character, they commenced with the fraudulent fiction that fugitives were entitled to habeas corpus, entitled to trial by jury in the State to which they fled.  They pretended to believe that our fugitive slaves were entitled to more rights than their white citizens; perhaps they were right, they know one another better than I do.  You may charge a white man with treason, or felony, or other crime, and you do not require any trial by jury before he is given up; there is nothing to determine but that he is legally charged with a crime and that he fled, and then he is to be delivered up upon demand.  White people are delivered up every day in this way; but not slaves.  Slaves, black people, you say, are entitled to trial by jury; and in this way schemes have been invented to defeat your plain constitutional obligations. * * *

The next demand made on behalf of the South is, “that Congress shall pass effective laws for the punishment of all persons in any of the States who shall in any manner aid and abet invasion or insurrection in any other State, or commit any other act against the laws of nations, tending to disturb the tranquillity of the people or government of any other State.”  That is a very plain principle.  The Constitution of the United States now requires, and gives Congress express power, to define and punish piracies and felonies committed on the high seas, and offences against the laws of nations.  When the honorable and distinguished Senator from Illinois (Mr. Douglas) last year introduced a bill for the purpose of punishing people thus offending under that clause of the Constitution, Mr. Lincoln, in his speech at New York, which I have before me, declared that it was a “sedition bill “; his press and party hooted at it.  So far from recognizing the bill as intended to carry out the Constitution of the United States, it received their jeers and jibes.  The Black Republicans of Massachusetts elected the admirer and eulogist of John Brown’s courage as their governor, and we may suppose he will throw no impediments in the way of John Brown’s successors.  The epithet applied to the bill of the Senator from Illinois is quoted from a deliberate speech delivered by Lincoln in New York, for which, it was stated in the journals, according to some resolution passed by an association of his own party, he was paid a couple of hundred dollars.  The speech should therefore have been deliberate.  Lincoln denounced that bill.  He places the stamp of his condemnation upon a measure intended to promote the peace and security of confederate States.  He is, therefore, an enemy of the human race, and deserves the execration of all mankind.

We demand these five propositions.  Are they not right?  Are they not just?  Take them in detail, and show that they are not warranted by the Constitution, by the safety of our people, by the principles of eternal justice.  We will pause and consider them; but mark me, we will not let you decide the question for us. * * *