Turning next to the relations between England and Rome, the parliament reviewed the Annates Act,[681] which had been left unratified in the hope that the pope might have consented to a compromise, and that “by some gentle ways the said exaction might have been redressed and reformed.”  The expectation had been disappointed.  The pope had not condescended to reply to the communication which had been made to him, and the act had in consequence received the royal assent.  An alteration had thus become necessary in the manner of presentation to vacant bishoprics.  The anomalies of the existing practice have been already described.  By the Great Charter the chapters had acquired the right of free election.  A conge d’elire was granted by the king on the occurrence of a vacancy, with no attempt at a nomination.  The chapters were supposed to make their choice freely, and the name of the bishop-elect was forwarded to the pope, who returned the Pallium and the Bulls, receiving the Annates in exchange.  The pope’s part in the matter was now terminated.  No Annates would be sent any longer to Rome, and no Bulls would be returned from Rome.  The appointments lay between the chapters and the crown; and it might have seemed, at first sight, as if it would have been sufficient to omit the reference to the papacy, and as if the remaining forms might continue as they were.  The chapters, however, had virtually long ceased to elect freely; the crown had absorbed the entire functions of presentation, sometimes appointing foreigners,[682] sometimes allowing the great ecclesiastical ministers to nominate themselves;[683] while the rights of the chapters, though existing in theory, were not officially recognised either by the pope or by the crown.  The king affected to accept the names of the prelates-elect, when returned to him from Rome, as nominations by the pope; and the pope, in communicating with the chapters, presented them with their bishops as from himself.[684] The papal share in the matter was a shadow, but it was acknowledged under the forms of courtesy; the share of the chapters was wholly and absolutely ignored.  The crisis of a revolution was not the moment at which their legal privileges could be safely restored to them.  The problem of re-arrangement was a difficult one, and it was met in a manner peculiarly English.  The practice of granting the conge d’elire to the chapters on the occurrence of a vacancy, which had fallen into desuetude, was again adopted, and the church resumed the forms of liberty:  but the licence to elect a bishop was to be accompanied with the name of the person whom the chapter was required to elect; and if within twelve days the person so named had not been chosen, the nomination of the crown was to become absolute, and the chapter would incur a Premunire.[685]