priesthood, administering the rights of sacred justice!  But whilst I revere men in the functions which belong to them, and would do as much as one man can do to prevent their exclusion from any, I cannot, to flatter them, give the lie to Nature.  They are good and useful in the composition; they must be mischievous, if they preponderate so as virtually to become the whole.  Their very excellence in their peculiar functions may be far from a qualification for others.  It cannot escape observation, that, when men are too much confined to professional and faculty habits, and, as it were, inveterate in the recurrent employment of that narrow circle, they are rather disabled than qualified for whatever depends on the knowledge of mankind, on experience in mixed affairs, on a comprehensive, connected view of the various, complicated, external, and internal interests which go to the formation of that multifarious thing called a State.

After all, if the House of Commons were to have an wholly professional and faculty composition, what is the power of the House of Commons, circumscribed and shut in by the immovable barriers of laws, usages, positive rules of doctrine and practice, counterpoised by the House of Lords, and every moment of its existence at the discretion of the crown to continue, prorogue, or dissolve us?  The power of the House of Commons, direct or indirect, is, indeed, great:  and long may it be able to preserve its greatness, and the spirit belonging to true greatness, at the full!—­and it will do so, as long as it can keep the breakers of law in India from becoming the makers of law for England.  The power, however, of the House of Commons, when least diminished, is as a drop of water in the ocean, compared to that residing in a settled majority of your National Assembly.  That assembly, since the destruction of the orders, has no fundamental law, no strict convention, no respected usage to restrain it.  Instead of finding themselves obliged to conform to a fixed constitution, they have a power to make a constitution which shall conform to their designs.  Nothing in heaven or upon earth can serve as a control on them.  What ought to be the heads, the hearts, the dispositions, that are qualified, or that dare, not only to make laws under a fixed constitution, but at one heat to strike out a totally new constitution for a great kingdom, and in every part of it, from the monarch on the throne to the vestry of a parish?  But

    “Fools rush in where angels fear to tread.”

In such a state of unbounded power, for undefined and undefinable purposes, the evil of a moral and almost physical inaptitude of the man to the function must be the greatest we can conceive to happen in the management of human affairs.