of the resources—­possessed by that country both in peace and in war—­no man living estimates more highly than I do the wisdom of her statesmen and the skill of her generals—­no man is more ready than myself to concede to the French people the possession of a large amount of talent and of virtue, of physical and of moral resources, and of all that renders a state respectable or formidable in the eyes of other nations.  But in proportion as we admit these facts, we are bound to watch closely that nothing be done or said derogatory from British honour or injurious to British interests.

March 16, 1832.

* * * * *

Opinion of the Reform Bill, 1832.

I beg your Lordships to recollect that this is the point which the House will have to consider:—­the question is not whether alterations have been made in this part or that part, or in many parts of the bill which your Lordships objected to last session, but the question you will have to consider is this—­Whether this bill, if passed and accompanied, let it be recollected, with the other bills at present in the other House of Parliament, will afford to the country a prospect of having a government under which the country can go on—­under which it will be practicable that this or any other can be governed—­or which, in the words of the noble Earl who addressed your Lordships first this evening employed last session—­if practicable, would not be pernicious.  That is the question which your Lordships will have to consider, when you come to the second reading of the bill.  The principle of this measure is not reform, but the disfranchisement of some places and the enfranchisement of others, and also the granting of votes to large bodies of persons on a new qualification.  The total alteration of the representation of this country, coupled with an alteration of the representation of Scotland, amounting there to a complete revolution, and the overthrow in Ireland of all the measures which were adopted in that country three years ago—­these, and not reform, are what your Lordships must consider as the principles of the bill.  I entertain the same opinion as the noble earl near me as to the necessity of reform.  My opinion on this point is now as it was originally.  But how comes the question now before your Lordships? it has been altered considerably, and is no longer what it was before.

The noble Earl has thrown out some imputations with respect to party motives—­if the noble Earl meant them to apply to me he is much mistaken, I have no party views to serve.  I believe there is scarcely an individual in this house, or in the country, who has so little to do with borough interests or county interests, or any sort of Parliamentary interests as I have.  I have the same interest in the country as any other individual, that is to say, I wish to see the representation established on such a basis as will give the country a prospect of a practicable system of government.