as low as possible—still its ordinary Budget
exceeds the Budget of the former reign—the
extravagant reign of the Bourbons—to the
amount of 10,000,000 l. sterling; and, including those
laws for two years, there is the extraordinary expenditure
of 50,000,000 l. in that space of time. To say,
then, that popular excitement tends to cheap government,
is monstrous and absurd, and it is impossible for
any man who regards these facts to arrive at that
conclusion. We are called upon to adopt a system
which is to lead to these results. I ask, then,
whether such a system can be more effectual in this
country, than that under which we have so long prospered?
I ask, whether the Civil Government will have more
power—whether it is possible that the Government
can be carried on with a smaller proportion of the
army? I beg your Lordships to observe the transactions
which have occurred at Paris within the last two years,
and you will see that, while Louis XVIII, and Charles
X. were able to maintain the peace and tranquillity
of the capital with a gendarmerie of from 500 to 1000
men,—since the period of the revolution
of July, 1830, the Government has not had less than
60,000 once a month put into requisition to maintain
the peace of the city. I say once a month, upon
an average, not to exaggerate the facts; being convinced
that upon not less than twenty-four occasions the
army has been under arms.
If the system now proposed to your Lordships is adopted,
will any man tell me that it will be possible for
any Government to be carried on, as the Government
of this country has hitherto been, by a civil power,
aided by a small military force? In the course
of this last summer, events of a fearful character
occurred, nearly at the same time, in this country
and in France. I allude to the disturbances at
Bristol and at Lyons. The riots at Bristol were
put down by ninety men, as soon as an officer was
found who would employ the force entrusted to him.
But what happened at Lyons—were the disturbances
there so easily quelled? The events at Lyons—a
larger town, I admit, but not much larger than Bristol—required
40,000 troops to be brought against the town, under
the command of a Marshal of France, the present Minister-at-War,
and a Prince of the Blood, before tranquillity could
be restored. I entreat, then, your Lordships
to consider well, first of all, the causes of this
difference,—to see that it is the sovereignty
of the people that you are called upon to establish
in this country,—and whether it is possible
to carry on the civil Government of England, as it
has hitherto been, under such a Government as you
would establish, if you pass this Bill.
April 10,1832.
* * * *
*
Fiscal Regulations for the Extinction of Slavery
not defensible.