on ‘Anglican Difficulties,’ in which he
ridiculed the Church of his earlier vows with all the
refined cruelty of which he was a master. But
he was soon in trouble again. One Dr. Giacinto
Achilli, formerly a Dominican friar, gave lectures
in London upon the scandals of the Roman Inquisition,
which had imprisoned him for attacking the Catholic
faith and fomenting sedition. The temper of the
British public at this time made it ready to believe
anything to the discredit of the Roman Church, and
Achilli became a popular hero. Wiseman published
a libellous article upon him in the Dublin Review,
which passed unnoticed. But when Newman repeated
the charges of profligacy in a public lecture, Achilli
brought an action for libel, which in costs and expenses
cost Newman L12,000. The money however was paid,
and much more than paid, by his co-religionists.
This trial was quickly followed by the inauguration
of a scheme for founding a Catholic University in
Ireland, the avowed object of which was to withdraw
young Catholics from the liberalising influences of
mixed education. This scheme was sure to appeal
strongly to Newman. Liberalism had come in with
a rush at Oxford, after the dissipation of the ‘long
nightmare’ (as Mark Pattison calls it) while
the University was dominated by religious medievalism.
The Oxford of Newman had become the Oxford of Jowett.
The ablest of Newman’s young friends and disciples,
such as Mark Pattison and J.A. Froude, were now
in the opposite camp, full of anger and disgust at
the seductive influences from which they had just escaped.
Newman, as might be expected, was anxious to protect
Catholic students from similar dangers, and accepted
the post of Rector of the proposed Catholic University.
He intended it to provide ’philosophical defences
of Catholicity and Revelation, and create a Catholic
literature.’ The lectures in which he expounded
his ideals at Dublin were a great success, and he
returned to England full of hope. With a curious
inability to read the character of one who was to be
his worst enemy, he offered Manning the post of Vice-Rector.
Manning’s refusal was followed by his failure
to obtain the support of Ward, Henry Wilberforce, and
others; and Catholic opinion in Ireland was much divided.
For three or four years Newman was engaged in ineffectual
efforts to push his scheme forward. At last,
in 1855, he was installed as Rector, and began his
work at Dublin. A fine church was built at St.
Stephen’s Green with the surplus of the Achilli
subscriptions, and Newman produced some excellent
literary work in the form of University lectures and
sermons. But the whole movement was viewed with
distrust by the Irish ecclesiastics, who, as he said
in a moment of impatience, ’regard any intellectual
man as being on the road to perdition.’
There was a cloud over his work from first to last.
He had been promised a bishopric, without which he
was made to feel himself in an inferior position by
the Irish prelates; but the promise was not fulfilled.
The Irish objected to one or two English professors
on his staff, because they were English. Dr. Cullen,
the ruling spirit in the Irish hierarchy, was a narrow
conservative, who wished to use Newman merely as an
instrument against progressive tendencies in Church
and State. In 1857 he resigned an impossible task,
and returned to Birmingham.


