is what particularly constitutes a man of the world, and a well-bred man!” All true enough, but how shallow, and how ineffably conceited!  Here is another absurd fragment—­“My dear boy, let us resume our reflections upon men, their character, their manners—­in a word, our reflections upon the World.”  It is quite like Mr. Pecksniff’s finest vein.  There is not a touch of nature or vital truth in the Chesterfield letters, and the most that can be said of them is that they are the work of a fairly clever man who was flattered until he lost all sense of his real size.  If we take the whole bunch of finikin sermons and compare them with the one tremendous knock-down letter which Johnson sent to the dandy earl, we can easily see who was the Man of the pair.  When we return to Walpole, the case is different.  Horace never posed at all; he was a natural gentleman, and anything like want of simplicity was odious to him.  The age lives in his charming letters; after going through them we feel as though we had been on familiar terms with that wicked, corrupt, outwardly delightful society that gambled and drank, and scandalised the grave spirits of the nation, in the days when George III. was young.  Horace Walpole was the letter-writer of letter-writers; his gossip carries the impress of truth with it; and, though he had no style, no brilliancy, no very superior ability, yet, by using his faculties in a natural way, he was able to supply material for two of the finest literary fragments of modern times.  I take it that the most stirring and profoundly wise piece of modern history is Carlyle’s brief account of William Pitt, given in the “Life of Frederick the Great.”  Once we have read it we feel as though the great commoner had stood before us for a while under a searching light; his figure is imprinted on the very nerves, and no man who has read carefully can ever shake off an impression that seems burnt into the fibre of the mind.  This superlatively fine historic portrait was painted by Carlyle solely from Walpole’s material—­for we cannot reckon chance newspaper scraps as counting for much—­and thus the gossip of Strawberry Hill conferred immortality on himself and on our own Titanic statesman.  But Walpole’s influence did not end there.  Whoever wants to read a very good and charming work should not miss seeing Sir George Trevelyan’s “Life of Charles James Fox.”  To praise this book is almost an impertinence.  I content myself with saying that those who once taste its fascination go back to it again and again, and usually end by placing it with the books that are “the bosom friends” of men.  Now the grim Scotchman lit up Horace’s letters with the lurid furnace-glow of his genius; Sir George held the serene lamp of the scholar above the same letters, and lo, we have two pieces that can only die when the language dies!  What a feat for a mere letter-writer to achieve!  Let ambitious correspondents take example by Horace Walpole, and learn that simplicity is the first, best—­nay, the only—­object to be aimed at by the letter-writer.