amenable to Catholic influence. Manning and Talbot
seem to have given the project its
coup de grace
at Rome, and Newman sold the land which he had bought.
He was bitterly disappointed; but the growth of public
esteem had given him self-confidence, and he did not
again fall into despondency, though he had a strange
presentiment of approaching death, which prompted his
last famous poem, ‘The Dream of Gerontius.’
A second attempt to go to Oxford was thwarted by enemies
at Home and in England in 1866-7. The extreme
party, with Manning, now Archbishop, at their head,
seemed to be victorious all along the line. They
were able to proceed to their supreme triumph in the
Vatican Council which issued the dogma of Papal Infallibility.
Newman, while others were intriguing and haranguing,
was quietly engaged in preparing his subtlest and
(on one side) his most characteristic work, ‘The
Grammar of Assent,’ an attempt at a Catholic
apologetic on a ‘personalist,’ as opposed
to an ‘intellectualist’ basis. He
declined to take an active part in the theological
conferences about infallibility, being by this time
well aware how little weight such arguments as he
could bring were likely to have at Rome. He was
disgusted at the insolent aggressiveness of the Ultramontanes,
but he had no wish to combat it. The situation
was hopeless, and he knew it. The death of several
friends increased the sense of isolation, and during
the years 1875 to 1879 his silence and depression were
very noticeable to those who lived with him.
His dearest friend, Ambrose St. John, was one of several
who died about this time. But Trinity College,
Oxford, made him an honorary fellow in 1877, an honour
which seemed to prognosticate the far higher distinction
which was soon to be conferred upon him.
The death of Pius IX in 1878 brought to an end the
long reign of obscurantism at the Vatican, and with
the election of Leo XIII Newman emerged from the cloud
under which he had remained for more than a generation.
The new Pope lost no time in making him a Cardinal,
though even now the prize seemed to be on the point
of slipping through his fingers. He valued the
honour immensely as setting the official seal of approbation
on his life’s work, and the last ten years of
his life were quietly happy. He was able to mingle
actively in affairs of public interest, and to write
long letters, till near the end. He died on August
11, 1890, in his ninetieth year, and was buried, by
his own request, in the same grave with his friend
Ambrose St. John.
Why is it that this sad, isolated, broken life, in
which the young man renounces the creed of the boy,
and the elder man pours scorn upon the loyalties of
his prime; which found its last haven in a society
which wished to make a tool of him but distrusted
him too much for even this pitiful service, has still
an absorbing interest for our generation? For
it is not only in England that Newman’s fame
lives and grows. In France there is a cult of
Newman, which has produced biographies by Bremond and
Faure, as well as a history of the Catholic Revival
in England by Thureau-Dangin. In England, besides
Dean Church’s ‘Oxford Movement,’
we have biographies by R.H. Hutton and W. Barry,
and appreciations or depreciations by E. Abbott, Leslie
Stephen, Froude, Mark Pattison, and several others.