This letter was dated on the fourth of October, and was written in the hope that the pope had collected his courage, and that the legate had brought powers to proceed to judgment.  In a few days the prospect was again clouded, and Wolsey was once more in despair.[153] Campeggio had brought with him instructions if possible to arrange a compromise,—­if a compromise was impossible, to make the best use of his ingenuity, and do nothing and allow nothing to be done.  In one of two ways, however, it was hoped that he might effect a peaceful solution.  He urged the king to give way and to proceed no further; and this failing, as he was prepared to find, he urged the same thing upon the queen.[154] He invited Catherine, or he was directed to invite her, in the pope’s name,[155] for the sake of the general interests of Christendom, to take the vows and enter what was called religio laxa, a state in which she might live unincumbered by obligations except the easy one of chastity, and free from all other restrictions either of habit, diet, or order.  The proposal was Wolsey’s, and was formed when he found the limited nature of Campeggio’s instructions;[156] but it was adopted by the latter; and I cannot but think (though I have no proof of it) that it was not adopted without the knowledge of the emperor.  Whatever were his own interests, Charles V. gave Catherine his unwavering support:  he made it his duty to maintain her in the ignominious position in which she was placed, and submitted his own conduct to be guided by her wishes.  It cannot be doubted, however, from the pope’s words, and also from the circumstances of the case, that if she could have prevailed upon herself to yield, it would have relieved him from a painful embarrassment.  As a prince, he must have felt the substantial justice of Henry’s demand, and in refusing to allow the pope to pass a judicial sentence of divorce, he could not but have known that he was compromising the position of the Holy See:  while Catherine herself, on the other hand, if she had yielded, would have retired without a stain; no opinion would have been pronounced upon her marriage; the legitimacy of the Princess Mary would have been left without impeachment; and her right to the succession, in the event of no male heir following from any new connection which the king might form, would have been readily secured to her by act of parliament.  It may be asked why she did not yield, and it is difficult to answer the question.  She was not a person who would have been disturbed by the loss of a few court vanities.  Her situation as Henry’s wife could not have had many charms for her, nor can it be thought that she retained a personal affection for him.  If she had loved him, she would have suffered too deeply in the struggle to have continued to resist, and the cloister would have seemed a paradise.  Or if the cloister had appeared too sad a shelter for her, she might have gone back to the gardens of the Alhambra, where she