the business may very well end. The men of the
music hall live, as I have said, entirely in a dull
convention; and, if a set of thorough artists were
to portray them exactly, no one would be more surprised
than the folk whose portraits were taken. The
gentlemen who are resolved to regenerate the music-hall
stage persist in not considering the audience; and
yet, when all is said and done, the poor stupid audience
should be considered a little. If we played Browning’s
“Strafford” for them, how much would they
be “raised”? They would not laugh,
they would not yawn; they would be stupefied, and a
trifle insulted. Give them a good silly swinging
chorus about some subject connected with the tender
affections, and let the refrain run to a waltz rhythm
or to a striking drawl, and they are satisfied in
mind and rejoice exceedingly. The finer class
of people in the East-end of London seem to enjoy
the very noblest and even the most abstruse of sacred
music at the Sunday concerts; but it will be long
before the music-hall audiences are educated up even
to the standard of those crowds who come off the Whitechapel
pavements to hear Handel. We cannot hurry them:
why try? Their lives are very hard, and, when
the brief gleam comes on the evening of evenings in
the week, we should be content with ensuring them
decency, safety, order, and let them enjoy their own
entertainment in their own way. A thoroughly
prosaic and logical preacher might say to those poor
souls with perfect truth, “Why do you waste
time in coming here to see things which are done much
better in the streets? You roar and cheer and
stamp when you see a real cab-horse come across from
the wings, and yet in an hour you might watch a hundred
cabs pass you in the street and you would not cheer
the least bit. You hear a costermonger on the
stage say, ’Give me my ’umble fireside,
and let my good old missus ‘and me my cup o’
tea and my ‘ard-earned bit o’ bread, and
all the dooks and lords in Hengland ain’t nothin’
to me!’—you hear that, and you know
quite well that no costermonger on this goodly earth
ever talked in that way, and still you cheer.
You like only what is unreal, and, when you are shown
a character which is supposed in some mysterious way
to resemble you, you are more than delighted, and you
applaud a thing which is either a silly caricature
or an utterly foolish libel.” The poor
and lowly personage thus hailed with cutting denunciation
and logic might say, “Please mind your own business.
Do you pay my sixpence for the gallery? No; I
find it myself, and I come to have my bit of fun with
my own money, in my own place, at my own price.
I have enough of workshops and streets and what you
call real things; so, when I come out to the play,
I want them all unreal, and as unreal as possible.
Monday morning’s time enough to go back to reality.”
As often as ever fussy reformers try to do more than
ensure propriety in theatres, so often will they be
beaten; and I am quite sure that, if any attempt is