’Some corner
of a foreign field
That is for ever England.
There shall be
In that rich earth a richer
dust concealed;
A dust whom England bore,
shaped, made aware,
Gave, once, her flowers to
love, her ways to roam,’
do we not feel that the solidarity of England with the English folk and of the English folk with the English soil, is burnt into our imaginations in a new and distinctive way?
But the poetry of shires and provinces reacts too upon the poetry of nationality. It infuses something of the more instinctive and rudimentary attachments from which it springs into a passion peculiarly exposed to the contagion of rhetoric and interest. Some of the most strident voices among living nationalist poets have found an unexpected note of tenderness when they sang their home province. Mr. Kipling charms us when he tells, in his close-knit verse, of the ’wooded, dim, Blue goodness of the Weald’. And the more strident notes of D’Annunzio’s patriotism are also assuaged by the tenderness and depth of his home feeling. We read with some apprehension his dedication of La Nave to the god of seas:
’O Lord, who bringest
forth and dost efface
The ocean-ruling Nations,
race by race,
It is this living People,
by Thy grace
Who
on the sea
Shall magnify Thy name, who
on the sea
Shall glorify Thy name, who
on the sea
With myrrh and blood shall
sacrifice to Thee
At
the altar-prow,
Of all earth’s oceans
make our sea, O Thou!
Amen!
But he dedicated a noble drama, the Figlia d’Iorio, in a different tone, ’To the land of the Abruzzi, to my Mother, to my Sisters, to my brother in exile, to my father in his grave, to all my dead and all my race in the mountains and by the sea, I dedicate this song of the ancient blood.’
(2) Democracy
The growth of democratic as of national feeling during the later century naturally produced a plentiful harvest of eloquent utterance in verse. With this, merely as such, I am not here concerned, even though it be as fine as the Socialist songs of William Morris or Edward Carpenter. But the Catholic Socialism of Charles Peguy,—itself an original and, for most of his contemporaries, a bewildering combination—struck out a no less original poetry,—a poetry of solidarity. Peguy’s Socialism, like his Catholicism, was single-souled; he ignored that behind the one was a Party, and behind the other a Church. It was his bitterest regret that a vast part of humanity was removed beyond the pale of fellowship by eternal damnation. It was his sublimest thought that the solidarity of man includes the damned. In his first version of the Jeanne d’Arc mystery, already referred to, he tells how Jesus, crucified,
Saw not his Mother in tears
at the cross-foot
Below him, saw not Magdalen
nor John,
But wept, dying, only for
Judas’ death.
The Saviour loved this Judas,
and though utterly
He gave himself, he knew he
could not save him.


