Some men talk as if the tariff-reformers, as if the Democrats, weren’t part of the United States.  I met a lady the other day, not an elderly lady, who said to me with pride:  “Why, I have been a Democrat ever since they hunted them with dogs.”  And you would really suppose, to hear some men talk, that Democrats were outlaws and did not share the life of the United States.  Why, Democrats constitute nearly one half the voters of this country.  They are engaged in all sorts of enterprises, big and little.  There isn’t a walk of life or a kind of occupation in which you won’t find them; and, as a Philadelphia paper very wittily said the other day, they can’t commit economic murder without committing economic suicide.  Do you suppose, therefore, that half of the population of the United States is going about to destroy the very foundations of our economic life by simply running amuck amidst the schedules of the tariff?  Some of the schedules are so tough that they wouldn’t be hurt, if it did.  But that isn’t the program, and anybody who says that it is simply doesn’t understand the situation at all.  All that the tariff-reformers claim is this:  that the partnership ought to be bigger than it is.  Just because there are so many of them, they know how many are outside.  And let me tell you, just as many Republicans are outside.  The only thing I have against my protectionist fellow-citizens is that they have allowed themselves to be imposed upon so many years.  Think of saying that the “protective” tariff is for the benefit of the workingman, in the presence of all those facts that have just been disclosed in Lawrence, Mass., where the worst schedule of all—­“Schedule K”—­operates to keep men on wages on which they cannot live.  Why, the audacity, the impudence, of the claim is what strikes one; and in face of the fact that the workingmen of this country who are in unprotected industries are better paid than those who are in “protected” industries; at any rate, in the conspicuous industries!  The Steel schedule, I dare say, is rather satisfactory to those who manufacture steel, but is it satisfactory to those who make the steel with their own tired hands?  Don’t you know that there are mills in which men are made to work seven days in the week for twelve hours a day, and in the three hundred and sixty-five weary days of the year can’t make enough to pay their bills?  And this in one of the giants among our industries, one of the undertakings which have thriven to gigantic size upon this very system.

Ah, the whole mass of the fraud is falling away, and men are beginning to see disclosed little groups of persons maintaining a control over the dominant party and through the dominant party over the government, in their own interest, and not in the interest of the people of the United States!

* * * * *

Let me repeat:  There cannot be free trade in the United States so long as the established fiscal policy of the federal government is maintained.  The federal government has chosen throughout all the generations that have preceded us to maintain itself chiefly on indirect instead of direct taxation.  I dare say we shall never see a time when it can alter that policy in any substantial degree; and there is no Democrat of thoughtfulness that I have met who contemplates a program of free trade.