Bligh’s words, ’My lads, I’ll do you justice’ he considered them applied to the people in the boat, and not to those in the ship—­to the same question put by the Court, he said they applied to persons remaining in the ship.  And he notices some other instances which he thinks most materially affect Mr. Hayward’s credit; and says, that if he had been under arms when Hayward swore he was, he humbly submits Mr. Hallet must have seen him.  And he concludes with asserting (what indeed was a very general opinion), ’that the great misfortune attending this unhappy business is, that no one ever attempted to rescue the ship; that it might have been done, Thompson being the only sentinel over the arm-chest.’

Michael Byrne’s Defence

was very short.  He says, ’It has pleased the Almighty, among the events of His unsearchable providence, nearly to deprive me of sight, which often puts it out of my power to carry the intentions of my mind into execution.

’I make no doubt but it appears to this honourable Court, that on the 28th of April, 1789, my intention was to quit his Majesty’s ship Bounty with the officers and men who went away, and that the sorrow I expressed at being detained was real and unfeigned.

’I do not know whether I may be able to repeat the exact words that were spoken on the occasion, but some said, “We must not part with our fiddler”; and Charles Churchill threatened to send me to the shades if I attempted to quit the cutter, into which I had gone for the purpose of attending Lieutenant Bligh’:  and, without further trespassing on the time of the Court, he submits his case to its judgement and mercy.

It is not necessary to notice any parts of the defence made by Coleman, Norman, and M’Intosh, as it is clear, from the whole evidence and from Bligh’s certificates, that those men were anxious to go in the boat, but were kept in the ship by force.

It is equally clear, that Ellison, Millward, and Burkitt, were concerned in every stage of the mutiny, and had little to offer in their defence in exculpation of the crime of which they were accused.

On the sixth day, namely, on the 18th of September, 1792, the Court met,—­the prisoners were brought in, audience admitted, when the president, having asked the prisoners if they or any of them had anything more to offer in their defence, the Court was cleared, and agreed,—­

’That the charges had been proved against the said Peter Heywood, James Morrison, Thomas Ellison, Thomas Burkitt, John Millward, and William Muspratt; and did adjudge them, and each of them, to suffer death, by being hanged by the neck, on board such of his Majesty’s ship or ships of war, and at such time or times, and at such place or places, as the commissioners for executing the office of Lord High Admiral of Great Britain and Ireland, etc., or any three of them, for the time being, should, in writing, under their hands, direct; but the Court, in consideration of various circumstances, did humbly and most earnestly recommend the said Peter Heywood and James Morrison to his Majesty’s mercy; and the Court further agreed, that the charges had not been proved against the said Charles Norman, Joseph Coleman, Thomas M’Intosh, and Michael Byrne, and did adjudge them, and each of them, to be acquitted.’