The school-boys of St. Paul’s were taken down the river with the master in six boats, at the cost of a shilling a boat—the cost of the dresses and the other expenses amounting in all to sixty-one shillings.
The characters were—
An orator in apparel of cloth of gold.
Religio, Ecclesia, Veritas, like three widows, in garments of silk, and suits of lawn and Cyprus.
Heresy and False Interpretation, like sisters of Bohemia, apparelled in silk of divers colours.
The heretic Luther, like a party friar, in russet damask and black taffety.
Luther’s wife, like a frow of Spiers in Almayn, in red silk.
Peter, Paul, and James, in habits of white sarsnet, and three red mantles, and lace of silver and damask, and pelisses of scarlet.
A Cardinal in his apparel.
Two Sergeants in rich apparel.
The Dolphin and his brother in coats of velvet embroidered with gold, and capes of satin bound with velvet.
A Messenger in tinsel satin.
Six men in gowns of grey sarsnet.
Six women in gowns of crimson velvet.
War, in rich cloth of gold and feathers, armed.
Three Almeyns, in apparel all cut and holed in silk.
Lady Peace in lady’s apparel white and rich.
Lady Quietness and Dame Tranquillity richly beseen in lady’s apparel.
It is a strange world. This was in November, 1527. In November, 1530, but three brief years after, Wolsey lay dying in misery, a disgraced man, at Leicester Abbey; “the Pope’s Holiness” was fast becoming in English eyes plain Bishop of Rome, held guilty towards this realm of unnumbered enormities, and all England was sweeping with immeasurable velocity towards the heretic Luther. So history repeats the lesson to us, not to boast ourselves of the morrow, for we know not what a day may bring forth.
Before I conclude this survey, it remains for me to say something of the position of the poor, and of the measures which were taken for the solution of that most difficult of all problems, the distinguishing the truly deserving from the worthless and the vagabond. The subject is one to which in the progress of this work I shall have more than one occasion to return; but inasmuch as a sentimental opinion prevails that an increase of poverty and the consequent enactment of poor-laws was the result of the suppression of the religious houses, and that adequate relief had


