AVERAGE PRODUCE PER IMPERIAL ACRE.
New Brunswick State of New York Bushels Bushels Wheat 20 14 Barley 29 16 Oats 34 26 Rye 201/2 91/2 Buckwheat 333/4 14 Indian Corn 413/4 25 Potatoes 226 90 Turnips 460 88 Hay 13/4 —
A possibility of error in striking the averages is suggested in the report; and to guard against it the following statement of the averages derived from the minimum returns is given, viz.:—Wheat 173/4 bushels; Barley, 27; Oats, 33; Buckwheat, 28; Rye, 18; Indian Corn, 361/2; Potatoes, 204; Turnips, 389. The diminished averages scarcely affect the question of productiveness, as in every particular they exceed the averages for the favored Genesee Valley and the southern shores of Lake Ontario.
While the productiveness of the soil is thus proven by the statements of most experienced farmers, the average prices appear to be equally favorable to the Provincial growers. The following tables of averages set this in a clear point of view:—
AVERAGE PRICES OF GRAIN PER BUSHEL AND PER QUARTER.
Per Bushel Per Quarter Wheat 7s. 6d. 60s. 0d. Barley 4 21/2 33 8 Oats 2 0 16 0 Rye 4 10 38 8 Buckwheat 3 9 30 0 Indian Corn 4 8 37 4
ROOT CROPS AND HAY.
Potatoes 1s. 11d. per bushel. Turnips 1 2 " Eng. Hay 49 0 per ton. Carrots 2 5 per bushel. Man. Wurtzel 2 1 " Marsh Hay 20 0 per ton.
AVERAGE MONEY VALUE OF AN ACRE OF EACH CROP. New Brunswick Canada West State of Ohio Wheat L 6 13 0 L2 4 7 L2 19 0 Barley 5 13 71/2 1 19 41/2 2 4 0 Oats 6 3 6 1 11 0 1 13 9 Rye 4 7 0 1 5 101/2 1 12 4 Buckwheat 5 5 0 3 5 0 1 16 3 Indian Corn 8 10 4 2 14 41/2 2 15 0 Potatoes 19 11 0 6 6 0 6 9 41/2
On a review of the foregoing and other tables, Professor Johnston has drawn the following conclusions:—
“That grain and roots generally can be raised more cheaply in the Province of New Brunswick than in New York, Ohio, or Upper Canada; and that the Province ought to be able to compete with those countries and drive them from its home markets.”
Such are the deductions of a skilful and scientific, practical and theoretical agriculturist, from the statements furnished by the most enterprising and successful of our colonists. Nevertheless, I cannot conceal a doubt whether all the elements of comparison have been duly weighed. The result, especially as regards wheat, is so contrary to pre-conceived opinions, that further investigations should be made. Is it not possible that, while an equality of expense in preparing the land for a wheat crop appears to have been assumed, the great care and expense necessary in New Brunswick to prepare the land, and an occasional succession of minimum returns would, to a very considerable extent, account for the supposed discrepancy?