“Elated with the success of my spontaneous exertion to procure material and respectable aid to Johnson for his very favourite work, ‘the Lives of the Poets,’ I hastened down to Mr. Thrale’s, at Streatham, where he now was, that I might insure his being at home next day; and after dinner, when I thought he would receive the good news in the best humour, I announced it eagerly:  ’I have been at work for you to-day, Sir.  I have been with Lord Marchmont.  He bade me tell you he has a great respect for you, and will call on you to-morrow at one o’clock, and communicate all he knows about Pope.’ Johnson. ’I shall not be in town to-morrow.  I don’t care to know about Pope.’ Mrs. Thrale (surprised, as I was, and a little angry).  ’I suppose, Sir, Mr. Boswell thought that as you are to write Pope’s Life, you would wish to know about him.’ Johnson. ’Wish! why yes.  If it rained knowledge, I’d hold out my hand; but I would not give myself the trouble to go in quest of it.’  There was no arguing with him at the moment.  Sometime afterwards he said, ’Lord Marchmont will call upon me, and then I shall call on Lord Marchmont.’  Mrs. Thrale was uneasy at this unaccountable caprice:  and told me, that if I did not take care to bring about a meeting between Lord Marchmont and him, it would never take place, which would be a great pity.”

The ensuing conversation is a good sample of the freedom and variety of “talk” in which Johnson luxuriated, and shows how important a part Mrs. Thrale played in it: 

“Mrs. Thrale told us, that a curious clergyman of our acquaintance (Dr. Lort is named in the margin) had discovered a licentious stanza, which Pope had originally in his ‘Universal Prayer,’ before the stanza,—­

  “’What conscience dictates to be done,
    Or warns us not to do,’ &c.

It was this:—­

  “’Can sins of moment claim the rod
    Of everlasting fires? 
  And that offend great Nature’s God
    Which Nature’s self inspires.”

and that Dr. Johnson observed, it had been borrowed from Guarini.  There are, indeed, in Pastor Fido, many such flimsy superficial reasonings as that in the last two lines of this stanza.

“Boswell.  ’In that stanza of Pope’s, “rod of fires” is certainly a bad metaphor.’ Mrs. Thrale.  ’And “sins of moment” is a faulty expression; for its true import is momentous, which cannot be intended.’ Johnson.  ’It must have been written “of moments.”  Of moment, is momentous; of moments, momentary.  I warrant you, however, Pope wrote this stanza, and some friend struck it out.’

“Talking of divorces, I asked if Othello’s doctrine was not plausible:—­

  “’He that is robb’d, not wanting what is stolen,
  Let him not know’t, and he’s not robb’d at all.’