She was herself a woman of wide erudition, and her
fame as a poet was such as to win for her, according
to the fashion of the day, the title of “the
Dutch Sappho.” Tesselschade, ten years
younger than her sister and educated under her fostering
care, was however destined to eclipse her, alike by
her personal charms and her varied accomplishments.
If one could believe all that is said in her praise
by Hooft, Huyghens, Barlaeus, Brederoo, Vondel and
Cats, she must indeed have been a very marvel of perfect
womanhood. As a singer she was regarded as being
without a rival; and her skill in painting, carving,
etching on glass and tapestry work was much praised
by her numerous admirers. Her poetical works,
including her translation into Dutch verse of Tasso’s
Gerusalemme Liberata, have almost all unfortunately
perished, but a single ode that survives—“the
Ode to a Nightingale”—is an effort
not unworthy of Shelley and shows her possession of
a true lyrical gift. At Muiden the presence of
the “beautiful” Tesselschade was almost
indispensable. “What feast would be complete,”
wrote Hooft to her, “at which you were not present?
Favour us then with your company if it be possible”;
and again: “that you will come is my most
earnest desire. If you will but be our guest,
then, I hope, you will cure all our ills.”
He speaks of her to Barlaeus as “the priestess”;
and it is clear that at her shrine all the frequenters
of Muiden were ready to burn the incense of adulation.
Both Anna and Tesselschade, like their father, were
devout Catholics.
Anna Maria van Schuurman (1607-84) was a woman of
a different type. She does not seem to have loved
or to have shone in society, but she was a very phenomenon
of learning. She is credited with proficiency
in painting, carving and other arts; but it is not
on these, so to speak, accessory accomplishments that
her fame rests, but on the extraordinary range and
variety of her solid erudition. She was at once
linguist, scholar, theologian, philosopher, scientist
and astronomer. She was a remarkable linguist
and had a thorough literary and scholarly knowledge
of French, English, German, Italian, Latin, Greek,
Hebrew, Syriac, Chaldee, Arabic and Ethiopic.
Her reputation became widespread; and, in the latter
part of her long life, many strangers went to Utrecht,
where she resided, to try to get a glimpse of so great
a celebrity, which was not easy owing to her aversion
to such visits.
Turning to the domain of mathematical and physical
science and of scientific research and discovery,
we find that here also the 17th century Netherlanders
attained the highest distinction. As mathematicians
Simon Stevin, the friend and instructor of Maurice
of Orange, and Francis van Schooten, the Leyden Professor,
who numbered among his pupils Christian Huyghens and
John de Witt, did much excellent work in the earlier
years of the century. The published writings of
De Witt on “the properties of curves”
and on “the theory of probabilities” show