a physiological character, been brought about by Natural Selection, just as extreme fecundity had been brought about (by Natural Selection) in cases where such fecundity was of advantage.

TO PROF.  MELDOLA

Frith Hill, Godalming.  April 12, 1888.

My dear Meldola,—­Many thanks for your criticism.  It is a perfectly sound one as against my view being a complete explanation of the phenomena, but that I do not claim.  And I do not see any chance of the required facts being forthcoming for many years to come.  Experiments in the hybridisation of animals are so difficult and tedious that even Darwin never undertook any, and the only people who could and ought to have done it—­the Zoological