who wish it should pass, as a means of their obtaining votes, but I will repeat, that it is, in fact, opposed to the sentiments of all the real English gentlemen, of the yeomanry, and of the middle classes throughout the country.  Yes, my Lords, I will say, that there is a change of opinion, and that the best part of the public are not desirous for the bill, but are, on the contrary, apprehensive of its effects.  But the noble Lords will say;—­“We hear none of this.”  No my Lords; and why do we hear none of this?  Because there is scarcely a gentleman in the country who can believe that, if he were to attend a public meeting for the purpose of expressing his sentiments on this question, he would be secure or protected from the attacks of the mob.

April 10, 1832

* * * * *

No Compromise.

My Lords, I must now advert to what has fallen from another noble Earl (Harrowby), who opposed the bill strongly last year, but who last night came to a different conclusion, and asked if there was no hope of effecting a compromise? and he particularly called upon me to come to such a compromise.  My Lords, these noble Lords have been trying a compromise for the last six months; if they have made no progress in effecting a compromise, what encouragement can they hold out to me and others to follow them upon this occasion.  We know the evils of this bill; we know that it will consign the country to evils from which it cannot recover.  Agree to a compromise!  Why, he has not been enabled to advance one single step from last October up to the present moment.  He, and his noble Friends who act with him, have remained perfectly stationary.  If this be the case, I hope that those who intend to act with my noble Friends, will understand that there is no more chance of compromise on the present than on the last occasion; and that if they agree to the second reading, they agree to a bill with which the country cannot be governed.  I beg then that the noble Lords will look to the responsibility they take upon themselves, in giving support to this bill.  The Government are now decidedly responsible for that bill—­they are responsible for the election of the House of Commons, that passed it—­they are responsible for the excitement which caused these events—­and they are, moreover, responsible for any evil consequences which may occur, if this House reject it.  But when noble Lords change their sentiments, and are followed by many who voted against it last time, I beg them to recollect, that they will partake of a large portion of this responsibility, and that the country will look to them as responsible for whatever may occur.[17]

[Footnote 17:  The bill was soon after carried by a species of compromise, Peers staying away from the division.]

April 10,1832.

* * * * *

Revolutions may be effected by Laws as well as by Violence.