must be tolerated in an intermixture of it, in some
trifling or some enthusiastic shape or other, else
you will deprive weak minds of a resource found necessary
to the strongest. The body of all true religion
consists, to be sure, in obedience to the will of the
Sovereign of the world, in a confidence in His declarations,
and in imitation of His perfections. The rest
is our own. It may be prejudicial to the great
end,—it may be auxiliary. Wise men,
who, as such, are not
admirers, (not admirers
at least of the
munera terrae,) are not violently
attached to these things, nor do they violently hate
them. Wisdom is not the most severe corrector
of folly. They are the rival follies which mutually
wage so unrelenting a war, and which make so cruel
a use of their advantages, as they can happen to engage
the immoderate vulgar, on the one side or the other,
in their quarrels. Prudence would be neuter;
but if, in the contention between fond attachment and
fierce antipathy concerning things in their nature
not made to produce such heats, a prudent man were
obliged to make a choice of what errors and excesses
of enthusiasm he would condemn or bear, perhaps he
would think the superstition which builds to be more
tolerable than that which demolishes,—that
which adorns a country, than that which deforms it,—that
which endows, than that which plunders,—that
which disposes to mistaken beneficence, than that
which stimulates to real injustice,—that
which leads a man to refuse to himself lawful pleasures,
than that which snatches from others the scanty subsistence
of their self-denial. Such, I think, is very nearly
the state of the question between the ancient founders
of monkish superstition and the superstition of the
pretended philosophers of the hour.
For the present I postpone all consideration of the
supposed public profit of the sale, which, however,
I conceive to be perfectly delusive. I shall
here only consider it as a transfer of property.
On the policy of that transfer I shall trouble you
with a few thoughts.
In every prosperous community something more is produced
than goes to the immediate support of the producer.
This surplus forms the income of the landed capitalist.
It will be spent by a proprietor who does not labor.
But this idleness is itself the spring of labor, this
repose the spur to industry. The only concern
for the state is, that the capital taken in rent from
the land should be returned again to the industry
from whence it came, and that its expenditure should
be with the least possible detriment to the morals
of those who expend it and to those of the people
to whom it is returned.