The following sections of this BookRags Literature Study Guide is offprint from Gale's For Students Series: Presenting Analysis, Context, and Criticism on Commonly Studied Works: Introduction, Author Biography, Plot Summary, Characters, Themes, Style, Historical Context, Critical Overview, Criticism and Critical Essays, Media Adaptations, Topics for Further Study, Compare & Contrast, What Do I Read Next?, For Further Study, and Sources.
(c)1998-2002; (c)2002 by Gale. Gale is an imprint of The Gale Group, Inc., a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. Gale and Design and Thomson Learning are trademarks used herein under license.
The following sections, if they exist, are offprint from Beacham's Encyclopedia of Popular Fiction: "Social Concerns", "Thematic Overview", "Techniques", "Literary Precedents", "Key Questions", "Related Titles", "Adaptations", "Related Web Sites". (c)1994-2005, by Walton Beacham.
The following sections, if they exist, are offprint from Beacham's Guide to Literature for Young Adults: "About the Author", "Overview", "Setting", "Literary Qualities", "Social Sensitivity", "Topics for Discussion", "Ideas for Reports and Papers". (c)1994-2005, by Walton Beacham.
All other sections in this Literature Study Guide are owned and copyrighted by BookRags, Inc.
There appears to be something assuming in the act of writing, and thrusting into public notice, a new work on a subject which has already employed many able pens; for who would presume to do this, unless he believed his production to be, in some respects, superior to every one of the kind which had preceded it? Hence, in presenting to the public this system of English Grammar, the author is aware that an apology will be looked for, and that the arguments on which that apology is grounded, must inevitably undergo a rigid scrutiny. Apprehensive, however, that no explanatory effort, on his part, would shield him from the imputation of arrogance by such as are blinded by self-interest, or by those who are wedded to the doctrines mid opinions of his predecessors, with them he will not attempt a compromise, being, in a great measure, indifferent either to their praise or their censure. But with the candid, he is willing to negotiate an amicable treaty, knowing that they are always ready to enter into it on honorable terms. In this negotiation he asks nothing more than merely to rest the merits of his work on its practical utility, believing that, if it prove uncommonly successful in facilitating the progress of youth in the march of mental improvement, that will be its best apology.
When we bring into consideration the numerous productions of those learned philologists who have labored so long, and, as many suppose, so successfully, in establishing the principles of our language; and, more especially, when we view the labors of some of our modern compilers, who have displayed so much ingenuity and acuteness in attempting to arrange those principles in such a manner as to form a correct and an easy medium of mental conference; it does, indeed, appear a little like presumption for a young man to enter upon a subject which has so frequently engaged the attention and talents of men distinguished for their erudition. The author ventures forward, however, under the conviction, that most of his predecessors are very deficient, at least, in manner, if not in matter; and this conviction, he believes, will be corroborated by a majority of the best judges in community. It is admitted, that many valuable improvements have been made by some of our late writers, who have endeavored to simplify and render this subject intelligible to the young learner, but they have all overlooked what the author considers a very important object, namely, a systematic order of parsing; and nearly all have neglected to develop and explain the principles in such a manner as to enable the learner, without great difficulty, to comprehend their nature and use.
By some this system will, no doubt, be discarded on account of its simplicity; while to others its simplicity will prove its principal recommendation. Its design is an humble one. It proffers no great advantages to the recondite grammarian; it professes not to instruct the literary connoisseur; it presents no attractive graces of style to charm, no daring flights to astonish, no deep researches to gratify him; but in the humblest simplicity of diction, it attempts to accelerate the march of the juvenile mind in its advances in the path of science, by dispersing those clouds that so often bewilder it, and removing those obstacles that generally retard its progress. In this way it endeavors to render interesting and delightful a study which has hitherto been considered tedious, dry, and irksome. Its leading object is to adopt a correct and an easy method, in which pleasure is blended with the labors of the learner, and which is calculated to excite in him a spirit of inquiry, that shall call forth into vigorous and useful exercise, every latent energy of his mind; and thus enable him soon to become thoroughly acquainted with the nature of the principles, and with their practical utility and application.
Content to be useful, instead of being brilliant, the writer of these pages has endeavored to shun the path of those whose aim appears to have been to dazzle, rather than to instruct. As he has aimed not so much at originality as utility, he has adopted the thoughts of his predecessors whose labors have become public stock, whenever he could not, in his opinion, furnish better and brighter of his own. Aware that there is, in the public mind, a strong predilection for the doctrines contained in Mr. Murray’s grammar, he has thought proper, not merely from motives of policy, but from choice, to select his principles chiefly from that work; and, moreover, to adopt, as far as consistent with his own views, the language of that eminent philologist. In no instance has he varied from him, unless he conceived that, in so doing, some practical advantage would be gained. He hopes, therefore, to escape the censure so frequently and so justly awarded to those unfortunate innovators who have not scrupled to alter, mutilate, and torture the text of that able writer, merely to gratify an itching propensity to figure in the world as authors, and gain an ephemeral popularity by arrogating to themselves the credit due to another.
The author is not disposed, however, to disclaim all pretensions to originality; for, although his principles are chiefly selected, (and who would presume to make new ones?) the manner of arranging, illustrating, and applying them, is principally his own. Let no one, therefore, if he happen to find in other works, ideas and illustrations similar to some contained in the following lectures, too hastily accuse him of plagiarism. It is well known that similar investigations and pursuits often elicit corresponding ideas in different
As the plan of this treatise is far more comprehensive than those of ordinary grammars, the writer could not, without making his work unreasonably voluminous, treat some topics as extensively as was desirable. Its design is to embrace, not only all the most important principles of the science, but also exercises in parsing, false syntax, and punctuation, sufficiently extensive for all ordinary, practical purposes, and a key to the exercises, and, moreover, a series of illustrations so full and intelligible, as completely to adapt the principles to the capacities of common learners. Whether this design has been successfully or unsuccessfully executed, is left for the public to decide. The general adoption of the work into schools, wherever it has become known, and the ready sale of forty thousand copies, (though without hitherto affording the author any pecuniary profit,) are favorable omens.
In the selection and arrangement of principles for his work, the author has endeavored to pursue a course between the extremes, of taking blindly on trust whatever has been sanctioned by prejudice and the authority of venerable names, and of that arrogant, innovating spirit, which sets at defiance all authority, and attempts to overthrow all former systems, and convince the world that all true knowledge and science are wrapped up in a crude system of vagaries of its own invention. Notwithstanding the author is aware that public prejudice is powerful, and that he who ventures much by way of innovation, will be liable to defeat his own purpose by falling into neglect; yet he has taken the liberty to think for himself, to investigate the subject critically and dispassionately, and to adopt such principles only as he deemed the least objectionable, and best calculated to effect the object he had in view. But what his system claims as improvements on others, consists not so much in bettering the principles themselves, as in the method adopted of communicating a knowledge of them to the mind of the learner. That the work is defective, the author is fully sensible: and he is free to acknowledge, that its defects arise, in part, from his own want of judgment and skill.
* * * * *
Should parents object to the Compendium, fearing it will soon be destroyed by their children, they are informed that the pupil will not have occasion to use it one-tenth part as much as he will the book which it accompanies: and besides, if it be destroyed, he will find all the definitions and rules which it contains, recapitulated in the series of Lectures.
HINTS TO TEACHERS AND PRIVATE LEARNERS.
As this work proposes a new mode of parsing, and pursues an arrangement essentially different from that generally adopted, it may not be deemed improper for the author to give some directions to those who may be disposed to use it. Perhaps they who take only a slight view of the order of parsing, will not consider it new, but blend it with those long since adopted. Some writers have, indeed, attempted plans somewhat similar; but in no instance have they reduced them to what the author considers a regular systematic order.
The methods which they have generally suggested, require the teacher to interrogate the pupil as he proceeds; or else he is permitted to parse without giving any explanations at all. Others hint that the learner ought to apply definitions in a general way, but they lay down no systematic arrangement of questions as his guide. The systematic order laid down in this work, if pursued by the pupil, compels him to apply every definition and every rule that appertains to each word he parses, without having a question put to him by the teacher; and, in so doing, he explains every word fully as he goes along. This course enables the learner to proceed independently; and proves, at the same time, a great relief to the instructer. The convenience and advantage of this method, are far greater than can be easily conceived by one who is unacquainted with it. The author is, therefore, anxious to have the absurd practice, wherever it has been established, of causing learners to commit and recite definitions and rules without any simultaneous application of them to practical examples, immediately abolished. This system obviates the necessity of pursuing such a stupid course of drudgery; for the young beginner who pursues it, will have, in a few weeks, all the most important definitions and rules perfectly committed, simply by applying them in parsing.
If this plan be once adopted, it is confidently believed that every teacher who is desirous to consult, either his own convenience, or the advantage of his pupils, will readily pursue it in preference to any former method. This belief is founded on the advantages which the author himself has experienced from it in the course of several years, devoted to the instruction of youth and adults. By pursuing this system, he can, with less labor, advance a pupil farther in a practical knowledge of this abstruse science, in two months, than he could in one year when he taught in the “old way.” It is presumed that no instructor, who once gives this system a fair trial, will doubt the truth of this assertion.
Perhaps some will, on a first view of the work, disapprove of the transposition of many parts; but whoever examines it attentively, will find that, although the author has not followed the common “artificial and unnatural arrangement adopted by most of his predecessors,” yet he has endeavored to pursue a more judicious one, namely, “the order of the understanding.”
The learner should commence, not by committing and rehearsing, but by reading attentively the first two lectures several times over. He ought then to parse, according to the systematic order, the examples given for that purpose; in doing which, as previously stated, he has an opportunity of committing all the definitions and rules belonging to the parts of speech included in the examples.
The COMPENDIUM, as it presents to the eye of the learner a condensed but comprehensive view of the whole science, may be properly considered an “Ocular Analysis of the English language.” By referring to it, the young student is enabled to apply all his definitions and rules from the very commencement of his parsing. To some, this mode of procedure may seem rather tedious; but it must appear obvious to every person of discernment, that a pupil will learn more by parsing five words critically, and explaining them fully, than he would by parsing fifty words superficially, and without understanding their various properties. The teacher who pursues this plan, is not under the necessity of hearing his pupils recite a single lesson of definitions committed to memory, for he has a fair opportunity of discovering their knowledge of these as they evince it in parsing. All other directions necessary for the learner in school, as well as for the private learner, will be given in the succeeding pages of the work. Should these feeble efforts prove a saving of much time and expense to those young persons who may be disposed to pursue this science with avidity, by enabling them easily to acquire a critical knowledge of a branch of education so important and desirable, the author’s fondest anticipations will be fully realized; but should his work fall into the hands of any who are expecting, by the acquisition, to become grammarians, and yet, have not sufficient ambition and perseverance to make themselves acquainted with its contents, it is hoped that the blame for their nonimprovement, will not be thrown upon him.
* * * * *
To those enterprising and intelligent gentlemen who may be disposed to lecture on this plan, the author takes the liberty to offer a few hints by way of encouragement.
Any judicious instructor of grammar, if he take the trouble to make himself familiar with the contents of the following pages, will find it an easy matter to pursue this system. One remark only to the lecturer, is sufficient. Instead of causing his pupils to acquire a knowledge of the nature and use of the principles by intense application, let him communicate it verbally; that is, let him first take up one part of speech, and, in an oral lecture, unfold and explain all its properties, not only by adopting the illustrations given in the book, but also by giving others that may occur to his mind as he proceeds. After a part of speech has been thus elucidated, the class should be interrogated on it, and then taught to parse it, and correct errors in composition under the rules that apply to it. In the same manner he may proceed with the other parts of speech, observing, however, to recapitulate occasionally, until the learners become thoroughly acquainted with whatever principles may have been presented. If this plan be faithfully pursued, rapid progress, on the part of the learner, will be the inevitable result; and that teacher who pursues it, cannot fail of acquiring distinction, and an enviable popularity in his profession. S. KIRKHAM.
ON
ENGLISH GRAMMAR.
* * * * *
DIVISIONS OF GRAMMAR.—ORTHOGRAPHY.
TO THE YOUNG LEARNER.
You are about to enter upon one of the most useful, and, when rightly pursued, one of the most interesting studies in the whole circle of science. If, however, you, like many a misguided youth, are under the impression that the study of grammar is dry and irksome, and a matter of little consequence, I trust I shall succeed in removing from your mind, all such false notions and ungrounded prejudices; for I will endeavor to convince you, before I close these lectures, that this is not only a pleasing study, but one of real and substantial utility; a study that directly tends to adorn and dignify human nature, and meliorate the condition of man. Grammar is a leading branch of that learning which alone is capable of unfolding and maturing the mental powers, and of elevating man to his proper rank in the scale of intellectual existence;—of that learning which lifts the soul from earth, and enables it to hold converse with a thousand worlds. In pursuing any and every other path of science, you will discover the truth of these remarks, and feel its force; for you will find, that, as grammar opens the door to every department of learning, a knowledge
Doubtless you have heard some persons assert, that they could detect and correct any error in language by the ear, and speak and write accurately without a knowledge of grammar. Now your own observation will soon convince you, that this assertion is incorrect. A man of refined taste, may, by perusing good authors, and conversing with the learned, acquire that knowledge of language which will enable him to avoid those glaring errors that offend the ear; but there are other errors equally gross, which have not a harsh sound, and, consequently, which cannot be detected without a knowledge of the rules that are violated. Believe me, therefore, when I say, that without the knowledge and application of grammar rules, it is impossible for any one to think, speak, read, or write with accuracy. From a want of such knowledge, many often express their ideas in a manner so improper and obscure as to render it impossible for any one to understand them: their language frequently amounts, not only to bad sense, but non-sense. In other instances several different meanings may be affixed to the words they employ; and what is still worse, is, that not unfrequently their sentences are so constructed, as to convey a meaning quite the reverse of that which they intended. Nothing of a secular nature can be more worthy of your attention, then, than the acquisition of grammatical knowledge.
The path which leads to grammatical excellence, is not all the way smooth and flowery, but in it you will find some thorns interspersed, and some obstacles to be surmounted; or, in simple language, you will find, in the pursuit of this science, many intricacies which it is rather difficult for the juvenile mind completely to unravel. I shall, therefore, as I proceed, address you in plain language, and endeavor to illustrate every principle in a manner so clear and simple, that you will be able, if you exercise your mind, to understand its nature, and apply it to practice as you go along; for I would rather give you one useful idea, than fifty high-sounding words, the meaning of which you would probably be unable to comprehend.
Should you ever have any doubts concerning the meaning of a word, or the sense of a sentence, you must not be discouraged, but persevere, either by studying my explanations, or by asking some person competent to inform you, till you obtain a clear conception of it, and till all doubts are removed. By carefully examining, and frequently reviewing, the following lectures, you will soon be able to discern the grammatical construction of our language, and fix in your mind the principles by which it is governed. Nothing delights youth so much, as a clear and distinct knowledge of any branch of science which they are pursuing; and, on the other hand, I know they are apt to be discouraged with any branch of learning which requires much time and attention to be understood. It is the evidence of a weak mind, however, to be discouraged by the obstacles with which the young learner must expect to meet; and the best means that you can adopt, in order to enable you to overcome the difficulties that arise in the incipient stage of your studies, is to cultivate the habit of thinking methodically and soundly on all subjects of importance which may engage your attention. Nothing will be more effectual in enabling you to think, as well as to speak and write, correctly, than the study of English grammar, according to the method of pursuing it as prescribed in the following pages. This system is designed, and, I trust, well calculated, to expand and strengthen the intellectual faculties, in as much as it involves a process by which the mind is addressed, and a knowledge of grammar communicated in an interesting and familiar manner.
You are aware, my young friend, that you live in an age of light and knowledge;—an age in which science and the arts are marching onward with gigantic strides. You live, too, in a land of liberty;—a land on which the smiles of Heaven beam with uncommon refulgence. The trump of the warrior and the clangor of arms no longer echo on our mountains, or in our valleys; “the garments dyed in blood have passed away;” the mighty struggle for independence is over; and you live to enjoy the rich boon of freedom and prosperity which was purchased with the blood of our fathers. These considerations forbid that you should ever be so unmindful of your duty to your country, to your Creator, to yourself, and to succeeding generations, as to be content to grovel in ignorance. Remember that “knowledge is power;” that an enlightened and a virtuous people can never be enslaved; and that, on the intelligence of our youth, rest the future liberty, the prosperity, the happiness, the grandeur, and the glory of our beloved country. Go on then, with a laudable ambition, and an unyielding perseverance, in the path which leads to honor and renown. Press forward. Go, and gather laurels on the hill of science; linger among her unfading beauties; “drink deep” of her crystal fountain; and then join in “the march of fame.” Become learned and virtuous, and you will be great. Love God and serve him, and you will be happy.
LANGUAGE.
Language, in its most extensive sense, implies those signs by which men and brutes communicate to each other their thoughts, affections, and desires.
Language may be divided, 1. into natural and artificial; 2. into spoken and written.
NATURAL LANGUAGE, consists in the use of those natural signs which different animals employ in communicating their feelings one to another. The meaning of these signs all perfectly understand by the principles of their nature. This language is common both to man and brute. The elements of natural language in man, may be reduced to three kinds; modulations of the voice, gestures, and features. By means of these, two savages who have no common, artificial language, can communicate their thoughts in a manner quite intelligible: they can ask and refuse, affirm and deny, threaten and supplicate; they can traffick, enter into contracts, and plight their faith. The language of brutes consists in the use of those inarticulate sounds by which they express their thoughts and affections. Thus, the chirping of a bird, the bleating of a lamb, the neighing of a horse, and the growling, whining, and barking of a dog, are the language of those animals, respectively.
ARTIFICIAL LANGUAGE consists in the use of words, by means of which mankind are enabled to communicate their thoughts to one another.—In order to assist you in comprehending what is meant by the term word, I will endeavor to illustrate the meaning of the term.
Idea. The notices which we gain by sensation and perception, and which are treasured up in the mind to be the materials of thinking and knowledge, are denominated ideas. For example, when you place your hand upon a piece of ice, a sensation is excited which we call coldness. That faculty which notices this sensation or change produced in the mind, is called perception; and the abstract notice itself, or notion you form of this sensation, is denominated an idea. This being premised, we will now proceed to the consideration of words.
Words are articulate sounds, used by common consent, not as natural, but as artificial, signs of our ideas. Words have no meaning in themselves. They are merely the artificial representatives of those ideas affixed to them by compact or agreement among those who use them. In English, for instance, to a particular kind of metal we assign the name gold; not because there is, in that sound, any peculiar aptness which suggests the idea we wish to convey, but the application of that sound to the idea signified, is an act altogether arbitrary. Were there any natural connexion between the sound and the thing signified, the word gold would convey the same idea to the people of other countries as it does to ourselves. But such is not the fact. Other nations make use of different sounds to signify the same thing. Thus, aurum denotes the same idea in Latin, and or in French. Hence it follows, that it is by custom only we learn to annex particular ideas to particular sounds.
SPOKEN LANGUAGE or speech is made up of articulate sounds uttered by the human voice.
The voice is formed by air which, after it passes through the glottis, (a small aperture in the upper part of the wind-pipe,) is modulated by the action of the throat, palate, teeth, tongue, lips, and nostrils.
WRITTEN LANGUAGE. The elements of written language consist of letters or characters, which, by common consent and general usage, are combined into words, and thus made the ocular representatives of the articulate sounds uttered by the voice.
* * * * *
GRAMMAR is the science of language.
Grammar may be divided into two species, universal and particular.
UNIVERSAL GRAMMAR explains the principles which are common to all languages.
PARTICULAR GRAMMAR applies those general principles to a particular language, modifying them according to its genius, and the established practice of the best speakers and writers by whom it is used. Hence,
The established practice of the best speakers and writers of any language, is the standard of grammatical accuracy in the use of that language.
By the phrase, established practice, is implied reputable, national, and present usage. A usage becomes good and legal, when it has been long and generally adopted.
The best speakers and writers, or such as may be considered good authority in the use of language, are those who are deservedly in high estimation; speakers, distinguished for their elocution and other literary attainments, and writers, eminent for correct taste, solid matter, and refined manner.
In the grammar of a perfect language, no rules should be admitted, but such as are founded on fixed principles, arising out of the genius of that language and the nature of things; but our language being im-perfect, it becomes necessary, in a practical treatise, like this, to adopt some rules to direct us in the use of speech as regulated by custom. If we had a permanent and surer standard than capricious custom to regulate us in the transmission of thought, great inconvenience would be avoided. They, however, who introduce usages which depart from the analogy and philosophy of a language, are conspicuous among the number of those who form that language, and have power to control it.
Language is conventional, and not only invented, but, in its progressive advancement, varied for purposes of practical convenience. Hence it assumes any and every form which those who make use of it choose to give it. We are, therefore, as rational and practical grammarians, compelled to submit to the necessity of the case; to take the language as it is, and not as it should be, and bow to custom.
PHILOSOPHICAL GRAMMAR investigates and develops the principles of language, as founded in the nature of things and the original laws of thought. It also discusses the grounds of the classification of words, and explains those procedures which practical grammar lays down for our observance.
PRACTICAL GRAMMAR adopts the most convenient classification of the words of a language, lays down a system of definitions and rules, founded on scientific principles and good usage, illustrates their nature and design, and enforces their application.
PRINCIPLE. A principle in grammar is a peculiar construction of the language, sanctioned by good usage.
DEFINITION. A definition in grammar is a principle of language expressed in a definite form.
RULE. A rule describes the peculiar construction or circumstantial relation of words, which custom has established for our observance.
* * * * *
ENGLISH GRAMMAR.
ENGLISH GRAMMAR is the art of speaking and writing the English language with propriety.
GRAMMAR teaches us how to use words in a proper manner. The most important use of that faculty called speech, is, to convey our thoughts to others. If, therefore, we have a store of words, and even know what they signify, they will be of no real use to us unless we can also apply them to practice, and make them answer the purposes for which they were invented. Grammar, well understood, enables us to express our thoughts fully and clearly; and, consequently, in a manner which will defy the ingenuity of man to give our words any other meaning than that which we ourselves intend them to express. To be able to speak and write our vernacular tongue with accuracy and elegance, is, certainly, a consideration of the highest moment.
Grammar is divided into four parts;
1. ORTHOGRAPHY, 2. ETYMOLOGY, 3. SYNTAX, 4. PROSODY.
ORTHOGRAPHY teaches the nature and powers of letters, and the just method of spelling words.
ORTHOGRAPHY means word-making, or spelling. It teaches us the different kinds and sounds of letters, how to combine them into syllables, and syllables into words.
As this is one of the first steps in the path of literature, I presume you already understand the nature and use of letters, and the just method of spelling words. If you do, it is unnecessary for you to dwell long on this part of grammar, which, though very important, is rather dry and uninteresting, for it has nothing to do with parsing and analyzing language. And, therefore, if you can spell correctly, you may omit Orthography, and commence with Etymology and Syntax.
Orthography treats, 1st, of Letters, 2ndly, of Syllables, and 3dly, of Words.
I. LETTERS. A letter is the first principle, or least part, of a word.
The English Alphabet contains twenty-six letters.
They are divided into vowels and consonants.
A vowel is a letter that can be perfectly sounded by itself. The vowels are a, e, i, o, u, and sometimes w and y. W and y are consonants when they begin a word or syllable; but in every other situation they are vowels.
A consonant is a letter that cannot be perfectly sounded without the help of a vowel; as, b, d, f, l. All letters except the vowels are consonants.
Consonants are divided into mutes and semi-vowels.
The mutes cannot be sounded at all without the aid of a vowel. They are b, p, t, d, k, and c and g hard.
The semi-vowels have an imperfect sound of themselves. They are f, l, m, n, r, v, s, z, x, and c and g soft.
Four of the semi-vowels, namely, l, m, n, r, are called liquids, because they readily unite with other consonants, and flow, as it were, into their sounds.
A diphthong is the union of two vowels, pronounced by a single impulse of the voice; as oi in voice, ou in sound.
A triphthong is the union of three vowels pronounced in like manner; as, eau in beau, iew in view.
A proper diphthong has both the vowels sounded; as, ou in ounce. An improper diphthong has only one of the vowels sounded; as, oa in boat.
II. SYLLABLES. A Syllable is a distinct sound, uttered by a single impulse of the voice; as, a, an, ant.
A word of one syllable, is termed a Monosyllable; a word of two syllables, a Dissyllable; a word of three syllables, a Trisyllable; a word of four or more syllables, a Polysyllable.
III. WORDS. Words are articulate sounds, used by common consent, as signs of our ideas.
Words are of two sorts, primitive and derivative.
A primitive word is that which cannot be reduced to a simpler word in the language; as, man, good.
A derivative word is that which may be reduced to a simpler word; as, manful, goodness.
There is little or no difference between derivative and compound words. The terminations or added syllables, such as ed, es, ess, est, an, ant, en, ence, ent, dom, hood, ly, ous, ful, ness, and the like, were, originally, distinct and separate words, which, by long use, have been contracted, and made to coalesce with other words.
A.—A has four sounds; the long; as in name, basin; the broad; as in ball, wall; the short; as in fagot, glass; and the flat, Italian sound; as in bar, farther. The improper diphthong, aa, has the short sound of a in Balaam, Canaan, Isaac; and the long sound of a in Baal, Gaal, Aaron.
The Latin diphthong, ae, has the long sound of e in aenigma, Caesar, and some other words. But many authors reject this useless excrescence of antiquity, and write, enigma, Cesar.
The diphthong, ai, has the long sound of a; as in pail, sail; except in plaid, said, again, raillery, fountain, Britain, and some others.
Au is sounded like broad a in taught, like flat a in aunt, like long o in hautboy, and like short o in laurel.
Aw has always the sound of broad a; as in bawl, crawl.
Ay has the long sound of a; as in pay, delay.
B.—B has only one sound; as in baker, number, chub.
B is silent when it follows m in the same syllable; as in lamb, &c. except in accumb, rhomb, and succumb. It is also silent before t in the same syllable; as in doubt, debtor, subtle, &c.
C.—C sounds like k before a, o, u, r, l, t, and at the end of syllables; as in cart, cottage, curious, craft, tract, cloth; victim, flaccid. It has the sound of s before e, i, and y; as in centre, cigar, mercy. C has the sound of sh when followed by a diphthong, and is preceded by the accent, either primary or secondary; as in social, pronunciation, &c.; and of z in discern, sacrifice, sice, suffice. It is mute in arbuscle, czar, czarina, endict, victuals, muscle.
Ch is commonly sounded like tsh; as in church, chin; but in words derived from the ancient languages, it has the sound of k; as in chemist, chorus; and likewise in foreign names; as in Achish, Enoch. In words from the French, ch sounds like sh; as in chaise, chevalier; and also like sh when preceded by l or n; as in milch, bench, clinch, &c.
Ch in arch, before a vowel, sounds like k; as in arch-angel, except in arched, archery, archer; archenemy; but before a consonant, it sounds like tsh; as in archbishop. Ch is silent in schedule, schism, yacht, drachm.
D.—D has one uniform sound; as in death, bandage. It sounds like dj or j when followed by long u preceded by the accent; as in educate, verdure. It also sounds like j in grandeur, soldier.
The termination, ed, in adjectives and participial adjectives, retains its distinct sound; as, a wick-ed man, a learn-ed man, bless-ed are the meek; but in verbs the e is generally dropped; as, passed, walked, flashed, aimed, rolled, &c. which are pronounced, past, walkt, flasht, aimd, rold.
E.—E has a long sound; as in scheme, severe; a short sound; as in men, tent; and sometimes the sound of flat a; as in sergeant; and of short i; as in yes, pretty, England, and generally in the unaccented terminations, es, et, en.
F.—F has one unvaried sound; as in fancy, muffin; except in of, which, when uncompounded, is pronounced ov. A wive’s portion, a calve’s head, are improper. They should be, wife’s portion, calf’s head.
G.—G has two sounds. It is hard before a, o, u, l, and r, and at the end of a word; as in gay, go, gun, glory; bag, snug. It is soft before e, i, and y; as in genius, ginger, Egypt. Exceptions; get, gewgaw, gimlet, and some others. G is silent before n, as in gnash.
H.—H has an articulate sound; as in hat, horse, hull. It is silent after r; as in rhetoric, rhubarb.
I.—I has a long sound; as in fine; and a short one; as in fin. Before r it is often sounded like u short; as in first, third; and in other words, like short e; as in birth, virtue. In some words it has the sound of long e; as in machine, profile.
J.—J has the sound of soft g; except in hallelujah, in which it is pronounced like y.
K.—K has the sound of c hard, and is used before e, i, and y, where c would be soft; as kept, skirt, murky. It is silent before n; as in knife, knell, knocker.
L.—L has always a soft liquid sound; as in love, billow. It is often silent; as in half, talk, almond.
M.—M has always the same sound; as in murmur, monumental; except in comptroller, which is pronounced controller.
N.—N has two sounds; the one pure; as in man, net, noble; the other a compound sound; as in ankle, banquet, distinct, &c., pronounced angkl, bangkwet. N final is silent when preceded by m; as in hymn, autumn.
O.—O has a long sound; as in note, over; and a short one; as in not, got. It has the sound of u short; as in son, attorney, doth, does; and generally in the terminations, op, ot, or, on, om, ol, od, &c.
P.—P has but one uniform sound; as in pin, slipper; except in cupboard, clapboard, where it has the sound of b. It is mute in psalm, Ptolemy, tempt, empty, corps, raspberry, and receipt.
Ph has the sound of f in philosophy, Philip; and of v in nephew, Stephen.
Q.—Q is sounded like k, and is always followed by u pronounced like w; as in quadrant, queen, conquest.
R.—R has a rough sound; as in Rome, river, rage; and a smooth one; as in bard, card, regard. In the unaccented termination re, the r is sounded after the e; as in fibre, centre.
S.—S has a flat sound like z; as in besom, nasal; and, at the beginning of words, a sharp, hissing sound; as in saint, sister, sample. It has the sound of sh when preceded by the accent and another s or a liquid, and followed by a diphthong or long u; as in expulsion, censure. S sounds like zh when preceded by the accent and a vowel, and followed by a diphthong or long u as in brasier, usual. It is mute in isle, corps, demesne, viscount.
T.—T is sounded in take, temper. T before u, when the accent precedes, and generally before eou, sounds like tsh; as, nature, virtue, righteous, are pronounced natshure, virtshue, richeus. Ti before a vowel, preceded by the accent, has the sound of sh; as in salvation, negotiation; except in such words as tierce, tiara, &c. and unless an s goes before; as, question; and excepting also derivatives from words ending in ty; as in mighty, mightier.
Th, at the beginning, middle, and end of words, is sharp; as in thick, panther, breath. Exceptions; then, booth, worthy, &c.
U.—U has three sounds; a long; as in mule, cubic; a short; as in dull, custard; and an obtuse sound; as in full, bushel. It is pronounced like short e in bury; and like short i in busy, business.
V.—V has uniformly the sound of flat f; as in vanity, love.
W.—W, when a consonant, has its sound, which is heard in wo, beware. W is silent before r; as in wry, wrap, wrinkle; and also in answer, sword, &c. Before h it is pronounced as if written after the h; as in why, when, what;—hwy, hwen, hwat. When heard as a vowel, it takes the sound of u; as in draw, crew, now.
X.—X has a sharp sound, like ks, when it ends a syllable with the accent on it; as, exit, exercise; or when it precedes an accented syllable which begins with any consonant except h; as, excuse, extent; but when the following accented syllable begins with a vowel or h, it has, generally, a flat sound, like gz; as in exert, exhort. X has the sound of Z at the beginning of proper names of Greek original; as in Xanthus, Xenophon, Xerxes.
Y.—Y, when a consonant, has its proper sound; as in youth, York, yes, new-year. When y is employed as a vowel, it has exactly the sound that i would have in the same situation; as in rhyme, system, party, pyramid.
Z.—Z has the sound of flat s; as in freeze, brazen.
SPELLING is the art of expressing a word by its proper letters.
The following rules are deemed important in practice, although they assist us in spelling only a small portion of the words of our language. This useful art is to be chiefly acquired by studying the spelling-book and dictionary, and by strict attention in reading.
RULE I. Monosyllables ending in f, l, or s, double the final or ending consonant when it is preceded by a single vowel; as staff, mill, pass. Exceptions; of, if, is, as, lids, was, yes, his, this, us, and thus.
False Orthography for the learner to correct.—Be thou like the gale that moves the gras, to those who ask thy aid.—The aged hero comes forth on his staf; his gray hair glitters in the beam.—Shal mortal man be more just than God?—Few know the value of health til they lose it.—Our manners should be neither gros, nor excessively refined.
And that is not
the lark, whose notes do beat
The vaulty heaven
so high above our heads:
I have more care
to stay, than wil to go.
RULE II. Monosyllables ending in any consonant but f, l, or s, never double the final consonant when it is preceded by a single vowel; as, man, hat. Exceptions; add, ebb, butt, egg, odd, err, inn, bunn, purr, and buzz.
False Orthography.—None
ever went sadd from Fingal.—He rejoiced
over his sonn.—Clonar
lies bleeding on the bedd of death.—Many
a
trapp is set to insnare the
feet of youth.
The weary sunn
has made a golden sett,
And, by the bright
track of his golden carr,
Gives token of
a goodly day to-morrow.
RULE III. Words ending in y, form the plural of nouns, the persons of verbs, participial nouns, past participles, comparatives, and superlatives, by changing y into i, when the y is preceded by a consonant; as, spy, spies; I carry, thou carriest, he carries; carrier, carried; happy, happier, happiest.
The present participle in ing, retains the y that i may not be doubled; as, carry, carrying.
But when y is preceded by a vowel, in such instances as the above, it is not changed into i; as, boy, boys; I cloy, he cloys; except in the words lay, pay, and say I from which are formed laid, paid, and said; and their compounds, unpaid, unsaid, &c.
False Orthography.—Our
fancys should be governed by reason.—Thou
wearyest thyself in vain.—He
denyed himself all sinful pleasures.
Win straiing souls
with modesty and love;
Cast none away.
The truly good
man is not dismaied by poverty.
Ere fresh morning
streak the east, we must be risen to reform yonder
allies
green.
RULE IV. When words ending in y, assume an additional syllable beginning with a consonant, the y, if it is preceded by a consonant, is commonly changed to i; as, happy, happily, happiness.
But when y is preceded by a vowel, in such instances, it is very rarely changed to i; as, coy, coyless; boy, boyish; boyhood; joy, joyless, joyful.
False Orthography.—His
mind is uninfluenced by fancyful
humors.—The vessel
was heavyly laden.—When we act against
conscience, we become the
destroiers of our own peace.
Christiana, mayden
of heroic mien!
Star of the north!
of northern stars the queen!
RULE V. Monosyllables, and words accented on the last syllable, ending with a single consonant that is preceded by a single vowel, double that consonant when they assume another syllable that begins with a vowel; as, wit, witty; thin, thinnish; to abet, an abetter.
But if a diphthong precedes, or the accent is not on the last syllable, the consonant remains single; as, to toil, toiling; to offer, an offering; maid, maiden.
False Orthography.—The business of to-day, should not be defered till to-morrow.—That law is annuled.—When we have outstriped our errors we have won the race.—By defering our repentance, we accumulate our sorrows.—The Christian Lawgiver has prohibited many things which the heathen philosophers allowed.
At summer eve,
when heaven’s aerial bow
Spans with bright
arch the glitterring hills below.—
Thus mourned the
hapless man; a thunderring sound
Rolled round the
shudderring walls and shook the ground.
RULE VI. Words ending in double l, in taking ness, less, ly, or ful, after them, generally omit one l; as, fulness, skilless, fully skilful.
But words ending in any double letter but l, and taking ness, less, ly, or ful, after them, preserve the letter double; as, harmlessness, carelessness, carelessly, stiffly, successful.
False Orthography.—A
chillness generally precedes a fever.—He
is
wed to dullness.
The silent stranger
stood amazed to see
Contempt of wealth
and willful poverty.
Restlesness of mind impairs
our peace.—The road to the blisful
regions, is as open to the
peasant as to the king.—The arrows of
calumny fall harmlesly at
the feet of virtue.
RULE VII. Ness, less, ly, or ful, added to words ending in silent e, does not cut it off; as, paleness, guileless, closely, peaceful; except in a few words; as, duly, truly, awful.
False Orthography.—Sedatness is becoming.
All these with ceasless praise his works behold. Stars rush: and final ruin fiercly drives Her ploughshare o’er creation! ------Nature made a pause, An aweful pause! prophetic of her end!
RULE VIII. When words ending in silent e, assume the termination, ment, the e should not be cut off; as, abatement, chastisement.
Ment, like other terminations, changes y into i when the y is preceded by a consonant; as, accompany, accompaniment; merry, merriment.
False Orthography.—A
judicious arrangment of studies facilitates
improvment.—Encouragment
is greatest when we least need it.
To shun allurments
is not hard,
To minds resolv’d,
forwarn’d, and well prepared.
RULE IX. When words ending in silent e, assume the termination, able or ible, the e should generally be cut off; as, blame, blamable; cure, curable; sense, sensible. But if c or g soft comes before e in the original word, the e is preserved in words compounded with able; as, peace, peaceable; change, changeable.
False Orthography.—Knowledge
is desireable.—Misconduct is
inexcuseable.—Our
natural defects are not chargable upon us.—We
are made to be servicable
to others as well as to ourselves.
RULE X. When ing or ish is added to words ending in silent e, the e is almost always omitted; as, place, placing; lodge, lodging; slave, slavish; prude, prudish.
False Orthography.—Labor
and expense are lost upon a droneish
spirit.—An obligeing
and humble disposition, is totally unconnected
with a servile and cringeing
humor.
Conscience anticipateing
time,
Already rues th’
unacted crime.
One self-approveing
hour, whole years outweighs
Of stupid starers,
and of loud huzzas.
RULE XI. Compound words are generally spelled in the same manner as the simple words of which they are compounded; as, glasshouse, skylight, thereby, hereafter. Many words ending in double l, are exceptions to this rule; as, already, welfare, wilful, fulfil; and also the words, wherever, christmas, lammas, &c.
False Orthography.—The
Jew’s pasover was instituted in A.M.
2513.—They salute
one another by touching their forheads.—That
which is some times expedient,
is not allways so.
Then, in the scale
of reasoning life ’tis plain,
There must be,
somwhere, such a rank as man.
Till hymen brought
his lov-delighted hour,
There dwelt no
joy in Eden’s rosy bower.
The
head reclined, the loosened hair,
The
limbs relaxed, the mournful air:—
See,
he looks up; a wofull smile
Lightens
his wo-worn cheek awhile.
QUESTIONS.
What is language?—How is language divided?—What is natural language?—What are the elements of natural language in man?—Wherein consists the language of brutes?—What is artificial language?—What is an idea?—What are words?—What is grammar?—What does Universal grammar explain?—Wherein does Particular grammar differ from universal?—What is the standard of grammatical accuracy?—What is Philosophical grammar?—What is Practical grammar?—What is a principle of grammar?—A definition?—A rule?—What is English grammar?—Into how many parts is grammar divided?—What does Orthography teach?
* * * * *
LECTURE II
OF NOUNS AND VERBS.
ETYMOLOGY treats of the different sorts of words, their various modifications, and their derivation.
SYNTAX treats of the agreement and government of words, and of their proper arrangement in a sentence.
The word ETYMOLOGY signifies the origin or pedigree of words.
Syn, a prefix from the Greek, signifies together. Syn-tax, means placing together; or, as applied in grammar, sentence making.
The rules of syntax, which direct to the proper choice of words, and their judicious arrangement in a sentence, and thereby enable us to correct and avoid errors in speech, are chiefly based on principles unfolded and explained by Etymology. Etymological knowledge, then, is a prerequisite to the study of Syntax; but, in parsing, under the head of Etymology, you are required to apply the rules of Syntax. It becomes necessary, therefore, in a practical work of this sort, to treat these two parts of grammar in connexion.
Conducted on scientific principles, Etymology would comprehend the exposition of the origin and meaning of words, and, in short, their whole history, including their application to things in accordance with the laws of nature and of thought, and the caprice of those who apply them; but to follow up the current of language to its various sources, and analyze the springs from which it flows, would involve a process altogether too arduous and extensive for an elementary work. It would lead to the study of all those languages from which ours is immediately derived, and even compel us to trace many words through those languages to others more ancient, and so on, until the chain of research would become, if not endless, at least, too extensive to be traced out by one man. I shall, therefore, confine myself to the following, limited views of this part of grammar.
1. Etymology treats of the classification of words.
2. Etymology explains the accidents or properties peculiar to each class or sort of words, and their present modifications. By modifications, I mean the changes produced on their endings, in consequence of their assuming different relations in respect to one another. These changes, such as fruit, fruit_s_, fruit’s; he, h_is_, h_im_; write, write_st_, write_th_, write_s_, wr_ote_, writ_ten_, writ_ing_, write_r_; a, a_n_; ample, ampl_y_, and the like, will be explained in their appropriate places.
3. Etymology treats of the derivation of words; that is, it teaches you how one word comes from, or grows out of another. For example, from the word speak, come the words speak_est_, speak_eth_, speak_s_, speak_ing_, sp_oke_, spo_ken_, speak_er_, speak_er’s_, speak_ers_. These, you perceive, are all one and the same word, and all, except the last three, express the same kind of action. They differ from each other only in the termination. These changes in termination are produced on the word in order to make it correspond with the various persons who speak, the number of persons, or the time of speaking; as, I speak, thou speak_est_, the man speak_eth_, or speak_s_, the men speak, I sp_oke_; The speak_er_ speak_s_ another speak_er’s_ spe_ech_.
The third part of Etymology, which is intimately connected with the second, will be more amply expanded in Lecture XIV, and in the Philosophical notes; but I shall not treat largely of that branch of derivation which consists in tracing words to foreign languages. This is the province of the lexicographer, rather than of the philologist. It is not the business of him who writes a practical, English grammar, to trace words to the Saxon, nor to the Celtic, the Greek, the Dutch, the Mexican, nor the Persian; nor is it his province to explain their meaning in Latin, French, or Hebrew, Italian, Mohegan, or Sanscrit; but it is his duty to explain their properties, their powers, their connexions, relations, dependancies, and, bearings, not at the period in which the Danes made an irruption into the island of Great Britain, nor in the year in which Lamech paid his addresses to Adah and Zillah, but at the particular period in which he writes. His words are already derived, formed, established, and furnished to his hand, and he is bound to take them and explain them as he finds them in his day, without any regard to their ancient construction and application.
CLASSIFICATION. In arranging the parts of speech, I conceive it to be the legitimate object of the practical grammarian, to consult practical convenience. The true principle of classification seems to be, not a reference to essential differences in the primitive meaning of words, nor to their original combinations, but to the manner in which they are at present employed. In the early and rude state of society, mankind are quite limited in their knowledge, and having but few ideas to communicate, a small number of words answers their purpose in the transmission of thought. This leads them to express their ideas in short, detached sentences, requiring few or none of those connectives, or words of transition, which are afterwards introduced into language by refinement, and which contribute so largely to its perspicuity and elegance. The argument appears to be conclusive, then, that every language must necessarily have more parts of speech in its refined, than in its barbarous state.
The part of speech to which any word belongs, is ascertained, not by the original signification of that word, but by its present manner of meaning, or, rather, the office which it performs in a sentence.
The various ways in which a word is applied to the idea which it represents, are called its manner of meaning. Thus, The painter dips his paint brush in paint, to paint the carriage. Here, the word paint, is first employed to describe the brush which the painter uses; in this situation it is, therefore, an adjective; secondly, to name the mixture employed; for which reason it is a noun; and, lastly, to express the action performed; it therefore, becomes a verb; and yet, the meaning of the word is the same in all these applications. This meaning, however, is applied in different ways; and thus the same word becomes different parts of speech. Richard took water from the water pot, to water the plants.
ETYMOLOGY.
Etymology treats, first, of the classification of words.
THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE is derived chiefly from the Saxon, Danish, Celtic, and Gothic; but in the progressive stages of its refinement, it has been greatly enriched by accessions from the Greek, Latin, French, Spanish, Italian, and German languages.
The number of words in our language, after deducting proper names, and words formed by the inflections of our verbs, nouns, and adjectives, may be estimated at about forty thousand. There are ten sorts of words, called parts of speech, namely, the NOUN or SUBSTANTIVE, VERB, ARTICLE, ADJECTIVE, PARTICIPLE, ADVERB, PREPOSITION, PRONOUN, CONJUNCTION, and INTERJECTION.
Thus you perceive, that all the words in the English language are included in these ten classes: and what you have to do in acquiring a knowledge of English Grammar, is merely to become acquainted with these ten parts of speech, and the rules of Syntax that apply to them. The Noun and Verb are the most important and leading parts of speech; therefore they are first presented: all the rest (except the interjection) are either appendages or connectives of these two. As you proceed, you will find that it will require more time, and cost you more labor, to get a knowledge of the noun and verb, than it will to become familiar with all the minor parts of speech.
The principal use of words is, to name things, compare them with each other, and express their actions.
Nouns, which are the names of entities or things, adjectives which denote the comparisons and relations of things by describing them, and expressing their qualities, and verbs, which express the actions and being of things, are the only classes of words necessarily recognised in a philosophical view of grammar. But in a treatise which consults, mainly, the practical advantages of the learner, it is believed, that no classification will be found more convenient or accurate than the foregoing, which divides words into ten sorts. To attempt to prove, in this place, that nothing would be gained by adopting either a less or a greater number of the parts of speech, would be anticipating the subject. I shall, therefore, give my reasons for adopting this arrangement in preference to any other, as the different sorts of words are respectively presented to you, for then you will be better prepared to appreciate my arguments.
A noun is the name of any person, place, or thing; as, man, Charleston, knowledge.
Nouns are often improperly called substantives. A substantive is the name of a substance only; but a noun is the name either of a substance or a quality.
Noun, derived from the Latin word nomen, signifies name. The name of any thing [1] that exists, whether animate or inanimate, or which we can see, hear, feel, taste, smell, or think of, is a noun. Animal, bird, creature, paper, pen, apple, fold, house, modesty, virtue, danger, are all nouns. In order that you may easily distinguish this part of speech from others, I will give you a sign, which will be useful to you when you cannot tell it by the sense. Any word that will make sense with the before it, is a noun. Try the following words by this sign, and see if they are nouns: tree, mountain, soul, mind, conscience, understanding. The tree, the mountain, the soul, and so on. You perceive, that they will make sense with the prefixed; therefore you know they are nouns. There are, however, exceptions to this rule, for some nouns will not make sense with the prefixed. These you will be able to distinguish, if you exercise your mind, by their making sense of themselves; as, goodness, sobriety, hope, immortality.
[1] The word thing, from the Saxon verb thingian, to think, is almost unlimited in its meaning. It may be applied to every animal and creature in the universe. By the term creature, I mean that which has been created; as, a dog, water, dirt. This word is also frequently applied to actions; as, “To get drunk is a beastly thing.” In this phrase, it signifies neither animal nor creature; but it denotes merely an action; therefore this action is the thing.
Nouns are used to denote the nonentity or absence of a thing, as well as its reality; as, nothing, naught, vacancy, non-existence, invisibility.
Nouns are sometimes used as verbs, and verbs, as nouns, according to their manner of meaning; and nouns are sometimes used as adjectives, and adjectives, as nouns. This matter will be explained in the concluding part of this lecture, where you will be better prepared to comprehend it.
NOUNS are of two kinds, common and proper.
A Common noun is the name of a sort or species of things; as, man, tree, river.
A Proper noun is the name of an individual; as, Charles, Ithaca, Ganges.
A noun signifying many, is called a collective noun, or noun of multitude; as, the people, the army.
The distinction between a common and a proper noun, is very obvious. For example: boy is a common noun, because it is a name applied to all boys; but Charles is a proper noun, because it is the name of an individual boy. Although many boys may have the same name, yet you know it is not a common noun, for the name Charles is not given to all boys. Mississippi is a proper noun, because it is the name of an individual river; but river is a common noun, because it is the name of a species of things, and the name river is common to all rivers.
Nouns which denote the genus, species, or variety of beings or things, are always common; as, tree, the genus; oak, ash, chestnut, poplar, different species; and red oak, white oak, black oak, varieties. The word earth, when it signifies a kind or quantity of dirt, is a common noun; but when it denotes the planet we inhabit, it is a proper noun. The words person, place, river, mountain, lake, &c. are common nouns, because they are the names of whole species, or classes of things containing many sorts; but the names of persons, places, rivers, mountains, lakes, &c. are proper nouns, because they denote individuals; as, Augustus, Baltimore, Alps, Huron.
Physician, lawyer, merchant, and shoemaker, are common nouns, because these names are common to classes of men. God and Lord, when applied to Jehovah or Jesus Christ, are proper; but when employed to denote heathen or false gods, or temporal lords, they are common. The Notes and remarks throughout the work, though of minor importance, demand your attentive and careful perusal.
NOTES.
1. When proper
nouns have an article annexed to them, they are
used after the manner of common
nouns; as, “Bolivar is styled
the Washington of South
America.”
2. Common nouns are sometimes used to signify individuals, when articles or pronouns are prefixed to them; as, “The boy is studious; That girl is discreet.” In such instances, they are nearly equivalent to proper nouns.
3. Common nouns are sometimes subdivided into the following classes: Nouns of Multitude; as, The people, the parliament: Verbal or participial nouns; as, The beginning, reading, writing; and Abstract nouns, or the names of qualities abstracted from their substances; as, knowledge, virtue, goodness. Lest the student be led to blend the idea of abstract nouns with that of adjectives, both of which denote qualities, a farther illustration appears to be necessary, in order to mark the distinction between these two parts of speech. An abstract noun denotes a quality considered apart (that is, abstracted) from the substance or being to which it belongs; but an adjective denotes a quality joined (adjected) to the substance or being to which it belongs. Thus, whiteness and white both denote the same quality; but we speak of whiteness as a distinct object of thought, while we use the word white always in reference to the noun to which it belongs; as, white paper, white mouse.
4. Some authors have proceeded to still more minute divisions and sub-divisions of nouns; such, for example, as the following, which appear to be more complex than useful: Natural nouns, or names of things formed by nature; as, man, beast, water, air: 2. Artificial nouns, or names of things formed by art; as, book, vessel, house: 3. Personal nouns, or those which stand for human beings; as, man, woman, Edwin: 4. Neuter nouns, or those which denote things inanimate; as, book, field, mountain, Cincinnati. The following, however, is quite a rational division: Material nouns are the names of things formed of matter; as, stone, book: Immaterial nouns are the names of things having no substance; as, hope, immortality.
To nouns belong gender, person, number, and case.
GENDER.
GENDER is the distinction of sex. Nouns have three genders, the masculine, the feminine, and the neuter.
The masculine gender denotes males; as, a man, a boy.
The feminine gender denotes females; as, a woman, a girl.
The neuter gender denotes things without sex; as, a hat, a stick.
Neuter means neither: therefore neuter gender signifies neither gender; that is, neither masculine nor feminine. Hence, neuter gender means no gender. Strictly speaking, then, as there are but two sexes, nouns have but two genders; but for the sake of practical convenience, we apply to them three genders, by calling that a gender which is no gender. The English and the pure Persian, appear to be the only languages which observe, in the distinction of sex, the natural division of nouns.—The genders of nouns are so easily known, that a farther explanation of them is unnecessary, except what is given in the following
NOTES.
1. The same noun is sometimes masculine and feminine, and sometimes masculine or feminine. The noun parents is of the masculine and feminine gender. The nouns parent, associate, neighbor, servant, friend, child, bird, fish, &c. if doubtful, are of the masculine or feminine gender.
2. Some nouns naturally neuter, are, when used figuratively, or personified, converted into the masculine or feminine gender. Those nouns are generally rendered masculine, which are conspicuous for the attributes of imparting or communicating, and which are by nature strong and efficacious; as, the sun, time, death, sleep, winter, &c. Those, again, are generally feminine, which are conspicuous for the attributes of containing or bringing forth, or which are very beautiful, mild, or amiable; as, the earth, moon, church, boat, vessel, city, country, nature, ship, soul, fortune, virtue, hope, spring, peace, &c. This principle for designating the sex of a personified object, which is quite rational, is generally adhered to in the English language; but, in some instances, the poet applies the sex according to his fancy.
The masculine and feminine genders are distinguished in three ways:
1. By different words; as,
Masculine. Feminine. Bachelor maid Boar sow Boy girl Brother sister Buck doe Bull cow Cock hen Dog bitch Drake duck Earl countess Father mother Friar nun Gander goose Hart roe Horse mare Husband wife King queen Lad lass Lord lady Man woman Master mistress Milter spawner Nephew niece Ram ewe Singer songstress or singer Sloven slut Son daughter Stag hind Uncle aunt Wizard witch Sir madam
2. By a difference in termination; as, Abbot abbess Actor actress Administrator administratrix Adulterer adulteress Ambassador ambassadress Arbiter arbitress Auditor auditress Author authoress Baron baroness Benefactor benefactress Bridegroom bride Canon canoness Caterer cateress Chanter chantress Conductor conductress Count countess Czar czarina Deacon deaconess Detracter detractress Director directress Duke dutchess ElectorPage 26
electress Embassador embassadress Emperor emperess Enchanter enchantress Executor executrix Fornicator fornicatress God goddess Governor governess Heir heiress Hero heroine Host hostess Hunter huntress Inheritor inheritress or inheritrix Instructor instructress Jew Jewess Lion lioness Marquis marchioness Mayor mayoress Patron patroness Peer peeress Poet poetess Priest priestess Prince princess Prior prioress Prophet prophetess Proprietor proprietress Protector protectress Shepherd shepherdess Songster songstress Sorcerer sorceress Suiter suitress Sultan sultaness or sultana Tiger tigress Testator testatrix Traitor traitress Tutor tutoress Tyrant tyranness Victor victress Viscount viscountess Votary votaress Widower widow
3. By prefixing another word; as,
A cock-sparrow A hen-sparrow A man-servant A maid-servant A he-goat A she-goat A he-bear A she-bear A male-child A female-child Male-descendants Female-descendants
PERSON is a property of the noun and pronoun which varies the verb.
The first person denotes the speaker.
The second person denotes the person or thing spoken to; as, “Listen, earth!"
The third person denotes the person or thing spoken of; as, “The earth thirsts.”
Nouns have but two persons, the second and third. When a man speaks, the pronoun I or we is always used; therefore nouns can never be in the first person. In examples like the following, some philologists suppose the noun to be in the first person:—“This may certify, that I, Jonas Taylor, do hereby give and grant,” &c. But it is evident, that the speaker or writer, in introducing his own name, speaks of himself; consequently the noun is of the third person.
If you wish to understand the persons of nouns, a little sober thought is requisite; and, by exercising it, all difficulties will be removed. If I say, my son, have you seen the young man? you perceive that the noun son is of the second person, because I address myself to him; that is, he is spoken to; but the noun man is of the third person, because he is spoken of. Again, if I say, young man, have you seen my son? man is of the second person, and son is of the third.
“Hast thou left thy blue course in the heavens, golden-haired sun of the sky?”
“Father, may the Great Spirit so brighten the chain of friendship between us, that a child may find it, when the sun is asleep in his wig-wam behind the western waters.”
“Lo, earth receives him from the
bending skies!
Sink down, ye mountains,
and, ye valleys, rise!”
“Eternal Hope, thy glittering
wings explore
Earth’s loneliest bounds,
and ocean’s wildest shore.”
In these examples, the nouns, sun, father, mountains, valleys, and hope, are of the second person, and, as you will hereafter learn, in the nominative case independent. Course, heavens, sky, Spirit, chain, friendship, child, sun, wig-wam, waters, earth, skies, wings, earth, bounds, ocean, and shore, are all of the third person.
NUMBER.
Number is the distinction of objects, as one or more. Nouns are of two numbers, the singular and the plural.
The singular number implies but one; as, a book.
The plural number implies more than one; as, books.
NOTES.
1. Some nouns are used only in the singular form; as, hemp, flax, barley, wheat, pitch, gold, sloth, pride, honesty, meekness, compassion, &c.; others only in the plural form; as, bellows, scissors, ashes, riches, snuffers, tongs, thanks, wages, embers, ides, pains, vespers, &c.
2. Some words are the
same in both numbers; as, deer, sheep, swine;
and, also, hiatus, apparatus,
series, species.
3. The plural number of nouns is generally formed by adding s to the singular; as, dove, doves; face, faces; but sometimes we add es in the plural; as, box, boxes; church, churches; lash, lashes; cargo, cargoes.
4. Nouns ending in f or fe, are rendered plural by a change of that termination into ves; as, half, halves; wife, wives: except grief, relief, reproof, and several others, which form their plurals by the addition of s. Those ending in ff, have the regular plural; as, ruff, ruffs; except staff, staves.
5. Nouns ending in y in the singular, with no other vowel in the same syllable, change it into ies in the plural; as, beauty, beauties; fly, flies. But the y is not changed, where there is another vowel in the syllable; as, key, keys; delay, delays; attorney, attorneys; valley, valleys; chimney, chimneys.
6. Mathematics, metaphysics,
politics, optics, ethics, pneumatics,
hydraulics, &c. are construed
either as singular or plural nouns.
7. The word news is always singular. The nouns means, alms, and amends, though plural in form, may be either singular or plural in signification. Antipodes, credenda, literati, and minutiae are always plural. Bandit is now used as the singular of Banditti.
8. The following nouns form their plurals not according to any general rule; thus, man, men; woman, women; child, children; ox, oxen; tooth, teeth; goose, geese; foot, feet; mouse, mice; louse, lice; brother, brothers or brethren; cow, cows or kine; penny, pence, or pennies when the coin is meant; die, dice for play, dies for coining; pea and fish, pease and fish when the species is meant, but peas and fishes when we refer to the number; as, six peas, ten fishes.
9. The following compounds
form their plurals thus: handful,
handfuls; cupful, cupfuls;
spoonful, spoonfuls:—brother-in-law,
brothers-in-law; court-martial,
courts-martial.
The following words form their
plurals according to the rules of the
languages from which they
are adopted.
Singular Plural. Antithesis antitheses Apex apices Appendix appendixes or appendices Arcanum arcana Automaton automata Axis axes Basis bases Beau beaux or beaus Calx calces or calxes Cherub cherubim or cherubs Crisis crises Criterion criteria Datum data Diaeresis diaereses Desideratum desiderata Effluvium effluvia Ellipsis ellipses Emphasis emphases Encomium encomia or encomiums Erratum errata Genius genii [2] Genus genera Hypothesis hypotheses Ignis fatuus, ignes fatui Index indices or indexes [3] Lamina laminae Magus magi Memorandum memoranda or memorandums Metamorphosis metamorphoses Parenthesis parentheses Phenomenon phenomena Radius radii or radiuses Stamen stamina Seraph seraphim or seraphs Stimulus stimuli Stratum strata Thesis theses Vertex vertices Vortex vortices or vortexes
[2] Genii, imaginary spirits: geniuses, persons of great mental abilities.
[3] Indexes, when pointers or tables of contents are meant: indices, when referring to algebraic quantities.
CASE.
Case, when applied to nouns and pronouns, means the different state, situation, or position they have in relation to other words. Nouns have three cases, the nominative, the possessive, and the objective.
I deem the essential qualities of case, in English, to consist, not in the changes or inflections produced on nouns and pronouns, but in the various offices which they perform in a sentence, by assuming different positions in regard to other words. In accordance with this definition, these cases can be easily explained on reasoning principles, founded in the nature of things.
Now, five grains of common sense will enable any one to comprehend what is meant by case. Its real character is extremely simple; but in the different grammars it assumes as many meanings as Proteus had shapes. The most that has been written on it, however, is mere verbiage. What, then, is meant by case? In speaking of a horse, for instance, we say he is in a good case, when he is fat, and in a bad case, when he is lean, and needs more oats; and in this sense we apply the term case to denote the state or condition of the horse. So, when we place a noun before a verb as actor or subject, we say it is in the nominative case; but when it follows a transitive verb or preposition, we say it has another case; that is, it assumes a new position or situation in the sentence: and this we call the objective case. Thus, the boy gathers fruit. Here the boy is represented as acting. He is, therefore, in the nominative case. But when I say, Jane struck the boy, I do not represent the boy as the actor, but as the object of the action. He is, therefore, in a new case or condition. And when I say, This is the boy’s hat, I do not speak of the boy either as acting or as acted upon; but as possessing something: for which reason he is in the possessive case. Hence, it is clear, that nouns have three cases or positions.
As the nominative and objective cases of the noun are inseparably connected with the verb, it is impossible for you to understand them until you shall have acquired some knowledge of this part of speech. I will, therefore, now give you a partial description of the verb in connexion with the noun; which will enable me to illustrate the cases of the noun so clearly, that you may easily comprehend their nature.
In the formation of language, mankind, in order to hold converse with each other, found it necessary, in the first place, to give names to the various objects by which they were surrounded. Hence the origin of the first part of speech, which we denominate the noun. But merely to name the objects which they beheld or thought of, was not sufficient for their purpose. They perceived that these objects existed, moved, acted, or caused some action to be done. In looking at a man, for instance, they perceived that he lived, walked, ate, smiled, talked, ran, and so on. They perceived that plants grow, flowers bloom, and rivers flow. Hence the necessity of another part of speech, whose office it should be to express these existences and actions. This second class of words we call
VERBS.
A verb is a word which signifies to BE, to DO, or
to SUFFER; as, I am;
I rule; I am ruled.
Verbs are of three kinds, active, passive, and neuter. They are also divided into regular, irregular, and defective.
The term verb is derived from the Latin word verbum, which signifies a word. This part of speech is called a verb or word, because it is deemed the most important word in every sentence: and without a verb and nominative, either expressed or implied, no sentence can exist. The noun is the original and leading part of speech; the verb comes next in order, and is far more complex than the noun. These two are the most useful in the language, and form the basis of the science of grammar. The other eight parts of speech are subordinate to these two, and, as you will hereafter learn, of minor importance.
For all practical purposes, the foregoing definition and division of the verb, though, perhaps, not philosophically correct, will be found as convenient as any other. I adopt them, therefore, to be consistent with the principle, that, in arranging the materials of this treatise, I shall not alter or reject any established definition, rule, or principle of grammar, unless, in my humble judgment, some practical advantage to the learner is thereby gained. The following, some consider a good definition.
A VERB is a word which expresses affirmation.
An active verb expresses action; and
The nominative case is the actor, or subject of the verb; as, John writes.
In this example, which is the verb? You know it is the word writes, because this word signifies to do; that is, it expresses action, therefore, according to the definition, it is an active verb. And you know, too, that the noun John is the actor, therefore John is in the nominative case to the verb writes. In the expressions, The man walks—The boy plays—Thunders roll—– Warriors fight—you perceive that the words walks, plays, roll, and fight, are active verbs; and you cannot be at a loss to know, that the nouns man, boy, thunders, and warriors, are in the nominative case.
As no action can be produced without some agent or moving cause, it follows, that every active verb must have some actor or agent. This actor, doer, or producer of the action, is the nominative. Nominative, from the Latin nomino, literally signifies to name; but in the technical sense in which it is used in grammar, it means the noun or pronoun which is the subject of affirmation. This subject or nominative may be active, passive, or neuter, as hereafter exemplified.
A neuter verb expresses neither action nor passion, but being, or a state of being; as, John sits.
Now, in this example, John is not represented as an actor, but, as the subject of the verb sits, therefore John is in the nominative case to the verb. And you know that the word sits does not express apparent action, but a condition of being; that is, it represents John in a particular state of existence; therefore sits is a neuter verb. In speaking of the neuter gender of nouns, I informed you, that neuter means neither; from which it follows, that neuter gender implies neither gender; that is, neither masculine nor feminine. Hence, by an easy transition of thought, you learn, that neuter, when applied to verbs, means neither of the other two classes; that is, a neuter verb is one which is neither active nor passive. In these examples, The man stands—The lady lives—The child sleeps—The world exists—the words stands, lives, sleeps, and exists, are neuter verbs; and the nouns, man, lady, child, and world, are all in the nominative case, because each is the subject of a verb. Thus you perceive, that when a noun is in the nominative case to an active verb, it is the actor; and when it is nominative to a neuter verb, it is not an actor, but the subject of the verb.
Some neuter verbs express being in general; as, The man is; Kingdoms exist. Others express being in some particular state; as, The man stands, sits, lies, or hangs.
I will now give you two signs, which will enable you to distinguish the verb from other parts of speech, when you cannot tell it by its signification. Any word that will make sense with to before it, is a verb. Thus, to run, to write, to smile, to sing, to hear, to ponder, to live, to breathe, are verbs. Or, any word that will conjugate, is a verb. Thus, I run, thou runnest, he runs; I write, thou writest, he writes; I smile, &c. But the words, boy, lady, child, and world, will not make sense with to prefixed—to boy, to lady, to world, is nonsense. Neither will they con_jugate_—I lady, thou ladiest, &c. is worse than nonsense. Hence you perceive, that these words are not verbs. There are some exceptions to these rules, for verbs are sometimes used as nouns. This will be explained by and by.
To verbs belong number, person, mood, and tense.
At present I shall speak only of the number and person of verbs; but hereafter I will give you a full explanation of all their properties. And permit me to inform you, that I shall not lead you into the intricacies of the science, until, by gradual and easy progressions, you are enabled to comprehend the principles involved in them. Only such principles will be elucidated, as you are prepared to understand at the time they are unfolded before you. You must not be too anxious to get along rapidly; but endeavor to become thoroughly acquainted with one principle, before you undertake another. This lecture will qualify you for the next.
NUMBER AND PERSON OF VERBS. You recollect, that the nominative is the actor or subject, and the active verb is the action performed by the nominative. By this you perceive, that a very intimate connexion or relation exists between the nominative case and the verb. If, therefore, only one creature or thing acts, only one action, at the same instant, can be done; as, The girl writes. The nominative girl is here of the singular number, because it signifies but one person; and the verb writes denotes but one action, which the girl performs; therefore the verb writes is of the singular number, agreeing with its nominative girl. When the nominative case is plural, the verb must be plural; as, girls write. Take notice, the singular verb ends in s, but the noun is generally plural when it ends in s; thus, The girl writes—the girls write.
Person, strictly speaking, is a quality that belongs not to verbs, but to nouns and pronouns. We say, however, that the verb must agree with its nominative in person, as well as in number; that is, the verb must be spelled and spoken in such a manner as to correspond with the first, second, or third person of the noun or pronoun which is its nominative.
I will now show you how the verb is varied in order to agree with its nominative in number and person. I, Thou, He, She, It; We, Ye or You, They, are personal pronouns. I is of the first person, and singular number; Thou is second person, sing.; He, She, or It, is third per. sing.; We is first per. plural; Ye or You is second per. plural; They is third per. plural. These pronouns are the representatives of nouns, and perform the same office that the nouns would for which they stand. When placed before the verb, they are, therefore, the nominatives to the verb.
Notice particularly, the different variations or endings of the verb, as it is thus conjugated in the INDICATIVE MOOD, PRESENT TENSE.
Singular. Plural.
1. Per. I walk, 1.
Per. We Walk, 2. Per. Thou
walk_est_, 2. Per. Ye or
you walk, 3. Per. He walk_s_, or
3. Per. They walk, or
the
boy walk_s_, the boys walk.
or
walk_eth_.
This display of the verb shows you, that whenever it ends in est, it is of the second person singular; but when the verb ends in s, or eth, it is of the third person singular. Walkest, ridest, standest, are of the second person singular; and walks or walketh, rides or rideth, stands or standeth, are of the third person singular.
I have told you, that when the nominative is singular number, the verb must be; when the nominative is plural, the verb must be; and when the nominative is first, second, or third person, the verb must be of the same person. If you look again at the foregoing conjugation of walk, you will notice that the verb varies if its endings in the singular, in order to agree in form with the first, second, and third person of its nominative; but in the plural it does not vary its endings from the first person singular. The verb, however, agrees in sense with its nominative in the plural, as well as in the singular. Exercise a little mind, and you will perceive that agreement and government in language do not consist merely in the form of words. Now, is it not clear, that when I say, I walk, the verb walk is singular, because it expresses but one action? And when I say, Two men walk, is it not equally apparent, that walk is plural, because it expresses two actions? In the sentence, Ten men walk, the verb walk denotes ten actions, for there are ten actors. Common sense teaches you, that there must be as many actions as there are actors; and that the verb, when it has no form or ending to show it, is as strictly plural, as when it has.—So, in the phrase, We walk, the verb walk is first person, because it expresses the actions performed by the speakers: Ye or you walk, the verb is second person, denoting the actions of the persons spoken to; third person, They walk. The verb, then, when correctly written, always agrees, in sense, with its nominative in number and person.
At present you are learning two parts of speech, neither of which can be understood without a knowledge of the other. It therefore becomes necessary to explain them both, in the same lecture. You have been already informed, that nouns have three cases; the nominative, the possessive, and the objective.
POSSESSIVE CASE. The possessive case denotes the possessor of something; as, This is John’s horse. This expression implies, that John is the owner or possessor of the horse; and, that horse is the property which he possesses.
When I say, These are the men’s, and those, the boys’ hats, the two words, “boys’ hats,” plainly convey the idea, if they have any meaning at all, that the boys own or possess the hats. “Samuel Badger sells boys’ hats.” Who owns the hats? Mr. Badger. How is that fact ascertained? Not by the words, “boys’ hats,” which, taken by themselves, imply, not that they are Mr. Badger’s hats, nor that they are for boys, but that they are hats of, or belonging to, or possessed by boys. But we infer from the words connected with the phrase, “boys’ hats,” that the boys are not yet, as the phrase literally denotes, in the actual possession of the hats. The possession is anticipated.
In the phrases, fine hats, coarse hats, high-crowned hats, broad-brimmed hats, woollen, new, ten, some, these, many hats, the words in italics, are adjectives, because they restrict, qualify, or define the term hats; but the term boys’ does not describe or limit the meaning of hats. Boys’, therefore, is not, as some suppose, an adjective.
“The slave’s master.” Does the slave possess the master? Yes. The slave has a master. If he has him, then, he possesses him;—he sustains that relation to him which we call possession.
A noun in the possessive case, is always known by its having an apostrophe, and generally an s after it; thus, John’s, hat; the boy’s coat. When a plural noun in the possessive case, ends in s, the apostrophe is added, but no additional s; as, “Boys’ hats; Eagles’ wings.” When a singular noun ends in ss, the apostrophe only is added; as, “For goodness’ sake; for righteousness’ sake;” except the word witness; as, “The witness’s testimony.” When a noun in the possessive case ends in ence, the s is omitted, but the apostrophe is retained; as, “For conscience’ sake.”
Now please to turn back, and read over this and the preceding lecture three times, and endeavor, not only to understand, but, also, to remember, what you read. In reading, proceed thus: read one sentence over slowly, and then look off the book, and repeat it two or three times over in your mind. After that, take another sentence and proceed in the same manner, and so on through the whole lecture. Do not presume to think, that these directions are of no real consequence to you; for, unless you follow them strictly, you need not expect to make rapid progress. On the other hand, if you proceed according to my instructions, you will be sure to acquire a practical knowledge of grammar in a short time.—When you shall have complied with this requisition, you may commit the following order of parsing a noun, and the order of parsing a verb; and then you will be prepared to parse or analyze the following examples.
ANALYSIS, OR PARSING.
Do you recollect the meaning of the word analysis? If you do not, I will explain if: and first, I wish you to remember, that analysis is the reverse of synthesis. Synthesis is the act of combining simples so as to form a whole or compound. Thus, in putting together letters so as to form syllables, syllables so as to form words, words so as to form sentences, and sentences so as to form a discourse, the process is called synthetic. Analysis, on the contrary, is the act of decomposition; that is, the act of separating any thing compounded into its simple parts, and thereby exhibiting its elementary principles. Etymology treats of the analysis
SYSTEMATIC ORDER OF PARSING.
The order of parsing a NOUN, is—a noun, and why?—common, proper, or collective, and why?—gender, and why?—person, and why?—number, and why?—case, and why?—RULE:—decline it.
The order of parsing a VERB, is—a verb, and why?—active, passive, or neuter, and why?—if active—transitive or intransitive, and why?—if passive—how is it formed?—regular, irregular, or defective, and why?—mood, and why?—tense, and why?—person and number, and why?—with what does it agree?—RULE:—conjugate it.
I will now parse two nouns according to the order, and, in so doing, by applying the definitions and rules, I shall answer all those questions given in the order. If you have perfectly committed the order of parsing a noun and verb, you may proceed with me; but, recollect, you cannot parse a verb in full, until you shall have had a more complete explanation of it.
John’s hand trembles.
John’s is a noun, [because it is] the name of a person—proper, the name of an individual—masculine gender, it denotes a male—third person, spoken of—singular number, it implies but one—and in the possessive case, it denotes possession—it is governed by the noun “hand,” according to
RULE 12. A noun or pronoun in the possessive case, is governed by the noun it possesses.
Declined—Sing. nom. John, poss. John’s, obj. John. Plural—nom. Johns, poss. Johns’, obj. Johns.
Hand is a noun, the name of a thing—common, the name of a sort or species of things—neuter gender, it denotes a thing without sex—third person, spoken of—sing. number, it implies but one—and in the nominative case, it is the actor and subject of the verb “trembles,” and governs it agreeably to
RULE 3. The nominative case governs the verb:—that is, the nominative determines the number and person of the verb.
Declined—Sing. nom. hand, poss. hand’s, obj. hand. Plur. nom. hands, poss. hands’, obj. hands.
Trembles is a verb, a word which signifies to do—active, it expresses action—third person, singular number, because the nominative “hand” is with which it agrees, according to
RULE 4. The verb must agree with its nominative in number and person.
You must not say that the verb is of the third person because it is spoken of. The verb is never spoken of; but it is of the third person, and singular or plural number, because its nominative is.
Conjugated—First pers. sing. I tremble, 2 pers. thou tremblest, 3 pers. he trembles, or, the hand trembles. Plural, 1 pers. we tremble, 2 pers. ye or you tremble, 3 pers. they or the hands tremble.
Government, in language, consists in the power which one word has over another, in causing that other word to be in some particular case, number, person, mood, or tense.
ILLUSTRATION.
RULE 3. The nominative case governs the verb.
If you employ the pronoun I, which is of the first person, singular number, as the nominative to a verb, the verb must be of the first pers. sing, thus, I smile; and when your nominative is second pers. sing, your verb must be; as, thou smil_est_. Why, in the latter instance, does the ending of the verb change to est? Because the nominative changes. And if your nominative is third person, the verb will vary again; thus, he smiles, the man smiles. How clear it is, then, that the nominative governs the verb; that is, the nominative has power to change the form and meaning of the verb, in respect to num. and person. Government, thus far, is evinced in the form of the words, as well as in the sense.
RULE 4. The verb must agree with its nominative in number and person.
It is improper to say, thou hear, the men hears. Why improper? Because hear is first pers. and the nominative thou is second pers. Hears is singular, and the nom. men is plural. Rule 4th says, The verb must agree with its nominative. The expressions should, therefore, be, thou hear_est_, the men hear; and then the verb would agree with its nominatives. But why must the verb agree with its nominative? Why must we say, thou talk_est_, the man talks, men talk? Because the genius of our language, and the common consent of those who speak it, require such a construction: and this requisition amounts to a law or rule. This rule, then, is founded in the nature of things, and sanctioned by good usage.
RULE 12. A noun or pronoun in the possessive case, is governed by the noun which it possesses.
It is correct to say, The man eats, he eats; but we cannot say, the man dog eats, he dog eats. Why not? Because the man is here represented as the possessor, and dog, the property, or thing possessed; and the genius of our language requires, that when we add to the possessor, the thing which he is represented as possessing, the possessor shall take a particular form to show its case, or relation to the property; thus, The man’s dog eats, his dog eats. You perceive, then, that the added noun, denoting the thing possessed, has power to change the form of the noun or pronoun denoting the possessor, according to RULE 12. thus, by adding dog in the preceding examples, man is changed to man’s, and he, to his.
Now parse the sentence which I have parsed, until the manner is quite familiar to you; and then you will be prepared to analyze correctly and systematically, the following exercises. When you parse, you may spread the Compendium before you; and, if you have not already committed the definitions and rules, you may read them on that, as you apply them. This mode of procedure will enable you to learn all the definitions and rules by applying them to practice.
EXERCISES IN PARSING.
Rain descends—Rains descend—Snow falls—Snows fall—Thunder rolls—Thunders roll—Man’s works decay—Men’s labors cease—John’s dog barks—Eliza’s voice trembles—Julia’s sister’s child improves—Peter’s cousin’s horse limps.
In the next place, I will parse a noun and a neuter verb, which verb, you will notice, differs from an active only in one respect.
"Birds repose on the branches of trees.”
Birds is a noun, the name of a thing or creature—common, the name of a genus or class—masculine and feminine gender, it denotes both males and females—third person, spoken of—plural number, it implies more than one—and in the nominative case, it is the subject of the verb “repose,” and governs it according to RULE 3. The nominative case governs the verb. Declined—Sing. nom. bird, poss. bird’s, obj. bird. Plural, nom. birds, poss. birds’, obj. birds.
Repose is a verb, a word that signifies to be—neuter, it expresses neither action nor passion, but a state of being—third person, plural number, because the nominative “birds” is with which it agrees, agreeably to RULE 4. The verb must agree with its nominative in number and person.
Declined—1. pers. sing. I repose, 2. pers. thou reposest, 3. pers. he reposes, or the bird reposes. Plur. 1. pers. we repose, 2. pers. ye or you repose, 3. pers. they repose, or birds repose.
Now parse those nouns and neuter verbs that are distinguished by italics, in the following
EXERCISES IN PARSING.
The book lies on the desk—The cloak hangs on the wall—Man’s days are few—Cathmor’s warriors sleep in death—Caltho reposes in the narrow house—Jocund day stands tiptoe on the misty mountain tops. The sunbeams rest on the grave where her beauty sleeps.
You may parse these and the preceding exercises, and all that follow, five or six times over, if you please.
OBJECTIVE CASE.—ACTIVE-TRANSITIVE VERBS.
The objective case expresses the object of an action or of a relation. It generally follows a transitive verb, a participle, or a preposition.
A noun is in the objective case when it is the object of something. At present I shall explain this case only as the object of an action; but when we shall have advanced as far as to the preposition, I will also illustrate it as the object of a relation.
An active verb is transitive when the action passes over from the subject or nominative to an object; as, Richard strikes John.
Transitive means passing. In this sentence the action of the verb strikes is transitive, because it passes over from the nominative Richard to the object John; and you know that the noun John is in the objective case, because it is the object of the action expressed by the active-transitive verb strikes. This matter is very plain. For example: Gallileo invented the telescope. Now it is evident, that Gallileo did not exert his powers of invention, without some object in view. In order to ascertain that object, put the question, Gallileo invented what? The telescope. Telescope, then, is the real object of the action, denoted by the transitive verb invented; and, therefore, telescope is in the objective case. If I say, The horse kicks the servant—Carpenters build houses—Ossian wrote poems—Columbus discovered America—you readily perceive, that the verbs kick, build, wrote, and discovered, express transitive actions; and you cannot be at a loss to tell which nouns are in the objective case:—they are servant, houses, poems, and America.
The nominative and objective cases of nouns are generally known by the following rule: the nominative does something; the objective has something done to it. The nominative generally comes before the verb; and the objective, after it. When I say, George struck the servant, George is in the nominative, and servant is in the objective case; but, when I say, The servant struck George, servant is in the nominative case, and George is in the objective. Thus you perceive, that Case means the different state or situation of nouns with regard to other words.
It is sometimes very difficult to tell the case of a noun. I shall, therefore, take up this subject again, when I come to give you an explanation of the participle and preposition.
Besides the three cases already explained, nouns are sometimes in the nominative case independent, sometimes in the nominative case absolute, sometimes in apposition in the same case, and sometimes in the nominative or objective case after the neuter to be, or after an active-intransitive or passive verb. These cases are illustrated in Lecture X. and in the 21 and 22 rules of Syntax.
ACTIVE-INTRANSITIVE VERBS.
An active verb is transitive, when the action terminates on an object: but
An active verb is intransitive, when the action does not terminate on an object; as, John walks.
You perceive that the verb walks, in this example, is intransitive, because the action does not pass over to an object; that is, the action is confined to the agent John. The following sign will generally enable you to distinguish a transitive verb from an intransitive. Any verb that will make sense with the words a thing or a person, after it, is transitive. Try these verbs by the sign, love, help, conquer, reach, subdue, overcome. Thus, you can say, I love a person or thing—I can help a person or thing—and so on. Hence you know that these verbs are transitive. But an intransitive verb will not make sense with this sign, which fact will be shown by the following examples: smile, go, come, play, bark, walk, fly. We cannot say, if we mean to speak English, I smile a person or thing—I go a person or thing:—hence you perceive that these verbs are not transitive, but intransitive.
If you reflect upon these examples for a few moments, you will have a clear conception of the nature of transitive and intransitive verbs. Before I close this subject, however, it is necessary farther to remark, that some transitive and intransitive verbs express what is called a mental or moral action; and others, a corporeal or physical action. Verbs expressing the different affections or operations of the mind, denote moral actions; as, Brutus loved his country; James hates vice; We believe the tale:—to repent, to relent, to think, to reflect, to mourn, to muse. Those expressing the actions produced by matter, denote physical actions; as, The dog hears the bell; Virgil wrote the Aenead; Columbus discovered America;—to see, to feel, to taste, to smell, to run, to talk, to fly, to strike. In the sentence, Charles resembles his father, the verb resembles does not appear to express any action at all; yet the construction of the sentence, and the office which the verb performs, are such, that we are obliged to parse it as an active-transitive verb, governing the noun father in the objective case. This you may easily reconcile in your mind, by reflecting, that the verb has a direct reference to its object. The following verbs are of this character: Have, own, retain; as, I have a book.
Active intransitive verbs are frequently made transitive. When I say, The birds fly, the verb fly is intransitive; but when I say, The boy flies the kite, the verb fly is transitive, and governs the noun kite in the objective case. Almost any active intransitive verb, and sometimes even neuter verbs, are used as transitive. The horse walks rapidly; The boy runs swiftly; My friend lives well; The man died of a fever. In all these examples the verbs are intransitive; in the following they are transitive: The man walks his horse; The boy ran a race; My friend lives a holy life; Let me die the death of the righteous.
The foregoing development of the character of verbs, is deemed sufficiently critical for practical purposes; but if we dip a little deeper into the verbal fountain, we shall discover qualities which do not appear on its surface. If we throw aside the veil which art has drawn over the real structure of speech, we shall find, that almost every verb has either a personal or a verbal object, expressed or implied. Verbal objects, which are the effects or productions resulting from the actions, being necessarily implied, are seldom expressed.
The fire burns. If the fire burns, it must burn wood, coal, tallow, or some other combustible substance. The man laughs. Laughs what? Laughs laughter or laugh. They walk; that is, They walk or take walks. Rivers flow (move or roll them-selves or their waters) into the ocean.
“I sing the shady regions of the west.”
“And smile the wrinkles from the brow of age.”
The child wept itself sick; and then, by taking (or sleeping) a short nap, it slept itself quiet and well again. “He will soon sleep his everlasting sleep"; that is, “He will sleep the sleep of death.”
Thinkers think thoughts; Talkers talk or employ words, talk, or speeches; The rain rains rain. “Upon Sodom and Gomorrah the Lord rained fire and brimstone.” “I must go the whole length.” “I shall soon go the way of all the earth.”
Now please to turn back again, and peruse this lecture attentively; after which you may parse, systematically, the following exercises containing nouns in the three cases, and active-transitive verbs.
The printer prints books.
Prints is a verb, a word that signifies to do—active, it expresses action—transitive, the action passes over from the nominative “printer” to the object “books”—third pers. sing. numb. because the nominative printer is with which it agrees.
RULE 4. The verb must agree with its nominative case in number and person.
Declined—1. pers. sing. I print, 2. pers. thou printest, 3. pers. he prints, or the printer prints, and so on.
Books is a noun, the name of a thing—common, the name of a sort of things,—neut. gend. it denotes a thing without sex—third pers. spoken of—plur. num. it implies more than one—and in the objective case, it is the object of the action, expressed by the active-transitive verb “prints,” and is governed by it according to
RULE 20. Active-transitive verbs govern the objective case.
The noun books is thus declined—Sing. nom. book, poss. book’s, obj. book—Plur. nom. books, poss. books’, obj. books.
RULE 20. Transitive verbs govern the objective case; that is, they require the noun or pronoun following them to be in that case; and this requisition is government. Pronouns have a particular form to suit each case; but nouns have not. We cannot say, She struck he; I gave the book to they. Why not? Because the genius of our language requires the pronoun following a transitive verb or preposition (to is a preposition) to assume that form which we call the objective form or case. Accordingly, the construction should be, She struck him; I gave the book to them.—Read, again, the illustration of “government” on page 52.
EXERCISES IN PARSING.
Nom. case.—Trans. verb—Poss.
case—Obj. case.
Julius prints childrens’ primers.
Harriet makes ladies’ bonnets.
The servant beats the man’s horse.
The horse kicks the servant’s master.
The boy struck that man’s child.
The child lost those boys’ ball.
The tempest sunk those merchants’ vessels.
Pope translated Homer’s Illiad.
Cicero procured Milo’s release.
Alexander conquered Darius’ army.
Perry met the enemy’s fleet.
Washington obtained his country’s freedom.
NOTE 1. The words the,
that, those, and his, you need not parse.
2. A noun in the possessive
case, is sometimes governed by a noun
understood; as, Julia’s
lesson is longer than John’s [lesson.]
As you have been analyzing nouns in their three cases, it becomes necessary to present, in the next place, the declension of nouns, for you must decline every noun you parse. Declension means putting a noun through the different cases: and you will notice, that the possessive case varies from the nominative in its termination, or ending, but the objective case ends like the nominative. The nominative and objective cases of nouns, must, therefore, be ascertained by their situation in the sentence, or by considering the office they perform.
DECLENSION OF NOUNS.
SING. PLUR.
Nom. king kings Poss. king’s kings’ Obj. king. kings.
Nom. man men Poss. man’s men’s Obj. man. men.
Now, if you have parsed every word in the preceding examples, (except the, that, those, and his) you may proceed with me and parse the examples in the following exercises, in which are presented nouns and active-intransitive verbs.
“My flock increases yearly.”
Flock is a noun, a name denoting animals—a noun of multitude, it signifies many in one collective body—masculine and feminine gender, denoting both sexes—third person, spoken of—singular number, it denotes but one flock—and in the nominative case, it is the active agent of the verb “increases,” and governs it, according to RULE 3, The nominative case governs the verb. (Decline it.)
Increases is a verb, a word that signifies to do—active, it expresses action—intransitive, the action does not pass over to an object—of the third person, singular number, because its nominative “flock” conveys unity of idea, and it agrees with “flock” agreeably to
RULE 10. A noun of multitude conveying unity of idea, must have a verb or pronoun agreeing with it in the singular.
“The divided multitude hastily disperse.”
Multitude is a noun, a name that denotes persons—a collective noun, or noun of multitude, it signifies many—masculine and feminine gender, it implies both sexes—third person, spoken of—singular number, it represents but one multitude, or collective body; (but in another sense, it is plural, as it conveys plurality of idea, and, also, implies more individuals than one;)—and in the nominative case, it is the actor and subject of the verb “disperse,” which it governs, according to RULE 3. The nom. case governs the verb.—Declined.—Sing. nom. multitude, poss. multitude’s, obj. multitude—Plur. nom. multitudes, poss. multitudes’, obj. multitudes.
Disperse is a verb, a word that signifies to do—active, it expresses action—intransitive, the action does not terminate on an object—third person, plural number, because its nominative “multitude” conveys plurality of idea; and it agrees with “multitude” agreeably to RULE 11. A noun of multitude conveying plurality of idea, must have a verb or pronoun agreeing with it in the plural.
Rules 10, and 11, rest on a sandy foundation. They appear not to be based on the principles of the language; and, therefore, it might, perhaps, be better to reject than to retain them. Their application is quite limited. In many instances, they will not apply to nouns of multitude. The existence of such a thing as “unity or plurality of idea,” as applicable to nouns of this class, is doubtful. It is just as correct to say, “The meeting was divided in its sentiments,” as to say, “The meeting were divided in their sentiments.” Both are equally supported by the genius of the language, and by the power of custom. It is correct to say, either that, “The fleet were dispersed;” “The council were unanimous;” “The council were divided;” or that, “The fleet was dispersed;” “The council was unanimous;” “The council was divided.” But, perhaps for the sake of euphony, in some instances, custom has decided in favor of a singular, and in others, of a plural construction, connected with words of this class. For example; custom gives a preference to the constructions, “My people do not consider;” “The peasantry go barefoot;” “The flock is his object;” instead of, “My people doth not consider;” “The peasantry goes barefoot;” “The flock are his object.” In instances like these, the application of the foregoing rules may be of some use; but the constructions in which they do not apply, are probably more numerous than those in which they do.
EXERCISES IN PARSING.
Nom. case. Intran. verb. Nom. case.
Intran. verb.
Men labor. The sun sets.
Armies march. The moon rises.
Vessels sail. The stars twinkle.
Birds fly. The rain descends.
Clouds move. The river flows.
Multitudes perish. The nation mourns.
Your improvement in grammar depends, not on the number of words which you parse, but on the attention which you give the subject. You may parse the same exercises several times over.
For the gratification of those who prefer it, I here present another
DIVISION OF VERBS.
Verbs are of two kinds, transitive and intransitive.
A verb is transitive when the action affects an object; as, “Earthquakes rock kingdoms; thrones and palaces are shaken down; and potentates, princes, and subjects, are buried in one common grave.”
The nominative to a passive verb, is the object, but not the agent, of the action.
A verb is intransitive when it has no object; as, “The waters came upon me;” “I am he who was, and is, and is to come.”
As an exercise on what you have been studying, I will now put to you a few questions, all of which you ought to be able to answer before you proceed any farther.
QUESTIONS NOT ANSWERED IN PARSING.
With what two general divisions of grammar does the second lecture begin?—Of what does Etymology treat?—Of what does Syntax treat?—On what is based the true principle of classification?—How do you ascertain the part of speech to which a word belongs?—What is meant by its manner of meaning?—Name the ten parts of speech.—Which of these are considered the most important?—By what sign may a noun be distinguished?—How many kinds of nouns are there?—What belong to nouns?—What is gender?—How many genders have nouns?—What is person?—How many persons have nouns?—What is number?—How many numbers have nouns?—What is case?—How many cases have nouns?—Does case consist in the inflections of a noun?—How many kinds of verbs are there?—By what sign may a verb be known?—What belong to verbs?—What is synthesis?—What is analysis?—What is parsing?—Repeat the order of parsing the noun.—Repeat the order of parsing the verb.—What rule do you apply in parsing a noun in the possessive case?—What rule, in parsing a noun in the nominative case?—What rule applies in parsing a verb?—What is meant by government?—Explain rules 3, 4, and 12.—By what rule are the nominative and objective cases of nouns known?—By what sign can you distinguish a transitive from an intransitive verb?—Do transitive verbs ever express a moral action?—Are intransitive and neuter verbs ever used as transitive?—Give some examples of transitive verbs with personal and verbal objects.—What rule do you apply in parsing a noun in the objective case?—Explain rule 20.—In parsing a verb agreeing with a noun of multitude conveying plurality of idea, what rule do you apply?
* * * * *
QUESTIONS ON THE NOTES.
Whether the learner be required to answer the following questions, or not, is, of course, left discretionary with the teacher. The author takes the liberty to suggest the expediency of not, generally, enforcing such a requisition, until the pupil goes through the book a second time.
Name some participial nouns.—What are abstract nouns?—What is the distinction between abstract nouns and adjectives?—What are natural nouns?—Artificial nouns?—What is the distinction between material and immaterial nouns?—Are nouns ever of the masculine and feminine gender?—Give examples.—When are nouns, naturally neuter, converted into the masculine or feminine gender?—Give examples.—Speak some nouns that are always in the singular number.—Some that are always plural.—Speak some that are in the same form in both numbers.—Name all the various ways of forming the plural number of nouns.—Of what number are the nouns news, means, alms, and amends?—Name the plurals to the following compound nouns, handful, cupful, spoonful, brother-in-law, court-martial.
* * * * *
NOTES ON PHILOSOPHICAL GRAMMAR.
Perhaps no subject has, in this age, elicited more patient research, and critical investigation of original, constituent principles, formations, and combinations, than the English language. The legitimate province of philology, however, as I humbly conceive, has, in some instances, been made to yield to that of philosophy, so far as to divert the attention from the combinations of our language which refinement has introduced, to radical elements and associations which no way concern the progress of literature, or the essential use for which language was intended. Were this retrogressive mode of investigating and applying principles, to obtain, among philologists, the ascendency over that which accommodates the use of language to progressive refinement, it is easy to conceive the state of barbarism to which society would, in a short time, be reduced. Moreover, if what some call the philosophy of language, were to supersede, altogether, the province of philology as it applies to the present, progressive and refined state of English literature, the great object contemplated by the learned, in all ages, namely, the approximation of language, in common with every thing else, to that point of perfection at which it is the object of correct philology to arrive, would be frustrated.
The dubious and wildering track struck out by those innovators and visionaries who absurdly endeavor to teach modern English, by rejecting the authority and sanction of custom, and by conducting the learner back to the original combinations, and the detached, disjointed, and barbarous constructions of our progenitors, both prudence and reason,Page 45
as well as a due regard for correct philology, impel me to shun. Those modest writers who, by bringing to their aid a little sophistry, much duplicity, and a wholesale traffic in the swelling phrases, “philosophy, reason, and common sense,” attempt to overthrow the wisdom of former ages, and show that the result of all the labors of those distinguished philologists who had previously occupied the field of grammatical science, is nothing but error and folly, will doubtless meet the neglect and contempt justly merited by such consummate vanity and unblushing pedantry. Fortunately for those who employ our language as their vehicle of mental conference, custom will not yield to the speculative theories of the visionary. If it would, improvement in English literature would soon be at an end, and we should be tamely conducted back to the Vandalic age.
As the use of what is commonly called the philosophy of language, is evidently misapplied by those who make it the test of grammatical certainty, it may not be amiss to offer a few considerations with a view to expose the fallacy of so vague a criterion.
All reasoning and investigation which depend on the philosophy of language for an ultimate result, must be conducted a posteriori. Its office, according to the ordinary mode of treating the subject, is to trace language to its origin, not for the purpose of determining and fixing grammatical associations and dependances, such as the agreement, government, and mutual relations of words, but in order to analyze combinations with a view to develop the first principles of the language, and arrive at the primitive meaning of words. Now, it is presumed, that no one who has paid critical attention to the subject, will contend, that the original import of single words, has any relation to the syntactical dependances and connexions of words in general;—to gain a knowledge of which, is the leading object of the student in grammar. And, furthermore, I challenge those who have indulged in such useless vagaries, to show by what process, with their own systems, they can communicate a practical knowledge of grammar. I venture to predict, that, if they make the attempt, they will find their systems more splendid in theory, than useful in practice.
Again, it cannot rationally be contended, that the radical meaning has any efficiency in controlling the signification which, by the power of association, custom has assigned to many words;—a signification essentially different from the original import. Were this the case, and were the language now to be taught and understood in compliance with the original import of words, it would have to undergo a thorough change; to be analyzed, divided, and sub-divided, almost ad infinitum. Indeed, there is the same propriety in asserting that the Gothic, Danish, and Anglo-Saxon elements in our language, ought to be pronounced separately, to enable us to understandPage 46
our vernacular tongue, that there is in contending, that their primitive meaning has an ascendency over the influence of the principle of association in changing, and the power of custom in determining, the import of words. Many of our words are derived from the Greek, Roman, French, Spanish, Italian, and German languages; and the only use we can make of their originals, is to render them subservient to the force of custom in cases in which general usage has not varied from the primitive signification. Moreover, let the advocates of a mere philosophical investigation of the language, extend their system as far as a radical analysis will warrant them, and, with Horne Tooke, not only consider adverbs, prepositions, conjunctions, and interjections, as abbreviations of nouns and verbs, but, on their own responsibility, apply them, in teaching the language, in compliance with their radical import, and what would such a course avail them against the power of custom, and the influence of association and refinement? Let them show me one grammarian, produced by such a course of instruction, and they will exhibit a “philosophical” miracle. They might as well undertake to teach architecture, by having recourse to its origin, as represented by booths and tents. In addition to this, when we consider the great number of obsolete words, from which many now in use are derived, the original meaning of which cannot be ascertained, and, also, the multitude whose signification has been changed by the principle of association, it is preposterous to think, that a mere philosophical mode of investigating and teaching the language, is the one by which its significancy can be enforced, its correctness determined, its use comprehended, and its improvement extended. Before what commonly passes for a philosophical manner of developing the language can successfully be made the medium through which it can be comprehended, in all its present combinations, relations, and dependances, it must undergo a thorough retrogressive change, in all those combinations, relations, and dependances, even to the last letter of the alphabet. And before we can consent to this radical modification and retrograde ratio of the English language, we must agree to revive the customs, the habits, and the precise language of our progenitors, the Goths and Vandals. Were all the advocates for the introduction of such philosophical grammars into common schools, at once to enter on their pilgrimage, and recede into the native obscurity and barbarity of the ancient Britons, Picts, and Vandals, it is believed, that the cause of learning and refinement would not suffer greatly by their loss, and that the good sense of the present age, would not allow many of our best teachers to be of the party.
The last consideration which I shall give a philosophical manner of investigating and enforcing the English language, is, that by this mode of analyzing and reducing it to practice, it cannot,Page 47
in this age, be comprehended as the medium of thought. Were this method to prevail, our present literal language would become a dead letter. Of what avail is language, if it can not be understood? And how can it be accommodated to the understanding, unless it receive the sanction of common consent? Even if we admit that such a manner of unfolding the principles of our language, is more rational and correct than the ordinary, practical method, I think it is clear that such a mode of investigation and development, does not meet the necessities and convenience of ordinary learners in school. To be consistent, that system which instructs by tracing a few of our words to their origin, must unfold the whole in the same manner. But the student in common schools and academies, cannot afford time to stem the tide of language up to its source, and there dive to the bottom of the fountain for knowledge. Such labor ought not to be required of him. His object is to become, not a philosophical antiquarian, but a practical grammarian. If I comprehend the design (if they have any) of our modern philosophical writers on this subject, it is to make grammarians by inculcating a few general principles, arising out of the genius of the language, and the nature of things, which the learner, by the exercise of his reasoning powers, must reduce to practice. His own judgment, independent of grammar rules, is to be his guide in speaking and writing correctly. Hence, many of them exclude from their systems, all exercises in what is called false Syntax. But these profound philological dictators appear to have overlooked the important consideration, that the great mass of mankind, and especially of boys and girls in common schools, can never become philosophers; and, consequently, can never comprehend and reduce to practice their metaphysical and obscure systems of grammar. I wish to see children treated as reasoning beings. But there should be a medium in all things. It is, therefore, absurd to instruct children as if they were already profound philosophers and logicians.
To demonstrate the utility, and enforce the necessity, of exercising the learner in correcting false Syntax, I need no other argument than the interesting and undeniable fact, that Mr. Murray’s labors, in this department, have effected a complete revolution in the English language, in point of verbal accuracy. Who does not know, that the best writers of this day, are not guilty of one grammatical inaccuracy, where those authors who wrote before Mr. Murray flourished, are guilty of five? And what has produced this important change for the better? Ask the hundreds of thousands who have studied “Mr. Murray’s exercises in FALSE SYNTAX.” If, then, this view of the subject is correct, it follows, that the greater portion of our philosophical grammars, are far more worthy the attention of literary connoisseurs,Page 48
than of the great mass of learners.
Knowing that a strong predilection for philosophical grammars, exists in the minds of some teachers of this science, I have thought proper, for the gratification of such, to intersperse through the pages of this work under the head of “PHILOSOPHICAL NOTES,” an entire system of grammatical principles as deduced from what appears to me to be the most rational and consistent philosophical investigations. They who prefer this theory to that exhibited in the body of the work, are, of course, at liberty to adopt it.
In general, a philosophical theory of grammar will be found to accord with the practical theory embraced in the body of this work. Wherever such agreement exists, the system contained in these NOTES will be deficient, and this deficiency may be supplied by adopting the principles contained in the other parts of the work.
* * * * *
OF THE PHILOSOPHICAL CLASSIFICATION OF WORDS.
According to the method in which philosophical investigations of language have generally been conducted, all our words should be reduced to two classes; for it can be easily shown, that from the noun and verb, all the other parts of speech have sprung. Nay, more. They may even be reduced to one. Verbs do not, in reality, express actions; but they are intrinsically the mere names of actions. The idea of action or being communicated by them, as well as the meaning of words in general, is merely inferential. The principle of reasoning assumed by the celebrated Horne Tooke, if carried to its full extent, would result, it is believed, in proving that we have but one part of speech.
Adnouns or adjectives were originally nouns. Sweet, red, white, are the names of qualities, as well as sweetness, redness, whiteness. The former differ from the latter only in their manner of signification. To denote that the name of some quality or substance is to be used in connexion with some other name, or, that this quality is to be attributed to some other name, we sometimes affix to it the termination en, ed, or y; which signifies give, add, or join. When we employ the words wood_en_, wooll_en_, wealth_y_, grass_y_, the terminations en and y, by their own intrinsic meaning, give notice that we intend to give, add, or join, the names of some other substances in which are found the properties or qualities of wood, wool, wealth, or grass.
Pronouns are a class of nouns, used instead of others to prevent their disagreeable repetition. Participles are certain forms of the verb. Articles, interjections, adverbs, prepositions, and conjunctions, are contractions of abbreviations of nouns and verbs. An (a, one,Page 49
or one) comes from ananad, to add, to heap. The and that, from the Anglo-Saxon verb thean, to get, assume. Lo is the imperative of look; fy, of fian, to hate; and welcome means, it is well that you are come. In comes from the Gothic noun inna, the interior of the body; and about, from boda, the first outward boundary. Through or thorough is the Teutonic noun thuruh, meaning passage, gate, door. From is the Anglo-Saxon noun frum, beginning, source, author. He came from (beginning) Batavia. If (formerly written gif, give, gin) is the imperative of the Anglo-Saxon verb gifan, to give. I will remain if (give or grant that fact) he will (remain.) But comes from the Saxon verb beon-utan, to be-out. I informed no one but (be-out, leave-out) my brother.
This brief view of the subject, is sufficient to elucidate the manner in which, according to Horne Tooke’s principles, the ten parts of speech are reduced to one. But I am, by no means, disposed to concede, that this is the true principle of classification; nor that it is any more philosophical or rational than one which allows a more practical division and arrangement of words. What has been generally received as “philosophical grammar,” appears to possess no stronger claims to that imposing appellation than our common, practical grammars. Query. Is not Mr. Murray’s octavo grammar more worthy the dignified title of a “Philosophical Grammar,” than Horne Tooke’s “Diversions of Purley,” or William S. Cardell’s treatises on language? What constitutes a philosophical treatise, on this, or on any other subject? Wherein is there a display of philosophy in a speculative, etymological performance, which attempts to develop and explain the elements and primitive meaning of words by tracing them to their origin, superior to the philosophy employed in the development and illustration of the principles by which we are governed in applying those words to their legitimate purpose, namely, that of forming a correct and convenient medium by means of which we can communicate our thoughts? Does philosophy consist in ransacking the mouldy records of antiquity, in order to guess at the ancient construction and signification of single words? or have such investigations, in reality, any thing to do with grammar?
Admitting that all the words of our language include, in their original signification, the import of nouns or names, and yet, it does not follow, that they now possess no other powers, and, in their combinations and connexions in sentences, are employed for no other purpose, than barely to name objects. The fact of the case is, that words are variously combined andPage 50
applied, to answer the distinct and diversified purposes of naming objects, asserting truths, pointing out and limiting objects, attributing qualities to objects, connecting objects, and so on; and on this fact is founded the true philosophical principle of the classification of words. Hence, an arrangement of words into classes according to this principle, followed by a development and illustration of the principles and rules that regulate us in the proper use and application of words in oral and written discourse, appears to approximate as near to a true definition of philosophical grammar, as any I am capable of giving.
Nouns, or the names of the objects of our perceptions, doubtless constituted the original class of words; (if I may be allowed to assume such a hypothesis as an original class of words;) but the ever-active principle of association, soon transformed nouns into verbs, by making them, when employed in a particular manner, expressive of affirmation. This same principle also operated in appropriating names to the purpose of attributing qualities to other names of objects; and in this way was constituted the class of words called adjectives or attributes. By the same principle were formed all the other classes.
In the following exposition of English grammar on scientific principles, I shall divide words into seven classes; Nouns or Names, Verbs, Adjectives, Adnouns, or Attributes, Adverbs, Propositions, Pronouns, and Conjunctions or Connectives.
For an explanation of the noun, refer to the body of the work.
* * * * *
Plausible arguments may be advanced, for rejecting neuter and passive verbs; but they have been found to be so convenient in practice, that the theory which recognises them, has stood the test of ages. If you tell the young learner, that, in the following expressions, The church rests on its foundation; The book lies on the desk; The boys remain (are) idle, the nouns church, book, and boys, are represented as acting, and, therefore, the verbs rests, lies, remain, and are, are active, he will not believe you, because there is no action that is apparent to his senses. And should you proceed further, and, by a labored and metaphysical investigation and development of the laws of motion, attempt to prove to him that “every portion of matter is influenced by different, active principles, tending to produce change,” and, therefore, every thing in universal nature is always acting, it is not at all probable, that you could convince his understanding, in opposition to the dearer testimony of his senses. Of what avail to learners is a theory which theyPage 51
cannot comprehend?
Among the various theorists and speculative writers on philosophical grammar, the ingenious Horne Tooke stands pre-eminent; but, unfortunately, his principal speculations on the verb, have never met the public eye. William S. Cardell has also rendered himself conspicuous in the philological field, by taking a bolder stand than any of his predecessors. His view of the verb is novel, and ingeniously supported. The following is the substance of his theory
OF THE VERB.
A verb is a word which expresses
action; as, Man exists; Trees
grow; Waters_flow_;
Mountains stand; I am.
All verbs are active, and have one object or more than one, expressed or implied. The pillar stands; that is, it keeps itself in an erect or standing posture; it upholds or sustains itself in that position. They are; i.e. they air themselves, or breathe air; they inspirit, vivify, or uphold themselves by inhaling air.
Many verbs whose objects are seldom expressed, always have a persona or verbal one implied. The clouds move; i.e. move themselves along. The troops marched twenty miles a day; i.e. marched themselves. The moon shines:—The moon shines or sheds a shining, sheen, lustre, or brightness. The sparrow flies:—flies or takes a flight. Talkers talk or speak words or talk; Walkers walk walkings or walks; The rain rains rain; Sitters sit or hold sittings or sessions.
To prove that there is no
such thing as a neuter verb, the following
appear to be the strongest
arguments adduced.
1. No portion of matter is ever in a state of perfect quiescence; but the component parts of every thing are at all times “influenced by different, active principles, tending to produce change.” Hence, it follows, that no being or thing can be represented in a neuter or non-acting state.
This argument supposes the essential character of the verb to be identified with the primary laws of action, as unfolded by the principles of physical science. The correctness of this position may be doubted; but if it can be clearly demonstrated, that every particle of matter is always in motion, it does not, by any means, follow, that we cannot speak of things in a state of quiescence. What is false in fact may be correct in grammar. The point contested, is not whether things always act, but whether, when we assert or affirm something respecting them, we always represent them as acting.
2. Verbs were originally used to express the motions or changes of thingsPage 52
which produced obvious actions, and, by an easy transition, were afterward applied, in the same way, to things whose actions were not apparent. This assumption is untenable, and altogether gratuitous.
3. Verbs called neuter are used in the imperative mood; and, as this mood commands some one to do something, any verb which adopts it, must be active. Thus, in the common place phrases, “Be there quickly; Stand out of my way; Sit or lie farther.”
It is admitted that these verbs are here employed in an active sense; but it is certain, that they are not used according to their proper, literal meaning. When I tell a man, literally, to stand, sit, or lie, by moving he would disobey me; but when I say, “Stand out of my way,” I employ the neuter verb stand, instead of the active verb move or go, and in a correspondent sense. My meaning is, Move yourself out of my way; or take your stand somewhere else. This, however, does not prove that stand is properly used. If we choose to overstep the bounds of custom, we can employ any word in the language as an active-transitive verb. Be, sit, and lie, may be explained in the same manner.
4. Neuter verbs are used in connexion with adverbs which express the manner of action. They must, therefore, be considered active verbs. The child sleeps soundly; He sits genteelly; They live contentedly and happily together.
The class of verbs that are never employed as active, is small. By using adverbs in connexion with verbs, we can fairly prove that some verbs are not active. It is incorrect to say, I am happily; They were peacefully; She remains quietly; The fields appear greenly. These verbs in their common acceptation, do not express action; for which reason we say, I am happy; They are peaceful; &c. But in the expressions, The child sleeps soundly; She sits gracefully; They live happily and contentedly; we employ the verbs sleeps, sits, and live, in an active sense. When no action is intended, we say, They live happy and contented.
If, on scientific principles, it can be proved that those verbs generally denominated neuter, originally expressed action, their present, accepted meaning will still oppose the theory, for the generality of mankind do not attach to them the idea of action.
Thus I have endeavored to
present a brief but impartial abstract of
the modern theory of
the verb, leaving it with the reader to
estimate it according to its
value.
To give a satisfactory definition of the verb, or such a one as shall be found scientifically correct and unexceptionable, has hitherto baffled the skill, and transcended the learning, of our philosophical writers. If its essential quality, as is generally supposed, is made to consist in expressing affirmation, it remains still to be defined when a verb expresses affirmation. In English, and in other languages, words appropriated to express affirmation, are often used without any such force; our idea of affirmation, in such instances, being the mere inference of custom.
In the sentence,—“Think, love, and hate, denote moral actions,” the words think, love, and hate, are nouns, because they are mere names of actions. So, when I say, “John, write—is an irregular verb,” the word write is a noun; but when I say, “John, write—your copy,” write is called a verb.
Why is this word considered a noun in one construction, and a verb in the other, when both constructions, until you pass beyond the word write, are exactly alike? If write does not express action in the former sentence, neither does it in the latter, for, in both, it is introduced in the same manner. On scientific principles, write must be considered a noun in the latter sentence, for it does not express action, or make an affirmation; but it merely names the action which I wish John to perform, and affirmation is the inferential meaning.
The verb in the infinitive,
as well as in the imperative mood, is
divested of its affirmative
or verbal force. In both these moods, it
is always presented in its
noun-state.
If, after dinner, I say to a servant, “Wine," he infers, that I wish him to bring me wine; but all this is not said. If I say, Bring some wine, he, in like manner, understands, that I wish him to bring me wine; but all that is expressed, is the name of the action, and of the object of the action. In fact, as much is done by inference, as by actual expression, in every branch of language, for thought is too quick to be wholly transmitted by words.
It is generally conceded, that the termination of our verbs, est, eth, s, ed, and, also, of the other parts of speech, were originally separate words of distinct meaning; and that, although they have been contracted, and, by the refinement of language, have been made to coalesce with the words in connexion with which they are employed, yet, in their present character of terminations, they retain their primitive meaning and force. To denote that a verbal name was employed as a verb, the Saxons affixed to it a verbalizing adjunct; thus, the (to take, hold) was the noun-state of the verb; and when they used it as a verb,Page 54
they added the termination an; thus, the_an_. The termination added, was a sign that affirmation was intended. The same procedure has been adopted, and, in many instances, is still practised, in our language. An, originally affixed to our verbs, in the progress of refinement, was changed to en, and finally dropped. A few centuries ago, the plural number of our verbs was denoted by the termination, en; thus, they weren, they loven; but, as these terminations do not supersede the necessity of expressing the subject of affirmation, as is the case in the Latin and Greek verbs, they have been laid aside, as unnecessary excrescences. For the same reason, we might, without any disparagement to the language, dispense with the terminations of our verbs in the singular.
In support of the position, that these terminations were once separate words, we can trace many of them to their origin. To denote the feminine gender of some nouns, we affix ess; as, heir_ess_, instructr_ess. Ess_ is a contraction of the Hebrew noun essa, a female. Of our verbs, the termination est is a contraction of doest, eth, of doeth, s of does. We say, thou dost or doest love; or thou lovest; i.e. love-dost, or love-doest. Some believe these terminations to be contractions of havest, haveth, has. We affix ed, a contraction of dede, to the present tense of verbs to denote that the action named is dede, did, doed, or done.
To and do from the Gothic noun taui, signifying act or effect, are, according to Horne Tooke, nearly alike in meaning and force; and when the custom of affixing some more ancient verbalizing adjunct, began to be dropped, its place and meaning were generally supplied by prefixing one of these. When I say, “I am going to walk," the verbal or affirmative force is conveyed by the use of to, meaning the same as do; and walk is employed merely as a verbal name; that is, I assert that I shall do the act which I name by the word walk, or the act of walking.
Perhaps such speculations as these will prove to be more curious than profitable. If it be made clearly to appear, that, on scientific principles, whenever the verbal name is unaccompanied by a verbalizing adjunct, it is in the noun-state, and does not express affirmation, still this theory would be very inconvenient in practice.
I shall resume this subject in Lecture XI.
* * * * *
QUESTIONS ON THE PHILOSOPHICAL NOTES.
What has usually been the object of philosophical investigations of language? (page 32.)—Do the syntactical dependances and connexions of words depend on their original import?—Is the power of association and custom efficient in changing the radical meaning of some words?—Have words intrinsically a signification of their own; or is their meaning inferential; i.e. such as custom has assigned to them? (page 38.)—On what fact is based the true, philosophical principle of classification?—Define philosophical grammar.—Which is supposed to be the original part of speech?—How were the others formed from that?—How many parts of speech may be recognised in a scientific development and arrangement of the principles of our language?—Name them.—What testimony have we that many things do not act? (page 43.)—Repeat some of the arguments in favor of, and against, the principle which regards all verbs as active.—In what moods are verbs used in their noun-state? (page 48.)—Give examples.—What is said of the terminations est, eth, s, and en, and of the words to and do?
REMARKS ON VERBS AND NOUNS.
You have already been informed, that verbs are the most important part of speech in our language; and to convince you of their importance, I now tell you, that you cannot express a thought, or communicate an idea, without making use of a verb, either expressed or implied. Verbs express, not only the state or manner of being, but, likewise, all the different actions and movements of all creatures and things, whether animate or inanimate. As yet I have given you only a partial description of this sort of words; but when you are better prepared to comprehend the subject, I will explain all their properties, and show you the proper manner of using them.
A word that is generally a noun, sometimes becomes a verb; and a verb is frequently used as a noun. These changes depend on the sense which the word conveys; or, rather, on the office it performs in the sentence; that is the manner in which it is applied to things. For instance, glory is generally a noun; as “The glory of God’s throne.” But if I say, I glory in religion; or, He glories in wickedness, the word glory becomes a verb. The love of man is inconstant. In this sentence, love is a noun; in the next, it is a verb: They love virtue. He walks swiftly; Scavengers sweep the streets; The ship sails well. In these phrases, the words walks, sweep, and sails, are verbs; in the following they are nouns: Those are pleasant walks; He takes a broad sweep; The ship lowered her sails.
Thus you see, it is impossible for you to become a grammarian without exercising your judgment. If you have sufficient resolution to do this, you will, in a short time, perfectly understand the nature and office of the different parts of speech, their various properties and relations, and the rules of syntax that apply to them; and, in a few weeks, be able to speak and write accurately. But you must not take things for granted, without examining their propriety and correctness. No. You are not a mere automaton, or boy-machine; but a rational being. You ought, therefore, to think methodically, to reason soundly, and to investigate every principle critically. Don’t be afraid to think for yourself. You know not the high destiny that awaits you. You know not the height to which you may soar in the scale of intellectual existence. Go on, then, boldly, and with unyielding perseverance; and if you do not gain admittance into the temple of fame, strive, at all hazards, to drink of the fountain which gurgles from its base.
EXERCISES IN FALSE SYNTAX.
NOTE 1, TO RULE 12. A noun in the possessive case, should always be distinguished by the apostrophe, or mark of elision; as, The nation’s glory.
That girls book is cleaner than those boys books.
Not correct, because the nouns girls and boys are both in the possessive case, and, therefore, require the apostrophe, by which they should be distinguished; thus, “girl’s, boys’" according to the preceding NOTE. [Repeat the note.]
Thy ancestors virtue is not thine.
If the writer of this sentence meant one ancestor, he should have inserted the apostrophe after r, thus, “ancestor’s"; if more than one, after s, thus, "ancestors’ virtue;” but, by neglecting to place the apostrophe, he has left his meaning ambiguous, and we cannot ascertain it. This, and a thousand other mistakes you will often meet with, demonstrate the truth of my declaration, namely, that “without the knowledge and application of grammar rules, you will often speak and write in such a manner as not to be understood." You may now turn back and re-examine the “illustration” of Rules 3, 4, and 12, on page 52, and then correct the following examples about five times over.
A mothers tenderness and a fathers care, are natures gift’s for mans advantage. Wisdoms precept’s form the good mans interest and happiness. They suffer for conscience’s sake. He is reading Cowpers poems. James bought Johnsons Dictionary.
RULE 4. A verb must agree with its nominative in number and person.
Those boys improves rapidly. The men labors in the field. Nothing delight some persons. Thou shuns the light. He dare not do it. They reads well.
I know you can correct these sentences without a rule, for they all have a harsh sound, which offends the ear. I wish you, however, to adopt the habit of correcting errors by applying rules; for, by-and-by, you will meet with errors in composition which you cannot correct, if you are ignorant of the application of grammar rules.
Now let us clearly understand this 4th Rule. Recollect, it applies to the verb and not to the noun; therefore, in these examples the verb is ungrammatical. The noun boys, in the first sentence, is of the third person plural, and the verb improves is of the third person singular; therefore, Rule 4th is violated, because the verb dues not agree with its nominative in number. It should be, “boys improve.” The verb would then be plural, and agree with its nominative according to the Rule. In the fourth sentence, the verb does not agree in person with its nominative. Thou is of the second person, and shuns is of the third. It should be, “thou shunnest,” &c. You may correct the other sentences, and, likewise, the following exercises in
FALSE SYNTAX.
A variety of pleasing objects charm the eye. The number of inhabitants of the United States exceed nine millions. Nothing but vain and foolish pursuits delight some persons.
In vain our flocks and fields increase
our store,
When our abundance make us wish for more.
While ever and anon, there falls
Huge heaps of hoary, moulder’d walls.
OF ARTICLES.
An article is a word prefixed to nouns to limit their signification; as, a man, the woman.
There are only two articles, a or an, and the. A or an is called the indefinite article. The is called the definite article.
The indefinite article limits the noun to one of a kind, but to no particular one; as, a house.
The definite article generally limits the noun to a particular object, or collection of objects; as, the house, the men.
The small claims of the article to a separate rank as a distinct part of speech, ought not to be admitted in a scientific classification of words. A and the, this and that, ten, few, and fourth, and many other words, are used to restrict, vary, or define the signification of the nouns to which they are joined. They might, therefore, with propriety, be ranked under the general head of Restrictives, Indexes, or Defining Adjectives. But, as there is a marked distinction in their particular meaning and application, each class requires a separate explanation. Hence, no practical advantage would be gained, by rejecting their established classification, as articles, numerals, and demonstratives, and by giving them new names. The character and application of a and the can be learned as soon when they are styled articles, as when they are denominated specifying or defining adjectives.
The history of this part of speech is very brief. As there are but two articles, a or an and the, you will know them wherever they occur.
A noun used without an article, or any other restrictive, is taken in its general sense; as, "Fruit is abundant;” “Gold is heavy;” “Man is born to trouble” Here we mean, fruit and gold in general; and all men, or mankind.
When we wish to limit the meaning of the noun to one object, but to no particular one, we employ a or an. If I say, “Give me a pen;” “Bring me an apple;” you are at liberty to fetch any pen or any apple you please. A or an, then, is indefinite, because it leaves the meaning of the noun to which it is applied, as far as regards the person spoken to, vague, or indeterminate; that is, not definite. But when reference is made to a particular object, we employ the, as, “Give me the pen;” “Bring me the apple, or the apple.” When such a requisition is made, you are not at liberty to bring any pen or apple you please, but you must fetch the particular pen or apple to which you know me to refer. The is, therefore, called the definite article.
“A star appears.” Here, the star referred to, may be known as a particular star, definite, and distinguished from all others, in the mind of the speaker; but to the hearer, it is left, among the thousands that bedeck the vault of heaven, undistinguished and indefinite. But when the star has previously been made the subject of discourse, it becomes, in the minds of both speaker and hearer a definite object, and he says, “The star appears;” that is, that particular star about which we were discoursing.
“Solomon built a temple.” Did he build any temple, undetermined which? No; it was a particular temple, pre-eminently distinguished from all others. But how does it become a definite object in the mind of the hearer? Certainly, not by the phrase, “a temple,” which indicates any temple, leaving it altogether undetermined which; but supposing the person addressed was totally unacquainted with the fact asserted, and it becomes to him, in one respect only, a definite and particular temple, by means of the associated words, “Solomon built;” that is, by the use of these words in connexion with the others, the hearer gets the idea of a temple distinguished as the one erected by Solomon. If the speaker were addressing one whom he supposed to be unacquainted with the fact related, he might make the temple referred to a still more definite object in the mind of the hearer by a farther explanation of it; thus, “Solomon built a temple on mount Zion; and that was the temple to which the Jews resorted to worship.”
“The lunatic, the
poet, and the lover,
Are of imagination all compact.”
“The horse is a noble animal;” “The dog is a faithful creature;” “The wind blows;” “The wolves were howling in the woods.” In these examples, we do not refer to any particular lunatics, poets, lovers, horses, dogs, winds, wolves, and woods, but we refer to these particular classes of things, in contradistinction to other objects or classes. The phrase, “Neither the one nor the other,” is an idiom of the language.
REMARKS.—This method of elucidating the articles, which is popular with Blair, Priestley, Lowth, Johnson, Harris, Beattie, Coote, Murray, and many other distinguished philologists, is discarded by some of our modern writers. But, by proving that this theory is exceptionable, they by no means make it appear, that it ought, therefore, to be rejected.
Exceptionable or not, they have not been able to supply its place with one that is more convenient in practice. Neither have they adopted one less exceptionable. The truth is, after all which can be done to render the definitions and rules of grammar comprehensive and accurate, they will still be found, when critically examined by men of learning and science, more or less exceptionable. These exceptions and imperfections are the unavoidable consequence of the imperfections of the language. Language, as well as every thing else of human invention, will always be imperfect. Consequently, a perfect system of grammatical principles, would not suit it. A perfect grammar will not be produced, until some perfect being writes it for a perfect language; and a perfect language will not be constructed, until some super-human agency is employed in its production. All grammatical principles and systems which are not perfect, are exceptionable.
NOTES.
1. The article is omitted before nouns implying the different virtues, vices, passions, qualities, sciences, arts, metals, herbs, &c.; as, “Modesty is becoming; Falsehood is odious; Grammar is useful,” &c.
2. The article is not prefixed to proper nouns; as, Barron killed Decatur; except by way of eminence, or for the sake of distinguishing a particular family, or when some noun is understood; as, “He is not a Franklin; He is a Lee, or of the family of the Lees; We sailed down the (river) Missouri.”
3. An adjective is frequently placed between the article and the noun with which the article agrees; as, “A good boy; an industrious man.” Sometimes the adjective precedes the article; as, “As great a man as Alexander; Such a shame.”
4. In referring to many individuals, when we wish to bring each separately under consideration, the indefinite article is sometimes placed betweenPage 60
the adjective many and a singular noun; as, “Where many a rosebud rears its blushing head;” “Full many a flower is born to blush unseen.”
5. The definite article
the is frequently applied to adverbs
in
the comparative or superlative
degree; as, “The more I examine it,
the better I like it,”
“I like this the least of any.”
You may proceed and parse the following articles, when you shall have committed this
The order of parsing an Article, is—an article, and why?—definite or indefinite, and why?—with what noun does it agree?—RULE.
“He is the son of a king.”
The is an article, a word prefixed to a noun to limit its signification—definite, it limits the noun to a particular object—it belongs to the noun “son,” according to
RULE 2. The definite article the belongs to nouns in the singular or plural number.
A is an article, a word placed before a noun to limit its signification—indefinite, it limits the noun to one of a kind, but to no particular one—it agrees with “king,” agreeably to
RULE 1. The article a or an agrees with nouns in the singular number only.
NOTE. By considering the original meaning of this article, the propriety of Rule 1, will appear. A or an, (formerly written ane,) being equivalent to one, any one, or some one, cannot be prefixed to nouns in the plural number. There is, however, an exception to this rule. A is placed before a plural noun when any of the following adjectives come between the article and the noun: few, great, many, dozen, hundred, thousand, million; as, a few men, a thousand houses, &c.
EXERCISES IN PARSING.
A bird sings. An eagle flies. Mountains stand. The multitude pursue pleasure. The reaper reaps the farmer’s grain. Farmers mow the grass. Farmers’ boys spread the hay. The clerk sells the merchant’s goods. An ostrich outruns an Arab’s horse. Cecrops founded Athens. Gallileo invented the telescope. James Macpherson translated Ossian’s poems. Sir Francis Drake circumnavigated the globe. Doctor Benjamin Franklin invented the lightning-rod. Washington Irving wrote the Sketch-Book.
I will now offer a few remarks on the misapplication of the articles, which, with the exercise of your own discriminating powers, will enable you to use them with propriety. But, before you proceed, please to answer the following
QUESTIONS NOT ANSWERED IN PARSING.
How many articles are there?—In what sense is a noun taken, when it has no article to limit it?—Repeat the order of parsing an article.—What rule applies in parsing the definite article?—What rule in parsing the indefinite?
* * * * *
PHILOSOPHICAL NOTES.
A, AN, THE.
In a scientific arrangement
of grammatical principles, a and the
belong to that class of adjectives
denominated definitives or
restrictives.
A, an, ane, or one,
is the past participle of ananad, to add,
to join. It denotes that
the thing to which it is prefixed, is
added, united, aned, an-d,
oned, (woned,) or made one.
The and that. According to Horne Tooke, the is the imperative, and that, the past participle, of the Anglo-Saxon verb thean, to get, take, assume. The and that had, originally, the same meaning. The difference in their present application, is a modern refinement. Hence, that, as well as the, was formerly used, indifferently, before either a singular or a plural noun.
* * * * *
QUESTIONS ON THE NOTES.
Before what nouns is the article omitted?—Is the article the ever applied to adverbs?—Give examples.—What is the meaning of a or an? —When is a or an placed before a plural noun?—From what are a, the, and that derived?
EXERCISES IN FALSE SYNTAX.
NOTE TO RULE 1. An is used before a vowel or silent h, and a before a consonant or u long, and also before the word one.
It is not only disagreeable to the ear, but, according to this note, improper to say, a apple, a humble suppliant, an hero, an university, because the word apple begins with a vowel, and h is not sounded in the word humble, for which reasons a should be an in the first two examples; but, as the h is sounded in hero, and the u is long in university, a ought to be prefixed to these words: thus, an apple, an humble suppliant: a hero, a university. You may correct the following
A enemy, a inkstand, a hour, an horse, an herald, an heart, an heathen, an union, a umbrella, an useful book, many an one. This is an hard saying. They met with an heavy loss. He would not give an hat for an horse.
NOTE 1, TO RULE 2. The articles are often properly omitted: when used they should be justly applied, according to their distinct character; as, “Gold is corrupting; The sea is green; A lion is bold.” It would be improper to say, The gold is corrupting; Sea is green; Lion is bold.
The grass is good for horses, and the wheat for men. Grass is good for the horses, and wheat for the men. Grass looks well. Wheat is blighted.
In the first of these sentences, we are not speaking of any particular kind of grass or wheat, neither do we wish to limit the meaning to any particular crop or field of grass, or quantity of wheat; but we are speaking of grass and wheat generally, therefore the article the should be omitted. In the second sentence, we do not refer to any definite kind, quality, or number of horses or men; but to horses and men generally; that is, the terms are here used to denote whole species, therefore, the article should be omitted, and the sentence should read thus, “Grass is good for horses, and wheat for men.”
In the third and fourth examples, we wish to limit our meaning to the crops of grass and wheat now on the ground, which, in contradistinction to the crops heretofore raised, are considered as particular objects; therefore we should say, “The grass looks well; The wheat is blighted.”
NOTE 2. When a noun is used in its general sense, the article should be omitted; as, “Poetry is a pleasing art;” “Oranges grow in New Orleans.”
FALSE SYNTAX.
Corn in the garden, grows well; but corn in the field, does not. How does the tobacco sell? The tobacco is dear. How do you like the study of the grammar? The grammar is a pleasing study. A candid temper is proper for the man. World is wide. The man is mortal. And I persecuted this way unto the death. The earth, the air, the fire, and the water, are the four elements of the old philosophers.
* * * * *
OF ADJECTIVES.
An ADJECTIVE is a word added to a noun to express its quality or kind, or to restrict its meaning; as, a good man, a bad man, a free man, an unfortunate man, one man, forty men.
In the phrases, a good apple, a bad apple, a large apple, a small apple, a red apple, a white apple, a green apple, a sweet apple, a sour apple, a bitter apple, a round apple, a hard apple, a soft apple, a mellow apple, a fair apple, a May apple, an early apple, a late apple, a winter apple, a crab apple, a thorn apple, a well-tasted apple, an ill-looking apple, a water-cored apple, you perceive that all those words in italics are adjectives, because each expresses some quality or property of the noun apple, or it shows what kind of an apple it is of which we are speaking.
The distinction between a noun and an adjective is very clear. A noun is the name of a thing; but an adjective denotes simply the quality or property of a thing. This is fine cloth. In this example, the difference between the word denoting the thing, and that denoting the quality of it, is easily perceived. You certainly cannot be at a loss to know, that the word cloth expresses the name, and fine, the quality, of the thing; consequently fine must be an adjective. If I say, He is a wise man, a prudent man, a wicked man, or an ungrateful man, the words in italics are adjectives, because each expresses a quality of the noun man. And, if I say, He is a tall man, a short man, a white man, a black man, or a persecuted man, the words, tall, short, white, black, and persecuted, are also adjectives, because they tell what kind of a man he is of whom I am speaking, or they attribute to him some particular property.
Some adjectives restrict or limit the signification of the nouns to which they are joined, and are, therefore, sometimes called definitives; as, one era, seven ages, the first man, the whole mass, no trouble, those men, that book, all regions.
Other adjectives define or describe nouns, or do both; as, fine silk, blue paper, a heavy shower, pure water, green mountains, bland breezes, gurgling rills, glass window, window glass, beaver hats, chip bonnets, blackberry ridge, Monroe garden, Juniata iron, Cincinnati steam-mill.
Some adjectives are secondary, and qualify other adjectives; as, pale red lining, dark blue silk, deep sea green sash, soft iron blooms, red hot iron plate.
You will frequently find the adjective placed after the noun; as, “Those men are tall; A lion is bold; The weather is calm; The tree is three feet thick.”
Should you ever be at a loss to distinguish an adjective from the other parts of speech, the following sign will enable you to tell it. Any word that will make sense with the word thing added, or with any other noun following it, is an adjective; as, a high thing, a low thing, a hot thing, a cold thing, an unfinished thing, a new-fashioned thing:—or, a pleasant prospect, a long-deserted dwelling, an American soldier, a Greek Testament. Are these words adjectives, distant, yonder, peaceful, long-sided, double-headed? A distant object or thing, yonder hill, &c. They are. They will make sense with a noun after them. Adjectives sometimes become adverbs. This matter will be explained in Lecture VI. In parsing, you may generally know an adjective by its qualifying a noun or pronoun.
Most words ending in ing are present participles. These are frequently used as adjectives; therefore, most participles will make sense with the addition of the word thing, or any other noun, after them; as, a pleasing thing, a moving spectacle, mouldering ruins.
In the Latin language, and many others, adjectives, like nouns, have gender, number, and case; but in the English language, they have neither gender, person, number, nor case. These properties belong to creatures and things, and not to their qualities; therefore gender, person, number, and case, are the properties of nouns, and not of adjectives.
Adjectives are varied only to express the degrees of comparison. They have three degrees of comparison, the Positive, the Comparative, and the Superlative.
The positive degree expresses the quality of an object without any increase or diminution; as, good, wise, great.
The comparative degree increases or lessens the positive in signification; as, better, wiser, greater, less wise.
The superlative degree increases or lessens the positive to the highest or lowest degree; as, best, wisest, greatest, least wise.
COMPARISON OF ADJECTIVES.
More and most form the comparative and superlative degrees by increasing the positive; and less and least, by diminishing it.
Comparison by increasing the positive
Pos. Comp. Sup. great, greater, greatest. wise, wiser, wisest. holy, more holy most holy. frugal, more frugal most frugal.
Comparison by diminishing the positive.
Pos. Comp. Sup. wise, less wise least wise. holy, less holy, least holy. frugal, less frugal, least frugal.
NUMERAL ADJECTIVES.
Words used in counting, are called numeral adjectives of the cardinal kind; as, one, two, three, four, twenty, fifty, &c.
Words used in numbering, are called numeral adjectives of the ordinal kind; as, first, second, third, fourth, twentieth, fiftieth, &c.
NOTE. The words many,
few, and several, as they always refer to
an indefinite number, may
be properly called numeral adjectives of
the indefinite kind.
NOTES.
1. The simple word, or Positive, becomes the Comparative by adding r, or er; and the Positive becomes the Superlative, by adding st, or est, to the end of it; as, Pos. wise, Com. wise_r_, Sup. wise_st_; rich, rich_er_, rich_est_; bold, bold_er_, bold_est_. The adverbs, more and most, less and least, when placed before the adjective,Page 65
have the same effect; as, Pos. wise, Com. more wise, Sup. most wise; Pos. wise, Com. less wise, Sup. least wise.
2. Monosyllables are generally compared by adding er and est; dissyllables, trisyllables, &c. by more and most; as, mild, milder, mildest; frugal, more frugal, most frugal; virtuous, more virtuous, most virtuous. Dissyllables ending in y; as, happy, lovely; and in le after a mute; as, able, ample; and dissyllables accented on the last syllable; as, discreet, polite; easily admit of er and est; as, happi_er_, happi_est_; polit_er_, politest_. Words of more than two syllables very seldom admit of these terminations.
3. When the positive ends in d, or t, preceded by a single vowel, the consonant is doubled in forming the comparative and superlative degrees; as red, redder, reddest; hot, hotter, hottest.
4. In some words the
superlative is formed by adding most to the
end of them; as, nethermost,
uttermost or utmost, undermost,
uppermost, foremost.
5. In English, as in most languages, there are some words of very common use, (in which the caprice of custom is apt to get the better of analogy,) that are irregular in forming the degrees of comparison; as, “Good, better, best; bad, worse, worst; little, less, least; much or many, more, most; near, nearer, nearest or next; late, later, latest or last; old, older or elder, oldest or eldest;” and a few others.
6. The following adjectives, and many others, are always in the superlative degree, because, by expressing a quality in the highest degree, they carry in themselves a superlative signification: chief, extreme, perfect, right, wrong, honest, just, true, correct, sincere, vast, immense, ceaseless, infinite, endless, unparalleled, universal, supreme, unlimited, omnipotent, all-wise, eternal.
7. Compound adjectives, and adjectives denoting qualities arising from the figure of bodies, do not admit of comparison; such as, well-formed, frost-bitten, round, square, oblong, circular, quadrangular, conical, &c.
8. The termination ish added to adjectives, expresses a slight degree of quality below the comparative; as, black, blackish; salt, saltish. Very, prefixed to the comparative, expresses a degree of quality, but not always a superlative degree.
Read this Lecture carefully, particularly the NOTES; after which you may parse the following adjectives and neuter verb, and, likewise, the examples that follow. If you cannot repeat all the definitions and rules, spread the Compendium when you parse. But before you proceed, please to commit the
SYSTEMATIC ORDER OF PARSING.
The order of parsing an ADJECTIVE, is—an adjective, and why?—compare it—degree of comparison, and why?—to what noun does it belong?—RULE.
That great nation was once powerful; but now it is feeble.
Great is an adjective, a word added to a noun to express its quality—pos. great, com. greater, sup. greatest—it is in the positive degree, it expresses the quality of an object without any increase or diminution, and belongs to the noun “nation,” according to
RULE 18. Adjectives belong to, and qualify, nouns expressed or understood.
Was is a verb, a word that signifies to be—neuter, it expresses neither action nor passion, but being or a state of being—third person singular, because its nominative “nation” is a noun of multitude conveying unity of idea—it agrees with “nation,” agreeably to RULE 10. A noun of multitude conveying unity of idea, may have a verb or pronoun agreeing with it in the singular.
Powerful is an adjective belonging to “nation,” according to Rule 18. Feeble belongs to “it,” according to Note 1, under Rule 18. Is is a neuter verb agreeing with “it,” agreeably to Rule 4.
“Bonaparte entered Russia with 400,000 men.”
Four-hundred-thousand is a numeral adjective of the cardinal kind, it is a word used in counting, and belongs to the noun “men,” according to Note 2, under Rule 18. Numeral adjectives belong to nouns, which nouns must agree in number with their adjectives.
If, in parsing the following examples, you find any words about which you are at a loss, you will please to turn back, and parse all the foregoing examples again. This course will enable you to proceed without any difficulty.
More is an adverb. Of and to are prepositions, governing the nouns that follow them in the objective case.
EXERCISES IN PARSING. A benevolent man helps indigent beggars. Studious scholars learn many long lessons. Wealthy merchants own large ships. The heavy ships bear large burdens; the lighter ships carry less burdens. Just poets use figurative language. Ungrammatical expressions offend a true critic’s ear. Weak critics magnify trifling errors. No composition is perfect. The rabble was tumultuous. The late-washed grass looks green. Shady trees form a delightful arbor. The setting sun makes a beautiful appearance; the variegated rainbow appears more beautiful. Epaminondas was the greatest of the Theban generals; Pelopidas was next to Epaminondas.
The first fleet contained three hundred men; the second contained four thousand. The earth contains one thousand million inhabitants. Many a cheering ray brightens the good man’s pathway.
NOTE. Like, Worth. The adjective like is a contraction of the participle likened, and generally has the preposition unto understood after it. “She is like [unto] her brother.” “They are unlike [to] him.” “The kingdom of heaven is like [likened or made like] unto a householder.”
The noun worth has altogether dropped its associated words. “The cloth is worth ten dollars a yard;” that is, The cloth is of the worth of ten dollars by the yard, or for a, one, or every yard.
Some eminent philologists do not admit the propriety of supplying an ellipsis after like, worth, ere, but, except, and than, but consider them prepositions. See Anomalies, in the latter part of this work.
REMARKS ON ADJECTIVES AND NOUNS.
A critical analysis requires that the adjective when used without its noun, should be parsed as an adjective belonging to its noun understood; as, “The virtuous [persons] and the sincere [persons] are always respected;” “Providence rewards the good [people,] and punishes the bad [people.]”
“The evil [deed or
deeds] that men do, lives after them;
“The good [deed or
deeds] is oft-interred with their bones.”
But sometimes the adjective, by its manner of meaning, becomes a noun, and has another adjective joined to it; as, “the chief good;” “The vast immense [immensity] of space.”
Various nouns placed before other nouns, assume the character of adjectives, according to their manner of meaning; as, “Sea fish, iron mortar, wine vessel, gold watch, corn field, meadow ground, mountain height.”
The principle which recognises custom as the standard of grammatical accuracy, might rest for its support on the usage of only six words, and defy all the subtleties of innovating skeptics to gainsay it. If the genius and analogy of our language were the standard, it would be correct to observe this analogy, and say, “Good, good_er_, good_est_; bad, bad_der_, bad_dest_; little, littl_er_, littl_est_; much, much_er_; much_est_.” “By this mean;” “What are the news.” But such a criterion betrays only the weakness of those who attempt to establish it. Regardless of the dogmas and edicts of the philosophical umpire, the good sense of the people will cause them, in this instance, as well as in a thousand others, to yield to custom, and say, “Good, better, best; bad, worse, worst; little, less, least; much, more, most;” “By this means;” “What is the news?”
With regard to the using of adjectives and other qualifying words, care must be taken, or your language will frequently amount to absurdity or nonsense. Let the following general remark, which is better than a dozen rules, put you on your guard. Whenever you utter a sentence, or put your pen on paper to write, weigh well in your mind the meaning of the words which you are about to employ. See that they convey precisely the ideas which you wish to express by them, and thus you will avoid innumerable errors. In speaking of a man, we may say, with propriety, he is very wicked, or exceedingly lavish, because the terms wicked and lavish are adjectives that admit of comparison; but, if we take the words in their literal acceptation, there is a solecism in calling a man very honest, or exceedingly just, for the words honest and just, literally admit of no comparison. In point of fact, a man is honest or dishonest, just or unjust: there can be no medium or excess in this respect. Very correct, very incorrect, very right, very wrong, are common expressions; but they are not literally proper. What is not correct, must be incorrect; and that which is not incorrect, must be correct: what is not right, must be wrong; and that which is not wrong, must be right. To avoid that circumlocution which must otherwise take place, our best speakers and writers, however, frequently compare adjectives which do not literally admit of comparison: “The most established practice;” “The most uncertain method;” “Irving, as a writer, is far more accurate than Addison;” “The metaphysical investigations of our philosophical grammars, are still more incomprehensible to the learner.” Comparisons like these, should generally be avoided; but sometimes they are so convenient in practice, as to render them admissible. Such expressions can be reconciled with the principles of grammar, only by considering them as figurative.
Comparative members of sentences, should be set in direct opposition to each other; as, “Pope was rich, but Goldsmith was poor.” The following sentences are inaccurate: “Solomon was wiser than Cicero was eloquent.” “The principles of the reformation were deeper in the prince’s mind than to be easily eradicated.” This latter sentence contains no comparison at all; neither does it literally convey any meaning. Again, if the Psalmist had said, “I am the wisest of my teachers,” he would have spoken absurdly, because the phrase would imply, that he was one of his teachers. But in saying, “I am wiser than my teachers,” he does not consider himself one of them, but places himself in contradistinction to them.
Before you proceed any farther, you may answer the following
QUESTIONS NOT ANSWERED IN PARSING.
What is the distinction between a noun and an adjective?—By what sign may an adjective be known?—Are participles ever used as adjectives?—Does gender, person, number, or case, belong to adjectives?—How are they varied?—Name the three degrees of comparison.—What effect have less and least in comparing adjectives?—Repeat the order of parsing an adjective.—What rule applies in parsing an adjective?—What rule in parsing a verb agreeing with a noun of multitude conveying unity of idea?—What Note should be applied in parsing an adjective which belongs to a pronoun?—What Note in parsing numeral adjectives?
QUESTIONS ON THE NOTES. Repeat all the various ways of forming the degrees of comparison, mentioned in the first five NOTES.—Compare these adjectives; ripe, frugal, mischievous, happy, able, good, little, much or many, near, late, old.—Name some adjectives that are always in the superlative, and never compared.—Are compound adjectives compared?—What is said of the termination ish, and of the adverb very?—When does an adjective become a noun?—What character does a noun assume when placed before another noun?—How can you prove that custom is the standard of grammatical accuracy?
* * * * *
PHILOSOPHICAL NOTES.
ADNOUNS.
Adnoun or Adjective,
comes from the Latin, ad and jicio, to
add to.
Adnouns are a class of words added to nouns to vary their comprehension, or to determine their extension. Those which effect the former object, are called adjectives, or attributes; and those which effect the latter, restrictives. It is not, in all cases, easy to determine to which of these classes an adnoun should be referred. Words which express simply the qualities of nouns, are adjectives; and such as denote their situation or number, are restrictives.
Adjectives were originally nouns or verbs.
Some consider the adjective, in its present application, exactly equivalent to a noun connected to another noun by means of juxtaposition, of a preposition, or of a corresponding flexion. “A golden cup,” say they, “is the same as a gold cup, or a cup of gold.” But this principle appears to be exceptionable. “A cup of gold,” may mean either a cup-full of gold, or a cup made of gold. “An oaken cask,” signifies an oak cask, or a cask of oak; i.e. a cask made of oak; but a beer cask, and a cask of beer, are two different things. A virtuous son; a son of virtue.
The distinguishing characteristic
of the adjective, appears to
consist in its both naming
a quality, and attributing that
quality to some object.
The terminations en, ed, and ig (our modern y,) signifying give, add, join, denote that the names of qualities to which they are postfixed, are to be attributed to other nouns possessing such qualities: wood-en, wood-y. See page 37.
Left is the past participle of the verb leave. Horne Tooke defines right to be that which is ordered or directed. The right hand is that which your parents and custom direct you to use in preference to the other. And when you employ that in preference, the other is the leaved, leav’d, or left hand; i.e. the one leaved or left. “The one shall be taken, and the other (leaved) left.”
Own. Formerly
a man’s own was what he worked for,
own being a
past participle of a verb
signifying to work.
Restrictive. Some restrictives, in modern times, are applied only to singular nouns; such as a or an, another, one, this, that, each, every, either. Others, only to plural nouns; as, these, those, two, three, few, several, all. But most restrictives, like adjectives, are applied to both singular and plural nouns: first, second, last, the, former, latter, any, such, same, some, which, what.
Numerals. All numeration was, doubtless, originally performed by the fingers; for the number of the fingers is still the utmost extent of its signification. Ten is the past participle of tynan, to close, to shut in. The hands tyned, tened, closed, or shut in, signified ten; for there numeration closed. To denote a number greater than ten, we must begin again, ten and one, ten and two, &c.
Twain, twa-in, twa-ain, twa-ane, is a compound of two (twa, twae, twee, twi, two or dwo or duo) and one (ane, ain, an.) It signifies two units joined, united, aned, or oned. Twenty (twa-ane-ten) signifies two tens aned, oned, or united. Things separated into parcels of twenty each, are called scores. Score is the past participle of shear, to separate.
The Ordinals are formed
like abstract nouns in eth. Fifth,
sixth, or tenth
is the number which fiv-eth, six-eth, ten-eth,
or mak-eth up the number
five, six, or ten.
Philosophical writers who limit our acceptation of words to that in which they were originally employed, and suppose that all the complicated, yet often definable, associations which the gradual progress of language and intellect has connected with words, are to be reduced to the standard of our forefathers; appear not to have sufficiently attended to the changesPage 71
which this principle of association actually produces. As language is transmitted from generation to generation, many words become the representatives of ideas with which they were not originally associated; and thus they undergo a change, not only in the mode of their application, but also in their meaning. Words being the signs of things, their meaning must necessarily change as much, at least, as things themselves change; but this variation in their import more frequently depends on accidental circumstances. Among the ideas connected with a word that which was once of primary, becomes only of secondary importance; and sometimes, by degrees, it loses altogether its connexion with the word, giving place to others with which, from some accidental causes, it has been associated.
Two or three instances will illustrate the truth of these remarks. In an ancient English version of the New Testament, we find the following language: “I, Paul, a rascal of Jesus Christ, unto you Gentiles,” &c. But who, in the present acceptation of the word, would dare to call “the great apostle of the Gentiles” a rascal? Rascal formerly meant a servant: one devoted to the interest of another; but now it is nearly synonymous with villain. Villain once had none of the odium which is now associated with the term; but it signified one who, under the feudal system, rented or held lands of another. Thus, Henry the VIII. says to a vassal or tenant, “As you are an accomplished villain, I order that you receive L700 out of the public treasury.” The word villain, then, has given up its original idea, and become the representative of a new one, the word tenant having supplanted it. To prove that the meaning of words changes, a thousand examples could be adduced; but with the intelligent reader, proof is unnecessary.
* * * * *
QUESTIONS ON THE PHILOSOPHICAL NOTES.
How are adnouns divided?—What constitutes the true character of an adjective?—What are the signification and denotement of the terminations, en, ed, and ig?—What do left and own signify?—Name the three ways in which restrictives are applied.—How was numeration originally performed?—What is said of twain, twenty, score, and the ordinal numbers?—What is said of the changes produced in the meaning of words, by the principle of association?
EXERCISES IN FALSE SYNTAX. NOTE 9, under RULE 18. Double Comparatives and Superlatives should be avoided; such as, worser, lesser, more deeper, more wickeder, &c.: chiefest, supremest, perfectest, rightest; or more perfect, most perfect, most supreme, &c.
Virtue confers the most supreme
dignity on man, and it should be his
chiefest desire.
He made the greater light
to rule the day, and the lesser light to
rule the night.
The phrases “most supreme,” and “chiefest,” in the first sentence, are incorrect, because supreme and chief are in the superlative degree without having the superlative form superadded, which addition makes them double superlatives. They should be written, “confers supreme dignity,” and, “his chief desire.”
We can say, one thing is less than another, or smaller than another, because the adjectives less and smaller are in the comparative degree; but the phrase “lesser light,” in the second sentence, is inaccurate. Lesser is a double comparative, which, according to the preceding Note, should be avoided. Lesser is as incorrect as badder, gooder, worser. “The smaller light,” would be less exceptionable. You can correct the following without my assistance. Correct them four times over.
The pleasures of the understanding are more preferable than those of imagination or sense. The tongue is like a race-horse, which runs the faster the lesser weight it carries. The nightingale’s voice is the most sweetest in the grove. The Most Highest hath created us for his glory, He was admitted to the chiefest offices. The first witness gave a strong proof of the fact; the next more stronger still; but the last witness, the most stronger of all. He gave the fullest and the most sincere proof of the truer friendship.
OF PARTICIPLES.
A PARTICIPLE is a word derived from a verb, and partakes of the nature of a verb, and also of an adjective.
Verbs have three participles, the present or imperfect, the perfect, and the compound.
The present or imperfect participle denotes action or being continued, but not perfected. It always ends in ing; as, ruling, being: “I am writing a letter.”
The perfect participle denotes action or being perfected or finished. When derived from a regular verb, it ends in ed, and corresponds with the imperfect tense; as, ruled, smiled: “The letter is written.”
The compound participle implies action or being completed before the time referred to. It is formed by placing having before the perfect participle; as, having ruled, having been ruled: “Having written the letter, he mailed it.”
The term Participle comes from the Latin word participio, which signifies to partake: and this name is given to this part of speech, because it partakes of the nature of the verb and of the adjective.
By many writers, the participle is classed with the verb, and treated as a part of it; but, as it has no nominative, partakes of the nature of an adjective, requires many syntactical rules which apply not to the verb, and, in some other respects, has properties peculiar to itself, it is believed that its character is sufficiently distinct from the verb, to entitle it to the rank of a separate part of speech. It is, in fact, the connecting link between, not only the adjective and the verb, but also the noun and the verb.
All participles are compound in their meaning and office. Like verbs, they express action and being, and denote time; and, like adjectives, they describe the nouns of which they denote the action or being. In the sentences, The boatman is crossing the river; I see a man laboring in the field; Charles is standing; you perceive that the participles crossing and laboring express the actions of the boatman and the man, and standing the state of being of Charles. In these respects, then, they partake of the nature of verbs. You also notice, that they describe the several nouns associated with them, like describing adjectives; and that, in this respect, they participate the properties of adjectives. And, furthermore, you observe they denote actions which are still going on; that is, incomplete or unfinished actions; for which reason we call them imperfect participles.
Perhaps I can illustrate their character more clearly. When the imperfect or present and perfect participles are placed before nouns, they become defining or describing adjectives, and are denominated participial adjectives; as, A loving companion; The rippling stream; Roaring winds; A wilted leaf; An accomplished scholar. Here the words loving, rippling, roaring, wilted, and accomplished, describe or define the nouns with which they are associated. And where the participles are placed after their nouns, they have, also, this descriptive quality. If I say, I see the moon rising; The horse is running a race; The dog is beaten; I describe the several objects, as a rising moon, a running horse, and a beaten dog, as well as when I place these participles before the nouns. The same word is a participle or a participial adjective, according to its manner of meaning. The preceding illustration, however, shows that this distinction is founded on a very slight shade of difference in the meaning of the two. The following examples will enable you to distinguish the one from the other.
Participles. Participial adjectives.
See the sun setting. See the setting
sun.
See the moon rising. See the rising
moon.
The wind is roaring. Hear the roaring
wind.
The twig is broken. The broken
twig fell.
The vessel anchored in the The anchored
vessel spreads
bay, lost her mast. her
sail.
The present or imperfect participle is known by its ending in ing; as, float_ing_, rid_ing_, hear_ing_, see_ing_. These are derived from the verbs, float, ride, hear, and see. But some words ending in ing are not participles; such as evening, morning, hireling, sapling, uninteresting, unbelieving, uncontrolling. When you parse a word ending in ing, you should always consider whether it comes from a verb or not. There is such a verb as interest, hence you know that the word interesting is a participle; but there is no such verb as uninterest, consequently, uninteresting can not be a participle: but it is an adjective; as, an uninteresting story. You will be able very easily to distinguish the participle from the other parts of speech, when you shall have acquired a more extensive knowledge of the verb.
Speak the participles from each of these verbs, learn, walk, shun, smile, sail, conquer, manage, reduce, relate, discover, overrate, disengage. Thus, Pres. learning, Perf. learned, Comp. having learned. Pres. walking, Perf. walked, Compound, having walked, and so on.
You may now commit the order of parsing a participle, and then proceed with me.
SYSTEMATIC ORDER OF PARSING.
The order of parsing a PARTICIPLE, is—a participle, and why?—from what verb is it derived?—speak the three—present, perfect, or compound, and why?—to what does it refer or belong?—RULE.
“I saw a vessel sailing"
Sailing is a participle, a word derived from a verb, and partakes of the nature of a verb, and also of an adjective—it comes from the verb to sail—pres. sailing, perf. sailed, comp. having sailed—it is a present or imperfect participle, because it denotes the continuance of an unfinished action—and refers to the noun “vessel” for its subject, according to
RULE 27. The present participle refers to some noun or pronoun denoting the subject or actor.
“Not a breath disturbs the sleeping billow.”
Sleeping is a participial adjective, a word added to a noun to express its quality—it cannot, with propriety, be compared—– it belongs to the noun “billow,” agreeably to
RULE 18. Adjectives belong to, and qualify, nouns expressed or understood.
You will please to parse these two words several times over, and, by a little reflection, you will perfectly understand the 27th RULE. Recollect, the participle never varies its termination to agree with a noun or pronoun, for, as it has no nominative, it has no agreement; but it simply refers to an actor. Examples: I see a vessel sailing; or, I see three vessels sailing. You perceive that the participle sailing refers to a singular noun in the first example, and to a plural noun in the second; and yet the participle is in the same form in both examples. The noun vessel is in the objective case, and governed by the transitive verb see. But when a verb follows a noun, the ending of the verb generally varies in order to agree with the noun which is its nominative; as, the vessel sails; the vessels sail.
In this place it may not be improper to notice another Rule that relates to the participle. In the sentence, “The man is beating his horse,” the noun horse is in the objective case, because it is the object of the action expressed by the active-transitive participle “beating,” and it is governed by the participle beating, according to
RULE 26. Participles have the same government as the verbs have from which they are derived.
The principle upon which this rule is founded, is quite apparent. As a participle derived from a transitive verb, expresses the same kind of action as its verb, it necessarily follows, that the participle must govern the same case as the verb from which it is derived.
When you shall have studied this lecture attentively, you may proceed and parse the following exercises, containing five parts of speech. If, in analyzing these examples, you find any words which you cannot parse correctly and systematically by referring to your Compend for definitions and rules, you will please to turn back and read over again the whole five lectures. You must exercise a little patience; and, for your encouragement, permit me to remind you, that when you shall have acquired a thorough knowledge of these five parts of speech, only five more will remain for you to learn. Be ambitious to excel. Be thorough in your investigations. Give your reasoning powers free scope. By studying these lectures with attention, you will acquire more grammatical knowledge in three months, than is commonly obtained in two years.
In the following examples, the words purling, crusted, slumbering, and twinkling, are participial adjectives. There and its you may omit.
EXERCISES IN PARSING.
Orlando left the herd grazing. The hunters heard the young dog barking. The old fox heard the sportsman’s horn sounding. Deep rivers float long rafts. Purling streams moisten the earth’s surface. The sun approaching, melts the crusted snow. The slumbering seas calmed the grave old hermit’s mind. Pale Cynthia declining, clips the horizon. Man beholds the twinkling stars adorning night’s blue arch. The stranger saw the desert thistle bending there its lowly head.
REMARKS ON PARTICIPLES.
Participles frequently become nouns; as, “A
good understanding;
Excellent writing; He made a good beginning,
but a bad ending.”
Constructions like the following, have long been sanctioned by the best authorities: “The goods are selling;” “The house is building;” “The work is now publishing.” A modern innovation, however, is likely to supersede this mode of expression: thus, “The goods are being sold;” “The house is being built;” “The work is now being published.”
You may now answer these
QUESTIONS NOT ANSWERED IN PARSING.
How many kinds of participles are there?—What is the ending of a present participle?—What does a perfect participle denote?—With what does the perfect participle of a regular verb correspond?—What is a compound participle?—From what word is the term participle derived?—Why is this part of speech thus named?—Wherein does this part of speech partake of the nature of a verb?—Do all participles participate the properties of adjectives?—In what respect?—When are participles called participial adjectives?—Give examples.—How may a present participle be known?—Repeat the order of parsing a participle.—What rule applies in parsing a present participle?—What Rule in parsing a participial adjective?—Do participles vary in their terminations in order to agree with their subject or actor?—What Rule applies in parsing a noun in the objective case, governed by a participle?—Do participles ever become nouns?—Give examples.
* * * * *
PHILOSOPHICAL NOTES.
Participles are formed by adding to the verb the termination ing, ed, or en. Ing signifies the same as the noun being. When postfixed to the noun-state of the verb, the compound word thus formed, expresses a continued state of the verbal denotement. It implies that what is meant by the verb, is being continued. En is an alteration of an, the Saxon verbalizing adjunct; ed is a contraction of dede; and the terminations d and t, are a contraction of ed. Participles ending in ed or en, usually denote the dodo, dede, doed, did, done, or finished state of what is meant by the verb. The book is printed. It is a print-ed or print-done book, or such a one as the done act of printing has made it. The book is written; i.e. it has received the done or finish-ed act of writ-ing it.
Participles bear the same relation to verbs, that adnouns do to nouns. They might, therefore, be styled verbal adjectives. But that theory which ranks them with adnouns, appears to rest on a sandy foundation. In classifying words, we ought to be guided more by their manner of meaning, and their inferential meaning, than by their primitive, essential signification. “I have a broken plate;” i.e. I have a plate—broken; “I have broken a plate.” If there is no difference in the essential meaning of the word broken, in these two constructions, it cannot be denied, that there is a wide difference in the meaning—inferred by custom; which difference depends on the manner in which the term is applied. The former construction denotes, that I possess a plate which was broken, (whether with or without my agency, is not intimated,) perhaps, one hundred or onePage 77
thousand years ago; whereas, the meaning of the latter is, that I performed the act of reducing the plate from a whole to a broken state; and it is not intimated whether I possess it, or some one else. It appears reasonable, that, in a practical grammar, at least, any word which occurs in constructions differing so widely, may properly be classed with different parts of speech. This illustration likewise establishes the propriety of retaining what we call the perfect tense of the verb.
* * * * *
QUESTIONS ON THE PHILOSOPHICAL NOTES.
How are participles formed?—What does the
imperfect part express?—
What do perfect participles denote?
* * * * *
OF ADVERBS.
An ADVERB is a word used to modify the sense of a verb, a_participle_, an adjective, or another adverb.
Recollect, an adverb never qualifies a noun. It qualifies any of the four parts of speech abovenamed, and none others.
To modify or qualify, you know, means to produce some change. The adverb modifies. If I say, Wirt’s style excels Irving’s, the proposition is affirmative, and the verb excels expresses the affirmation. But when I say, Wirt’s style excels not Irving’s, the assertion is changed to a negative. What is it that thus modifies or changes the meaning of the verb excels? You perceive that it is the little word not. This word has power to reverse the meaning of the sentence. Not, then, is a modifier, qualifier, or negative adverb.
When an adverb is used to modify the sense of a verb or participle, it generally expresses the manner, time, or place, in which the action is performed, or some accidental circumstance respecting it. In the phrases, The man rides gracefully, awkwardly, badly, swiftly, slowly, &c.; or, I saw the man riding swiftly, slowly, leisurely, very fast, &c., you perceive that the words gracefully, awkwardly, very fast, &c., are adverbs, qualifying the verb rides, or the participle riding, because they express the manner in which the action denoted by the verb and participle, is done.
In the phrases, The man rides daily, weekly, seldom, frequently, often, sometimes, never; or, The man rode yesterday, heretofore, long since, long ago, recently, lately, just now or, The man will ride soon, presently, directly, immediately, by and by, to-day, hereafter, you perceive that all these words in italics, are adverbs, qualifying the meaning of the verb, rides, because they express the time of the action denoted by the verb.
Again, if I say, The man lives here, near by, yonder, remote, far off, somewhere, nowhere, everywhere, &c., the words in italics are adverbs of place, because they tell where he lives.
Adverbs likewise qualify adjectives, and sometimes other adverbs; as, more wise, most wise; or more wisely, most wisely. When an adverb is joined to an adjective or adverb, it generally expresses the degree of comparison; for adverbs, like adjectives, have degrees of comparison. Thus, in the phrase, A skilful artist, you know the adjective skilful is in the positive degree; but, by placing the adverb more before the adjective, we increase the degree of quality denoted by the adjective to the comparative; as, A more skilful artist: and most renders it superlative; as, A most skilful artist. And if we place more and most before other adverbs, the effect is the same; as, skilfully, more skilfully, most skilfully.
COMPARISON OF ADVERBS.
Positive Comparative Superlative. soon sooner soonest. often oftener oftenest. much more most. well better best. far farther farthest. wisely more wisely most wisely. justly more justly most justly. justly less justly least justly.
You will generally know an adverb at sight; but sometimes you will find it more difficult to be distinguished, than any other part of speech in the English language. I will, therefore, give you some signs which will assist you a little.
Most words ending in ly are adverbs; such as, politely, gracefully, judiciously. Any word or short phrase that will answer to any one of the questions, how? how much? when? or where? is an adverb; as, The river flows rapidly; He walks very fast; He has gone far away; but he will soon return; She sings sweetly; They learn none at all. How, or in what manner does the river flow? Rapidly. How does he walk? Very fast. Where has he gone? Far away. When will he return? Soon. How does she sing? Sweetly. How much do they learn? None at all. From this illustration, you perceive, that, if you could not tell these adverbs by the sense, you would know them by their answering to the questions. However, your better way will be to distinguish adverbs by considering the office they perform in the sentence; or by noticing their grammatical relation, or their situation, with respect to other words. To gain a thorough knowledge of their real character, is highly important. Rapidly, fast, far away, soon, sweetly, &c. are known to be adverbs by their qualifying the sense of verbs. “A very good pen writes extremely well.” Well, in this sentence, is known to be an adverb by its qualifying the sense of the verb writes; extremely, by its ending in ly, or by its being joined to the adverb well to qualify it; and very is known as an adverb by its joining the adjective good.
Expressions like these, none at all, a great deal, a few days ago, long since, at length, in vain, when they are used to denote the manner or time of the action of verbs or participles, are generally termed adverbial phrases.
Adverbs, though very numerous, may, for the sake of practical convenience, be reduced to particular classes.
1. Of Number; as, Once, twice, thrice, &c.
2. Of Order; as, First, secondly, lastly, finally, &c.
3. Of Place; as, Here, there, where, elsewhere, anywhere, somewhere, nowhere, herein, whither, hither, thither, upward, downward, forward, backward, whence, thence, whithersoever, &c.
4. Of Time. Present; as, Now, to-day, &c. Past; as, Already, before, lately, yesterday, heretofore, hitherto, long since, long ago, &c. Future; as, To-morrow, not yet, hereafter, henceforth, henceforward, by and by, instantly, presently, immediately, ere long, straightways, &c. Time indefinite; as, Oft, often, oft-times, often-times, sometimes, soon, seldom, daily, weekly, monthly, yearly, always, when, then, ever, never, again, &c.
5. Of Quantity; as, Much, little, sufficiently, how much, how great, enough, abundantly, &c.
6. Of Manner or quality; as, Wisely, foolishly, justly, unjustly, quickly, slowly, &c. Adverbs of quality are the most numerous kind; and they are generally formed by adding the termination ly to an adjective or a participle, or by changing le into ly; as, Bad, badly; cheerful, cheerfully; able, ably; admirable, admirably.
7. Of Doubt; as, Haply, perhaps, peradventure, possibly, perchance.
8. Of Affirmation; as, Verily, truly, undoubtedly, doubtless, certainly, yea, yes, surely, indeed, really, &c.
9. Of Negation; as, Nay, no, not, by no means, not at all, in no wise, &c.
10. Of Interrogation; as, How, why, wherefore, whither, &c., and sometimes when, whence, where.
11. Of Comparison; as, More, most, better, best, worse, worst, less, least, very, almost, little, alike, &c.
NOTES.
1. This catalogue contains but a small portion of the adverbs in our language. Many adverbs are formed by a combination of prepositions with the adverbs of place, here, there, where; as, Hereof, thereof, whereof; hereto, thereto, whereto; hereby, thereby, whereby; herewith, therewith, wherewith; herein, therein, wherein; therefore, (i.e. there-for,) wherefore, (i.e. where-for,) hereupon, hereon, thereupon, thereon, whereupon, whereon, &c.
2. Some adverbs are composed of nouns or verbs and the letter a, used instead of at, an, &c.; as, Aside, athirst, afoot, asleep, aboard, ashore, abed, aground, afloat, adrift, aghast, ago, askance, away, asunder, astray, &c.
You will now please to read this lecture four times over, and read slowly and carefully, for unless you understand well the nature and character of this part of speech, you will be frequently at a loss to distinguish it from others in composition. Now do you notice, that, in this sentence which you have just read, the words slowly, carefully, well, and frequently, are adverbs? And do you again observe, that, in the question I have just put to you, the words now and just are adverbs? Exercise a little sober thought. Fifteen minutes spent in reflection, are worth whole days occupied in careless reading.
In the following exercises six parts of speech are presented, namely, Nouns, Verbs, Articles, Adjectives, Participles, and Adverbs; and I believe you are now prepared to parse them all agreeably to the systematic order, four times over. Those words in italics are adverbs.
SYSTEMATIC ORDER OF PARSING.
The order of parsing an ADVERB, is—an adverb, and why?—what sort?—what does it qualify?—RULE.
“My friend has returned again; but his health is not very good.” Again, is an adverb, a word used to modify the sense of a verb—of time indefinite, it expresses a period of time not precisely defined—it qualifies the verb “has returned,” according to
Rule 29. Adverbs qualify verbs, participles, adjectives, and other adverbs.
Not is an adverb, a word used to modify the sense of an adverb—of negation, it makes the assertion negative; that is, it changes the proposition from an affirmative to a negative—and it qualifies the adverb “very,” agreeably to Rule 29. Adverbs qualify verbs, &c.
Very is an adverb, a word used to qualify the sense of an adjective—of comparison, it compares the adjective “good,” and qualifies it according to Rule 29. Adverbs qualify adjectives, &c.
EXERCISES IN PARSING.
The traveller described a lofty castle decaying gradually. Very few literary men ever became distinguished poets. The great Milton excels not Homer. The Roman women, once voluntarily contributed their most precious jewels to save the city.
Many small streams uniting, form very large rivers. The river Funza falling perpendicularly forms a vast cataract. Attentive servants always drive horses very carefully; negligent servants often drive horses very carelessly. Assiduous scholars improve very fast; idle scholars learn none at all. Friendship often ends in love; but love in friendship, never.
NOTE. Several adverbs frequently qualify one verb. Have you walked? Not yet quite far enough, perhaps. Not, yet, far, and enough, qualify “have walked” understood; perhaps qualifies not; and quite qualifies far. The adverbs always and carefully both qualify the verb “drive:” the former expresses time, and the latter, manner. Once and voluntarily qualify the verb “contributed;” the former expresses number, and the latter, manner. The word their you need not parse. The active verb to save has no nominative. The nouns love and friendship, following in, are in the objective case, and governed by that preposition.
REMARKS ON ADVERBS.
When the words therefore, consequently, accordingly, and the like, are used in connexion with other conjunctions, they are adverbs; but when they appear single, they are commonly considered conjunctions.
The words when and where, and all others of the same nature, such as whence, whither, whenever, wherever, till, until, before, otherwise, while, wherefore, &c. may be properly called adverbial conjunctions, because they participate the nature both of adverbs and conjunctions; of adverbs, as they denote the attributes either of time or place; of conjunctions, as they conjoin sentences.
There are many words that are sometimes used as adjectives, and, sometimes as adverbs; as, “More men than women were there; I am more diligent than he.” In the former sentence more is evidently an adjective, for it is joined to a noun to qualify it; in the latter it is an adverb, because it qualifies an adjective. There are others that are sometimes used as nouns, and sometimes as adverbs; as, “to-day’s lesson is longer than yesterday’s.” In this example, to-day and yesterday are nouns in the possessive case; but in phrases like the following, they are generally considered adverbs of time; “He came [to his] home yesterday, and will set out again to-day.” Here they are nouns, if we supply on before them.
“Where much [wealth, talent, or something else] is given, much [increase, improvement] will be required; Much money has been expended; It is much better to write than starve.” In the first two of these examples, much is an adjective, because it qualifies a noun; in the last, an adverb, because it qualifies the adjective better. In short, you must determine to what part of speech a word belongs, by its sense, or by considering the manner in which it is associated with other words.
An adjective may, in general, be distinguished from an adverb by this rule: when a word qualifies a noun or pronoun, it is an adjective, but when it qualifies a verb, participle, adjective, or adverb, it is an adverb.
Prepositions are sometimes erroneously called adverbs, when their nouns are understood. “He rides about;” that is, about the town, country, or some-thing else. “She was near [the act or misfortune of] falling;” “But do not after [that time or event] lay the blame on me.” “He came down [the ascent] from the hill;” “They lifted him up [the ascent] out of the pit.” “The angels above;”—above us—“Above these lower heavens, to us invisible, or dimly seen.”
Before you proceed to correct the following exercises in false Syntax, you may answer these
QUESTIONS NOT ANSWERED IN PARSING.
Does an adverb ever qualify a noun?—What parts of speech does it qualify?—When an adverb qualifies a verb or participle, what does it express?—When an adverb qualifies an adjective or adverb, what does it generally express?—Compare some adverbs.—By what signs may an adverb be known?—Give examples.—Repeat some adverbial phrases.—Name the different classes of adverbs.—Repeat some of each class.—Repeat the order of parsing an adverb.—What rule do you apply in parsing an adverb?
QUESTIONS ON THE NOTES.
Repeat some adverbs that are formed by combining prepositions with adverbs of place.—Repeat some that are composed of the article a and nouns.—What part of speech are the words, therefore, consequently, &c.?—What words are styled adverbial conjunctions?—Why are they so called?—Is the same word sometimes used as an adjective, and sometimes as an adverb?—Give examples.—What is said of much?—By what rule can you distinguish an adjective from an adverb?—Do prepositions ever become adverbs?
* * * * *
PHILOSOPHICAL NOTES.
As the happiness and increasing prosperity of a people essentially depend on their advancement in science and the arts, and as language, in all its sublime purposes and legitimate bearings, is strictly identified with these, it may naturally be supposed, that that nation which continues, through successive generations, steadily to progress in the former, will not be neglectful of the cultivation and refinement of the latter. The truth of this remark is illustrated by those who have, for many ages, employed the English language as their medium for the transmission of thought. Among its refinements may be ranked those procedures by which verbs and nouns have been so modified and contracted as to form what we call adverbs, distributives, conjunctions, and prepositions; for I presume it will be readily conceded, that conciseness, as well as copiousness and perspicuity in language, is the offspring of refinement. That an immense amount of time and breath is saved by the use of adverbs, the following development will clearly demonstrate. He who is successful in contractingPage 83
one mode of expression that is daily used by thirty millions, doubtless does much for their benefit.
Most adverbs express in one word what would otherwise require two or more words; as, “He did it here,” for, He did it in this place; there, for, in that place; where, for, in what place; now, for, at this time. Why means for what reason; how—in what mind, mood, mode, or manner; exceedingly—to a great degree; very—in an eminent degree; often and seldom signify many times, few times.
The procedures by which words have been contracted, modified and combined, to form this class of words, have been various. The most prolific family of this illegitimate race, are those in ly, a contraction of like. Gentleman-ly, means gentleman-like, like a gentleman. We do not yet say, ladily, but lady-like. The north Britons still say, wiselike, manlike, instead of, wisely, manly.
Quick comes from gwick, the past part. of the Anglo-Saxon verb gwiccian, to vivify, give life. Quick-ly or live-ly, means, in a quick-like or life-like manner; in the manner of a creature that has life. Rapid-ly—rapid-like, like a rapid; a quick-ly or swift-ly running place in a stream.
Al-ways, contraction of in all ways. By a slight transition, it means in or at all times. Al-one, contraction of all-one. On-ly—one-like. Al-so—all the same (thing.) Ever—an age. For ever and ever—for ages and ages. Ever is not synonymous with always. Never—ne ever. It signifies no age, no period of time. No, contraction of not. Not, a modification of no-thing, noth-ing, naught. “He is not greater”—is greater in naught—in no thing.
Adrift is the past part. adrifed, adrif’d, adrift; from the Saxon drifan, or adrifan, to drive. Ago, formerly written ygo, gon, agon, gone, agone, is the past part. of the verb to go. It refers to time gone by. Asunder, the Saxon past part. asundren, from the verb sondrian or asondrian, to separate. Aloft—on the loft, on luft, on lyft; lyft being the Anglo-Saxon word for air or clouds. Astray, the part. of straegan, to stray. Awry, part. of wry than, to writhe.
Needs—need-is; anciently, nedes, nede is. To-wit, the infinitive of witan, to know. It means, to be known. Ay or yea signifies have it, enjoy it. Yes is ay-es, have, possess, enjoy that. Our corrupt o-yes of the crier, is the French imperative,Page 84
oyez, hear, listen. Straight way—by a straight way. While—wheel; period in which some thing whiles or wheels itself round. Till—to while. Per, Latin,—the English by. Perhaps—per haps, per chance. These examples of derivation are given with the view to invite the attention of the intelligent pupil to the “Diversions of Purley, by John Horne Tooke.”
* * * * *
QUESTIONS ON THE PHILOSOPHICAL NOTES.
How does the use of adverbs contribute to the conciseness of language?—Illustrate the fact.—What is said of ly, like, and quick?—How are the following words composed, always, alone, only, also?—What is the meaning of ever, never, not, adrift, ago, asunder, aloft, astray, awry?—Give the signification of needs, to-wit, ye, yes, o-yes, straightway, while, till, and per.
NOTE. Learners need not answer the questions on the Philosophical Notes, in this or any other Lecture, unless the teacher deem it expedient.
EXERCISES IN FALSE SYNTAX.
NOTE 3, TO RULE 29, Adjectives are sometimes improperly applied as adverbs; as, indifferent honest; excellent well; miserable poor:—She writes elegant; He is walking slow.
The adjectives indifferent, excellent, and miserable, are here improperly used, because adjectives do not express the degree of adjectives or adverbs, but such modifications are denoted by adverbs. The phrases should, therefore, be, “indifferently honest, excellently well, miserably poor.” Elegant and slow are also inaccurate, for it is not the office of the adjective to express the manner, time, or place of the action of verbs and participles, but it is the office of the adverb. The constructions should be, “She writes elegantly; He is walking slowly.”
You may correct the following examples several times over, and explain the principles that are violated.
FALSE SYNTAX.
He speaks fluent, and reasons coherent.
She reads proper, and writes very neat.
They once lived tolerable well, but now they are miserable poor.
The lowering clouds are moving slow.
He behaved himself submissive, and was exceeding careful not to give offence.
NOTE 4, TO RULE 29. Adverbs are sometimes improperly used instead of adjectives; as, “The tutor addressed him in terms rather warm, but suitably to his offence.”
The adverb suitably is incorrect. It does not express the manner of the action of the verb “addressed,” but it denotes the quality of the noun terms understood; for which reason it should be an adjective, suitable.
FALSE SYNTAX.
The man was slowly wandering about, solitarily and distressed.
He lived in a manner agreeably to his condition.
The study of Syntax should be previously to that of Punctuation.
He introduced himself in a manner very abruptly.
Conformably to their vehemence of thought, was their vehemence of gesture.
I saw him previously to his arrival.
OF PREPOSITIONS.
A PREPOSITION is a word which serves to connect words, and show the relation between them.
The term preposition is derived from the two Latin words, pre, which signifies before, and pono, to place. Prepositions are so called, because they are mostly placed before the nouns and pronouns which they govern in the objective case.
The principal prepositions are presented in the following list, which you may now commit to memory, and thus you will be enabled to distinguish them from other parts of speech whenever you see them in composition.
A LIST OF THE PREPOSITIONS.
of, over, at, after, betwixt, to, under, near, about, beside, for, through, up, against, athwart, by, above, down, unto, towards, with, below, before, across, notwithstanding, in, between, behind, around, out of, into, beneath, off, amidst, instead of, within, from, on upon, throughout, over against, without, beyond, among, underneath, according to.
This list contains many words that are sometimes used as conjunctions, and sometimes as adverbs; but when you shall have become acquainted with the nature of the preposition, and of the conjunction and adverb too, you will find no difficulty in ascertaining to which of these classes any word belongs.
By looking at the definition of a preposition, you will notice, that it performs a double office in a sentence, namely, it connects words, and also shows a relation between them. I will first show you the use and importance of this part of speech as a connective. When corn is ripe—October, it is gathered—the field—men—who go—hill—hill—baskets,—which they put the ears. You perceive, that in this sentence there is a total want of connexion and meaning; but let us fill up each vacancy with a preposition, and the sense will be clear. “When corn is ripe, in October, it is gathered in the field by men, who go from hill to hill with baskets, into which they put the ears.”
From this illustration you are convinced, no doubt, that our language would be very deficient without prepositions to connect the various words of which it is composed. It would, in fact, amount to nothing but nonsense. There is, however, another part of speech that performs this office, namely, the conjunction. This will be explained in Lecture IX.; in which lecture you will learn, that the nature of a preposition, as a connective particle, is nearly allied to that of a conjunction. In the next place I will show you how prepositions express a relation between words.
The boy’s hat is under his arm. In this expression, what relation does the preposition under show? You know that hat and arm are words used as signs of two objects, or ideas; but under is not the sign of a thing you can think of: it is merely the sign of the relation existing between the two objects. Hence you may perceive, that since the word under is the sign of the relation existing between particular ideas, it also expresses a relation existing between the words hat and arm, which words are the representatives of those ideas.
The boy holds his hat in his hand. In this sentence the preposition in shows the relation existing between hat and hand, or the situation, or relative position, each has in regard to the other. And, if I say, The boy’s hat is on his head, you perceive that on shows the relation between hat and head. Again, in the expressions, The boy threw his hat up stairs—under the bed—behind the table—through the window—over the house—across the street—into the water—and so on, you perceive that the several prepositions express the different relations existing between the hat and the other nouns, stairs, bed, table, window, house, street, and water.
A preposition tells where a thing is: thus, “The pear is on the ground, under the tree.”
Prepositions govern the objective case, but they do not express an action done to some object, as an active-transitive verb or participle does. When a noun or pronoun follows a preposition, it is in the objective case, because it is the object of the relation expressed by the preposition, and not the object of an action.
I can now give you a more extensive explanation of the objective case, than that which was given in a former lecture. I have already informed you, that the objective case expresses the object of an action or of a relation; and, also, that there are three parts of speech which govern nouns and pronouns in the objective case, namely, active-transitive verbs, participles derived from transitive verbs, and prepositions. A noun or pronoun in the objective case, cannot be, at the same time, the object of an action and of a relation. It must be either the object of an action or of a relation. And I wish you particularly to remember, that whenever a noun or pronoun is governed by a transitive verb or participle, it is the object of an action; as, The tutor instructs his pupils; or, The tutor is instructing his pupils; but whenever a noun or pronoun is governed by a preposition, it is the object of a relation; as, The tutor gives good instruction to his pupils.
Before you proceed to parse the following examples, please to review this lecture, and then the whole seven in the manner previously recommended, namely, read one or two sentences, and then look off your book and repeat them two or three times over in your mind. This course will enable you to retain the most important ideas advanced. If you wish to proceed with ease and advantage, you must have the subject-matter of the preceding lectures stored in your mind. Do not consider it an unpleasant task to comply with my requisitions, for when you shall have learned thus far, you will understand seven parts of speech; and only three more will remain to be learned.
If you have complied with the foregoing request, you may commit the following order, and then proceed in parsing.
SYSTEMATIC ORDER OF PARSING.
The order of parsing a PREPOSITION, is—a preposition, and why?—what does it connect?—what relation does it show?
“He saw an antelope in the wilderness."
In is a preposition, a word which serves to connect words, and show the relation between them—it connects the words “antelope” and “wilderness”—and shows the relation between them.
Wilderness is a noun, the name of a place—com. the name of a sort or species—neut. gend. it denotes a thing without sex—third pers. spoken of—sing. num. it implies but one—and in the objective case, it is the object of a relation expressed by the preposition “in,” and governed by it, according to
RULE 31. Prepositions govern the objective case.
The genius of our language will not allow us to say, Stand before he; Hand the paper to they. Prepositions require the pronoun following them to be in the objective form, position, or case; and this requisition amounts to government. Hence we say, “Stand before him;” “Hand the paper to them.” Every preposition expresses a relation, and every relation must have an object: consequently, every preposition must be followed by a noun or pronoun in the objective case.
EXERCISES IN PARSING.
The all-wise Creator bestowed the power of speech upon man, for the most excellent uses. Augustus heard the orator pleading the client’s cause, in a flow of most powerful eloquence. Fair Cynthia smiles serenely over nature’s soft repose. Life’s varying schemes no more distract the laboring mind of man. Septimius stabbed Pompey standing on the shore of Egypt.
A beam of tranquillity often plays round the heart of the truly pious man. The thoughts of former years glide over my soul, like swift-shooting meteors over Ardven’s gloomy vales.
At the approach of day, night’s swift dragons cut the clouds full fast; and ghosts, wandering here and there, troop home to church-yards.
Love still pursues an ever devious race,
True to the winding lineaments of grace.
* * * * *
NOTE.—The words my and and you need not parse. The noun “meteors,” following the adverb “like,” is in the objective case, and governed by unto understood, according to NOTE 2, under Rule 32. The noun “home” is governed by to understood, according to Rule 32.
REMARKS ON PREPOSITIONS AND VERBS.
A noun or pronoun in the objective case, is often governed by a preposition understood; as, “Give him that book;” that is, “Give that book to him;” “Ortugrul was one day wandering,” &c. that is, on one day. “Mercy gives affliction a grace;” that is, Mercy gives a grace to affliction. See Note 1, under Rule 32.
To be able to make a proper use of prepositions, particular attention is requisite. There is a peculiar propriety to be observed in the use of by and with; as, “He walks with a staff by moonlight;” “He was taken by stratagem, and killed with a sword.” Put the one preposition for the other, and say, “He walks by a staff with moonlight;” “He was taken with stratagem, and killed by a sword;” and it will appear, that the latter expressions differ from the former in signification, more than one, at first view, would be apt to imagine.
Verbs are often compounded of a verb and a preposition; as, to uphold, to withstand, to overlook; and this composition gives a new meaning to the verb; as, to understand, to withdraw, to forgive. But the preposition is more frequently placed after the verb, and separately from it, like an adverb; in which situation it does not less affect the sense of the verb, and give it a new meaning; and in all instances, whether the preposition is placed either before or after the verb, if it gives a new meaning to the verb, it may be considered as a part of the verb. Thus, to cast means to throw; but to cast up an account, signifies to compute it; therefore up is a part of the verb. The phrases, to fall on, to bear out, to give over, convey very different meanings from what they would if the prepositions on, out and over, were not used. Verbs of this kind are called compound verbs.
You may now answer the following
QUESTIONS NOT ANSWERED IN PARSING.
From what words is the term preposition derived?—Why is it thus named?—Repeat the list of prepositions.—Name the three parts of speech that govern nouns and pronouns in the objective case.—When is a noun or pronoun in the objective case, the object of an action?—When is it the object of a relation?—Repeat the order of parsing a preposition.—What rule do you apply in parsing a noun or pronoun governed by a preposition?—Does every preposition require an objective case after it?—Is a noun or pronoun ever governed by a preposition understood?—Give examples.—What is said of verbs compounded of a verb and preposition?—Give the origin and meaning of the prepositions explained in the Philosophical Notes.
* * * * *
From, according to H. Tooke, is the Anglo-Saxon and Gothic noun frum, beginning, source, author. “He came from (beginning) Rochester.” Of, he supposes to be a fragment of the Gothic and Saxon noun afora, consequence, offspring, follower. “Solomon, the son of (offspring) David.” Of or off, in its modern acceptation, signifies disjoined, sundered: A piece of (off) the loaf, is, a piece disjoined, or separated from the loaf. The fragrance of or off the rose.
For signifies cause. “I write for your satisfaction;” i.e. your satisfaction being the cause. By or be is the imperative byth, of the Saxon beon, to be. With, the imperative of withan, to join; or, when equivalent to by, of wyr-than, to be. “I will go with him.” “I, join him, will go.” In comes from the Gothic noun inna, the interior of the body; a cave or cell. About, from boda, the first outward boundary. Among is the past part. of gamaengan, to mingle. Through or thorough is the Gothic substantive dauro, or the Teutonic thuruh. It means passage, gate, door.
Before—be-fore, be-hind, be-low, be-side, be-sides, be-neath are formed by combining the imperative, be, with the nouns fore, hind, low, side, neath. Neath—Saxon neothan, neothe, has the same signification as nadir. Be-tween, be-twixt—be and twain. A dual preposition. Be-yond—be-passed. Beyond a place, means, be passed that place. Notwithstanding—not-stand-ing-with, not-withstanding. “Any order to the contrary not-withstanding,” (this order;) i.e. not effectually withstanding or opposing it.
* * * * *
LECTURE VIII.
OF PRONOUNS.
A PRONOUN is a word used instead of a noun, and generally to avoid the too frequent repetition of the same word. A pronoun is, likewise, sometimes a substitute for a sentence, or member of a sentence.
The word pronoun comes from the two Latin words, pro, which means for, or instead of, and nomen, a name, or noun. Hence you perceive, that pronoun means for a noun, or instead of a noun.
In the sentence, “The man is happy; he is benevolent; he is useful;” you perceive, that the word he is used instead of the noun man; consequently he must be a pronoun. You observe, too, that, by making use of the pronoun he in this sentence, we avoid the repetition of the noun man, for without the pronoun, the sentence would be rendered thus, “The man is happy; the man is benevolent; the man is useful.”
By looking again at the definition, you will notice, that pronouns always stand for nouns, but they do not always avoid the repetition of nouns. Repetition means repeating or mentioning the same thing again. In the sentence, “I come to die for my country,” the pronouns, I and my, stand for the name of the person who speaks; but they do not avoid the repetition of that name, because the name or noun for which the pronouns are used, is not mentioned at all. Pronouns of the third person, generally avoid the repetition of the nouns for which they stand; but pronouns of the first and second person, sometimes avoid the repetition of nouns, and sometimes they do not.
A little farther illustration of the pronoun will show you its importance, and, also, that its nature is very easily comprehended. If we had no pronouns in our language, we should be obliged to express ourselves in this manner: “A woman went to a man, and told the man that the man was in danger of being murdered by a gang of robbers; as a gang of robbers had made preparations for attacking the man. The man thanked the woman for the woman’s kindness, and, as the man was unable to defend the man’s self, the man left the man’s house, and went to a neighbor’s.”
This would be a laborious style indeed; but, by the help of pronouns, we can express the same ideas with far greater ease and conciseness: “A woman went to a man, and told him, that he was in great danger of being murdered by a gang of robbers, who had made preparations for attacking him. He thanked her for her kindness, and, as he was unable to defend himself, he left his house and went to a neighbor’s.”
If you look at these examples a few moments, you cannot be at a loss to tell which words are pronouns; and you will observe too, that they all stand for nouns.
Pronouns are generally divided into three kinds, the Personal, the Adjective, and the Relative pronouns. They are all known by the lists.
1. OF PERSONAL PRONOUNS. Personal Pronouns are distinguished from the relative, by their denoting the person of the nouns for which they stand. There are five of them; I, thou, he, she, it; with their plurals, We, ye or you, they.
To pronouns belong gender, person, number, and case.
GENDER. When we speak of a man, we say, he, his, him; when we speak of a woman, we say, she, hers, her; and when we speak of a thing, we say it. Hence you perceive, that gender belongs to pronouns as well as to nouns. Example; “The general, in gratitude to the lady, offered her his hand; but she, not knowing him, declined accepting it.” The pronouns his and him, in this sentence, personate or represent the noun general; they are, therefore, of the masculine gender: her and she personate the lady; therefore, they are feminine: and it represents hand; for which reason it is of the neuter gender. This illustration shows you, then, that pronouns must be of the same gender as the nouns are for which they stand. But, as it relates to the variation of the pronouns to express the sex,
Gender has respect only to the third person singular of the pronouns, he, she, it. He is masculine; she is feminine; it is neuter.
You may naturally inquire, why pronouns of the first and second persons are not varied to denote the gender of their nouns, as well as of the third. The reason is obvious. The first person, that is, the person speaking, and the second person, or the person spoken to, being at the same time the subjects of the discourse, are supposed to be present; from which, and other circumstances, their sex is commonly known, and, therefore, the pronouns that represent these persons, need not be marked by a distinction of gender; but the third person, that is, the person or thing spoken of, being absent, and in many respects unknown, necessarily requires the pronoun that stands for it, to be marked by a distinction of gender.
In parsing, we sometimes apply gender to pronouns of the first and second person, and also to the plural number of the third person; but these have no peculiar form to denote their gender; therefore they have no agreement, in this respect, with the nouns which they represent.
PERSON. Pronouns have three persons in each number.
I, is the first person } Thou, is the second person } Singular. He, she, or it, is the third person }
We, is the first person } Ye or you, is the second person } Plural. They, is the third person }
This account of persons will be very intelligible, when you reflect, that there are three persons who may be the subject of any discourse: first, the person who speaks, may speak of himself; secondly, he may speak of the person to whom he addresses himself; thirdly, he may speak of some other person; and as the speakers, the persons spoken to, and the persons spoken of, may be many, so each of these persons must have a plural number.
Pronouns of the second and third person, always agree, in person with the nouns they represent; but pronouns of the first person, do not. Whenever a pronoun of the first person is used, it represents a noun; but nouns are never of the first person, therefore these pronouns cannot agree in person with their nouns.
NUMBER. Pronouns, like nouns, have two numbers, the singular and the plural; as, I, thou, he; we, ye or you, they.
CASE. Pronouns have three cases, the nominative, the possessive, and the objective.
In the next place I will present to you the declension of the personal pronouns, which declension you must commit to memory before you proceed any farther.
The advantages resulting from the committing of the following declension, are so great and diversified, that you cannot be too particular in your attention to it. You recollect, that it is sometimes very difficult to distinguish the nominative case of a noun from the objective, because these cases of nouns are not marked by a difference in termination; but this difficulty is removed in regard to the personal pronouns, for their cases are always known by their termination. By studying the declension you will learn, not only the cases of the pronouns, but, also, their genders, persons, and numbers.
DECLENSION OF THE PERSONAL PRONOUNS.
FIRST PERSON. Sing. Plur_. Nom. I, we, Poss. my or mine, our or ours, Obj. me. us.
SECOND PERSON. Sing. Plur. Nom. thou, ye or you, Poss. thy or thine, your or yours, Obj. thee. you.
THIRD PERSON. Mas. Sing. Plur. Nom, he, they, Poss. his, their or theirs, Obj. him. them.
THIRD PERSON. Fem. Sing. Plur. Nom. she, they, Poss. her or hers, their or theirs. Obj. her. them.
THIRD PERSON. Neut. Sing. Plur. Nom. it, they, Poss. its, their or theirs, Obj. it. them.
* * * * *
NOTES.
1. When self is added to the personal pronouns, as himself, myself, itself, themselves, &c. they are called compound personal pronouns, and are used in the nominative or objective case, but not in the possessive.
2. In order to avoid the disagreeable harshness of sound, occasioned by the frequent recurrence of the terminations est, edst, in the adaptation of our verbs to the nominative thou, a modern innovation which substitutes you for thou, in familiar style, has generally been adopted. This innovation contributes greatly to the harmony of our colloquial style. You was formerly restricted to the plural number; but now it is employed to represent either a singular or a plural noun. It ought to be recollected, however, that when used as the representative of a singular noun, this word retains its original plural form; and, therefore, the verb connected with it, should always be plural. Inattention to this peculiarity, has betrayed some writers into the erroneous conclusion, that, because you implies unity when it represents a singular noun, it ought, when thus employed, to be followed by a singular verb; as, “When was you there?” “How far was you from the parties?” Such a construction, however, is not supported by good usage, nor by analogy. It is as manifest a solecism as to say, We am, or we is. Were it, in any case, admissible to connect a singular verb with you, the use of was would still be ungrammatical, for this form of the verb is confined to the first and third persons, and you is second person. Wast being second person,Page 93
it would approximate nearer to correctness to say, you wast. We never use the singular of the present tense with you:—you art, you is; you walkest, you walks. Why, then, should any attempt be made to force a usage so unnatural and gratuitous as the connecting of the singular verb in the past tense with this pronoun? In every point of view, the construction, “When were you there?” “How far were you from the parties?” is preferable to the other.
3. The words my, thy, his, her, our, your, their, are, by many, denominated possessive adjective pronouns; but they always stand for nouns in the possessive case. They ought, therefore, to be classed with the personal pronouns. That principle of classification which ranks them with the adjective pronouns, would also throw all nouns in the possessive case among the adjectives. Example: “The lady gave the gentleman her watch for his horse.” In this sentence her personates, or stands for, the noun “lady,” and his represents “gentleman.” This fact is clearly shown by rendering the sentence thus, “The lady gave the gentleman the lady’s watch for the gentleman’s horse.” If lady’s and gentleman’s are nouns, her and his must be personal pronouns. The same remarks apply to my, thy, our, your, their and its. This view of these words may be objected to by those who speculate and refine upon the principles of grammar until they prove their non-existence, but it is believed, nevertheless, to be based on sound reason and common sense.
4. Mine, thine, his, hers, ours, yours, theirs, have, by many respectable grammarians, been considered merely the possessive cases of personal pronouns, whilst, by others, they have been denominated pronouns or nouns in the nominative or objective case. It is believed, however, that a little attention to the meaning and office of these words, will clearly show the impropriety of both these classifications. Those who pursue the former arrangement, allege, that, in the examples, “You may imagine what kind of faith theirs was; My pleasures are past; hers and yours are to come; they applauded his conduct, but condemned hers and yours,” the words theirs, hers, and yours, are personal pronouns in the possessive case, and governed by their respective nouns understood. To prove this, they construct the sentence thus, “You may imagine what kind of faith their faith was;—her pleasures and your pleasures are to come;—but condemned her conduct and your conduct;” or thus, “You may imagine what kind of faith the faith of them was;—the pleasures of her and the pleasures of you, are to come;— but condemned the conduct of her and the conduct of you.” But these constructions, (both of which are correct,) prove too much for their purpose;Page 94
for, as soon as we supply the nouns after these words, they are resolved into personal pronouns of kindred meaning, and the nouns which we supply: thus, theirs becomes, their faith: hers, her pleasures; and yours, your pleasures. This evidently gives us two words instead of, and altogether distinct from, the first; so that, in parsing, their faith, we are not, in reality, analyzing theirs, but two other words of which theirs is the proper representative. These remarks also prove, with equal force, the impropriety of calling these words merely simple pronouns or nouns in the nominative or objective case. Without attempting to develop the original or intrinsic meaning of these pluralizing adjuncts, ne and s, which were, no doubt, formerly detached from the pronouns with which they now coalesce, for all practical purposes, it is sufficient for us to know, that, in the present application of these pronouns, they invariably stand for, not only the person possessing, but, also the thing possessed, which gives them a compound character. They may, therefore, be properly denominated COMPOUND PERSONAL PRONOUNS; and, as they always perform a double office in a sentence by representing two other words, and, consequently, including two cases, they should, like the compound relative what, be parsed as two words. Thus, in the example, “You may imagine what kind of faith theirs was,” theirs is a compound personal pronoun, equivalent to their faith. Their is a pronoun, a word used instead of a noun; personal, it personates the persons spoken of, understood; third pers. plur. numb., &c.—and in the possessive case, and governed by “faith,” according to Rule 12. Faith is a noun, the name of a thing, &c. &c.—and in the nominative case to “was,” and governs it; Rule 3. Or, if we render the sentence thus, “You may imagine what kind of faith the faith of them[4] was,” faith would be in the nominative case to “was,” and them would be in the objective case, and governed by “of:” Rule 31.
[4] In the note next preceding, it is asserted, that my, thy, his, her, our your, and their, are personal pronouns. What can more clearly demonstrate the correctness of that assertion, than this latter construction of the word theirs? All admit, that, in the construction, “The faith of them,” the word them, is a personal pronoun: and for this conclusive reason:—it represents a noun understood. What, then, is their, in the phrase, “their faith?” Is it not obvious, that, if them is a personal pronoun, their must be, also? for the latter represents the same noun as the former.
Objections to this method of treating these pronouns, will doubtless be preferred by those who assert, that a noun is understood after these words, and not represented by them. But this is assertion without proof; for, if a noun were understood, it might be supplied. If the question be put, whose book? and the answer be, mine, ours, hers, or theirs, the word book is included in such answer. Were it not included, we might supply it, thus, mine book, ours book, hers book, and so on. This, however, we cannot do, for it would be giving a double answer: but when the question is answered by a noun in the possessive case, the word book is not included, but implied; as, Whose book? John’s, Richard’s; that is, John’s book; Richard’s book.
This view of the subject, without a parallel, except in the compounds what, whoever, and others, is respectfully submitted to the public; believing, that those who approve of a critical analysis of words, will coincide with me. Should any still be disposed to treat these words so superficially as to rank them among the simple pronouns, let them answer the following interrogatory: If what, when compound, should be parsed as two words, why not mine, thine, his, hers, ours, yours, and theirs?
5. Mine and thine, instead of my and thy, are used in solemn style, before a word beginning with a vowel or silent h; as, “Blot out all mine iniquities;” and when thus used, they are not compound. His always has the same form, whether simple or compound; as, “Give John his book; That desk is his.” Her, when placed before a noun, is in the possessive case; as, Take her hat: when standing alone, it is in the objective case; as, Give the hat to her.
When you shall have studied this lecture attentively, and committed the declension of the personal pronouns, you may commit the following SYSTEMATIC ORDER OF PARSING.
The order of parsing a PERSONAL PRONOUN, is—a pronoun, and why?—personal, and why?—person, and why?—gender and number, and why?—RULE: case, and why?—RULE.—Decline it.
There are many peculiarities to be observed in parsing personal pronouns in their different persons; therefore, if you wish ever to parse them correctly, you must pay particular attention to the manner in which the following are analyzed. Now notice, particularly, and you will perceive that we apply only one rule in parsing I and my, and two in parsing thou, him, and they.
“I saw my friend.”
I is a pronoun, a word used instead of a noun—personal, it represents the person speaking, understood—first person, it denotes the speaker—singular number, it implies but one—and in the nominative case, it represents the actor and subject of the verb “saw,” and governs it, agreeably to RULE 3. The nom. case gov. the verb. Declined—first pers. sing. num. nom. I, poss. my or mine, obj. me. Plur. nom. we, poss. our or ours, obj. us.
My is a pronoun, a word used instead of a noun—personal, it personates the person speaking, understood—first pers. it denotes the speaker—sing. num. it implies but one—and in the possessive case, it denotes possession; it is governed by the noun “friend”, agreeably to RULE 12. A noun or pronoun in the possessive case, is governed by the noun it possesses. Declined—first pers. sing. nom. I, poss. my or mine, obj. me. Plur. nom. we, poss. our or ours, obj. us.
“Young man, thou
hast deserted thy companion, and left him in
distress.”
Thou is a pronoun, a word used instead of a noun—personal, it personates “man”—second person, it represents the person spoken to—mas. gend. sing. num. because the noun “man” is for which it stands, according to RULE 13. Personal pronouns must agree with the nouns for which they stand in gender and number.
Thou is in the nom. case, it represents the actor and subject of the verb “hast deserted,” and governs it agreeably to RULE 3. The nom. case governs the verb. Declined—sec. pers. sing. num. nom. thou, poss. thy or thine, obj. thee. Plur. nom. ye or you, poss. your or yours, obj. you.
Him is a pronoun, a word used instead of a noun—personal, it personates “companion”—third pers. it represents the person spoken of—mas. gend. sing. num. because the noun “companion” is for which it stands: RULE 13. Pers. pro. &c. (Repeat the Rule.)—Him is in the objective case, the object of the action expressed by the active-transitive verb “hast left,” and gov. by it: RULE 20. Active-trans. verbs gov. the obj. case. Declined—third pers. mas. gend. sing. num. nom. he, poss. his, obj. him. Plur. nom. they, poss. their or theirs, obj. them.
“Thrice I raised my
voice, and called the chiefs to combat, but
they dreaded the force
of my arm.”
They is a pronoun, a word used instead of a noun—personal, it represents “chiefs”—third pers. it denotes the persons spoken of—mas. gend. plur. num. because the noun “chiefs” is for which it stands: RULE 13. Pers. Pron. &c. (Repeat the Rule.) It is the nom. case, it represents the actors and subject of the verb “dreaded,” and governs it: RULE 3. The nom. case, gov. the verb. Declined—third pers. mas. gend. sing. num. nom. he, poss. his, obj. him. Plur. nom. they, poss. their or theirs, obj. them.
NOTE. We do not apply gender in parsing the personal pronouns, (excepting the third person singular,) if the nouns they represent are understood; and therefore we do not, in such instances, apply Rule 13. But when the noun is expressed, gender should be applied, and two Rules.
EXERCISES IN PARSING.
I saw a man leading his horse slowly over the new bridge. My friends visit me very often at my father’s office. We improve ourselves by close application. Horace, thou learnest many lessons. Charles, you, by your diligence, make easy work of the task given you by your preceptor. Young ladies, you run over your lessons very carelessly. The stranger drove his horses too far into the water, and, in so doing, he drowned them.
Gray morning rose in the east. A green narrow vale appeared before us: its winding stream murmured through the grove. The dark host of Rothmar stood on its banks, with their glittering spears. We fought along the vale. They fled. Rothmar sunk beneath my sword. Day was descending in the west, when I brought his arms to Crothar. The aged hero felt them with his hands: joy brightened his thoughts.
NOTE. Horace, Charles, and ladies, are of the second person, and nom. case independent: see RULE 5, and NOTE. The first you is used in the nom. poss. and obj. case.—It represents Charles, therefore it is singular in sense, although plural in form. In the next example, you personifies ladies, therefore it is plural. Given is a perfect participle. You following given, is governed by to understood, according to NOTE 1, under Rule 32. Run over is a compound verb. And is a conjunction. The first its personates vale; the second its represents stream.
You may now parse the following examples three times over.
COMPOUND PERSONAL PRONOUNS.
“Juliet, retain her paper, and present yours.”
Yours is a compound personal pronoun, representing both the possessor and the thing possessed, and is equivalent to your paper. Your is a pronoun, a word used instead of a noun—personal, it personates “Juliet”—second person, it represents the person spoken to—fem. gender, sing. number, (singular in sense, but plural in form,) because the noun Juliet is for which it stands: Rule 13. Pers. Pron. &c.—Your is in the possessive case, it denotes possession, and is governed by “paper,” according to Rule 12. A noun or pron. &c. (Repeat the Rule, and decline the pronoun.) Paper is a noun, the name of a thing—common, the name of a sort of things—neuter gender, it denotes a thing without sex—third person, spoken of—sing. number, it implies but one—and in the obj. case, it is the object of the action expressed by the transitive verb “present,” and governed by it: Rule 20. Active-transitive verbs govern the obj. case.
NOTE. Should it be objected, that yours does not mean your paper, any more than it means your book, your house, your any thing, let it be borne in mind, that pronouns have no definite meaning, like other words; but their particular signification is always determined by the nouns they represent.
EXERCISES IN PARSING.
Julia injured her book, and soiled mine: hers is better than mine. My friend sacrificed his fortune to secure yours: his deeds deserve reward; yours merit disgrace. Henry’s labors are past; thine are to come. We leave your forests of beasts for ours of men. My sword and yours are kin.
NOTE. She understood, is nominative to soiled, in the first example; and the substantive part of mine, after than, is nom. to is, understood: Rule 35. The verbs to secure and to come have no nominative. The pronouns mine, my, yours, thine, we, your, ours, my, and yours, personate nouns understood.
REMARKS ON IT.
For the want of a proper knowledge of this little pronoun it, many grammarians have been greatly puzzled how to dispose of it, or how to account for its multiform, and, seemingly, contradictory characters. It is in great demand by writers of every description. They use it without ceremony; either in the nominative or objective case; either to represent one person or thing, or more than one. It is applied to nouns in the masculine, feminine, or neuter gender, and, very frequently, it represents a member of a sentence, a whole sentence, or a number of sentences taken in a mass.
A little attention to its true character, will, at once, strip it of all its mystery. It, formerly written hit, according to H. Tooke, is the past participle of the Moeso-Gothic verb haitan. It means, the said, and, therefore, like its near relative that, meaning, the assumed, originally had no respect, in its application, to number, person, or gender. “It is a wholesome law;” i.e. the said (law) is a wholesome law; or, that (law) is a wholesome law;—the assumed (law) is a wholesome law. “It is the man; I believe it to be them:”—the said (man) is the man; that (man) is the man: I believe the said (persons) to be them; I believe that persons (according to the ancient application of that) to be them. “It happened on a summer’s day, that many people were assembled,” &c.—Many people were assembled: it, that, or the said (fact or circumstance) happened on a summer’s day.
It, according to its accepted meaning in modern times, is not referred to a noun understood after it, but is considered a substitute. “How is it with you?” that is, “How is your state or condition?” “It rains; It freezes; It is a hard winter;”—The rain rains; The frost frosts or freezes; The said (winter) is a hard winter. “It is delightful to see brothers and sisters living in uninterrupted love to the end of their days.” What is delightful? To see brothers and sisters living in uninterrupted love to the end of their days. It, this thing, is delightful. It, then, stands for all that part of the sentence expressed in italics; and the sentence will admit of the following construction; “To see brothers living in uninterrupted love to the end of their days, is delightful.”
* * * * *
OF ADJECTIVE PRONOUNS.
ADJECTIVE PRONOUNS, PRONOMINAL ADJECTIVES, or, more properly, SPECIFYING ADJECTIVES, are a kind of adjectives which point out nouns by some distinct specification.
Pronouns and adjectives are totally distinct in their character. The former stand for nouns, and never belong to them; the latter belong to nouns, and never stand for them. Hence, such a thing as an adjective-pronoun cannot exist. Each, every, either, this, that, some, other, and the residue, are pure adjectives.
Those specifying adjectives commonly called Adjective Pronouns, may be divided into three sorts; the distributive, the demonstrative, and the indefinite. They are all known by the lists.
I. The distributive adjectives are those that denote the persons or things that make up a number, each taken separately and singly. List: each, every, either, and sometimes neither; as, “Each of his brothers is in a favorable situation;” “Every man must account for himself;” “Neither of them is industrious.”
These distributives are words which are introduced into language in its refined state, in order to express the nicest shades and colors of thought. “Man must account for himself;” “Mankind must account for themselves;” “All men must account for themselves;” “All men, women, and children, must account for themselves;” “Every man must account for himself.” Each of these assertions conveys the same fact or truth. But the last, instead of presenting the whole human family for the mind to contemplate in a mass, by the peculiar force of every, distributes them, and presents each separately and singly; and whatever is affirmed of one individual, the mind instantaneously transfers to the whole human race.
Each relates to two or more persons or things, and signifies either of the two, or every one of any number taken separately.
Every relates to several persons or things, and signifies each one of them all taken separately.
Either relates to two persons or things taken separately, and signifies the one or the other. “Either of the three,” is an improper expression. It should be, “any of the three.”
Neither imports not either; that is, not one nor the other; as, “Neither of my friends was there.” When an allusion is made to more than two, none should be used instead of neither; as, “None of my friends was there.”
* * * * *
II. The demonstrative are those which precisely point out the subject to which they relate. List: this and that, and their plurals, these and those, and former and latter; as, “This is true charity; “that is only its image.”
There is but a slight shade of difference in the meaning and application of the and that. When reference is made to a particular book, we say, “Take the book;” but when we wish to be very pointed and precise, we say, “Take that book;” or, if it be near by, “Take this book.” You perceive, then, that these demonstratives have all the force of the definite article, and a little more.
This and these refer to the nearest persons or things, that and those to the most distant; as, “These goods are superior to those.” This and these indicate the latter, or last mentioned; that and those, the former, or first mentioned; as, “Both wealth and poverty are temptations; that tends to excite pride, this, discontent.”
“Some place the bliss in
action, some in ease;
Those call it pleasure, and
contentment, these.”
They, those. As it is the office of the personal they to represent a noun previously introduced to our notice, there appears to be a slight departure from analogy in the following application of it: “They who seek after wisdom, are sure to find her: They that sow in tears, sometimes reap in joy.” This usage, however, is well established, and they, in such constructions, is generally employed in preference to those.
* * * * *
III. The indefinite are those which express their subjects in an indefinite or general manner. List: some, other, any, one, all, such, both, same, another none. Of these, one and other are declined like nouns. Another is declined, but wants the plural.
The indefinite adjectives, like the indefinite article, leave the meaning unfixed, or, in some degree, vague. With a slight shade of difference in meaning, we say, Give me a paper, one paper, any paper, some paper, and so on. Though these words restrict the meaning of the noun, they do not fix it to a particular object. We therefore call them indefinite.
These adjectives, or adjective pronouns, frequently belong to nouns understood, in which situation they should be parsed accordingly; as “You may take either; He is pleased with this book, but dislikes that (book;) All (men) have sinned, but some (men) have repented.”
The words, one, other, and none, are used in both numbers; and, when they stand for nouns, they are not adjectives, but indefinite pronouns; as, “The great ones of the world have their failings;” “Some men increase in wealth, while others decrease;” “None escape.”
The word “ones,” in the preceding example, does not belong to a noun understood. If it did, we could supply the noun. The meaning is not “the great one men, nor ones men,” therefore one is not an adjective pronoun; but the meaning is, “The great men of the world,” therefore ones is a pronoun of the indefinite kind, representing the noun men understood, and it ought to be parsed like a personal pronoun. The word others, in the next example, is a compound pronoun, equivalent to other men; and should be parsed like mine, thine, &c. See Note 4th, page 100.
I will now parse two pronouns, and then present some examples for you to analyze. If, in parsing the following exercises, you should be at a loss for definitions and rules, please to refer to the compendium. But before you proceed, you may commit the following
SYSTEMATIC ORDER OF PARSING.
The order of parsing an ADJECTIVE PRONOUN, is—an adjective pronoun, and why?—distributive, demonstrative, or indefinite, and why?—to what noun does it belong, or with what does it agree?—RULE.
“One man instructs many others.” One is an adjective pronoun, or specifying adjective, it specifically points out a noun—indefinite, it expresses its subject in an indefinite or general manner, and belongs to the noun “man,” according to RULE 19. Adjective pronouns belong to nouns, expressed or understood.
Others is a compound pronoun, including both an adjective pronoun and a noun, and is equivalent to other men. Other is an adjective pronoun, it is used specifically to describe its noun—indefinite, it expresses its subject in an indefinite manner, and belongs to men: Rule 19. (Repeat the rule.) Men is a noun, a name denoting persons—common, &c. (parse it in full;) and in the objective case, it is the object of the action expressed by the transitive verb “instructs,” and gov. by it: Rule 20. Active-transitive verbs, &c.
“Those books are mine.”
Those is an adjective pronoun, it specifies what noun is referred to—demonstrative, it precisely points out the subject to which it relates—and agrees with the noun “books” in the plural number, according to NOTE 1, under Rule 19. Adjective pronouns must agree in number with their nouns.
Mine is a compound personal pronoun, including both the possessor and the thing possessed, and is equivalent to my books. My is a pron. a word used instead of a noun—personal, it stands for the name of the person speaking—first person, it denotes the speaker—sing. number, it implies but one—and in the poss. case, it denotes possession, and is gov. by “books,” according to Rule 12. (Repeat the rule, and decline the pronoun.) Books is a noun, the name of a thing—common, &c. (parse it in full;)—and in the nominative case after “are,” according to RULE 21. The verb to be admits the same case after it as before it.
EXERCISES IN PARSING.
Each individual fills a space in creation. Every man helps a little. These men rank among the great ones of the world. That book belongs to the tutor, this belongs to me. Some men labor, others labor not; the former increase in wealth, the latter decrease. The boy wounded the old bird, and stole the young ones. None performs his duty too well. None of those poor wretches complain of their miserable lot.
NOTE. In parsing the distributive pronominal adjectives, NOTE 2, undo Rule 19, should be applied.
* * * * *
III. OF RELATIVE PRONOUNS.
Relative Pronouns are such as relate, in general, to some word or phrase going before, which is called the antecedent. They are who, which, and that.
The word antecedent, comes from the two Latin words, ante, before, and cedo, to go. Hence you perceive, that antecedent means going before; thus, “The man is happy who lives virtuously; This is the lady who relieved my wants; Thou who lovest wisdom, &c. We who speak from experience,” &c. The relative who, in these sentences, relates to the several words, man, lady, thou, and we, which words, you observe, come before the relative: they are, therefore, properly called antecedents.
The relative is not varied on account of gender, person, or number, like a personal pronoun. When we use a personal pronoun, in speaking of a man, we say he, and of a woman, she; in speaking of one person or thing, we use a singular pronoun, of more than one, a plural, and so on; but there is no such variation of the relative. Who, in the first of the preceding examples, relates to an antecedent of the mas. gend. third pers. sing.; in the second, the antecedent is of the fem. gend.; in the third, it is of the second pers.; and in the fourth, it is of the first pers. plur. num.; and, yet, the relative is in the same form in each example. Hence you perceive, that the relative has no peculiar form to denote its gend. pers. and num., but it always agrees with its antecedent in sense. Thus, when I say, The man who writes, who is mas. gend. and sing.; but when I say, The ladies who write, who is feminine, and plural. In order to ascertain the gend. pers. and num. of the relative, you must always look at its antecedent.
WHO, WHICH, and THAT.
Who is applied to persons, which to things and brutes; as, “He is a friend who is faithful in adversity; The bird which sung so sweetly, is flown; This is the tree which produces no fruit.”
That is often used as a relative, to prevent the too frequent repetition of who and which. It is applied both to persons and things; as, “He that acts wisely, deserves praise; Modesty is a quality that highly adorns a woman.”
NOTES.
1. Who should never
be applied to animals. The following
application of it is erroneous:—“He
is like a least of prey,
who destroys without
pity.” It should be, that destroys,
&c.
2. Who should not be
applied to children. It is incorrect to say,
“The child whom
we have just seen,” &c. It should be, “The
child
that we have just seen.”
3. Which may be applied
to persons when we wish to distinguish one
person of two, or a particular
person among a number of others; as,
“Which of the
two? Which of them is he?”
4. That, in preference to who or which, is applied to persons when they are qualified by an adjective in the superlative degree, or by the pronominal adjective same; as, “Charles XII., king of Sweden, was one of the greatest madmen that the world ever saw;—He is the same man that we saw before.”
5. That is employed
after the interrogative who, in cases like
the following; “Who
that has any sense of religion, would have
argued thus?”
When the word ever or soever is annexed to a relative pronoun, the combination is called a compound pronoun; as, whoever or whosoever, whichever or whichsoever, whatever or whatsoever.
DECLENSION OF THE RELATIVE PRONOUNS.
SINGULAR AND PLURAL.
Nom. who, Poss. whose, Obj. whom. " whoever, " whosever, " whomever. " whosoever, " whosesoever, " whomsoever.
Which and that are indeclinable, except that whose is sometimes used as the possessive case of which; as, “Is there any other doctrine whose followers are punished;” that is, the followers of which are punished. The use of this license has obtained among our best writers; but the construction is not to be recommended, for it is a departure from a plain principle of grammar, namely, who, whose, whom, in their applications, should be confined to rational beings.
That may be used as a pronoun, an adjective, and a conjunction, depending on the office which it performs in the sentence.
That is a relative only when it can be changed to who or which without destroying the sense; as, “They that (who) reprove us, may be our best friends; From every thing that (which) you see, derive instruction.” That is a demonstrative adjective, when it belongs to, or points out, some particular noun, either expressed or implied; as, “Return that book; That belongs to me; Give me that.” When that is neither a relative nor an adjective pronoun, it is a conjunction; as, “Take care that every day be well employed.” The word that, in this last sentence, cannot be changed to who or which without destroying the sense, therefore you know it is not a relative pronoun; neither does it point out any particular noun, for which reason you know it is not an adjective pronoun; but it connects the sentence, therefore it is a conjunction.
If you pay particular attention to this elucidation of the word that, you will find no difficulty in parsing it. When it is a relative or an adjective pronoun, it may be known by the signs given; and whenever these signs will not apply to it, you know it is a conjunction.
Some writers are apt to make too free use of this word. I will give you one example of affronted that, which may serve as a caution. The tutor said, in speaking of the word that, that that that that that lady parsed, was not the that that that gentleman requested her to analyze. This sentence, though rendered inelegant by a bad choice of words, is strictly grammatical. The first that is a noun; the second, a conjunction; the third, an adjective pronoun; the fourth, a noun; the fifth, a relative pronoun; the sixth, an adjective pronoun; the seventh, a noun; the eighth, a relative pronoun; the ninth, an adjective pronoun. The meaning of the sentence will be more obvious, if rendered thus; The tutor said, in speaking of the word that, that that that which that lady parsed, was not the that which that gentleman requested her to analyze.
WHAT.
What is generally a compound relative, including both the antecedent and the relative, and is equivalent to that which; as, “This is what I wanted;” that is, that which, or, the thing which I wanted.
What is compounded of which that. These words have been contracted and made to coalesce, a part of the orthography of both being still retained: what—wh[ich—t]hat; (which-that.) Anciently it appeared in the varying forms, tha qua, qua tha, qu’tha, quthat, quhat, hwat, and finally, what.
What may be used as three kinds of a pronoun, and as an interjection. When it is equivalent to that which, the thing which, or those things which, it is a compound relative, because it includes both the antecedent and the relative; as, “I will try what (that which) can be found in female delicacy; What you recollect with most pleasure, are the virtuous actions of your past life;” that is, those things which you recollect, &c.
When what is a compound relative, you must always parse it as two words; that is, you must parse the antecedent part as a noun, and give it a case; the relative part you may analyze like any other relative, giving it a case likewise. In the first of the preceding examples, that, the antecedent part of what, is in the obj. case, governed by the verb “will try;” which, the relative part, is in the nom. case to “can be found.” “I have heard what (i.e. that which, or the thing which) has been alleged.”
Whoever and whosoever are also compound relatives, and should be parsed like the compound what; as, “Whoever takes that oath, is bound to enforce the laws.” In this sentence, whoever is equivalent to he who, or, the man who; thus, “He who takes that oath, is bound,” &c.
Who, which, and what, when used in asking questions, are called interrogative pronouns, or relatives of the interrogative kind; as, "Who is he? Which is the person? What are you doing?”
Interrogative pronouns have no antecedent; but they relate to the word or phrase which is the answer to the question, for their subsequent; as, “Whom did you see? The preceptor. What have you done? Nothing.” Antecedent and subsequent are opposed to each other in signification. Antecedent means preceding, or going before; and subsequent means following, or coming after. What, when used as an interrogative, is never compound.
What, which, and that, when joined to nouns, are specifying adjectives, or adjective pronouns, in which situation they have no case, but are parsed like adjective pronouns of the demonstrative or indefinite kind; as, “Unto which promise our twelve tribes hope to come;” “What misery the vicious endure! What havock hast thou made, foul monster, sin!”
What and which, when joined to nouns in asking questions, are denominated interrogative pronominal adjectives; as, “What man is that? Which road did he take?”
What, whatever, and whatsoever, which, whichever, and whichsoever, in constructions like the following, are compound pronouns, but not compound relatives; as, “In what character Butler was admitted, is unknown; Give him what name you choose; Nature’s care largely endows whatever happy man will deign to use her treasures; Let him take which course, or, whichever course he will.” These sentences may be rendered thus; “That character, or, the character in which Butler was admitted, is unknown; Give him that name, or, the name which you choose; Nature’s care endows that happy man who will deign, &c.; Let him take that course, or the course which he will.” A compound relative necessarily includes both an antecedent and a relative. These compounds, you will notice, do not include antecedents, the first part of each word being the article the, or the adjective pronoun, that; therefore they cannot properly be denominated compound relatives.—With regard to the word ever annexed to these pronouns, it is a singular fact, that, as soon as we analyze the word to which it is subjoined, ever is entirely excluded from the sentence.
What is sometimes used as an interjection; as, “But what! is thy servant a dog, that he should do this? What! rob us of our right of suffrage, and then shut us up in dungeons!”
You have now come to the most formidable obstacle, or, if I may so speak, to the most rugged eminence in the path of grammatical science; but be not disheartened, for, if you can get safely over this, your future course will be interrupted with only here and there a gentle elevation. It will require close application, and a great deal of sober thinking, to gain a clear conception of the nature of the relative pronouns, particularly the compound relatives, which are not easily comprehended by the young learner. As this eighth lecture is a very important one, it becomes necessary for you to read it carefully four or five times over before you proceed to commit the following order. Whenever you parse, you may spread the Compendium before you, if you please.
SYSTEMATIC ORDER OF PARSING.
The order of parsing a RELATIVE PRONOUN, is—a pronoun, and why?—relative, and why?—gender, person, and number, and why?—RULE:—case, and why?—RULE.—Decline it.
“This is the man whom we saw.”
Whom is a pronoun, a word used instead of a noun—relative, it relates to “man” for its antecedent—mas. gend. third pers. sing. num. because the antecedent “man” is with which it agrees, according to
RULE 14. Relative pronouns agree with their antecedents in gender, person, and number. Whom is in the objective case, the object of the action expressed by the active-transitive verb “saw,” and governed by it, agreeably to
RULE 16. When a nominative comes between the relative and the verb, the relative is governed by the following verb, or some other word in its own member of the sentence.
Whom, in the objective case, is placed before the verb that governs it, according to NOTE 1, under Rule 16. (Repeat the Note, and decline who.)
“From what is recorded, he appears,” &c.
What is a comp. rel. pron. including both the antecedent and the relative, and is equivalent to that which, or the thing which—Thing, the antecedent part of what, is a noun, the name of a thing—com. the name of a species—neuter gender, it has no sex—third person, spoken of—sing. number, it implies but one—and in the obj. case, it is the object of the relation expressed by the prep. “from,” and gov. by it: RULE 31. (Repeat the Rule, and every other Rule to which I refer.) Which, the relative part of what, is a pronoun, a word used instead of a noun—relative, it relates to “thing” for its antecedent—neut. gender, third person, sing. number, because the antecedent “thing” is with which it agrees, according to RULE 14. Rel pron. &c. Which is in the nom. case to the verb “is recorded,” agreeably to
RULE 15. The relative is the nominative case to the verb, when no nominative comes between it and the verb.
“What have you learned? Nothing.”
What is a pron. a word used, &c.—relative of the interrogative kind, because it is used in asking a question—it refers to the word “nothing” for its subsequent, according to
RULE 17. When the rel. pron. is of the interrog. kind, it refers to the word or phrase containing the answer to the question, for its subsequent, which subsequent must agree in case with the interrogative. What is of the neut. gend. third pers. sing. because the subsequent “nothing” is with which it agrees; RULE 14. Rel. pron. agree, &c.—It is in the obj. case, the object of the action, of the active-transitive verb “have learned,” and gov. by it, agreeably to RULE 16. When a nom. &c. See NOTE 1, under the Rule.
NOTE. 1. You need not apply gend. pers. and numb, to the interrogative when the answer to the question is not expressed.
WHO, WHICH, WHAT.
Truth and simplicity are twin sisters, and generally go hand in hand. The foregoing exposition of the “relative pronouns,” is in accordance with the usual method of treating them; but if they were unfolded according to their true character, they would be found to be very simple, and, doubtless, much labor and perplexity, on the part of the learner, would thereby be saved.
Of the words called “relatives,” who, only, is a pronoun; and this is strictly personal; more so, indeed, if we except I and we, than any other word in our language, for it is always restricted to persons. It ought to be classed with the personal pronouns. I, thou, he, she, it, we, ye, you, and they, relate to antecedents, as well as who. Which, that, and what, are always adjectives. They never stand for, but always belong to nouns, either expressed or implied. They specify, like many other adjectives, and connect sentences.
Who supplies the place of which or what and its personal noun. Who came? i.e. what man, what woman, what person;—which man, woman, or person, came? “They heard what I said”—they heard that (thing) which (thing) I said. “Take what (or whichever) course you please;”—take that course which (course) you please to take. “What have you done?” i.e. what thing, act, or deed have you done? “Which thing I also did at Jerusalem.” “Which will you take?”—which book, hat, or something else? “This is the tree which (tree) produces no fruit.” “He that (man, or which man) acts wisely, deserves praise.”
They who prefer this method of treating the “relatives,” are at liberty to adopt it, and parse accordingly.
EXERCISES IN PARSING.
The man who instructs you, labors faithfully. The boy whom I instruct, learns well. The lady whose house we occupy, bestows many charities. That modesty which highly adorns a woman, she possesses. He that acts wisely deserves praise. This is the tree which produces no fruit. I believe what He says. He speaks what he knows. Whatever purifies the heart, also fortifies it. What doest[5] thou? Nothing. What book have you? A poem. Whose hat have you? John’s. Who does that work? Henry. Whom seest thou? To whom gave you the present? Which pen did he take? Whom ye ignorantly worship, him declare I unto you. I heard what he said. George, you may pursue whatever science suits your taste. Eliza, take whichever pattern pleases you best. Whoever lives to see this republic forsake her moral and literary institutions, will behold her liberties prostrated. Whosoever, therefore, will be a friend of the world, is the enemy of God.
[5] The second person singular of do, when used as a principal verb, is spelled with an e; thus, “What thou doest, do quickly;” but when employed as an auxiliary, the e should be omitted; as, “Dost thou not behold a rock with its head of heath?”
NOTE. The nominative case is frequently placed after the verb, and the objective case, before the verb that governs it. Whom, in every sentence except one, house, modesty, book, hat, pen, him, the third what and which, the relative part of the first two whats, are all in the objective case, and governed by the several verbs that follow them. See RULE 16, and NOTE 1. Tree is nom. after is, according to RULE 21. Thing, the antecedent part of whatever, is nom. to “fortifies;” which, the relative part, is nom. to “purifies.” Nothing is governed by do, and poem, by have, understood. Henry is nominative to does, understood. Whose and John’s are governed according to RULE 12. I, thou, you,Page 108
him, &c. represent nouns understood. Him, in the last sentence but five, is governed by declare, and I is nominative to declare. George and Eliza are in the nominative case independent: Rule 5. “Whatever science,” &c. is equivalent to, that science which suits your taste;—“whichever pattern;” i.e. that pattern which pleases you best. Whoever is a compound relative; he, the antecedent part, is nominative to “will behold.” Take agrees with you understood. Forsake is in the infinitive mood after “see:” Rule 25.
REMARKS ON RELATIVE PRONOUNS.
Which sometimes relates to a member of a sentence, or to a whole sentence, for its antecedent: as, “We are required to fear God and keep his commandments, which is the whole duty of man.” What is the whole duty of man? “To fear God and keep his commandments:” therefore, this phrase is the antecedent to which.
The conjunction as, when it follows such, many, or same, is frequently denominated a relative pronoun; as, “I am pleased with such as have a refined taste;” that is, with those who, or them who have, &c. “Let such as presume to advise others, look well to their own conduct;” that is, Let those, or them who presume, &c. “As many as were ordained to eternal life, believed;” that is, they, those, or all who were ordained, believed. “He exhibited the same testimonials as were adduced on a former occasion;” that is, those testimonials which were adduced, &c. But, in examples like these, if we supply the ellipsis which a critical analysis requires us to do, as will be found to be a conjunction; thus, “I am pleased with such persons, as those persons are who have a refined taste; Let such persons, as those persons are who presume,” &c.
QUESTIONS NOT ANSWERED IN PARSING.
From what words is the term pronoun derived?—Do
pronouns always avoid the repetition of nouns?—Name
the three kinds of pronouns.—What distinguishes
the personal from the relative pronouns?—How
many personal pronouns are there?—Repeat
them.—What belong to pronouns?—Is
gender applied to all the personal pronouns?—To
which of them is it applied?—Which of the
personal pronouns have no peculiar termination to
denote their gender?—How many persons have
pronouns?—Speak them in their different
persons.—How many numbers have pronouns?—How
many cases?—What are they?—Decline
all the personal pronouns.—When self
is added to the personal pronouns, what are they called,
and how are they used?—When is you
singular in sense?—Is it ever singular in
form?—Why are the words, my, thy, his,
her, our, your, their, called personal pronouns?—Why
are the words, mine, thine, his, hers, ours, yours,
Page 109
theirs, denominated compound pers. pron.?—How
do you parse these compounds?—What is said
of others?—Repeat the order of parsing
a personal pronoun.—What rule do you apply
in parsing a pronoun of the first person, and in the
nom. case?—What rule when the pronoun is
in the possessive case?—What Rules apply
in parsing personal pronouns of the second and third
person?—What Rules in parsing the compounds,
yours, ours, mine, &c.?—What is said
of the pronoun it?
What are adjective pronouns?—Name the three kinds.—What does each relate to?—To what does every relate?—To what does either relate?—What does neither import?—To what do this and these refer?—Give examples.—To what do that and those refer?—Give examples.—Repeat all the adjective pronouns.—When adj. pronouns belong to nouns understood, how are they parsed?—When they stand for, or represent nouns, what are they called?—Give examples.—Repeat the order of parsing an adj. pronoun.—What Rule do you apply in parsing the indefinite adjective pronouns?—What Notes, in parsing the distributives and demonstratives?
What are relative pronouns?—Repeat them.—From what words is the term antecedent derived?—What does antecedent mean?—Are relatives varied on account of gender, person, or number?—To what are who and which applied?—To what is that applied?—Should who ever be applied to irrational beings or children?—In what instances may which be applied to persons?—Decline the rel. pronouns.—Can which and that be declined?—Is that ever used as three parts of speech?—Give examples.—What part of speech is the word what?—Is what ever used as three kinds of a pronoun?—Give examples.—What is said of whoever?—What words are used as interrogative pronouns?—Give examples.—When are the words, what, which, and that, called adj. pron.?—When are they called interrogative pronominal adjectives?—What is said of whatever and whichever?—Is what ever used as an interjection?—Give examples.—Repeat the order of parsing a rel. pron.—What Rules do you apply in parsing a relative?—What Rules in parsing a compound relative?—What Rules in parsing an interrogative?—Does the relative which ever relate to a sentence for its antecedent?—When does the conjunction as become a relative?—Give examples.
EXERCISES IN FALSE SYNTAX.
NOTE 1, to RULE 13. When a noun or pronoun is the subject of a verb, it must be in the nominative case.
Who will go? Him and I. How does thee do? Is thee well?
“Him and I;” not proper, because the pronoun him is the subject of the verb will go understood, therefore him should be in the nominative case, he, according to the above NOTE. (Repeat the NOTE.) Him and I are connected by the conjunction and, and him is in the obj. case, and I in the nom., therefore RULE 33d, is violated. (Repeat the Rule.) In the second and third examples, thee should be thou, according to the NOTE. The verbs, does and is, are of the third person, and the nom. thou is second, for which reason the verbs should be of the second person, dost do and art, agreeably to RULE 4. You may correct the other examples, four times over.
FALSE SYNTAX.
Him and me went to town yesterday. Thee must be attentive. Him who is careless, will not improve. They can write as well as me. This is the man whom was expected. Her and I deserve esteem. I have made greater proficiency than him. Whom, of all my acquaintances, do you think was there? Whom, for the sake of his important services, had an office of honor bestowed upon him.
NOTE 2, to RULE 13. Personal pronouns being used to supply the place of nouns, should not be employed in the same member of the sentence with the noun which they represent.
FALSE SYNTAX.
The men they are there. I saw him the king. Our cause it is just. Many words they darken speech. That noble general who had gained so many victories, he died, at last, in prison. Who, instead of going about doing good, they are continually doing evil.
In each of the preceding examples, the personal pronoun should be omitted, according to Note 2.
NOTE 3, to RULE 13. A personal pronoun in the objective case, should not be used instead of these and those.
FALSE SYNTAX.
Remove them papers from the desk. Give me them books. Give them men their discharge. Observe them three there. Which of them two persons deserves most credit?
In all these examples, those should be used in place of them. The use of the personal, them, in such constructions, presents two objectives after one verb or preposition. This is a solecism which may be avoided by employing an adjective pronoun in its stead.
* * * * *
LECTURE IX.
OF CONJUNCTIONS.
A CONJUNCTION is a part of speech that is chiefly used to connect sentences, joining two or more simple sentences into one compound sentence: it sometimes connects only words; as, “Thou and he are happy, because you are good.”
Conjunctions are those parts of language, which, by joining sentences in different ways, mark the connexions and various dependances of human thought. They belong to language only in its refined state.
The term CONJUNCTION comes from the two Latin words, con, which signifies together, and jungo, to join. A conjunction, then, is a word that conjoins, or joins together something. Before you can fully comprehend the nature and office of this sort of words, it is requisite that you should know what is meant by a sentence, a simple sentence, and a compound sentence, for conjunctions are chiefly used to connect sentences.
A SENTENCE is an assemblage of words forming complete sense.
A SIMPLE SENTENCE contains but one subject, or nominative, and one verb which agrees with that nominative; as, “Wheat grows in the field.”
You perceive that this sentence contains several words besides the nominative and the verb, and you will often see a simple sentence containing many parts of speech; but, if it has only one nominative and one finite verb, (that is, a verb not in the infinitive mood,) it is a simple sentence, though it is longer than many compound sentences.
A COMPOUND SENTENCE is composed of two or more simple sentences connected together; as, “Wheat grows in the field, and men reap it.”
This sentence is compound, because it is formed of two simple sentences joined together by the word and; which word, on account of its connecting power, is called a conjunction. If we write this sentence without the conjunction, it becomes two simple sentences: thus, “Wheat grows in the field. Men reap it.”
The nature and importance of the conjunction, are easily illustrated. After expressing one thought or sentiment, you know we frequently wish to add another, or several others, which are closely connected with it. We generally effect this addition by means of the conjunction: thus, “The Georgians cultivate rice and cotton;” that is, “They cultivate rice add cotton.” This sentence is compound, and without the use of the conjunction, it would be written in two separate, simple sentences: thus, “The Georgians cultivate rice. They cultivate cotton.” The conjunction, though chiefly used to connect sentences, sometimes connects only words; in which capacity it is nearly allied to the preposition; as, “The sun and (add) the planets constitute the solar system.” In this, which is a simple sentence, and connects two words.
A few more examples will illustrate the nature, and exhibit the use of this part of speech so clearly, as to enable you fully to comprehend it. The following simple sentences and members of sentences, have no relation to each other until they are connected by conjunctions. He labors harder—more successfully—I do. That man is healthy—he is temperate. By filling up the vacancies in these sentences with conjunctions, you will see the importance of this sort of words: thus, He labors harder and more successfully than I do. That man is healthy because he is temperate.
Conjunctions are divided into two sorts, the Copulative and Disjunctive.
I. The Conjunction Copulative serves to connect and continue a sentence by joining on a member which expresses an addition, a supposition, or a cause; as, “Two and three are five; I will go if he will accompany me; You are happy because you are good.”
In the first of these examples, and joins on a word that expresses an addition; in the second, if connects a member that implies a supposition or condition; and in the third, because connects a member that expresses a cause.
II. The Conjunction Disjunctive serves to connect and continue a sentence by joining on a member that expresses opposition of meaning; as, “They came with her, but they went away without her.”
But joins on a member of this sentence which expresses, not only something added, but, also, opposition of meaning.
The principal conjunctions, may be known by the following lists, which you may now commit to memory. Some words in these lists, are, however, frequently used as adverbs, and sometimes as prepositions; but if you study well the nature of all the different sorts of words, you cannot be at a loss to tell the part of speech of any word in the language.
LISTS OF THE CONJUNCTIONS.
Copulative. And, if, that, both, then, since, for, because, therefore, wherefore, provided, besides.
Disjunctive. But, or, nor, as, than, lest, though, unless, either, neither, yet, notwithstanding, nevertheless, except, whether, whereas, as well as.
Some conjunctions are followed by corresponding conjunctions, so that, in the subsequent member of the sentence, the latter answers to the former; as,
1. Though—yet or nevertheless; as, “Though he was rich, yet for our sakes he became poor.”
2. Whether—or; as, “Whether he will go, or not, I cannot tell.” It is improper to say, “Whether he will go or no.”
3. Either—or; as, “I will either send it, or bring it myself.”
4. Neither—nor; as, “Neither thou nor I can comprehend it.”
5. As—as; as, “She is as amiable as her sister.”
6. As—so; as, “As the stars, so shall thy seed be.”
7. So—as; as, “To see thy glory, so as I have seen thee in the sanctuary.”
8. So—that; as, “He became so vain, that everyone disliked him.”
NOTES.
1. Some conjunctions are used to connect simple sentences only, and form them into compound sentences; such as, further, again, besides, &c. Others are employed to connect simple members only, so as to make them compound members; such as, than, lest, unless, that, so that, if, though, yet, because, as well as, &c. But, and, therefore, or, nor, for, &c., connect either whole sentences, or simple members.
2. Relative pronouns,
as well as conjunctions, serve to connect
sentences; as, “Blessed
is the man who feareth the Lord, and
keepeth his commandments.”
You will now please to turn back and read this lecture four or five times over; and then, after committing the following order, you may parse the subsequent exercises.
SYSTEMATIC ORDER OF PARSING.
The order of parsing a CONJUNCTION, is—a conjunction, and why?—copulative or disjunctive, and why?—what does it connect?
“Wisdom and virtue form the good man’s character.” And is a conjunction, a word that is chiefly used to connect sentences; but in this example it connects only words—copulative, it serves to connect and continue the sentence by joining on a member which expresses an addition—it connects the words “wisdom and virtue.”
Wisdom is a noun, the name of a thing—(You may parse it in full.)—Wisdom is one of the nominatives to the verb “form.”
Virtue is a noun, the name, &c.—(Parse it in full:)—and in the nom. case to the verb “form,” and connected to the noun “wisdom” by and, according to RULE 33. Conjunctions connect nouns and pronouns in the same case.
Form is a verb, a word which signifies to do, &c.—of the third person, plural, because its two nominatives, “wisdom and virtue,” are connected by a copulative conjunction, agreeably to RULE 8. Two or more nouns in the singular number, joined by copulative conjunctions, must have verbs, nouns, and pronouns agreeing with them in the plural.
“Wisdom or folly governs us.” Or is a conjunction, a word that is chiefly used to connect sentences: it sometimes connects words—disjunctive, it serves not only to connect and continue the sentence, but also to join on a member which expresses opposition of meaning—it connects the nouns “wisdom and folly.”
Governs is a verb, a word that signifies, &e.—of the third person, singular number, agreeing with “wisdom or folly,” according to RULE 9. Two or more nouns singular, joined by disjunctive conjunctions, must have verbs, nouns, and pronouns agreeing with them in the singular:
If you reflect, for a few moments, on the meaning of me last two Rules presented, you will see, at once, their propriety and importance. For example; in the sentence, “Orlando and Thomas, who study their lessons, make rapid progress,” you notice that the two singular nouns, Orlando and Thomas, are connected by the copulative conjunction and, therefore the verb make, which agrees with them, is plural, because it expresses the action of both its nominatives or actors. And you observe, too, that the pronouns who and their, and the noun lessons, are plural, agreeing with the nouns Orlando and Thomas, according to RULE 8. The verb study is plural, agreeing with who, according to RULE 4.
But let us connect these two nouns by a disjunctive conjunction, and see how the sentence will read: “Orlando or Thomas, who studies his lesson, makes rapid progress.” Now, you perceive, that a different construction takes place, for the latter expression does not imply, that Orlando and Thomas, both study and make rapid progress; but it asserts, that either the one or the other studies, and makes rapid progress. Hence the verb makes is singular, because it expresses the action of the one or the other of its nominatives. And you observe, too, that the pronouns who and his, and the noun lesson, are likewise in the singular, agreeing with Orlando or Thomas, agreeably to RULE 9. Studies is also singular, agreeing with who, according to RULE 4.
EXERCISES IN PARSING.
Joseph and his brother reside in New York. The Sun, moon, and stars, admonish us of a superior and superintending Power. I respect my friend, because he is upright and obliging. Henry and William, who obey their teacher, improve rapidly. Henry or William, who obeys his teacher, improves very fast. Neither rank nor possession makes the guilty mind happy. Wisdom, virtue, and meekness, form the good man’s happiness and interest: they support him in adversity, and comfort him in prosperity. Man is a little lower than the angels. The United States, as justly as Great Britain, can now boast of their literary institutions.
NOTE. The verb form is plural, and agrees with three nouns singular, connected by copulative conjunctions, according to RULE 8. The verb comfort agrees with they for its nominative. It is connected to support by the conjunction and, agreeably to RULE 34. Angels is nom. to are understood, and Great Britain is nom. to can boast understood, according to RULE 35.
REMARKS ON CONJUNCTIONS AND PREPOSITIONS.
The same word is occasionally employed, either as a conjunction, an adverb, or a preposition. “I submitted, for it was in vain to resist;” in this example, for is a conjunction, because it connects the two members of a compound sentence. In the next it is a preposition, and governs victory in the objective case: “He contended for victory only.”
In the first of the following sentences, since is a conjunction; in the second, it is a preposition, and in the third, an adverb; “Since we must part, let us do it peaceably; I have not seen him since that time; Our friendship commenced long since.”
“He will repent before he dies; Stand before me; Why did you not return before” [that or this time;] in the first of these three examples, before is an adverbial conjunction, because it expresses time and connects; and in the second and third, it is a preposition.
As the words of a sentence are often transposed, so are also its members. Without attending to this circumstance, the learner may sometimes be at a loss to perceive the connecting power of a preposition or conjunction, for every preposition and every conjunction connects either words or phrases, sentences or members of sentences. Whenever a sentence begins with a preposition or conjunction, its members are transposed; as, “In the days of Joram, king of Israel, flourished the prophet Elisha;” “If thou seek the Lord, he will be found of thee; but, if thou forsake him, he will cast thee off for ever.”
“When coldness wraps this
suffering clay,
“Ah, whither strays the immortal
mind?”
That the words in, if, and when, in these examples, connect the members of the respective sentences to which they are attached, will obviously appear if we restore these sentences to their natural order, and bring these particles between the members which they connect: thus, “Elisha the prophet flourished in the days of Joram, king of Israel;” “The Lord will be found of thee if thou seek him; but he will cast thee off for ever if thou forsake him:”
“Ah, whither strays the immortal
mind,
“When coldness wraps this
suffering clay?”
As an exercise on this lecture, you may now answer these QUESTIONS NOT ANSWERED IN PARSING.
From what words is the term conjunction derived?—What is a sentence?—What is a simple sentence?—What is a compound sentence?—Give examples.—In what respect do conjunctions and prepositions agree in their nature?—How many sorts of conjunctions are there?—Repeat the lists of conjunctions.—Repeat some conjunctions with their corresponding conjunctions.—Do relative pronouns ever connect sentences?—Repeat the order of parsing a conjunction.—Do you apply any Rule in parsing a conjunction?—What Rule should be applied in parsing a noun or pronoun connected with another?—What Rule in parsing a verb agreeing with two or more nouns singular, connected by a copulative conjunction?—What Rule when the nouns are connected by a disjunctive?—In parsing a verb connected to another by a conjunction, what Rule do you apply?—Is a conjunction ever used as other parts of speech?—Give examples.—What is said of the words for, since, and before?—What is said of the transposition of sentences?
* * * * *
PHILOSOPHICAL NOTES.
On scientific principles, our connectives, commonly denominated prepositions and conjunctions, are but one part of speech, the distinction between them being merely technical. Some conjunctions unite only words, and some prepositions connect sentences. They are derived from nouns and verbs; and the time has been, when, perhaps, in our language, they did not perform the office of connectives.
“I wish you to believe, that I would not wilfully hurt a fly.” Here, in the opinion of H. Tooke, our modern conjunction that, is merely a demonstrative adjective, in a disguised form; and he attempts to prove it by the following resolution: “I would not wilfully hurt a fly. I wish you to believe that [assertion.”] Now, if we admit, that that is an adjective in the latter construction, it does not necessarily follow, that it is the same part of speech, nor that its associated meaning is precisely the same, in the former construction. Instead of expressing our ideas in two detached sentences, by the former phraseology we have a quicker and closer transition of thought, and both the mode of employing that, and its inferential meaning, are changed. Moreover, if we examine the meaning of each of these constructions, taken as a whole, we shall find, that they do not both convey the same ideas. By the latter, I assert, positively, that “I would not wilfully hurt a fly:” whereas, by the former, I merely wish you to believe that “I would not wilfully hurt a fly;” but I do not affirm, that as a fact.
That being the past part, of thean, to get, take, assume, by rendering it as a participle, instead of an adjective, we should come nearer to its primitive character. Thus, “I would not wilfully hurt a fly. I wish you to believe the assumed [fact or statement;] or, the fact assumed or taken.”
If, (formerly written gif, give, gin,) as previously stated, is the imperative of the Anglo-Saxon verb gifan, to give. In imitation of Horne Tooke, some of our modern philosophical writers are inclined to teach pupils to render it as a verb. Thus, “I will go, if he will accompany me:”—“He will accompany me. Grant—give that [fact] I will go.” For the purpose of ascertaining the primitive meaning of this word, I have no objection to such a resolution; but, by it, do we get the exact meaning and force of if as it is applied in our modern, refined state of the language? I trow not. But, admitting we do, does this prove that such a mode of resolving sentences can be advantageously adopted by learners in common schools? I presume it can not be denied, that instead of teaching the learner to express himself correctly in modern English, such a resolution is merely making him familiar with an ancient and barbarous construction which modern refinement has rejected. Our forefathers, I admit, who were governed by those laws of necessity which compel all nations in the early and rude state of their language, to express themselves in short, detached sentences, employed if as a verb when they used the following circumlocution: “My son will reform. Give that fact. I will forgive him.” But in the present, improved state of our language, by using ifPage 117
as a conjunction, (for I maintain that it is one,) we express the same thought more briefly; and our modern mode of expression has, too, a decisive advantage over the ancient, not only in point of elegance, but also in perspicuity and force. In Scotland and the north of England, some people still make use of gin, a contraction of given: thus, “I will pardon my son, gin he reform.” But who will contend, that they speak pure English?
But perhaps the advocates of what they call a philosophical development of language, will say, that by their resolution of sentences, they merely supply an ellipsis. If, by an ellipsis, they mean such a one as is necessary, to the grammatical construction, I cannot accede to their assumption. In teaching grammar, as well as in other things, we ought to avoid extremes:—we ought neither to pass superficially over an ellipsis necessary to the sense of a phrase, nor to put modern English to the blush, by adopting a mode of resolving sentences that would entirely change the character of our language, and carry the learner back to the Vandalic age.
But comes from the Saxon verb, beon-utan, to be-out. “All were well but (be-out, leave-out) the stranger.” “Man is but a reed, floating on the current of time.” Resolution: “Man is a reed, floating on the current of time; but (be-out this fact) he is not a stable being.”
And—aned, an’d, and, is the past part. of ananad, to add, join. A, an, ane, or one, from the same verb, points out whatever is aned, oned, or made one. And also refers to the thing that is joined to, added to, or made one with, some other person or thing mentioned. “Julius and Harriet will make a happy pair.” Resolution: “Julius, Harriet joined, united, or aned, will make a happy pair;” i.e. Harriet made one with Julius; will make a happy pair.
For means cause.
Because—be-cause, is a compound of the verb be, and the noun cause. It retains the meaning of both; as, “I believe the maxim, for I know it to be true;”—“I believe the maxim, be-cause I know it to be true;” i.e. the cause of my belief, be, or is, I know it to be true.
Nor is a contraction
of ne or. Ne is a contraction of not,
and
or, of other.
Nor is, not other-wise: not
in the other way
or manner.
Else is the imperative of alesan, unless, of onlesan, and lest, the past part. of lesan, all signifying to dismiss, release, loosen, set free. “He will be punished, unless he repent;”—“Unless, release, give up, (the fact) he repents he will be punished.” Though is the imperative of the Saxon verb thafigan, to allow, and yet of getan, to get. Yet is simply, get; ancient g is the modern y. “Though he slay me, yet will I trust in him:—Grant or allow (the fact) he slay me, get, or retain (the opposite fact) I will trust in him.”
* * * * *
QUESTIONS ON THE PHILOSOPHICAL NOTES.
From what parts of speech are prepositions and conjunctions derived?—What is Horne Tooke’s opinion of that?—From what is each of the following words derived, that, if, but, and, because, nor, else, unless, lest, though, and yet?
OF INTERJECTIONS.—CASES OF NOUNS.
INTERJECTIONS are words which express the sudden emotions of the speaker; as, “Alas! I fear for life;” “O death! where is thy sting?”
Interjections are not so much the signs of thought, as of feeling. Almost any word may be used as an interjection; but when so employed, it is not the representative of a distinct, idea. A word which denotes a distinct conception of the mind, must necessarily belong to some other part of speech. They who wish to speak often, or rather, to make noises, when they have no useful information to communicate, are apt to use words very freely in this way; such as the following expressions, la, la me, my, O my, O dear, dear me, surprising, astonishing, and the like.
Interjections not included in the following list, are generally known by their taking an exclamation point after them.
A LIST OF THE PRINCIPAL INTERJECTIONS.
1. Of earnestness or grief; as, O! oh! ah! alas! 2. Contempt; as, Pish! tush! 3. Wonder; as, Heigh! really! strange! 4. Calling; as, Hem! ho! halloo! 5. Disgust or aversion; as, Foh! fy! fudge! away! 6. Attention; as, Lo! behold! hark! 7. Requesting silence; as, Hush! hist! 8. Salutation; as, Welcome! hail! all hail!
NOTE. We frequently meet
with what some call an interjective
phrase; such as, Ungrateful
wretch! impudence of hope! folly in the
extreme! what ingratitude!
away with him!
As the interjection is the least important part of speech in the English language, it will require but little attention. You may, however, make yourself well acquainted with what has been said respecting it, and then commit the
SYSTEMATIC ORDER OF PARSING.
The order of parsing an INTERJECTION, is—an interjection, and why?
“O virtue! how amiable thou art!”
O is an interjection, a word used to express some passion or emotion of the speaker.
The ten parts of speech have now been unfolded and elucidated, although some of them have not been fully explained. Before you proceed any farther, you will please to begin again at the first lecture, and read over, attentively, the whole, observing to parse every example in the exercises systematically. You will then be able to parse the following exercises, which contain all the parts of speech. If you study faithfully six hours in a day, and pursue the directions given, you may become, if not a critical, at least, a good, practical grammarian, in six weeks; but if you study only three hours in a day, it will take you nearly three months to acquire the same knowledge.
EXERCISES IN PARSING.
True cheerfulness makes a man happy in himself, and promotes the happiness of all around him.
Modesty always appears graceful in youth: it doubles the lustre of every virtue which it seems to hide.
He who, every morning, plans the transactions of the day, and follows out that plan, carries on a thread that will guide him through the labyrinth of the most busy life.
The king gave me a generous reward for committing that barbarous act; but, alas! I fear the consequence.
E’en now, where Alpine solitudes
ascend,
I set me down a pensive hour to spend;
And, placed on high, above the storm’s
career,
Look downward where a hundred realms appear:—
Alas! the joys that fortune
brings,
Are trifling,
and decay;
And those who mind the paltry
things,
More trifling
still than they.
NOTE. In the second sentence of the foregoing exercises, which is governed by the verb to hide, according to RULE 16. He is nom. to carries; who is nom. to plans. Follows agrees with who understood, and is connected to plans by and; RULE 34. What did the king give? A reward to me. Then reward is in the obj. case, gov. by gave; RULE 20. Me is gov. by to understood; NOTE 1, RULE 32. The phrase, committing that barbarous act, is gov. by for; NOTE 2, under RULE 28. Hour is in the obj. case, gov. by to spend; RULE 20. Look is connected to set by and; RULE 34. Joys is nom. to are. That is gov. by brings; RULE 16. Those is nom. to are understood. They is nom. to are understood; RULE 35.
CASES OF NOUNS.
In a former lecture, I promised to give you a more extensive explanation of the cases of nouns; and, as they are, in many situations, a little difficult to be ascertained, I will now offer some remarks on this subject. But before you proceed, I wish you to parse all the examples in the exercises just presented, observing to pay particular attention to the remarks in the subjoined NOTE. Those remarks will assist you much in analyzing.
A noun is sometimes nominative to a verb placed many lines after the noun. You must exercise your judgment in this matter. Look at the sentence in the preceding exercises beginning with, “He who, every morning,” &c. and see if you can find the verb to which he is nominative. What does he do? He carries on a thread, &c. He, then, is nominative to the verb carries. What does who do? Who plans, and who follows, &c. Then who is nom. to plans, and who understood, is nominative to follows.
“A soul without reflection, like
a pile
Without inhabitant, to ruin runs.”
In order to find the verb to which the noun soul, in this sentence, is the nominative, put the question; What does a soul without reflection do? Such, a soul runs to ruin, like a pile without inhabitant. Thus you discover, that soul is nominative to runs.
When the words of a sentence are arranged according to their natural order, the nominative case, you recollect, is placed before the verb, and the objective, after it; but when the words of a sentence are transposed; that is, not arranged according to their natural order, it frequently happens, that the nominative comes after, and the objective, before the verb; especially in poetry, or when a question is asked: as, “Whence arises the misery of the present world?” “What good thing shall I do to inherit eternal life?” Put these expressions in the declarative form, and the nominative will precede, and the objective follow its verb: thus, “The misery of the present world arises whence; I shall do what good thing to inherit eternal life.”
“Now came still evening on,
and twilight gray
Had, in her sober livery, all things
clad.”
“Stern rugged nurse, thy rigid lore
With patience many a year she bore.”
What did the evening do? The evening came on. Gray twilight had clad what? Twilight had clad all things in her sober livery. Evening, then, is nom. to came, and the noun things is in the objective case, and gov. by had clad: RULE 20. What did she bear? She bore thy rigid lore with patience, for, or during, many a year. Hence you find, that lore is in the objective case, and governed by bore, according to RULE 20. Year is gov. by during understood: RULE 32.
A noun is frequently nominative to a verb understood, or in the objective, and governed by a verb understood; as, “Lo, [there is] the poor Indian! whose untutored mind.” “O, the pain [there is!] the bliss [there is] in dying!” “All were sunk, but the wakeful nightingale [was not sunk.”] “He thought as a sage [thinks,] though he felt as a man [feels.”] “His hopes, immortal, blow them by, as dust [is blown by.”] Rule 35 applies to these last three examples.
In the next place I will explain several cases of nouns and pronouns which have not yet come under our notice. Sometimes a noun or pronoun may be in the nominative case when it has no verb to agree with it.
OF THE NOMINATIVE CASE INDEPENDENT.
Whenever a direct address is made, the person or thing spoken to, is in the nominative case independent; as, “James, I desire you to study.”
You notice that, in this expression, I address myself to James that is, I speak to him; and you observe, too, that there is no verb, either expressed or implied, to which James can be the nominative; therefore you know that James is in the nom. case independent, according to Rule 5. Recollect, that whenever a noun is of the second person, it is in the nom. case independent; that is, independent of any verb; as, Selma, thy halls are silent; Love and meekness, my lord, become a churchman, better than ambition; O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, but ye would not!—For a farther illustration of this case, see Note 2, under the 5th Rule of Syntax.
NOTE. When a pronoun
of the second person is in apposition with a
noun independent, it is in
the same case; as, “Thou traitor, I
detest thee.”
OF THE NOMINATIVE CASE ABSOLUTE.
A noun or pronoun placed before a participle, without any verb to agree with it, is in the nominative case absolute; as, “The sun being risen, we pursued our journey.”
Sun is here placed before the participle “being risen,” and has no verb to agree with it; therefore it is in the nominative case absolute, according to RULE 6.
NOTE 1. A noun or pronoun in the nominative case independent, is always of the second person; but, in the case absolute, it is generally of the third person.
2. The case absolute is always nominative; the following sentence is therefore incorrect; “Whose top shall tremble, him descending,” &c.; it should be, he descending.
OF NOUNS IN APPOSITION.
Two or more nouns or pronouns signifying the same person or thing, are put, by apposition, in the same case; as, “Cicero, the great orator, philosopher, and statesman of Rome, was murdered by Antony.”
Apposition, in a grammatical sense, means something added, or names added, in order more fully to define or illustrate the sense of the first name mentioned.
You perceive that Cicero, in the preceding example, is merely the proper name of a man; but when I give him the three additional appellations, and call him a great orator, philosopher, and statesman, you understand what kind of a man he was; that is, by giving him these three additional names, his character and abilities as a man are more fully made known. And, surely, you cannot be at a loss to know that these four nouns must be in the same case, for they are all names given to the same person; therefore, if Cicero was murdered, the orator was murdered, and the philosopher was murdered, and the statesman was murdered, because they all mean one and the same person.
Nouns and pronouns in the objective case, are frequently in apposition; as, He struck Charles the student. Now it is obvious, that, when he struck Charles, he struck the student, because Charles was the student, and the student was Charles; therefore the noun student is in the objective case, governed by “struck,” and put by apposition with Charles, according to RULE 7.
Please to examine this lecture very attentively. You will then be prepared to parse the following examples correctly and systematically.
PARSING.
“Weep on the rocks of roaring winds, O maid of Inistore.”
Maid is a noun, the name of a person—– com. the name of a sort—fem. gender, it denotes a female—second pers. spoken to—sing. num. it implies but one—and in the nominative case independent, because it is addressed, and has no verb to agree with it, according to
RULE 5. When an address is made, the noun or pronoun addressed, is put in the nominative case independent.
“The general
being ransomed, the barbarians permitted him to
depart.”
General is a noun, the name, &c. (parse it in full:)—and in the nominative case absolute, because it is placed before the participle “being ransomed,” and it has no verb to agree with it, agreeably to
RULE 6. A noun or pronoun placed before a participle, and being independent of the rest of the sentence, is in the nominative case absolute.
"Thou man of God, flee to the land of Judah.”
Thou is a pronoun, a word used instead of a noun—personal, it personates “man”—second pers. spoken to—mas. gender, sing. num. because the noun “man” is for which it stands; RULE 13 (Repeat the Rule.)—Thou is in the nominative case independent and put by apposition with man, because it signifies the same thing, according to
RULE 7. Two or more nouns, or nouns and pronouns, signifying the same thing, are put, by apposition, in the same case.
Man is in the nominative case independent, according to Rule 5. Flee agrees with thou understood.
“Lo! Newton, priest
of Nature, shines afar,
Scans the wide world, and
numbers every star.”
Newton is a noun, (parse it in full,) and in the nominative case to “shines.” RULE 3.
Priest is a noun, (parse it in full,) and in the nom. case, it is the actor and subject of the verb “shines,” and put by apposition with “Newton,” because it signifies the same thing, agreeably to Rule 7. (Repeat the Rule.)
EXERCISES IN PARSING.
Turn from your evil ways, O house of Israel! Ye fields of light, celestial plains, ye scenes divinely fair! proclaim your Maker’s wondrous power. O king! live for ever. The murmur of thy streams, O Lora, brings back the memory of the past. The sound of thy woods, Garmallar, is lovely in my ear. Dost thou not behold, Malvina, a rock with its head of heath? Three aged pines bend from its face; green is the plain at its feet; there the flower of the mountain grows, and shades its white head in the breeze.
The General being slain, the army was routed. Commerce having thus got into the legislative body, privilege must be done away. Jesus had conveyed himself away, a multitude being in that place. I being in great haste, he consented. The rain having ceased, the dark clouds rolled away. The Son of God, while clothed in flesh, was subject to all the frailties and inconveniences of human nature, sin excepted; (that is, sin being excepted.)
In the days of Joram, king of Israel, flourished the prophet Elisha. Paul the apostle suffered martyrdom. Come, peace of mind, delightful guest! and dwell with me. Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears.
Soul of the just, companion of the dead!
Where is thy home, and whither art thou
fled?
Till Hymen brought his love-delighted
hour,
There dwelt no joy in Eden’s rosy
bower:—
The world was sad, the garden was a wild,
And man the hermit sighed, till woman
smiled.
NOTE. Those verbs in italics, in the preceding examples, are all in the imperative mood, and second person, agreeing with thou, ye, or you, understood. House of Israel is a noun of multitude. Was routed and must be done are passive verbs. Art fled is a neuter verb in a passive form. Clothed is a perfect participle. Till is an adverbial conjunction.
When you shall have analyzed, systematically, every word in the foregoing exercises, you may answer the following
QUESTIONS NOT ANSWERED IN PARSING.
Repeat the list of interjections.—Repeat some interjective phrases.—Repeat the order of parsing an interjection.—In order to find the verb to which a noun is nom. what question do you put?—Give examples.—Is the nominative case ever placed after the verb?—When?—Give examples.—Does the objective case ever come before the verb?—Give examples.—Is a noun ever nom. to a verb understood?—Give examples.—When is a noun or pronoun in the nom. case independent?—Give examples.—Are nouns of the second person always in the nom. case independent?—When a pronoun is put by apposition with a noun independent, in what case is it?—When is a noun or pronoun in the nom. case absolute?—Give examples.—When are nouns or nouns and pronouns put, by apposition, in the same case?—Give examples.—In parsing a noun or pronoun in the nom. case independent, what Rule should be applied?—In parsing the nom. case absolute, what Rule?—What Rule in parsing nouns or pronouns in apposition?—Do real interjections belong to written language?—(Phil. Notes.)—From what are the following words derived, pish, fy, lo, halt, farewell, welcome, adieu!
* * * * *
PHILOSOPHICAL NOTES.
The term INTERJECTION is applied to those inarticulate sounds employed both by men and brutes, not to express distinct ideas, but emotions, passions, or feelings. The sounds employed by human beings in groaning, sighing, crying, screaming, shrieking, and laughing, by the dog in barking, growling, and whining, by the horse in snorting and neighing, by the sheep in bleating, by the cat in mewing, by the dove in cooing, by the duck in quacking, and by the goose in hissing, we sometimes attempt to represent by words; but, as written words are the ocular representatives of articulate sounds, they cannot be made clearly to denote inarticulate or indistinct noises. Such indistinct utterances belong to natural language; but they fall below the bounds of regulated speech. Hence, real interjections are not a part of written language.
The meaning of those words
commonly called interjections, is easily
shown by tracing them to their
roots.
Pish and pshaw
are the Anglo-Saxon paec, paeca; and are
equivalent to trumpery!
i.e. tromperie, from tromper.
Fy or fie is the imperative, foe, the past tense, and foh or faugh, the past part. of the Saxon verb fian, to hate. Lo is the imperative of look. Halt is the imperative of healden, to hold. Farewell—fare-well, is a compound of faran, to go, and the adverb well. It means, to go well. Welcome—well-come, signifies, it is well that you are come. Adieu comes from the French a Dieu, to God; meaning, I commend you to God.
* * * * *
OF THE MOODS AND TENSES OF VERBS.
You have now acquired a general, and, I may say, an extensive, knowledge of nine parts of speech; but you know but little, as yet, respecting the most important one of all; I mean the VERB. I will, therefore, commence this lecture by giving you an explanation of the Moods and Tenses of verbs. Have the goodness, however, first to turn back and read over Lecture II., and reflect well upon what is there said respecting the verb; after which I will conduct you so smoothly through the moods and tenses, and the conjugation of verbs, that, instead of finding yourself involved in obscurities and deep intricacies, you will scarcely find an obstruction to impede your progress.
I. OF THE MOODS.
The MOOD or MODE of a verb means the manner in which its action, passion, or being, is represented.
When I wish to assert a thing, positively, I use the declarative or indicative mode; as, The man walks; but sometimes the action or occurrence of which I wish to speak, is doubtful, and then I must not declare it positively, but I must adopt another mode of expression; thus, If the man walk, he will refresh himself with the bland breezes. This second mode or manner of representing the action, is called the subjunctive or conditional mode.
Again, we sometimes employ a verb when we do not wish to declare a thing, nor to represent the action in a doubtful or conditional manner; but we wish to command some one to act. We then use the imperative or commanding mode, and say, Walk, sir. And when we do not wish to command a man to act, we sometimes allude to his power or ability to act. This fourth mode of representing action, is called the potential mode; as, He can walk; He could walk. The fifth and last mode, called the infinitive or unlimited mode, we employ in expressing action in an unlimited manner; that is, without confining it, in respect to number and person, to any particular agent; as, To walk, to ride. Thus you perceive, that the mood, mode, or manner of representing the action, passion, or being of a verb, must vary according to the different intentions of the mind.
Were we to assign a particular name to every change in the mode or manner of representing action or being, the number of moods in our language would amount to many hundreds. But this principle of division and arrangement, if followed out in detail, would lead to great perplexity, without producing any beneficial result. The division of Mr. Harris, in his Hermes, is much more curious than instructive. He has fourteen moods; his interrogative, optative, hortative, promissive, precautive, requisitive, enunciative, &c. But as far as philosophical accuracy and the convenience and advantage of the learner are concerned, it is believed that no arrangement is preferable to the following. I am not unaware that plausible objections may be raised against it; but what arrangement cannot be objected to?
There are five moods of verbs, the Indicative, the Subjunctive, the Imperative, the Potential, and the Infinitive.
The INDICATIVE MOOD simply indicates or declares a thing; as, “He writes;” or it asks a question; as, “Does he write? Who wrote that?”
The term indicative, comes from the Latin indico, to declare. Hence, the legitimate province of the indicative mood, is to declare things, whether positively or negatively; thus, positively, He came with me; negatively, He came not with me. But in order to avoid a multiplication of moods, we extend its meaning, and use the indicative mood in asking a question; as, Who came with you?
The subjunctive mood being more analogous to the indicative in conjugation, than any other, it ought to be presented next in order. This mood, however, differs materially from the indicative in sense; therefore you ought to make yourself well acquainted with the nature of the indicative, before you commence with the subjunctive.
The SUBJUNCTIVE MOOD expresses action, passion, or being, in a doubtful or conditional manner or,
When a verb is preceded by a word that expresses a condition, doubt, motive, wish, or supposition, it is in the SUBJUNCTIVE MOOD; as, “If he study, he will improve; I will respect him, though he chide me; He will not be pardoned, unless he repent; Had_ he been there, he would have conquered;” (that is, if he had been there.)
The conjunctions if, though, unless, in the preceding examples, express condition, doubt, &c.; therefore, the verbs study, chide, repent, and had been, are in the subjunctive mood.
NOTE 1. A verb in this mood is generally attended by another verb in some other mood. You observe, that each of the first three of the preceding examples, contains a verb in the indicative mood, and the fourth, a verb in the potential.
2. Whenever the conjunctions if, though, unless, except, whether, lest, or any others, denote contingency or doubt, the verbs that follow them are in the subjunctive mood; as, “If he ride out every day, his health will probably improve;” that is, if he shall or should ride out hereafter. But when these conjunctions do not imply doubt, &c. the verbs that follow them are in the indicative, or some other mood; as, “Though he rides out daily, his health is no better.” The conjunctive and indicative forms of this mood, are explained in the conjugation of the verb to love. See page.
The IMPERATIVE MOOD is used for commanding, exhorting, entreating, or permitting; as, "Depart thou; Remember my admonitions; Tarry awhile longer; Go in peace.”
The verb depart expresses a command; remember exhorts; tarry expresses entreaty; and go, permission; therefore they are all in the imperative mood.
The imperative, from impero, to command, is literally that mood of the verb used in commanding; but its technical meaning in grammar is extended to the use of the verb in exhorting, entreating, and permitting.
A verb in the imperative mood, is always of the second person, though never varied in its terminations, agreeing with thou, ye, or you, either expressed or implied. You may know a verb in this mood by the sense; recollect, however, that the nominative is always second person, and frequently understood; as, George, give me my hat; that is, give thou, or give you. When the nominative is expressed, it is generally placed after the verb; as, Go thou; Depart ye; or between the auxiliary and the verb; as, Do thou go; Do ye depart. (Do is the auxiliary.)
The POTENTIAL MOOD implies possibility, liberty, or necessity, power, will, or obligation; as, “It may rain; He may go or stay; We must eat and drink; I can ride; He would walk; They should learn.”
In the first of these examples, the auxiliary may implies possibility; in the second it implies liberty; that is, he is at liberty to go or to stay; in the third, must denotes necessity; can denotes power or ability; would implies will or inclination; that is, he had a mind to walk; and should implies obligation. Hence you perceive, that the verbs, may rain, may go, must eat, must drink, can ride, world walk, and should learn, are in the potential mood.
NOTE 1. As a verb in the indicative mood is converted into the subjunctive when it is preceded by a conjunction expressing doubt, contingency, supposition, &c., so a verb in the potential mood, may, in like manner, be turned into the subjunctive; as, “If I could deceive him, I should abhor it; Though he should increase in wealth, he would not be charitable.” I could deceive, is in the potential; If I could deceive, is in the subjunctive mood.
2. The potential mood,
as well as the indicative, is used in asking
a question; as, “May
I go? Could you understand him? Must we die?”
The INFINITIVE MOOD expresses action, passion, or being, in a general and unlimited manner, having no nominative, consequently, neither person nor number; as, "To speak, to walk.”
Infinitive means unconfined, or unlimited. This mood is called the infinitive, because its verb is not confined or limited to a nominative. A verb in any other mood is limited; that is, it must agree in number and person with its nominative; but a verb in this mood has no nominative, therefore, it never changes its termination, except to form the perfect tense. Now you understand why all verbs are called finite or limited, excepting those in the infinitive mood.
NOTE. To, the sign of the infinitive mood, is often understood before the verb; as, “Let me proceed;” that is, Let me to proceed. See RULE 25. To is not a preposition when joined to a verb in this mood; thus, to ride, to rule; but it should be parsed with the verb, and as a part of it.
If you study this lecture attentively, you will perceive, that when I say, I write, the verb is in the indicative mood; but when I say, if I write, or, unless I write, &c. the verb is in the subjunctive mood; write thou, or write ye or you, the imperative; I may write, I must write, I could write, &c. the potential; and to write, the infinitive. Any other verb (except the defective) may be employed in the same manner.
* * * * *
II. OF THE TENSES.
TENSE means time.
Verbs have six tenses, the Present, the Imperfect,
the Perfect, the
Pluperfect, and the First and Second Future tenses.
The PRESENT TENSE represents an action or event as taking place at the time in which it is mentioned; as, “I smile; I see; I am seen.”
NOTE 1. The present tense
is also used in speaking of actions
continued, with occasional
intermissions, to the present time; as,
“He rides out
every morning.”
2. This tense is sometimes
applied to represent the actions of
persons long since dead; as,
“Seneca reasons and moralizes well;
An honest man is the
noblest work of God.”
3. When the present tense is preceded by the words, when, before, after, as soon as, &c. it is sometimes used to point out the relative time of a future action; as, “When he arrives we shall hear the news.”
The IMPERFECT TENSE denotes a past action or event, however distant; or,
The IMPERFECT TENSE represents an action or event as past and finished, but without defining the precise time of its completion; as, “I loved her for her modesty and virtue; They were travelling post when he met them.”
In these examples, the verbs loved and met express past and finished actions, and therefore constitute a perfect tense as strictly as any form of the verb in our language; but, as they do not define the precise time of the completion of these actions, their tense may properly be denominated an indefinite past. By defining the present participle in conjunction with the verb, we have an imperfect tense in the expression, were travelling. This course, however, would not be in accordance with the ordinary method of treating the participle. Hence it follows, that the terms imperfect and perfect, as applied to this and the next succeeding tense, are not altogether significant of their true character; but if you learn to apply these tenses correctly, the propriety or impropriety of their names is not a consideration of very great moment.
The PERFECT TENSE denotes past time, and also conveys an allusion to the present; as, “I have finished my letter.”
The verb have finished, in this example, signifies that the action, though past, was perfectly finished at a point of time immediately preceding, or in the course of a period which comes to the present. Under this view of the subject, the term perfect may be properly applied to this tense, for it specifies, not only the completion of the action, but, also, alludes to the particular period of its accomplishment.
The PLUPERFECT TENSE represents a past action or event that transpired before some other past time specified; as, “I had finished my letter before my brother arrived.”
You observe that the verb had finished, in this example, represents one past action, and the arrival of my brother, another past action; therefore had finished is in the pluperfect tense, because the action took place prior to the taking place of the other past action specified in the same sentence.
The FIRST FUTURE TENSE denotes a future action or event; as “I will finish; I shall finish my letter.”
The SECOND FUTURE TENSE represents a future action that will be fully accomplished, at or before the time of another future action or event; as, “I shall have finished my letter when my brother arrives.”
This example clearly shows you the meaning and the proper use of the second future tense. The verb “shall have finished” implies a future action that will be completely finished, at or before the time of the other future event denoted by the phrase, “when my brother arrives.”
NOTE. What is sometimes called the Inceptive future, is expressed thus, “I am going to write;” “I am about to write.” Future time is also indicated by placing the infinitive present immediately after the indicative present of the verb to be; thus, “I am to write;” “Harrison is to be, or ought to be, commander in chief;” “Harrison is to command the army.”
You may now read what is said respecting the moods and tenses several times over, and then you may learn to conjugate a verb. But, before you proceed to the conjugation of verbs, you will please to commit the following paragraph on the Auxiliary verbs and, also, the signs of the moods and tenses; and, in conjugating, you must pay particular attention to the manner in which these signs are applied.
OF THE AUXILIARY VERBS.
AUXILIARY or HELPING VERBS are those by the help of which the English verbs are principally conjugated. May, can, must, might, could, would, should, and shall, are always auxiliaries; do, be, have, and will, are sometimes auxiliaries, and sometimes principal verbs.
The use of the auxiliaries is shown in the following conjugation.
SIGNS OF THE MOODS.
The Indicative Mood is known by the sense, or by its having no sign, except in asking a question; as, “Who loves you?”
The conjunctions if, though, unless, except, whether, and lest, are generally signs of the Subjunctive; as, “If I love; unless I love,” &c.
A verb is generally known to be in, the Imperative Mood by its agreeing with thou, or ye or you, understood; as, "Love virtue, and follow her steps;” that is, love thou, or love ye or you; follow thou, &c.
May, can, and must, might, could, would, and should, are signs of the Potential Mood; as, “I may love; I must love; I should love,” &c.
To is the sign of the Infinitive; as, “To love, to smile, to hate, to walk.”
SIGNS OF THE TENSES.
The first form of the verb is the sign of the present tense; as, love, smile, hate, walk.
Ed—the imperfect tense of regular verbs; as, loved, smiled, hated, walked.
Have—the perfect; as, have loved.
Had—the pluperfect; as, had loved. Shall or will—the first future; as, shall love, or will love; shall smile, will smile.
Shall or will have—the second future; as, shall have loved, or will have loved.
NOTE. There are some
exceptions to these signs, which you will
notice by referring to the
conjugation in the potential mood.
Now, I hope you will so far consult your own ease and advantage, as to commit, perfectly, the signs of the moods and tenses before you proceed farther than to the subjunctive mood. If you do, the supposed Herculean task of learning to conjugate verbs, will be transformed into a few hours of pleasant pastime.
The Indicative Mood has six tenses.
The Subjunctive has also six tenses.
The Imperative has only one tense.
The Potential has four tenses.
The Infinitive has two tenses.
CONJUGATION OF VERBS.
The CONJUGATION of a verb is the regular combination and arrangement of its several numbers, persons, moods, and tenses.
The Conjugation of an active verb, is styled the active voice; and that of a passive verb, the passive voice.
Verbs are called Regular when they form their imperfect tense of the indicative mood, and their perfect participle, by adding to the present tense ed, or d only when the verb ends in e; as,
Pres. Tense. Imp. Tense.
Perf. Participle
I favor. I favor_ed_. favor_ed_.
I love. I love_d_, love_d_.
A Regular Verb is conjugated in the following manner.
TO LOVE.—INDICATIVE MOOD.
Present Tense.
Singular. Plural.
1. Pers. I love,
1. We love, 2. Pers. Thou lovest,
2. Ye or you love,
3. Pers. He, she, or it, loveth
3. They love.
or
loves.
When we wish to express energy or positiveness, the auxiliary do should precede the verb in the present tense: thus,
Singular. Plural. 1. I do love, 1. We do love, 2. Thou dost love, 2. Ye or you do love, 3. He doth or does love. 3. They do love.
Imperfect Tense.
Singular. Plural. 1. I loved, 1. We loved, 2. Thou lovedst, 2. Ye or you loved, 3. He loved. 3. They loved.
Or by-prefixing did to the present: thus,
Singular. Plural. 1. I did love 1. We did love, 2. Thou didst love, 2. Ye or you did love, 3. He did love. 3. They did love.
Perfect Tense.
Singular. Plural. 1. I have loved, 1. We have loved, 2. Thou hast loved, 2. Ye or you have loved, 3. He hath or has loved. 3. They have loved.
Pluperfect Tense.
Singular. Plural. 1. I had loved, 1. We had loved, 2. Thou hadst loved, 2. Ye or you had loved, 3. He had loved. 3. They had loved.
First Future Tense.
Singular. Plural.
1. I shall or will love, 1. We
shall or will love, 2. Thou shalt or
wilt love, 2. Ye or you shall or
will
love,
3. He shall or will love, 3. They
shall or will love.
Second Future Tense.
Singular. Plural. 1. I shall have loved, 1. We shall have loved, 2. Thou wilt have loved, 2. Ye or you will have loved, 3. He will have loved, 3. They will have loved.
NOTE. Tenses formed without auxiliaries, are called simple tenses; as, I love; I loved; but those formed by the help of auxiliaries, are denominated compound tenses; as, I have loved; I had loved, &c.
This display of the verb shows you, in the clearest light, the application of the signs of the tenses, which signs ought to be perfectly committed to memory before you proceed any farther. By looking again at the conjugation, you will notice, that have, placed before the perfect participle of any verb, forms the perfect tense; had, the pluperfect; shall or will, the first future, and so on.
Now speak each of the verbs, love, hate, walk, smile, rule, and conquer, in the first person of each tense in this mood, with the pronoun I before it; thus, indicative mood, pres. tense, first pers. sing. I love; imperf. I loved; perf. I have loved; and so on, through all the tenses. If you learn thoroughly the conjugation of the verb in the indicative mood, you will find no difficulty in conjugating it through those that follow, for in the conjugation through all the moods, there is a great similarity.
SUBJUNCTIVE MOOD.
Present Tense, or elliptical future.—Conjunctive form.
Singular. Plural. 1. If I love, 1. If we love, 2. If thou love, 2. If ye or you love, 3. If he love. 3. If they love.
Look again at the conjugation in the indicative present, and you will observe, that the form of the verb differs from this form in the subjunctive. The verb in the present tense of this mood, does not vary its termination on account of number or person. This is called the conjunctive form of the verb; but sometimes the verb in the subjunctive mood, present tense, is conjugated in the same manner as it is in the indicative, with this exception, if, though, unless, or some other conjunction, is prefixed; as,
Indicative form.
Singular. Plural. 1. If I love, 1. If we love, 2. If thou lovest, 2. If ye or you love, 3. If he loves, 3. If they love.
The following general rule will direct you when to use the conjunctive form of the verb, and when the indicative. When a verb in the subjunctive mood, present tense, has a future signification, or a reference to future time, the conjunctive form should be used; as, “If thou prosper, thou shouldst be thankful;” “He will maintain his principles, though he lose his estate;” that is, If thou shalt or shouldst prosper; though he shall or should lose, &c. But when a verb in the subjunctive mood, present tense, has no reference to future time, the indicative form ought to be used; as, “Unless he means what he says, he is doubly faithless.” By this you perceive, that when a verb in the present tense of the subjunctive mood, has a future signification, an auxiliary is always understood before it, for which reason, in this construction, the termination of the principal verb never varies; us, “He will not become eminent, unless he exert himself;” that is, unless he shall exert, or should exert himself. This tense of the subjunctive mood ought to be called the elliptical future.
The imperfect, the perfect, the pluperfect, and the first future tenses of this mood, are conjugated, in every respect, like the same tenses of the indicative, with this exception; in the subjunctive mood, a conjunction implying doubt, &c. is prefixed to the verb. In the second future tense of this mood, the verb is conjugated thus:
Second Future Tense.
Singular. Plural.
1. If I shall have loved, 1. If we shall have loved, 2. If thou shalt have loved, 2. If you shall have loved, 3. If he shall have loved. 3. If they shall have loved.
Look at the same tense in the indicative mood, and you will readily perceive the distinction between the two conjugations.
IMPERATIVE MOOD.
Singular. Plural. 2. Love, or love thou, or do 2. Love, or love ye or you, or thou love. do ye or you love.
NOTE. We cannot command,
exhort, &c. either in past or future
time; therefore a verb in
this mood is always in the present
tense.
POTENTIAL MOOD.
Present Tense.
Singular. Plural.
1. I may, can, or must love, 1.
We may, can, or must love, 2. Thou mayst, canst,
or must 2. Ye or you may, can,
or
love,
must love,
3. He may, can, or must love. 3.
They may, can, or must love.
Imperfect Tense.
Singular. Plural.
1. I might, could, would, or 1.
We might, could, would, or
should love,
should love,
2. Thou mightst, couldst, 2. Ye or
you might, could,
wouldst, or shouldst love,
would, or should love,
3. He might, could, would, or 3.
They might, could, would,
should love,
or should love.
Perfect Tense.
Singular. Plural.
1. I may, can, or must have 1.
We may, can, or must have
loved,
loved,
2. Thou mayst, canst, or must 2.
Ye or you may, can, or
have loved,
must have loved,
3. He may, can, or must 3.
They may, can, or must
have loved.
have loved.
Pluperfect Tense.
Singular. Plural.
1. I might, could, would, 1. We
might, could, would,
or should
have loved, or should have loved,
2. Thou mightst, couldst, wouldst, 2. Ye
or you might, could,
or shouldst
have loved, would, or should have loved,
3. He might, could, would, 3. They
might, could, would,
or should
have loved, or should have loved.
By examining carefully the conjugation of the verb through this mood, you will find it very easy; thus, you will notice, that whenever any of the auxiliaries, may, can, or must, is placed before a verb, that verb is in the potential mood, present tense; might, could, would, or should, renders it in the potential mood, imperfect tense; may, can, or must have, the perfect tense; and might, could, would, or should have, the pluperfect tense.
INFINITIVE MOOD.
Pres. Tense. To love. Perf. Tense. To have loved.
PARTICIPLES.
Present or imperfect, Loving.
Perfect or passive, Loved.
Compound, Having loved.
NOTE. The perfect participle of a regular verb, corresponds exactly with the imperfect tense; yet the former may, at all times, be distinguished from the latter, by the following rule: In composition, the imperfect tense of a verb always has a nominative, either expressed or implied: the perfect participle never has.
For your encouragement, allow me to inform you, that when you shall have learned to conjugate the verb to love, you will be able to conjugate all the regular verbs in the English language, for they are all conjugated precisely in the same manner. By pursuing the following direction, you can, in a very short time, learn to conjugate any verb. Conjugate the verb love through all the moods and tenses, in the first person singular, with the pronoun I before it, and speak the Participles: thus, Indicative mood, pres. tense, first pers. sing. I love, imperf. tense, I loved; perf. tense, I have loved; and so on, through every mood and tense. Then conjugate it in the second pers. sing, with the pronoun thou before it, through all the moods and tenses; thus, Indic. mood, pres. tense, second pers. sing, thou lovest; imperf. tense, thou lovedst; and so on, through the whole. After that, conjugate it in the third pers. sing, with he before it; and then in the first pers. plural, with we before it, in like manner through all the moods and tenses. Although this mode of procedure may, at first, appear to be laborious, yet, as it is necessary, I trust you will not hesitate to adopt it. My confidence in your perseverance, induces me to recommend any course which I know will tend to facilitate your progress.
When you shall have complied with my requisition, you may conjugate the following verbs in the same manner; which will enable you, hereafter, to tell the mood and tense of any verb without hesitation: walk, hate, smile, rule, conquer, reduce, relate, melt, shun, fail.
* * * * *
The changes in the termination of words, in all languages, have been formed by the coalescence of words of appropriate meaning. This subject was approached on page 49. It is again taken up for the purpose of showing, that the moods and tenses, as well as the number and person, of English verbs, do not solely depend on inflection.
The coalescing syllables which form the number and person of the Hebrew verb, are still considered pronouns; and, by those who have investigated the subject, it is conceded, that the same plan has been adopted in the formationPage 135
of the Latin and Greek verbs, as in the Hebrew. Some languages have carried this process to a very great extent. Ours is remarkable for the small number of its inflections. But they who reject the passive verb, and those moods and tenses which are formed by employing what are called “auxiliary verbs,” because they are formed of two or more verbs, do not appear to reason soundly. It is inconsistent to admit, that walk-eth, and walk-ed, are tenses, because each is but one word, and to reject have walked, and will walk, as tenses, because each is composed of two words. Eth, as previously shown, is a contraction of doeth, or haveth, and ed, of dede, dodo, doed, or did; and, therefore, walk-eth; i.e. walk-doeth, or doeth-walk, and walk-ed; i.e. walk-did, or doed or did-walk, are, when analyzed, as strictly compound, as will walk, shall walk, and have walked. The only difference in the formation of these tenses, is, that in the two former, the associated verbs have been contracted and made to coalesce with the main verb, but in the two latter, they still maintain their ground as separate words.
If it be said that will walk is composed of two words, each of which conveys a distinct idea, and, therefore, should be analyzed by itself, the same argument with all its force, may be applied to walk-eth, walk-ed, walk-did, or did walk. The result of all the investigations of this subject, appears to settle down into the hackneyed truism, that the passive verbs, and the moods and tenses, of some languages, are formed by inflections, or terminations either prefixed or postfixed, and of other languages, by the association of auxiliary verbs, which have not yet been contracted and made to coalesce as terminations. The auxiliary, when contracted into a terminating syllable, retains its distinct and intrinsic meaning, as much as when associated with a verb by juxtaposition: consequently, an “auxiliary verb” may form a part of a mood or tense, or passive verb, with as much propriety as a terminating syllable. They who contend for the ancient custom of keeping the auxiliaries distinct, and parsing them as primary verbs, are, by the same principle, bound to extend their dissecting-knife to every compound word in the language.
Having thus attempted briefly to prove the philosophical accuracy of the theory which recognises the tenses, moods, and passive verbs, formed by the aid of auxiliaries, I shall now offer one argument to show that this theory, and this only, will subserve the purposes of the practical grammarian.
As it is not so much the province of philology to instruct in the exact meaning of single and separate words, as it is to teach the student to combine and employ them properly in framing sentences,Page 136
and as those combinations which go by the name of compound tenses and passive verbs, are necessary in writing and discourse, it follows, conclusively, that that theory which does not explain these verbs in their combined state, cannot teach the student the correct use and application of the verbs of our language. By such an arrangement, he cannot learn when it is proper to use the phrases, shall have walked, might have gone, have seen, instead of, shall walk, might go, and saw; because this theory has nothing to do with the combining of verbs. If it be alleged, that the speaker or writer’s own good sense must guide him in combining these verbs, and, therefore, that the directions of the grammarian are unnecessary, it must be recollected, that such an argument would bear, equally, against every principle of grammar whatever. In short, the theory of the compound tenses, and of the passive verb, appears to be so firmly based in the genius of our language, and so practically important to the student, as to defy all the engines of the paralogistic speculator, and the philosophical quibbler, to batter it down.
But the most plausible objection to the old theory is, that it is encumbered with much useless technicality and tedious prolixity, which are avoided by the simple process of exploding the passive verb, and reducing the number of the moods to three, and of the tenses to two. It is certain, however, that if we reject the names of the perfect, pluperfect, and future tenses, the names of the potential and subjunctive moods, and of the passive verb, in writing and discourse we must still employ those verbal combinations which form them; and it is equally certain, that the proper mode of employing such combinations, is as easily taught or learned by the old theory, which names them, as by the new, which gives them no name.
On philosophical principles, we might, perhaps, dispense with the future tenses of the verb, by analyzing each word separately; but, as illustrated on page 79, the combined words which form our perfect and pluperfect tenses have an associated meaning, which is destroyed by analyzing each word separately. That arrangement, therefore, which rejects these tenses, appears to be, not only unphilosophical, but inconsistent and inaccurate.
For the satisfaction of those teachers who prefer it, and for their adoption, too, a modernized philosophical theory of the moods and tenses is here presented. If it is not quite so convenient and useful as the old one, they need not hesitate to adopt it. It has the advantage of being new; and, moreover, it sounds large, and will make the commonalty stare. Let it be distinctly understood, that you teach "philosophical grammar, founded on reason and common sense,” and you will pass for a very learned man, and make all the good housewives wonder at the rapid march of intellect, and the vast improvements of the age.
MOOD.
Verbs have three moods, the indicative, (embracing what is commonly included under the indicative, the subjunctive, and the potential,) the imperative, and the infinitive.—For definitions, refer to the body of the work.
TENSE OR TIME.
Verbs have only two tenses, the present and the past. A verb expressing action commenced and not completed, is in the present tense; as, “Religion soars: it has gained many victories: it will [to] carry its votaries to the blissful regions.”
When a verb expresses finished
action, it is in the past tense; as,
“This page (the Bible)
God hung out of heaven, and retired.”
A verb in the imperative and infinitive moods, is always in the present tense, high authorities to the contrary notwithstanding. The command must necessarily be given in time present, although its fulfilment must be future. John, what are you doing? Learning my task. Why do you learn it? Because my preceptor commanded me to do so. When did he command you? Yesterday.—Not now, of course.
That it is inconsistent with the nature of things for a command to be given in future time, and that the fulfilment of the command, though future, has nothing to do with the tense or time of the command itself, are truths so plain as to put to the blush the gross absurdity of those who identify the time of the fulfilment with that of the command.
* * * * *
EXERCISES IN PARSING.
You may read the book which I have printed. May, an irregular active verb, signifying “to have and to exercise might or strength,” indic. mood, pres. tense, second pers. plur. agreeing with its nom. you. Read, an irregular verb active, infinitive mood, pres. tense, with the sign to understood, referring to you as its agent. Have, an active verb, signifying to possess, indic. present, and having for its object, book understood after “which.” Printed, a perf. participle, referring to book understood.
Johnson, and Blair, and Lowth,
would have been laughed at, had
they essayed to thrust
any thing like our modernized
philosophical grammar down
the throats of their contemporaries.
Would, an active verb, signifying “to exercise volition,” in the past tense of the indicative. Have, a verb, in the infinitive, to understood. Been, a perfect part. of to be, referring to Johnson, Blair, and Lowth. Laughed at, perf. part, of to laugh at, referring to the same as been. Had, active verb, in the past tense of the indicative, agreeing with its nom. they. Essayed, perf. part, referring to they. Call this “philosophical parsing, on reasoning principles, according to the original laws of nature and of thought,” and the pill will be swallowed, by pedants and their dupes, with the greatest ease imaginable.
* * * * *
LECTURE XII.
OF IRREGULAR VERBS.
Irregular verbs are those that do not form their imperfect tense and perfect participle by the addition of d or ed to the present tense; as,
Pres. Tense. Imperf. Tense. Perf. or Pass. Part. I write I wrote written I begin I began begun I go I went gone
The following is a list of the irregular verbs. Those marked with an R are sometimes conjugated regularly.
Pres. Tense. Imperf. Tense.
Perf. or Pass. Part.
Abide abode abode
Am was been
Arise arose arisen
Awake awoke, R. awaked
Bear, to bring forth bare born
Bear, to carry bore borne
Beat beat beaten, beat
Begin began begun
Bend bent bent
Bereave bereft, R. bereft, R.
Beseech besought besought
Bid bade, bid bidden, bid
Bind bound bound
Bite bit bitten, bit
Bleed bled bled
Blow blew blown
Break broke broken
Breed bred bred
Bring brought brought
Build built built
Burst burst, R. burst, R.
Buy bought bought
Cast cast cast
Catch caught, R. caught, R.
Chide chid chidden, chid
Choose chose chosen
Cleave, to adhere clave, R. cleaved
Cleave, to split cleft cleft,
or
clove
cloven
Cling clung clung
Clothe clothed clad, R.
Come came come
Cost cost cost
Crow crew, R. crowed
Creep crept crept
Cut cut cut
Dare, to venture durst dared
Dare, to challenge REGULAR
Deal dealt, R. dealt, R.
Dig dug, R. dug, R.
Do did done
Draw drew drawn
Drive drove driven
Drink drank drunk, drank[6]
Dwell dwelt, R. dwelt, R.
[6] The men were drunk; i.e. inebriated. The toasts were drank.
[7] Gotten is nearly obsolete. Its compound forgotten, is still in good use.
[8] Ridden is nearly obsolete.
[9] Sang and sank should not be used in familiar style.
[10] Spitten is nearly obsolete.
In familiar writing and discourse, the following, and some other verbs, are often improperly terminated by t instead of ed; as, “learnt, spelt, spilt, stopt, latcht.” They should be, “learned, spelled, spilled, stopped, latched.”
You may now conjugate the following irregular verbs, in a manner similar to the conjugation of regular verbs: arise, begin, bind, do, go, grow, run, lend, teach, write. Thus, to arise—Indicative mood, pres. tense, first person, sing. I arise; imperf. tense, I arose; perf. tense, I have arisen, and so on, through all the moods, and all the tenses of each mood; and then speak the participles: thus, pres. arising, perf. arisen, comp. having arisen. In the next place, conjugate the same verb in the second person sing. through all the moods and tenses; and then in the third person sing. and in the first pers. plural. After that, you may proceed in the same manner with the words begin, bind, &c.
Now read the eleventh and twelfth lectures four or five times over, and learn the order of parsing a verb. You will then be prepared to parse the following verbs in full; and I presume, all the other parts of speech. Whenever you parse, you must refer to the Compendium for definitions and rules, if you cannot repeat them without, I will now parse a verb, and describe all its properties by applying the definitions and rules according to the systematic order.
“We could not accomplish the business.”
Could accomplish is a verb, a word which signifies to do—active, it expresses action—transitive, the action passes over from the nom. “we” to the object “business”—regular, it will form its imperfect tense of the indic. mood and perf. part, in ed—potential mood, it implies possibility or power—imperfect tense, it denotes past time however distant—first pers. plural, because the nom. “we” is with which it agrees, agreeably to RULE 4. A verb must agree, &c. Conjugated—Indic. mood, present tense, first pers. sing. I accomplish; imperfect tense, I accomplished; perfect, I have accomplished; pluperfect, I had accomplished; and so on.—Speak it in the person of each tense through all the moods, and conjugate, in the same manner, every verb you parse.
EXERCISES IN PARSING.
These exercises contain a complete variety of Moods and Tenses.
I learn my lesson well. Charles, thou learnest thy lesson badly. John, do you write a good hand? Those ladies wrote a beautiful letter, but they did not despatch it. Have you seen the gentleman to whom I gave the book? He has gone. They had received the news before the messenger arrived. When will those persons return? My friend shall receive his reward. He will have visited me three times, if he come to-morrow.
If Eliza study diligently, she will improve. If Charles studies he does not improve. Unless that man shall have accomplished his work, by midsummer, he will receive no wages. Orlando, obey my precepts, unless you wish to injure yourself. Remember what is told you. The physician may administer the medicine, but Providence only can bless it. I told, him that he might go, but he would not. He might have gone last week, had he conducted himself properly; (that is, if he had conducted, &c.) Boys, prepare to recite your lessons. Young ladies, let me hear you repeat what you have learned. Study, diligently, whatever task may be allotted to you. To correct the spirit of discontent, let us consider how little we deserve. To die for one’s country, is glorious. How can we become wise? To seek God is wisdom. What is true greatness? Active benevolence. A good man is a great man.
NOTE 1. Man, following great, and what, in the last two examples, are nom. after is: RULE 21. To seek God, and to die for one’s country, are members of sentences, each put as the nom. case to is respectively: RULE 24. The verb to correct is the infinitive mood absolute: NOTE under RULE 23. May be allotted is a passive verb, agreeing with which, the relative part of whatever. That, the first part of whatever, is an adj. pronoun, agreeing with task; and task is governed by study. Hear, following let, and repeat, following hear, are in the infinitive mood without the sign to, according to RULE 25. To recite is governed by prepare: RULE 23. Is told, is a passive verb, agreeing with which, the relative part of whatever; and you, following, is governed by to understood: NOTE 1, under RULE 32.
2. In parsing a pronoun,
if the noun for which it stands is not
expressed, you must say it
represents some person or thing
understood.
LECTURE XIII.
OF THE AUXILIARY, PASSIVE, AND DEFECTIVE VERBS.
I. AUXILIARY VERBS.
Before you attend to the following additional remarks on the Auxiliary Verbs, you will do well to read again what is said respecting them in Lecture XI. page 140. The short account there given, and their application in conjugating verbs, have already made them quite familiar to you; and you have undoubtedly observed, that, without their help, we cannot conjugate any verb in any of the tenses, except the present and imperfect of the indicative and subjunctive moods, and the present of the imperative and infinitive. In the formation of all the other tenses, they are brought into requisition.
Most of the auxiliary verbs are defective in conjugation; that is, they are used only in some of the moods and tenses; and when unconnected with principal verbs, they are conjugated in the following manner:
MAY.
Pres. Tense Sing. I may, thou mayst,
he may.
Plur.
We may, ye or you may, they may.
Imperf. Sing. I might, thou mightst,
he might.
Tense. Plur. We might, ye or
you might, they might.
CAN.
Pres. Sing. I can, thou canst, he
can.
Tense. Plur. We can, ye or you
can, they can.
Imperf. Sing. I could, thou couldst,
he could.
Tense. Plur. We could, ye or
you could, they could.
WILL.
Pres. Sing. I will, thou wilt, he
will.
Tense. Plur. We will, ye or
you will, they will.
Imperf. Sing. I would, thou wouldst,
he would.
Tense. Plur. We would, ye or
you would, they would.
SHALL.
Pres. Sing. I shall, thou shalt, he
shall.
Tense. Plur. We shall, ye or
you shall, they shall.
Imperf. Sing. I should, thou shouldst,
he should.
Tense. Plur. We should, ye or
you should, they should.
TO DO.
Pres. Sing. I do, thou dost or
doest, he doth or does.
Tense. Plur. We do, ye or you
do, they do.
Imperf. Sing. I did, thou didst, he
did.
Tense. Plur. We did, ye or you
did, they did.
Participles.
Pres. doing. Perf. done.
TO BE.
Pres. Sing. I am, thou art, he is.
Tense. Plur. We are, ye or you
are, they are.
Imperf. Sing. I was, thou wast, he was.
Tense. Plur. We were, ye or
you were, they were.
Participles.
Pres. being. Perf. been.
TO HAVE.
Pres. Sing. I have, thou hast, he
hath or has.
Tense. Plur. We have, ye or
you have, they have.
Imperf. Sing. I had, thou hadst, he
had.
Tense. Plur. We had, ye or you
had, they had.
Participles.
Pres. having. Perf. had.
Do, be, have, and will, are sometimes used as principal verbs; and when employed as such, do, be, and have, may be conjugated, by the help of other auxiliaries, through all the moods and tenses.
DO. The different tenses of do, in the several moods, are thus formed: Indicative mood, pres. tense, first pers. sing. I do; imperfect tense, I did; perf. I have done; pluperfect, I had done; first future, I shall or will do; sec. fut. I shall have done. Subjunctive mood, pres. tense, If I do; imperf. if I did; and so on. Imperative mood, do thou. Potential, pres. I may, can, or must do, &c. Infinitive, present, to do; perf. to have done. Participles, pres. doing; perf. done; compound, having done.
HAVE. Have is in great demand. No verb can be conjugated through all the moods and tenses without it. Have, when used as a principal verb, is doubled in some of the past tenses, and becomes an auxiliary to itself; thus, Indic. mood, pres. tense, first pers. sing. I have; imperf. tense, I had; perf. I have had; pluperf. I had had; first fut. I shall or will have; sec. fut. I shall have had. Subjunctive, present, if I have; imperf. if I had; perf. if I have had; pluperf. if I had had; first fut. if I shall or will have; sec. fut. if I shall have had. Imper. mood, have thou. Potential, present, I may, can, or must have; imperf. I might, could, would, or should have; perf. I may, can, or must have had; pluperf. I might, could, would, or should have had. Infinitive, present, to have; perf. to have had. Participles, pres. having; perf. had; compound, having had.
BE. In the next place I will present to you the conjugation of the irregular, neuter verb, Be, which is an auxiliary whenever it is placed before the perfect participle of another verb, but in every other situation, it is a principal verb.
TO BE.—INDICATIVE MOOD.
Pres. Tense.
Sing. I am, thou art, he, she, or
it is.
Plur. We are, ye or you are, they
are.
Imperf. Tense. Sing. I was, thou wast, he was. Plur. We were, ye or you were, they were.
Perf. Tense. Sing. I have been, thou hast been, he hath or has been. Plur. We have been, ye or you have been, they have been.
Plup. Tense. Sing. I had been, thou hadst been, he had been. Plur. We had been, ye or you had been, they had been.
First Fut. T.
Sing, I shall or will be, thou shalt
or wilt be,
he
shall or will be.
Plur. We shall or will be, you
shall or will be,
they
shall or will be.
Second Fut. T. Sing. I shall have been, thou wilt have been, he will have been. Plur. We shall have been, you will have been, they will have been.
SUBJUNCTIVE MOOD.
Pres. Tense.
Sing. If I be, if thou be, if he be.
Plur. If we be, if ye or you be,
if they be.
Imperf. Tense. Sing. If I were, if thou wert, if he were. Plur. If we were, if ye or you were, if they were.
The neuter verb to be, and all passive verbs, have two forms in the imperfect tense of this mood, as well as in the present; therefore, the following rule may serve to direct you in the proper use of each form. When the sentence implies doubt, supposition, &c. and the neuter verb be, or the passive verb, is used with a reference to present or future time, and is either followed or preceded by another
The perfect, pluperfect, and first future tenses of the subjunctive mood, are conjugated in a manner similar to the correspondent tenses of the indicative. The second future is conjugated thus:
Second Fut. T. Sing. If I shall have been, if thou shalt have been, if he shall. &c Plur. If we shall have been, if you shall have been, if they, &c.
IMPERATIVE MOOD.
Pres. Tense.
Sing. Be, or be thou, or
do thou be.
Plur. Be, or be ye or you,
or do ye or you be.
POTENTIAL MOOD.
Pres. Tense
Sing. I may, can, or must be, thou
mayst, canst, or must be,
he
may, can, or must be.
Plur. We may, can, or must be,
ye or you may, can, or must be,
they
may, can, or must be.
Imperf. Tense.
Sing. I might, could, would, or
should be, thou mightest, &c.
Plur. We might, could, would, or
should be, you might, &c.
Perf. Tense Sing. I may, can, or must have been, thou mayst, canst, &c. Plur. We may, can, or must have been, you may, can, or must be, &c.
Pluper. Tense. Sing. I might, could, would, or should have been, thou, &c. Plur. We might, could, would, or should have been, you, &c.
INFINITIVE MOOD.
Pres. Tense. To be. Perf. Tense.
To have been.
PARTICIPLES.
Pres. Being. Perf. Been. Compound,
Having been.
This verb to be, though very irregular in its conjugation, is by far the most important verb in our language, for it is more frequently used than any other; many rules of syntax depend on constructions associated with it, and, without its aid, no passive verb can be conjugated. You ought, therefore, to make yourself perfectly familiar with all its changes, before you proceed any farther.
* * * * *
II. PASSIVE VERBS.
The cases of nouns are a fruitful theme for investigation and discussion. In the progress of these lectures, this subject has frequently engaged our attention; and, now, in introducing to your notice the passive verb, it will, perhaps, be found both interesting and profitable to present one more view of the nominative case.
Every sentence, you recollect, must have one finite verb, or more than one, and one nominative, either expressed or implied, for, without them, no sentence can exist.
The nominative is the actor or subject concerning which the verb makes an affirmation. There are three kinds of nominatives, active, passive, and neuter.
The nominative to an active verb, is active, because it produces an action, and the nominative to a passive verb, is passive, because it receives or endures the action expressed by the verb; for,
A Passive Verb denotes action received or endured by the person or thing which is the nominative; as, “The boy is beaten by his father.”
You perceive, that the nominative boy, in this example, is not represented as the actor, but as the object of the action expressed by the verb is beaten; that is, the boy receives or endures the action performed by his father; therefore boy is a passive nominative. And you observe, too, that the verb is beaten, denotes the action received or endured by the nominative; therefore is beaten is a passive verb.
If I say, John kicked the horse, John is an active nominative, because he performed or produced the action; but if I say, John was kicked by the horse, John is a passive nominative, because he received or endured the action.
The nominative to a neuter verb, is neuter, because it does not produce an action nor receive one; as, John sits in the chair. John is here connected with the neuter verb sits, which expresses simply the state of being of its nominative, therefore John is a neuter nominative.
I will now illustrate the active, passive, and neuter nominatives by a few examples.
I. Of ACTIVE NOMINATIVES; as, “The boy beats the dog; The lady sings; The ball rolls; The man walks.”
II. Of PASSIVE NOMINATIVES; as, “The boy is beaten; The lady is loved; The ball is rolled; The man was killed.”
III. Of NEUTER NOMINATIVES; as, “The boy remains idle; The lady is beautiful; The ball lies on the ground; The man lives in town.” You may now proceed to the conjugation of passive verbs.
Passive Verbs are called regular when they end in ed; as, was loved; was conquered.
All Passive Verbs are formed by adding the perfect participle of an active-transitive verb, to the neuter verb to be.
If you place a perfect participle of an active-transitive verb after this neuter verb be, in any mood or tense, you will have a passive verb in the same mood and tense that the verb be would be in if the participle were not used; as, I am slighted; I was slighted; he will be slighted; If I be slighted; I may, can, or must be slighted, &c. Hence you perceive, that when you shall have learned the conjugation of the verb be, you will be able to conjugate any passive verb in the English language.
The regular passive verb to be loved, which is formed by adding the perfect participle loved to the neuter verb to be, is conjugated in the following manner:
TO BE LOVED.—INDICATIVE MOOD.
Pres. Tense
Sing. I am loved, thou art loved, he is
loved.
Plur. We are loved, ye or you are
loved, they are loved.
Imperf. Tense. Sing. I was loved, thou wast loved, he was loved. Plur. We were loved, ye or you were loved, they were loved.
Perfect Tense. Sing. I have been loved, thou hast been loved, he has been loved. Plur. We have been loved, you have been loved, they have, &c.
Pluper. Tense Sing. I had been loved, thou hadst been loved, he had been, &c. Plur. We had been loved, you had been loved, they had been, &c.
First Future. Sing. I shall or will be loved, thou shall or wilt be loved, he, &c. Plur. We shall or will be loved, you shall or will be loved, they, &c.
First Future. Sing. I shall have been loved, thou wilt have been loved, he, &c. Plur. We shall have been loved, you will have been loved, &c.
SUBJUNCTIVE MOOD.
Pres. Tense
Sing. If I be loved, if thou be loved,
if he be loved.
Plur. If we be loved, if ye or
you be loved, if they be loved.
Imperf. Tense. Sing. If I were loved, if thou wert loved, if he were loved. Plur. If we were loved, if you were loved, if they were loved.
This mood has six tenses:—See conjugation of the verb to be.
IMPERATIVE MOOD.
Pres. Tense.
Sing. Be thou loved, or do thou
be loved.
Plur. Be ye or you loved, or
do ye be loved.
POTENTIAL MOOD.
Pres. Tense.
Sing. I may, can, or must be loved,
thou mayst, canst, or must, &c.
Plur. We may, can, or must be loved,
you may, can, or must, &c.
Imperf. Tense. Sing. I might, could, would, or should be loved, thou mightst, &c. Plur. We might, could, would, or should be loved, ye or you, &c.
Perfect Tense. Sing. I may, can, or must have been loved, thou mayst, canst, &c. Plur. We may, can, or must have been loved, you may, can, &c.
Plup. Tense. Sing. I might, could, would, or should have been loved, thou mightst, couldst, wouldst, or shouldst have Plur. We might, could, would, or should have been loved, you might, could, would, or should have been loved, they, &c.
INFINITIVE MOOD.
Pres. Tense. To be loved. Perf.
Tense. To have been loved.
PARTICIPLES.
Present, Being loved. Perfect or Passive,
Loved.
Compound, Having been loved.
NOTE. This conjugation
of the passive verb to be loved, is called
the passive, voice
of the regular active-transitive verb to
love.
Now conjugate the following passive verbs; that is, speak them in the first pers. sing, and plur. of each tense, through all the moods, and speak the participles; “to be loved, to be rejected, to be slighted, to be conquered, to be seen, to be beaten, to be sought, to be taken.”
NOTE 1. When the perfect participle of an intransitive verb is joined to the neuter verb to be, the combination is not a passive verb, but a neuter verb in a passive form; as, “He is gone; The birds are flown; The boy is grown_; My friend is arrived.” The following mode of construction, is, in general, to be preferred; “He has gone; The birds have flown; The boy has grown; My Friend has arrived.”
2. Active and neuter verbs may be conjugated by adding their present participle to the auxiliary verb to be, through all its variations; as, instead of, I teach, thou teachest, he teaches, &c., we may say, I am teaching, thou art teaching, he is teaching, &c.; and, instead of, I taught, &c.; I was teaching, &c. This mode of conjugation expresses the continuation of an action or state of being; and has, on some occasions, a peculiar propriety, and contributes to the harmony and precision of language. When the present participle of an active verb is joined with the neuter verb to be, the two words united, are, by some grammarians, denominated an active verb, either transitive or intransitive, as the case may be; as, “I am writing a letter; He is walking:” and when the present participle of a neuter verb is thus employed, they term the combination a neuter verb; as, “I am sitting; He is standing.” Others, in constructions like these, parse each word separately. Either mode may be adopted.
* * * * *
III. DEFECTIVE VERBS.
DEFECTIVE VERBS are those which are used only in some of the moods and tenses.
The principal of them are these.
Pres. Tense. Imperf. Tense.
Perfect or Passive Participle
is
wanting.
May, might. ------------ Can, could. ------------ Will, would. ------------ Shall, should. ------------ Must, must. ------------ Ought, ought. ------------ ----- quoth. ------------
NOTE. Must and ought are not varied. Ought and quoth are never used as auxiliaries. Ought is always followed by a verb in the infinitive mood, which verb determinesPage 149
its tenses. Ought is in the present tense when the infinitive following it is in the present; as, “He ought to do it;” and ought is in the imperfect tense when followed by the perfect of the infinitive; as, “He ought to have done it.”
Before you proceed to the analysis of the following examples, you may read over the last three lectures carefully and attentively; and as soon as you become acquainted with all that has been presented, you will understand nearly all the principles and regular constructions of our language. In parsing a verb, or any other part of speech, be careful to pursue the systematic order, and to conjugate every verb until you become familiar with all the moods and tenses.
“He should have been
punished before he committed that atrocious
deed.”
Should have been punished is a verb, a word that signifies to do—passive, it denotes action received or endured by the nom.—it is formed by adding the perfect part, punished to the neuter verb to be—regular, the perf. part, ends in ed—potential mood, it implies obligation, &c.—pluperfect tense, it denotes a past act which was prior to the other past time specified by “committed”—third pers. sing. num. because the nom. “he” is with which it agrees: RULE 4. The verb must agree, &c.—Conjugated, Indic. mood, pres. tense, he is punished; imperf. tense, he was punished; perf. tense, he has been punished; and so on. Conjugate it through all the moods and tenses, and speak the participles.
EXERCISES IN PARSING.
Columbus discovered America. America was discovered by Columbus. The preceptor is writing a letter. The letter is written by the preceptor. The work can be done. The house would have been built ere this, had he fulfilled his promise. If I be beaten by that man, he will be punished. Young man, if you wish to be respected, you must be more assiduous. Being ridiculed and despised, he left the institution. He is reading Homer. They are talking. He may be respected, if he become more ingenuous. My worthy friend ought to be honored for his benevolent deeds. This ought ye to have done.
ADDITIONAL EXERCISES IN PARSING.
All the most important principles of the science, together with many of the rules, have now been presented and illustrated. But before you proceed to analyze the following exercises, you may turn over a few pages, and you will find all the rules presented in a body. Please to examine them critically, and parse the examples under each rule and note. The examples, you will notice, are given to illustrate the respective rules and notes under which they are placed; hence, by paying particular attention to them, you will be enabled fully and clearly to comprehend the meaning and application of all the rules and notes.
As soon as you become familiarly acquainted with all the definitions so that you can apply them with facility, you may omit them in parsing; but you must always apply the rules of Syntax. When you parse without applying the definitions, you may proceed in the following manner:
“Mercy is the true badge of nobility.”
Mercy is a noun common, of the neuter gender, third person, singular number, and in the nominative case to “is:” RULE 3. The nominative case governs the verb.
Is is an irregular neuter verb, indicative mood, present tense, third person, singular number, agreeing with “mercy,” according to RULE 4. The verb must agree, &c.
The is a definite article, belonging to “badge,” in the singular number: RULE 2. The definite article the, &c.
True is an adjective in the positive degree, and belongs to the noun “badge:” RULE 18. Adjectives belong, &c.
Badge is a noun com. neuter gender, third person, singular number, and in the nominative case after “is,” and put by apposition with “mercy,” according to RULE 21. The verb to be may have the same case after it as before it.
Of is a preposition, connecting “badge” and “nobility,” and showing the relation between them.
Nobility is a noun of multitude, mas. and fem. gender, third person, sing, and in the obj. case, and governed by “of:” RULE 31. Prepositions govern the objective case.
EXERCISES IN PARSING.
Learn to unlearn what you have learned amiss.
What I forfeit for myself is a trifle; that my indiscretions should reach my posterity, wounds me to the heart.
Lady Jane Gray fell a sacrifice to the wild ambition
of the duke of
Northumberland.
King Missipsi charged his sons to consider the senate and people of Rome as proprietors of the kingdom of Numidia.
Hazael smote the children of Israel in all their coasts; and from what is left on record of his actions, he plainly appears to have proved, what the prophet foresaw him to be, a man of violence, cruelty, and blood.
Heaven hides from brutes what men, from men what spirits know.
He that formed the ear, can he not hear?
He that hath ears to hear, let him hear.
NOTE 1. Learn, in the first of the preceding examples, is a transitive verb, because the action passes over from the nom. you understood, to the rest of the sentence for its object: RULE 24. In the next example, that my indiscretions should reach my posterity, is a part of a sentence put as the nominative to the verb wounds, according to the same Rule.
2. The noun sacrifice, in the third example, is nom. after the active-intransitive verb fell: RULE 22. The noun proprietors, in the next sentence, is in the objective case, and put by apposition with senate and people: RULE 7, or governed by consider, understood, according to RULE 35.
3. In the fifth example, what, following proved, is a compound relative.Page 151
Thing, the antecedent part, is in the nom. case after to be, understood, and put by apposition with he, according to RULE 21, and NOTE. Which, the relative part, is in the obj. case after to be expressed, and put by apposition with him, according to the same RULE. Man is in the obj. case, put by apposition with which: RULE 7. The latter part of the sentence may be literally rendered thus: He plainly appears to have proved to be that base character which the prophet foresaw him to be, viz. a man of violence, cruelty, and blood. The antecedent part of the first what, in the next sentence, is governed by hides; and which, the relative part, is governed by know understood. The antecedent part of the second what, is governed by hides understood, and the relative part is governed by know expressed.
4. The first he, in the seventh example, is, in the opinion of some, nom. to can hear understood; but Mr. N.R. Smith, a distinguished and acute grammarian, suggests the propriety of rendering the sentence thus; “He that formed the ear, formed it to hear; can he not hear?” The first he, in the last example, is redundant; yet the construction is sometimes admissible, for the expression is more forcible than it would be to say, “Let him hear who hath ears to hear;” and if we adopt the ingenious method of Mr. Smith, the sentence is grammatical, and may be rendered thus; “He that hath ears, hath ears to hear; let him hear.”
EXERCISES IN PARSING.
Idioms, anomalies, and intricacies.
1. “The wall is three feet high.” 2. “His son is eight years old.” 3. “My knife is worth a shilling.” 4. “She is worth him and all his connexions.” 5. “He has been there three times.” 6. “The hat cost ten dollars.” 7. “The load weighs a tun.” 8. “The spar measures ninety feet.”
REMARKS.—Anomaly is derived from the Greek, a, without, and omales, similar; that is, without similarity. Some give its derivation thus; anomaly, from the Latin, ab, from, or out of, and norma, a rule, or law, means an outlaw; a mode of expression that departs from the rules, laws, or general usages of the language; a construction in language peculiar to itself. Thus, it is a general rule of the language, that adjectives of one syllable are compared by adding r, or er, and st, or est, to the positive degree; but good, better, best; bad, worse, worst, are not compared according to the general rule. They are, therefore, anomalies. The plural number of nouns is generally formed by adding s to the singular: man, men; woman, women; child, children; penny, pence, are anomalies. The use of news, means, alms and amends, in the singular, constitutes anomalies. Anomalous constructions are correct according to custom; but, as they are departures from general rules, by them they cannot be analyzed.
An idiom, Latin idioma, a construction peculiar to a language, may be an anomaly, or it may not. An idiomatical expression which is not an anomaly, can be analyzed.
Feet and years, in the 1st and 2d examples, are not in the nominative after is, according to Rule 21, because they are not in apposition with the respective nouns that precede the verb; but the constructions are anomalous; and, therefore, no rule can be applied to analyze them. The same ideas, however; can be conveyed by a legitimate construction which can be analyzed; thus, “The height of the wall is three feet;” “The age of my son is eight years.”
An anomaly, when ascertained to be such, is easily disposed of; but sometimes it is very difficult to decide whether a construction is anomalous or not. The 3d, 4th, and 5th examples, are generally considered anomalies; but if we supply, as we are, perhaps, warranted in doing, the associated words which modern refinement has dropped, they will cease to be anomalies; thus, “My knife is of the worth of a shilling;” “—of the worth of him,” &c. “He has been there for three times;” as we say, “I was unwell for three days, after I arrived;” or, “I was unwell three days.” Thus it appears, that by tracing back, for a few centuries, what the merely modern English scholar supposes to be an anomaly, an ellipsis will frequently be discovered, which, when supplied, destroys the anomaly.
On extreme points, and peculiar and varying constructions in a living language, the most able philologists can never be agreed; because many usages will always be unsettled and fluctuating, and will, consequently, be disposed of according to the caprice of the grammarian. By some, a sentence may be treated as an anomaly; by others who contend for, and supply, an ellipsis, the same sentence may be analyzed according to the ellipsis supplied; whilst others, who deny both the elliptical and anomalous character of the sentence, construct a rule by which to analyze it, which rule has for its foundation the principle contained in that sentence only. This last mode of procedure, inasmuch as it requires us to make a rule for every peculiar construction in the language, appears to me to be the most exceptionable of the three. It appears to be multiplying rules beyond the bounds of utility.
The verbs, cost, weighs, and measures, in the 6th, 7th, and 8th examples, may be considered as transitive. See remarks on resemble, have, own, &c., page 56.
EXAMPLES.
1. “And God said, ‘Let there be light,’ and there was light.” “Let us make man.” “Let us bow before the Lord.” “Let high-born seraphs tune the lyre.”
2. “Be it enacted.” “Be it remembered.” "Blessed be he that blesseth thee; and cursed be he that curseth thee.” “My soul, turn from them:—turn we to survey,” &c.
3. “Methinks I see the portals of eternity wide open to receive him.” “Methought I was incarcerated beneath the mighty deep.” “I was there just thirty years ago.”
4. “Their laws and their manners, generally speaking, were extremely rude.” “Considering their means, they have effected much.”
5.
“Ah me! nor hope nor life
remains.”
“Me miserable! which way
shall I fly?”
6.
“O happiness! our being’s
end and aim!
Good, pleasure, ease, content! whatever
thy name,
That something still which prompts th’
eternal sigh.
For which we bear to live, or dare to
die.”—
The verb let, in the idiomatic examples under number 1, has no nominative specified, and is left applicable to a nominative of the first, second, or third person, and of either number. Every action necessarily depends on an agent or moving cause; and hence it follows, that the verb, in such constructions, has a nominative understood; but as that nominative is not particularly pointed out, the constructions may be considered anomalous.
Instead of saying, “Let it [to] be enacted;” or, “It is or shall be enacted;” “Let him [to] be blessed;” or, “He shall be blessed;” “Let us turn to survey,” &c.; the verbs, be enacted, be blessed, turn, &c. according to an idiom of our language, or the poet’s license, are used in the imperative, agreeing with a nominative of the first or third person.
The phrases, methinks and methought, are anomalies, in which the objective pronoun me, in the first person, is used in place of a nominative, and takes a verb after it in the third person. Him was anciently used in the same manner; as, “him thute, him thought.” There was a period when these constructions were not anomalies in our language. Formerly, what we call the objective cases of our pronouns, were employed in the same manner as our present nominatives are. Ago is a contraction of agone, the past part. of to go. Before this participle was contracted to an adverb, the noun years preceding it, was in the nominative case absolute; but now the construction amounts to an anomaly. The expressions, “generally speaking,” and “considering their means,” under number 4, are idiomatical and anomalous, the subjects to the participles not being specified.
According to the genius of the English language, transitive verbs and prepositions require the objective case of a noun or pronoun after them; and this requisition is all that is meant by government, when we say, that these parts of speech govern the objective case. See pages 52, 57, and 94. The same principle applies to the interjection. Interjections require the objective case of a pronoun of the first
The second line may be rendered thus; Whether thou art good, or whether thou art pleasure, &c. or be thy name that [thing] which [ever thing] it may be: putting be in the imperative, agreeing with name in the third person. Something is nominative after art understood.
EXAMPLES.
1. “All were well but the stranger.” “I saw nobody but the stranger.” “All had returned but he.” “None but the brave deserve the fair.” “The thing they can’t but purpose, they postpone.” “This life, at best, is but a dream.” “It affords but a scanty measure of enjoyment.” “If he but touch the hills, they will smoke.” “Man is but a reed, floating on the current of time.”
2. “Notwithstanding his poverty, he is content.”
3. “Open your hand wide.” “The apples boil soft.” “The purest clay is that which burns white.” “Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring.”
4. “What though the swelling surge thou see?” &c. “What if the foot, ordain’d the dust to tread?” &c.
REMARKS.—According to the principle of analysis assumed by many of our most critical philologists, but is always a disjunctive conjunction; and agreeably to the same authorities, to construe it, in any case, as a preposition, would lead to error. See false Syntax under Rule 35. They maintain, that its legitimate and undeviating office is, to join on a member of a sentence which expresses opposition of meaning, and thereby forms an exception to,
Except and near, in examples like the following, are generally construed as prepositions: “All went except him;” “She stands near them.” But many contend, that when we employ but instead of except, in such constructions, a nominative should follow: “All went but he [did not go.”] On this point and many others, custom is variable; but the period will doubtless arrive, when but, worth, and like, will be considered prepositions, and, in constructions like the foregoing, invariably be followed by an objective case. This will not be the case, however, until the practice of supplying an ellipsis after these words is entirely dropped.
Poverty, under number 2, is governed by the preposition notwithstanding, Rule 31. The adjectives wide, soft, white, and deep, under number 3, not only express the quality of nouns, but also qualify verbs: Note 4, under Rule 18.—What, in the phrases “what though” and “what if,” is an interrogative in the objective case, and governed by the verb matters understood, or by some other verb; thus, “What matters it—what dost thou fear, though thou see the swelling surge?” “What would you think, if the foot, which is ordained to tread the dust, aspired to be the head?”
In the following examples, the same word is used as several parts of speech. But by exercising judgment sufficient to comprehend the meaning, and by supplying what is understood, you will be able to analyze them correctly.
EXERCISES IN PARSING.
I like what you dislike.
Every creature loves its like.
Anger, envy, and like passions, are sinful.
Charity, like the sun, brightens every object around
it.
Thought flies swifter than light.
He thought as a sage, though he felt as a man.
Hail often proves destructive to vegetation.
I was happy to hail him as my friend.
Hail! beauteous stranger of the wood.
The more I examine the work, the better I like it.
Johnson is a better writer than Sterne.
Calm was the day, and the scene delightful.
We may expect a calm after a storm.
To prevent passion is easier than to calm it.
Damp air is unwholesome.
Guilt often casts a damp over our sprightliest hours.
Soft bodies damp the sound much more than hard ones.
Much money has been expended.
Of him to whom much is given, much will be required.
It is much better to give than to receive.
Still water runs deep. He labored to still the
tumult.
Those two young profligates remain still in the wrong.
They wrong themselves as well as their friends.
I will now present to you a few examples in poetry. Parsing in poetry, as it brings into requisition a higher degree of mental exertion than parsing in prose, will be found a more delightful and profitable exercise. In this kind of analysis, in order to come at the meaning of the author, you will find it necessary to transpose his language, and supply what is understood; and then you will have the literal meaning in prose.
EXERCISES IN PARSING.
APOSTROPHE TO HOPE.—CAMPBELL.
Eternal Hope! when yonder spheres sublime
Pealed their first notes to sound the
march of time,
Thy joyous youth began:—but
not to fade.—
When all the sister planets have decayed;
When wrapt in flames the realms of ether
glow,
And Heaven’s last thunder shakes
the world below;
Thou, undismay’d, shalt o’er
the ruins smile,
And light thy torch at Nature’s
funeral pile!
TRANSPOSED.
Eternal Hope! thy joyous youth began when yonder sublime spheres pealed their first notes to sound the march of time:—but it began not to fade.—Thou, undismayed, shalt smile over the ruins, when all the sister planets shall have decayed; and thou shalt light thy torch at Nature’s funeral pile, when wrapt in flames, the realms of ether glow, and Heaven’s last thunder shakes the world below.
ADDRESS TO ADVERSITY.—GRAY.
Daughter of heaven, relentless power,
Thou tamer of the human breast,
Whose iron scourge, and tort’ring
hour,
The bad affright, afflict the best!
The gen’rous spark extinct revive;
Teach me to love and to forgive;
Exact my own defects to scan:
What others are to feel; and know myself
a man.
TRANSPOSED.
Daughter of heaven, relentless power, thou tamer of the human breast, whose iron scourge and torturing hour affright the bad, and afflict the best! Revive thou in me the generous, extinct spark; and teach thou me to love others, and to forgive them; and teach thou me to scan my own defects exactly, or critically: and teach thou me that which others are to feel; and make thou me to know myself to be a man.
ADDRESS TO THE ALMIGHTY.—POPE.
What conscience dictates to be done,
Or warns me not to do,
This teach me more than hell to shun,
That more than heav’n
pursue.
TRANSPOSED.
O God, teach thou me to pursue that (the thing) which conscience dictates to be done, more ardently than I pursue heaven; and teach thou me to shun this (the thing) which conscience warns me not to do, more cautiously than I would shun hell.
TRIALS OF VIRTUE.—MERRICK.
For see, ah! see, while yet her ways
With doubtful step I tread,
A hostile world its terrors raise,
Its snares delusive spread.
O how shall I, with heart prepared,
Those terrors learn to meet?
How, from the thousand snares to guard
My unexperienced feet?
TRANSPOSED.
For see thou, ah! see thou a hostile world to raise its terrors, and see thou a hostile world to spread its delusive snares, while I yet tread her (virtue’s) ways with doubtful steps.
O how shall I learn to meet those terrors with a prepared heart? How shall I learn to guard my unexperienced feet from the thousand snares of the world?
THE MORNING IN SUMMER.—THOMPSON.
Short is the doubtful empire of the night;
And soon, observant of approaching day,
The meek-eyed morn appears, mother of
dews,
At first, faint gleaming in the dappled
east,
Till far o’er ether spreads the
wid’ning glow,
And from before the lustre of her face
White break the clouds away.
TRANSPOSED.
The doubtful empire of the night is short; and the meek-eyed morn, (which is the) mother of dews, observant of approaching day, soon appears, gleaming faintly, at first, in the dappled east, till the widening glow spreads far over ether, and the white clouds break away from before the lustre of her face.
NATURE BOUNTIFUL.—AKENSIDE.
—Nature’s care, to all
her children just,
With richest treasures, and an ample state,
Endows at large whatever happy man
Will deign to use them.
TRANSPOSED.
Nature’s care, which is just to all her children, largely endows, with richest treasures and an ample state, that happy man who will deign to use them.
NOTE. What, in the second example, is a comp. rel. The antecedent part is gov. by teach understood; and the relative part by to feel expressed. To shun and to pursue, in the third example, are in the infinitive mood, gov. by than, according to a NOTE under Rule 23. Faint and from, in the 5th example, are adverbs. An adverb, in poetry, is often written in the form of an adjective. Whatever, in the last sentence, is a compound pronoun, and is equivalent to that and who. That is an adj. pron. belonging to “man;” who is nom. to “will deign;” and ever is excluded from the sentence in sense. See page 113. Parse these examples as they are transposed, and you will find the analysis very easy.
ADDITIONAL EXERCISES IN PARSING.
GOLD, NOT GENUINE WEALTH.
Where, thy true treasure? Gold says,
“not in me;”
And, “not in me,” the Diamond.
Gold is poor.
TRANSPOSED.
Where is thy true treasure? Gold says, “It
is not in me;” and the
Diamond says, “It is not in me.”
Gold is poor.
SOURCE OF FRIENDSHIP.—DR. YOUNG.
Lorenzo, pride repress; nor hope to find
A friend, but what has found a friend
in thee.
TRANSPOSED.
Lorenzo, repress thou pride; nor hope thou to find a friend, only in him who has already found a friend in thee.
TRUE GREATNESS.—POPE.
Who noble ends by noble means obtains,
Or, failing, smiles in exile or in chains,
Like good Aurelius let him reign, or bleed
Like Socrates, that man is great indeed.
TRANSPOSED.
That man is great indeed, let him to reign like unto good Aurelius, or let him to bleed like unto Socrates, who obtains noble ends by noble means; or that man is great indeed, who, failing to obtain noble ends by noble means, smiles in exile or in chains.
INVOCATION.—POLLOK.
Eternal Spirit! God of truth! to
whom
All things seem as they are, inspire my
song;
My eye unscale: me what is substance
teach;
And shadow what, while I of things to
come,
As past rehearsing, sing. Me thought
and phrase
Severely sifting out the whole idea, grant.
TRANSPOSED.
Eternal Spirit! God of truth! to whom all things seem to be as they really are, inspire thou my song; and unscale thou my eyes: teach thou to me the thing which is substance; and teach thou to me the thing which is shadow, while I sing of things which are to come, as one sings of things which are past rehearsing. Grant thou to me thought and phraseology which shall severely sift out the whole idea.
THE VOYAGE OF LIFE.
How few, favored by ev’ry element,
With swelling sails make good the promised
port,
With all their wishes freighted!
Yet ev’n these,
Freighted with all their wishes, soon
complain.
Free from misfortune, not from nature
free,
They still are men; and when is man secure?
As fatal time, as storm. The rush
of years
Beats down their strength; their numberless
escapes
In ruin end: and, now, their proud
success
But plants new terrors on the victor’s
brow.
What pain, to quit the world just made
their own!
Their nests so deeply downed and built
so high!—
Too low they build, who build beneath
the stars.
TRANSPOSED.
How few persons, favored by every element, safely make the promised port with swelling sails, and with all their wishes freighted! Yet even these few persons who do safely make the promised port with all their wishes freighted, soon complain. Though they are free from misfortunes, yet (though and yet, corresponding conjunctions, form only one connexion) they are not free from the course of nature, for they still are men; and when is man secure? Time is as fatal to him, as a storm is to the mariner.—The rush of years beats down their strength; (that is, the strength of these few;) and their numberless escapes end in ruin: and then their proud success only plants new terrors on the victor’s brow. What pain it is to them to quit the world, just as they have made it to be their own world; when their nests are built so high, and when they are downed so deeply!—They who build beneath the stars, build too low for their own safety.
REFLECTIONS ON A SCULL.—LORD BYRON.
Remove yon scull from out
the scattered heaps.
Is that a temple, where a
God may dwell?
Why, ev’n the worm at last disdains
her shattered cell!
Look on its broken arch, its
ruined wall,
Its chambers desolate, and
portals foul;
Yes, this was once ambition’s
airy hall,
The dome of thought, the palace
of the soul.
Behold, through each lack-lustre,
eyeless hole,
The gay recess of wisdom and
of wit,
And passion’s host,
that never brooked control.
Can all, saint, sage, or sophist
ever writ,
People this lonely tower, this tenement
refit?
TRANSPOSED.
Remove thou yonder scull out from the scattered heaps. Is that a temple, where a God may dwell? Why, even the worm at last disdains her shattered cell! Look thou on its broken arch, and look thou on its ruined wall, and on its desolate chambers, and on its foul portals:—yes, this scull was once ambition’s airy hall; (it was) the dome of thought, the palace of the soul. Behold thou, through each lack-lustre, eyeless hole, the gay recess of wisdom and of wit, and passion’s host, which never brooked control. Can all the works which saints, or sages, or sophists have ever written, repeople this lonely tower, or can they refit this tenement?
For your future exercises in parsing, you may select pieces from the English Reader, or any other grammatical work. I have already hinted, that parsing in poetry, as it brings more immediately into requisition the reasoning faculties, than parsing in prose, will necessarily tend more rapidly to facilitate your progress: therefore it is advisable that your future exercises in this way, be chiefly confined to the analysis of poetry. Previous to your attempting to parse a piece of poetry, you ought always to transpose it, in a manner similar to the examples just presented; and then it can be as easily analyzed as prose.
Before you proceed to correct the following exercises in false syntax, you may turn back and read over the whole thirteen lectures, unless you have the subject-matter already stored in your mind.
* * * * *
OF DERIVATION.
At the commencement of Lecture II., I informed you that Etymology treats, 3dly, of derivation. This branch of Etymology, important as it is, cannot be very extensively treated in an elementary work on grammar. In the course of the preceding lectures, it has been frequently agitated; and now I shall offer a few more remarks, which will doubtless be useful in illustrating some of the various methods in which one word is derived from another. Before you proceed, however, please to turn back and read again what is advanced on this subject on page 27, and in the PHILOSOPHICAL NOTES.
1. Nouns are derived from verbs. 2. Verbs are derived from nouns, adjectives, and sometimes from adverbs. 3. Adjectives are derived from nouns. 4. Nouns are derived from adjectives. 5. Adverbs are derived from adjectives.
1. Nouns are derived from verbs; as, from “to love,” comes “lover;” from “to visit, visiter;” from “to survive, surviver,” &c.
In the following instances, and in many others, it is difficult to determine whether the verb was deduced from the noun, or the noun from the verb, viz. “Love, to love; hate, to hate; fear, to fear; sleep, to sleep; walk, to walk; ride, to ride; act, to act,” &c.
2. Verbs are derived from nouns, adjectives, and sometimes from adverbs; as, from the noun salt, comes “to salt;” from the adjective warm, “to warm;” and from the adverb forward, “to forward.” Sometimes they are formed by lengthening the vowel, or softening the consonant; as, from “grass, to graze;” sometimes by adding en; as, from “length, to lengthen;” especially to adjectives; as, from “short, to shorten; bright, to brighten.”
3. Adjectives are derived from nouns in the following manner: adjectives denoting plenty are derived from nouns by adding y; as, from “Health, healthy; wealth, wealthy; might, mighty,” &c.
Adjectives denoting the matter out of which any thing is made, are derived from nouns by adding en; as, from “Oak, oaken; wood, wooden; wool, woollen,” &c.
Adjectives denoting abundance are derived from nouns by adding ful; as, from “Joy, joyful; sin, sinful; fruit, fruitful,” &c.
Adjectives denoting plenty, but with some kind of diminution, are derived from nouns by adding some; as, from “Light, lightsome; trouble, troublesome; toil, toilsome,” &c.
Adjectives denoting want are derived from nouns by adding less; as, from “Worth, worthless;” from “care, careless; joy, joyless,” &c.
Adjectives denoting likeness are derived from nouns by adding ly; as, from “Man, manly; earth, earthly; court, courtly,” &c.
Some adjectives are derived from other adjectives, or from nouns by adding ish to them; which termination when added to adjectives, imports diminution, or lessening the quality; as, “White, whitish;” i.e. somewhat white. When added to nouns, it signifies similitude or tendency to a character; as, “Child, childish; thief, thievish.”
Some adjectives are formed from nouns or verbs by adding the termination able; and those adjectives signify capacity; as, “Answer, answerable; to change, changeable.”
4. Nouns are derived from adjectives, sometimes by adding the termination ness; as, “White, whiteness; swift, swiftness;” sometimes by adding th or t, and making a small change in some of the letters; as, “Long, length; high, height.”
5. Adverbs of quality are derived from adjectives, by adding ly, or changing le into ly; and denote the same quality as the adjectives from which they are derived; as, from “base,” comes “basely;” from “slow, slowly;” from “able, ably.”
There are so many other ways of deriving words from one another, that it would be extremely difficult, if not impossible, to enumerate them. The primitive words of every language are very few; the derivatives form much the greater number. A few more instances only can be given here.
Some nouns are derived from other nouns, by adding the terminations hood or head, ship, ery, wick, rick, dom, ian, ment, and age.
Nouns ending in hood or head, are such as signify character or qualities; as, “Manhood, knighthood, falsehood,” &c.
Nouns ending in ship, are those that signify office, employment, state, or condition; as, “Lordship, stewardship, partnership,” &c. Some nouns in ship are derived from adjectives; as, “Hard, hardship,” &c.
Nouns which end in ery, signify action or habit; as, “Slavery, foolery, prudery,” &c. Some nouns of this sort come from adjectives; as, “Brave, bravery,” &c.
Nouns ending in wick, rick, and dom, denote dominion, jurisdiction, or condition; as, “Bailiwick, bishopric, kingdom, dukedom, freedom,” &c.
Nouns which end in ian, are those that signify profession; as, “Physician, musician,” &c. Those that end in ment and age, come generally from the French, and commonly signify the act or habit; as, “Commandment,” “usage.”
Some nouns ending in ard, are derived from verbs or adjectives, and denote character or habit; as, “Drunk, drunkard; dote, dotard.”
Some nouns have the form of diminutives; but these are not many. They are formed by adding the terminations kin, ling, ing, ock, el, and the like; as, “Lamb, lambkin; goose, gosling; duck, duckling; hill, hillock; cock, cockerel,” &c.
OF PREPOSITIONS USED AS PREFIXES.
I shall conclude this lecture by presenting and explaining a list of Latin and Greek prepositions which are extensively used in English as prefixes. By carefully studying their signification, you will be better qualified to understand the meaning of those words into the composition of which they enter, and of which they form a material part.
I. LATIN PREFIXES.
A, ab, abs—signify from or away; as, a-vert, to turn from; ab-ject, to throw away; abs-tract, to draw away.
Ad—to or at; as, ad-here, to stick to; ad-mire, to wonder at.
Ante—means before; as, ante-cedent, going before.
Circum—signifies round, about; as, circum-navigate, to sail round.
Con, com, co, col—together; as, con-join, to join together; com-press, to press together; co-operate, to work together; col-lapse, to fall together.
Contra—against; as, contra-dict, to speak against.
De—from, down; as, de-duct, to take from; de-scend, to go down.
Di, dis—asunder, away; as, di-lacerate, to tear asunder; dis-miss, to send away.
E, ef, ex—out; as, e-ject, to throw out; ef-flux, to flow out; ex-clude, to shut out.
Extra—beyond; as, extra-ordinary, beyond what is ordinary.
In, im, il, ir—(in, Gothic, inna, a cave or cell;) as, in-fuse, to pour in. These prefixes, when incorporated with adjectives or nouns, commonly reverse their meaning; as, in-sufficient, im-polite, il-legitimate, ir-reverence, ir-resolute.
Inter—between; as, inter-pose, to put between.
Intro—within, into; intro-vert, to turn within; intro-duce, to lead into.
Ob, op—denote opposition; as, ob-ject, to bring against; op-pugn, to oppose.
Per—through, by; as, per-ambulate, to walk through; per-haps, by haps.
Post—after; as, post-script, written after; post-fix, placed after.
Prae, pre—before; as, pre-fix, to fix before.
Pro—for, forth, forward; as, pro-noun, for a noun; pro-tend, to stretch forth; pro-ject, to shoot forward.
Praeter—past, beyond; as, preter-perfect, pastperfect; preter-natural, beyond the course of nature.
Re—again or back; as, re-peruse, to peruse again; re-trade, to trade back.
Retro—backwards; as, retro-spective, looking backwards.
Se—aside, apart; as, se-duce, to draw aside.
Sub—under; as, sub-scribe, to write under, or sub-sign.
Subter—under; as, subter-fluous, flowing under.
Super—above or over; as, super-scribe, to write above; super-vise, to overlook.
Trans—over, beyond, from one place to another; as, trans-port, to carry over; trans-gress, to pass beyond.
II. GREEK PREFIXES.
A—signifies privation; as, anonymous, without name.
Amphi—both or two; as, amphi-bious, partaking of both or two natures,
Anti—against; as, anti-masonry, against masonry.
Dia—through; as, dia-meter, line passing through a circle.
Hyper—over; as, hyper-critical, over or too critical.
Hypo—under, implying concealment or disguise; as, hypo-crite, one dissembling his real character.
Meta—denotes change or transmutation; as, meta-morphose, to change the shape.
Para—contrary or against; as, para-dox, a thing contrary to received opinion.
Peri—round about; as, peri-phrasis, circumlocution.
Syn, syl, sym—together; as, syn-tax, a placing together; syn-od, a meeting or coming together; syl-lable, that portion of a word which is taken together; sym-pathy, fellow-feeling, or feeling together.
WITH ADDITIONAL EXERCISES IN FALSE SYNTAX.
The third part of Grammar is SYNTAX, which treats of the agreement and government of words and of their proper arrangement in a sentence.
SYNTAX consists of two parts, Concord and Government.
CONCORD is the agreement which one word has with another, in gender, person, number, or case.
For the illustration of agreement and government, see pages 52, and 53.
For the definition of a sentence, and the transposition of its words and members, see pages 119, 124, 128, and 167.
The principal parts of a simple sentence are the nominative or subject, the verb or attribute, or word that makes the affirmation, and the object, or thing affected by the action of the verb; as, “A wise man governs his passions.” In this sentence, man is the subject; governs, the attribute; and passions the object.
A PHRASE is two or more words rightly put together, making sometimes a part of a sentence, and sometimes a whole sentence.
ELLIPSIS is the omission of some word or words, in order to avoid disagreeable and unnecessary repetitions, and to express our ideas concisely, and with strength and elegance.
In this recapitulation of the rules, Syntax is presented in a condensed form, many of the essential NOTES being omitted. This is a necessary consequence of my general plan, in which Etymology and Syntax, you know are blended. Hence, to acquire a complete knowledge of Syntax from this work, you must look over the whole.
You may now proceed and parse the following additional exercises in false Syntax; and, as you analyze, endeavor to correct all the errors without looking at the Key. If, in correcting these examples, you should be at a loss in assigning the reasons why the constructions are erroneous, you can refer to the manner adopted in the foregoing pages.
RULE I.
The article a or an agrees with nouns in the singular number only, individually or collectively; as, “A star, an eagle, a score, a thousand.”
RULE II.
The definite article the belongs to nouns in the singular or plural number; as, “The star, the stars; the hat, the hats.”
NOTE 1. A nice distinction in the meaning is sometimes effected by the use or omission of the article a. If I say, “He behaved with a little reverence,” my meaning is positive. But if I say, “He behaved with little reverence,” my meaning is negative. By the former, I rather praise a person; by the latter, I dispraise him. When I say, “There were few men with him,” I speak diminutively, and mean to represent them as inconsiderable; whereas, when I say, “There were a few men with him,” I evidently intend to make the most of them.
2. The indefinite article
sometimes has the meaning of every or
each; as, “They
cost five shillings a dozen;” that is,
’every
dozen.’
“A man he
was to all the country dear,
And passing rich
with forty pounds a year!”
that is, ‘every year.’
3. When several adjectives are connected, and express the various qualities of things individually different, though alike in name, the article should be repeated; but when the qualities all belong to the same thing or things, the article should not be repeated. “A black and a white calf,” signifies, A black calf, and a white calf; but “A black and white calf,” describes the two colors of one calf.
RULE III.
The nominative case governs the verb; as, “I learn, thou learnest, he learns, they learn.”
RULE IV.
The verb must agree with its nominative in number and person; as, “The bird sings, the birds sing, thou singest.”
NOTE 1. Every verb, when
it is not in the infinitive mood, must have
a nominative, expressed or
implied; as, “Awake, arise;” that is,
Awake ye; arise ye.
2. When a verb comes between two nouns, either of which may be considered as the subject of the affirmation, it must agree with that which is more naturally its subject; as, “The wages of sin is death; His meat was locusts and wild honey;” “His pavilion were dark waters and thick clouds.”
EXAMPLES OF FALSE SYNTAX.
Frequent commission of sin harden men in it.
Great pains has been taken to reconcile the parties.
So much both of ability and merit, are seldom found.
The sincere is always esteemed.
Not one of them are happy.
What avails the best sentiments, if people do not
live suitably to them?
Disappointments sinks the heart of man; but the renewal
of hope give
consolation.
The variety of the productions of genius, like that
of the operations of
nature; are without limit.
A variety of blessings have been conferred upon us.
Thou cannot heal him, it is true, but thou may do
something to relieve
him.
In piety and virtue consist the happiness of man.
O
thou, my voice inspire,
Who
touched Isaiah’s hallowed lips with fire.
Note 1. Will martial flames for ever
fire thy mind,
And
never, never be to Heaven resigned?
He was a man whose inclinations led him to be corrupt, and had great abilities to manage the business.
Note 2. The crown of virtue is peace and honor. His chief occupation and enjoyment were controversy.
RULE V.
When an address is made, the noun or pronoun addressed, is put in the nominative case independent; as, “Plato, thou reasonest well;” “Do, Trim, said my uncle Toby.”
NOTE 1. A noun is independent, when it has no verb to agree with it.
2. Interjections require the objective case of a pronoun of the first person after them, but the nominative of a noun or pronoun of the second or third person; as, “Ah! me; Oh! thou; O! virtue.”
RULE VI.
A noun or pronoun placed before a participle, and being independent of the rest of the sentence, is in the nominative case absolute; as, “Shame being lost; all virtue is lost;” “The sun being risen, we travelled on.”
NOTE. Every nominative
case, except the case absolute and
independent, should belong
to some verb expressed or understood; as,
“To whom thus Adam;”
that is, spoke.
Him Destroyed,
Or won to what may work his utter loss,
All this will follow soon.
Note.—Two
substantives, when they come together, and do not
signify the same thing, the
former must be in the genitive case.
Virtue, however it may be neglected for a time, men are so constituted as ultimately to acknowledge and respect genuine merit.
RULE VII.
Two or more nouns, or nouns and pronouns, signifying the same thing, are put, by apposition, in the same case; as, “Paul, the apostle;” “Joram, the king;” “Solomon, the son of David, king of Israel, wrote many proverbs.”
NOTE. A noun is sometimes
put in apposition with a sentence; as,
“The sheriff has just
seized and sold his valuable library—(which
was) a misfortune that
greatly depressed him.”
FALSE SYNTAX.
We ought to love God, he who created and sustains all things.
The pronoun he in this sentence, is improperly used in the nominative case. It is the object of the action of the transitive verb “love,” and put by apposition with “God;” therefore it should be the objective case, him, according to Rule 7. (Repeat the Rule, and correct the following.)
I saw Juliet and her brother, they that you visited.
They slew Varus, he that was mentioned before.
It was John, him who preached repentance.
Adams and Jefferson, them
who died on the fourth of July 1826, were
both signers and the firm
supporters of the Declaration of
Independence.
Augustus the Roman emperor,
him who succeeded Julius Cesar, is
variously described by historians.
RULE VIII.
Two or more nouns, or nouns and pronouns, in the singular number, connected by copulative conjunctions, must have verbs, nouns, and pronouns, agreeing with them in the plural; as, “Socrates and Plato were wise; they were eminent philosophers.”
NOTE 1. When each or every relates to two or more nominatives in the singular, although connected by a copulative, the verb must agree with each of them in the singular; as, “Every leaf, and every twig, and every drop of water, teems with life.”
2. When the singular nominative of a complex sentence, has another noun joined to it with a preposition, it is customary to put the verb and pronoun agreeing with it in the singular; as, “Prosperity with humility, renders its possessor truly amiable;” “The General, also, in conjunction with the officers, has applied for redress.”
FALSE SYNTAX.
Coffee and sugar grows in
the West Indies: it is exported in large
quantities.
Two singular nouns coupled together, form a plural idea. The verb grow is improper, because it expresses the action of both its nominatives, “coffee and sugar,” which two nominatives are connected by the copulative conjunction, and; therefore the verb should be plural, grow; and then it would agree with coffee and sugar, according to Rule 8. (Repeat the Rule.) The pronoun it, as it represents both the nouns, “coffee and sugar,” ought also to be plural, they, agreeably to Rule 8. The sentence should be written thus. “Coffee and sugar grow in the West Indies: they are exported in large quantities.”
Time and tide waits for no man.
Patience and diligence, like faith, removes mountains.
Life and health is both uncertain.
Wisdom, virtue, happiness, dwells with the golden mediocrity.
The planetary system, boundless
space, and the immense ocean,
affects the mind with sensations
of astonishment.
What signifies the counsel
and care of preceptors, when you think
you have no need of assistance?
Their love, and their hatred, and their envy, is now perished.
Why is whiteness and coldness in snow?
Obey the commandment of thy
father, and the law of thy mother; bind
it continually upon thy heart.
Pride and vanity always render
its possessor despicable in the eyes
of the judicious.
There is error and discrepance
in the schemes of the orthoepists,
which shows the impossibility
of carrying them into effect.
EXAMPLES FOR THE NOTE.
Every man, woman, and child, were numbered.
Not proper; for, although and couples things together so as to present the whole at one view, yet every has a contrary effect: it distributes them, and brings each separately and singly under consideration. Were numbered is therefore improper. It should be, “was numbered,” in the singular, according to the Note. (Repeat it.)
When benignity and gentleness
reign in our breasts, every person and
every occurrence are beheld
in the most favorable light.
RULE IX.
Two or more nouns, or nouns and pronouns, in the singular number, connected by disjunctive conjunctions, must have verbs, nouns, and pronouns, agreeing with them in the singular; as, “Neither John nor James has learned his lesson.”
NOTE 1. When singular pronouns, or a noun and pronoun, of different persons, are disjunctively connected, the verb must agree, in person, with that which is placed nearest to it; as, “Thou or I am in fault; I or thou art to blame; I, or thou, or he, is the author of it.” But it would be better to say “Either I am to blame or thou art,” &c.
2. When a disjunctive occurs between a singular noun or pronoun and a plural one, the verb must agree with the plural noun or pronoun, which should generally be placed next to the verb; as, “Neither poverty nor riches were injurious to him;” “I or they were offended by it.”
Constructions like these ought generally to be avoided.
FALSE SYNTAX.
Ignorance or negligence have caused this mistake.
The verb, have caused, in this sentence, is improperly used in the plural, because it expresses the action, not of both, but of either the one or the other of its nominatives; therefore it should be in the singular, has caused; and then it would agree with “ignorance or negligence,” agreeably to Rule 9 (Repeat the Rule.)
A circle or a square are the same in idea.
Neither whiteness nor redness are in the porphyry.
Neither of them are remarkable for precision.
Man is not such a machine
as a clock or a watch, which move merely
as they are moved.
When sickness, infirmity,
or reverse of fortune, affect us, the
sincerity of friendship is
proved.
Man’s happiness or misery
are, in a great measure, put into his own
hands.
Despise no infirmity of mind
or body, nor any condition of life, for
they may be thy own lot.
The prince, as well as the people, were blameworthy.
RULE X.
A collective noun or noun of multitude, conveying unity of idea, generally has a verb or pronoun agreeing with it in the singular; as, “The meeting was large, and it held three hours.”
NOTE. Rules 10, and 11, are limited in their application. See page.
FALSE SYNTAX.
The nation are powerful.
The fleet were seen sailing up the channel.
The church have no power to
inflict corporal punishment. The
flock, and not the fleece,
are, or ought to be, the objects of the
shepherd’s care.
That nation was once powerful; but now they are feeble.
RULE XI.
A noun of multitude, conveying plurality of idea, must have a verb or pronoun agreeing with it in the plural; as, “The council were divided in their sentiments.”
FALSE SYNTAX.
My people doth not consider.
The multitude eagerly pursues pleasure as its chief good.
The committee was divided
in its sentiments, and it has referred the
business to the general meeting.
The people rejoices in that which should give it sorrow.
RULE XII.
A noun or pronoun in the possessive case, is governed by the noun it possesses; as, “Man’s happiness;” “Its value is great.”
NOTE 1. When the possessor is described by a circumlocution, the possessive sign should generally be applied to the last term only; as, “The duke of Bridgewater’s canal; The bishop of Landaff’s excellent book; The captain of the guard’s house.” This usage, however, ought generally to be avoided. The words do not literally convey the ideas intended. What nonsense to say, “This is the governor of Ohio’s house!”
2. When nouns in the possessive case are in apposition, and follow each other in quick succession, the possessive sign is generally annexed to the last only; as, “For David my servant’s sake; John the Baptist’s head; The canal was built in consequence of De Witt Clinton the governor’s advice.”
But when a pause is proper, and thePage 169
governing noun not expressed, the sign should be applied to the first possessive only, and understood to the rest; as, “I reside at Lord Stormont’s, my old patron and benefactor.”
3. Its, the possessive case of it, is often improperly used for ’tis, or, it is; as, “Its my book: Its his,” &c.; instead of, "It is my book; or, ’Tis my book; It is his; or, ’Tis his.”
4. Participles frequently govern nouns and pronouns in the possessive case, as, “In case of his majesty’s dying without issue, &c.; Upon God’s having ended all his works, &c.; I remember its being reckoned a great exploit; At my coming in he said,” &c. But in such instances, the participle with its adjuncts may be considered a substantive phrase, according to Note 2, Rule 28.
5. Phrases like these, “A work of Washington Irving’s; A brother of Joseph’s; A friend of mine; A neighbor of yours,” do not, as some have supposed, each contain a double possessive, or two possessive cases, but they may be thus construed; “A work of (out of, or, among the number of) Washington Irving’s works; that is, One of the works of Washington Irving; One of the brothers of Joseph; One friend of my friends; One neighbor of your neighbors.”
FALSE SYNTAX.
Homers works are much admired.
Nevertheless, Asa his heart was not perfect with the Lord.
James Hart, his book, bought August the 19, 1829.
Note 1. It was
the men’s, women’s, and children’s
lot to suffer
great calamities.
This is Peter’s, John’s, and Andrew’s occupation.
Note 2. This is Campbell’s the poet’s production.
The silk was purchased at Brown’s, the mercer’s and haberdasher’s.
Note 4. Much will depend on the pupil composing frequently.
Much depends on this rule being observed.
The measure failed in consequence
of the president neglecting to lay
it before the council.
RULE XIII.
Personal pronouns must agree with the nouns for which they stand, in gender and number; as, “John writes, and he will soon write well.”
NOTE. You, though frequently employed to represent a singular noun, is always plural in form; therefore the verb connected with it should be plural; as, “My friend, you were mistaken.” See pages and
Every man will be rewarded according to their works.
Incorrect, because the pronoun their does not agree in gender or number with the noun “man,” for which it stands; consequently Rule 13, is violated. Their should be his; and then the pronoun would be of the masculine gender, singular number, agreeing with man, according to Rule 13. (Repeat the Rule.)
An orator’s tongue should be agreeable to the ear of their audience.
Rebecca took goodly raiment, and put them on Jacob.
Take handfuls of ashes, and
let Moses sprinkle it towards heaven, in
the sight of Pharaoh, and
it shall become small dust.
No one should incur censure for being tender of their reputation.
Note. Horace,
you was blamed; and I think you was worthy of
censure.
Witness, where was you standing
during the transaction? How far was
you from the defendant?
Relative pronouns agree with their antecedents, in gender, person, and number; as, “Thou who lovest wisdom;” “I who speak from experience.”
NOTE. When a relative pronoun is preceded by two antecedents of different persons, the relative and the verb may agree in person with either, but not without regard to the sense; as, “I am the man who command you;” or, “I am the man who commands you.” The meaning of the first of these examples will more obviously appear, if we render it thus: “I who command you, am the man.”
When the agreement of the relative has been fixed with either of the preceding antecedents, it must be preserved throughout the sentence; as, “I am the Lord, that maketh all things; that stretcheth forth the heavens alone; that spreadeth abroad the earth by myself,” &c.
FALSE SYNTAX.
Thou who has been a witness of the fact, canst state it.
The wheel killed another man,
which make the sixth which have lost
their lives by this means.
Thou great First Cause, least understood!
Who all my sense confined.
Note, 2d part.
Thou art the Lord, who didst choose Abraham, and
brought him forth out of Ur
of the Chaldees.
RULE XV.
The relative is the nominative case to the verb, when no nominative comes between it and the verb; as, “The master who taught us, was eminent.”
FALSE SYNTAX.
If he will not hear his best
friend, whom shall be sent to admonish
him.
This is the man whom, he informed me, was my benefactor.
RULE XVI.
When a nominative comes between the relative and the verb, the relative is governed by the following verb, or by some other word in its own member of the sentence; as, “He whom I serve, is eternal.”
NOTE 1. Who, which, what, the relative that, and their compounds, whomever, whomsoever, &c., though in the objective case, are always placed before the verb; as, “He whom ye seek, has gone hence.”
2. Every relative must
have an antecedent to which it relates,
either expressed or implied;
as, “Who steals my purse, steals
trash;” that is, he
who.
3. The pronouns whichsoever, whatsoever, and the like, are sometimes elegantly divided by the interposition of the corresponding nouns; as, “On which side soever the king cast his eyes,” &c.
4. The pronoun what
is sometimes improperly used instead of the
conjunction that; as,
“He would not believe but what I was in
fault.” It should
be “but that,” &c.
FALSE SYNTAX.
That is the friend who I sincerely esteem.
Not proper, because who, which is the object of the action expressed by the transitive verb “esteem,” is in the nominative case. It ought to be whom, in the objective; and then it would be governed by esteem, according to Rule 16. (Repeat the Rule:)—and, also, according to Rule 20. “That is the friend whom I sincerely esteem.”
They who much is given to, will have much to answer for.
From the character of those
who you associate with, your own will be
estimated.
He is a man who I greatly respect.
Our benefactors and tutors
are the persons who we ought to love, and
who we ought to be grateful
to.
They who conscience and virtue
support, may smile at the caprices of
fortune.
Who did you walk with?
Who did you see there?
Who did you give the book to?
RULE XVII.
When a relative pronoun is of the interrogative kind, it refers to the word or phrase containing the answer to the question for its subsequent, which subsequent must agree in case with the interrogative; as, “Whose book is that? Joseph’s;” “Who gave you this? John.”
NOTE. Whether the interrogative
really refers to a subsequent or
not, is doubtful; but it is
certain that the subsequent should agree
in case with the interrogative.
FALSE SYNTAX.
Who gave John those books?
Us. Of whom did you buy them? Of a
bookseller, he who lives in
Pearl street.
Who walked with you? My brother and him.
Who will accompany me to the country? Her and me.
RULE XVIII.
Adjectives belong to, and qualify nouns, expressed
or understood; as,
“He is a good, as well as a wise
man.”
NOTE 1. Adjectives frequently
belong to pronouns; as, “I am
miserable; He is industrious.”
2. Numeral adjectives belong to nouns, which nouns must agree in number with their adjectives, when of the cardinal kind; as, “Ten feet; Eighty fathoms.” But some anomalous and figurative expressions form an exception to this rule; as, “A fleet of forty sail;” “Two hundred head of cattle.”
3. Adjectives sometimes
belong to verbs in the infinitive mood, or
to a part of a sentence; as,
“To see is pleasant; To be blind
is
unfortunate; To die
for our country is glorious.”
4. Adjectives are often used to modify the sense of other adjectives, or the action of verbs, and to express the quality of things in connexion with the action by which that quality is produced; as, “Red hot iron; Pale blue lining; Deep sea-green sash; The apples boil soft; Open your hand wide; The clay burns white; The fire burns blue; The eggs boil hard.”
5. When an adjective
is preceded by a preposition, and the noun is
understood, the two words
may be considered an adverbial phrase; as,
“In general, in particular;”
that is, generally, particularly.
6. Adjectives should
be placed next to the nouns which they qualify;
as, “A tract of good
land.”
7. We should generally avoid comparing such adjectives as do not literally admit of comparison; such as, more impossible, most impossible; more unconquerable, more perfect, &c. See REMARKS on adjectives, page 76.
8. When an adjective or an adverb is used in comparing two objects, it should be in the comparative degree; but when more than two are compared, the superlative ought to be employed; as, “Julia is the taller of the two; Her specimen is the best of the three.”
FALSE SYNTAX.
Note 2. The boat carries thirty tun.
The chasm was twenty foot broad, and one hundred fathom in depth.
Note 6. He bought
a new pair of shoes, and an elegant piece of
furniture.
My cousin gave his fine pair of horses for a poor tract of land.
Note 7. The contradictions
of impiety are still more
incomprehensible.
It is the most uncertain way that can be devised.
This is a more perfect model than I ever saw before.
Note 8. Which of those two cords is the strongest?
I was at a loss to determine which was the wiser of the three.
RULE XIX.
Adjective pronouns belong to nouns, expressed or understood; as, “Any man, all men.”
NOTE 1. The demonstrative
adjective pronouns must agree in number
with their nouns; as, “This
book, these books; that sort,
those sorts.”
2. The pronominal adjectives, each, every, either, neither, another, and one, agree with nouns in the singular number only; as, “Each man, every person, another lesson;” unless the plural nouns convey a collective idea: as, “Every six months.”
3. Either is often improperly employed instead of each; as, “The king of Israel, and Jehoshaphat the king of Judah, sat either of them on his throne.” Each signifies both taken separately; either implies only the one or the other taken disjunctively:—“sat each on his throne.”
FALSE SYNTAX.
Note 1. Those sort of favors do real injury.
They have been playing this two hours.
These kind of indulgences
soften and injure the mind. He saw one
or more persons enter the
garden.
Note 2. Let each esteem others better than themselves.
There are bodies, each of which are so small as to be invisible.
Every person, whatever their
station may be, are bound by the laws
of morality and religion.
Note 3. On either side of the river was the tree of life.
Nadab and Abihu took either of them his censer.
RULE XX.
Active-transitive verbs govern the objective case; as, “Cesar conquered Pompey;” “Columbus discovered America;” “Truth ennobles her.”
FALSE SYNTAX.
Ye who were dead, hath he quickened.
Ye, in the nominative case, is erroneous, because it is the object of the action expressed by the transitive verb “hath quickened;” and therefore it should be you, in the objective case. You would then be governed by “hath quickened,” agreeably, to Rule 20. Active-transitive verbs govern the objective case.
Who did they entertain so freely?
They who opulence has made
proud, and who luxury has corrupted,
cannot relish the simple pleasures
of nature.
He and they we know, but who are ye?
She that is negligent, reprove sharply.
He invited my brother and I to pay him a visit.
Who did they send on that mission?
They who he has most injured, he had the greatest reason to love.
RULE XXI.
The verb to be may have the same case after it as before it; as, “I am the man;” “I believe it to have been them;” “He is the thief.”
NOTE 1. When nouns or pronouns next preceding and following the verb to be, signify the same thing, they are in apposition, and, therefore, in the same case. Rule 21 is predicated on the principle contained in Rule 7.
2. The verb to be is often understood; as, “The Lord made me man; He made him what he was;” that is, “The Lord made me to be man; He made him to be that which he was.” “They desired me to call them brethren;” i.e. by the name of brethren. “They named him John;” i.e. by the name of John; or, by the name John; putting these two nouns in apposition.
FALSE SYNTAX.
I know it to be they.
Improper, because it is in the objective case before the verb “to be,” and they is in the nominative after; consequently, Rule 21 is violated. They is in apposition with it, therefore they should be them, in the objective after to be, according to Rule 21. (Repeat the Rule.)
Be composed, it is me.
I would not act thus, if I were him.
Well may you be afraid; it is him, indeed.
Who do you fancy him to to be?
Whom do men say that I am? Whom say ye that I am?
If it was not him, who do you imagine it to have been?
He supposed it was me; but you knew that it was him.
RULE XXII.
Active-intransitive and passive verbs, the verb to become, and other neuter verbs, have the same case after them as before them, when both words refer to, and signify, the same thing; as, “Tom struts a soldier;” “Will sneaks a scrivener;” “He was called Cesar;” “The general was saluted emperor;” “They have become fools.”
NOTE 1. Active-intransitive verbs sometimes assume a transitive form, and govern the objective case; as, “To dream a dream; To run a race; To walk the horse; To dance the child; To fly the kite.”
2. According to a usage too common in colloquial style, an agent not literally the correct one, is employed as the nominative to a passive verb, which causes the verb to be followed by an objective case without the possibility of supplying before it a preposition: thus, “Pitticus was offered a large sum by the king;” “She was promised them (the jewels) by her mother;” “I was asked a question.” It would be better sense, and more agreeable to the idiom of our language, to say, “A large sum was offered to Pitticus;” “They were promised (to) her;” “A question was put to me.”
3. Some passive verbs are formed by using the participles of compound active verbs. To smile, to wonder, to dream, are intransitive verbs, for which reason they have no passive voice; but, to smile on, to wonder at, to dream of, are compound active-transitive verbs, and, therefore, admit of a passive voice; as, “He was smiled on by fortune; The accident is not to be wondered at;”
“There are
more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
“Than are
dreamed of in your philosophy.”
RULE XXIII.
A verb in the infinitive mood may be governed by a verb, noun, adjective, participle, or pronoun; as, “Cease to do evil;” “We all have our talent to be improved;” “She is eager to learn;” “They are preparing to go;” “Let him do it.”
ILLUSTRATION. The supposed principle of government referred to in this rule, may be thus illustrated. In the sentence, “Cease to do evil,” the peculiar manner in which cease is introduced, requires or compels us to put the verb do in the infinitive mood; and, according to the genius of our language, we cannot express this act of doing, when thus connected with cease, in any other mood, unless we change the construction of the sentence. Hence we say, that cease governs the mood of the verb do. Similar remarks may be applied to the words talent, eager, preparing, and him, in the respective examples under the rule.
Many respectable grammarians refer the government of this mood invariably to the preposition to prefixed, which word they do not, of course, consider a part of the verb. Others contend, and with some plausibility, that this mood is not governed by any particular word. If we reject the idea of government, as applied to the verb in this mood, the following rule, if substituted for the foregoing, might, perhaps, answer all practical purposes.
RULE.
A verb in the infinitive mood, refers to some noun or pronoun, as its subject or actor.
ILLUSTRATION of the examples under Rule XXIII. “To do” refers to thou understood for its agent; “to be improved” refers to talent; “to learn,” to she; “to go,” to they; and “to do,” refers to him.
NOTE 1. The infinitive
mood absolute stands independent of the rest
of the sentence; as, “To
confess the truth, I was in fault.”
2. The infinitive mood
is sometimes governed by conjunctions or
adverbs; as, “An object
so high as to be invisible;” “He
is wise
enough to deceive;”
“The army is about to march.”
RULE XXIV.
The infinitive mood, or part of a sentence, is frequently put as the nominative case to a verb, or the object of an active-transitive verb; as, “To play is pleasant;” “Boys love to play;” “That warm climates shorten life, is reasonable to suppose;” “He does not consider how near he approaches to his end.”
NOTE. To, the sign
of the infinitive mood, is sometimes properly
omitted; as, “I heard
him say it;” instead of, “to say
it.”
RULE XXV.
The verbs which follow bid, dare, need, make, see, hear, feel, help, let, and their participles, are in the infinitive mood without the sign to prefixed; as, “He bids me come;” “I dare engage;” “Let me go;” “Help me do it;” i.e. to come, to go, to do it, &c. “He is hearing me recite.”
FALSE SYNTAX.
Bid him to come.
He durst not to do it without permission.
Hear him to read his lesson.
It is the difference in their
conduct, which makes us to approve the
one, and to reject the other.
It is better live on a little, than outlive a great deal.
I wish him not wrestle with his happiness.
RULE XXVI.
Participles have the same government as the verbs have from which they are derived; as, “I saw the tutor instructing his pupils.”
NOTE. The present participle with the definite article the before it, becomes a noun, and must have the preposition of after it. The and of must both be used, or both be omitted; as, “By the observing of truth, you will command respect;” or, “By observing truth,” &c.
FALSE SYNTAX.
Note. We cannot be wise and good without the taking pains for it.
The changing times and seasons,
the removing and setting up kings,
belong to Providence alone.
These are the rules of grammar,
by observing of which you may avoid
mistakes.
RULE XXVII.
The present participle refers to some noun or pronoun denoting the subject or actor; as, “I see a boy running.”
RULE XXVIII.
The perfect participle belongs, like an adjective, to some noun or pronoun, expressed or understood; as, “I saw the boy abused.”
NOTE 1. Participles of
neuter verbs have the same case after them as
before them; as, “Pontius
Pilate being Governor of Judea, and
Herod being Tetrarch,”
&c.
2. A participle with its adjuncts, may sometimes be considered as a substantive or participial phrase, which phrase may be the subject of a verb, or the object of a verb or preposition; as, “Taking from another without his knowledge or assent, is called stealing; He studied to avoid expressing himself too severely; I cannot fail of having money, &c.; By promising much and performing but little, we become despicable.”
3. As the perfect participle and the imperfect tense of irregular verbs, are sometimes different in their form, care must be taken that they be not indiscriminately used. It is frequently said, ’He begun,’ for ‘he began;’ ‘He run,’ for ‘he ran;’ ‘He come,’ for ’he came;’ the participles being here used instead of the imperfect tense; and much more frequently is the imperfect tense employed instead of the participle; as, ‘I had wrote,’ for ‘I had written;’ ‘I was chose,’ for ‘I was chosen;’ ‘I have eat,’ for ‘I have eaten.’ ’He would have spoke;’—spoken. ’He overrun his guide;’—overran. ’The sun had rose;’—risen.
FALSE SYNTAX.
I seen him. I have saw many a one.
Seen is improper, the perfect participle being used instead of the imperfect tense of the verb. It ought to be, “I saw him,” according to Note 3, Have saw is also erroneous, the imperfect tense being employed instead of the perfect participle. The perfect tense of a verb is formed by combining the auxiliary have with its perfect participle: therefore the sentence should be written thus, “I have seen many a one:” Note 3.
Note 3. He done
me no harm, for I had wrote my letter before he
come home.
Had not that misfortune befel
my cousin, he would have went to
Europe long ago.
The sun had already arose, when I began my journey.
Since the work is began, it must be prosecuted.
The French language is spoke in every state in Europe.
He writes as the best authors
would have wrote, had they writ on the
same subject.
RULE XXIX.
Adverbs qualify verbs, participles, adjectives, and other adverbs; as, “A very good pen writes extremely well;” “By living temperately,” &c.
NOTE 1. Adverbs are generally
set before adjectives or adverbs,
after verbs, or between the
auxiliary and the verb; as, “He made a
very sensible discourse,
and was attentively heard.”
2. When the qualifying word which follows a verb, expresses quality, it must be an adjective, but when it expresses manner, an adverb should be used; as, “She looks cold; She looks coldly on him; He feels warm; He feels warmly the insult offered to him.” If the verb to be can be substituted for the one employed, an adjective should follow, and not an adverb; as, “She looks [is] cold; The hay smells [is] sweet; The fields look [are] green; The apples taste [are] sour; The wind blows [is] fresh.”
3. It is not strictly proper to apply the adverbs here, there, and where, to verbs signifying motion, instead of the adverbs hither, thither, whither; thus, “He came here [hither] hastily;” “They rode there [thither] in two hours;” “Where [whither] will he go?” But in familiar style, these constructions are so far sanctioned as sometimes to be admissible.
4. The use of where, instead of in which, in constructions like the following, is hardly admissible: “The immortal sages of ’76, formed a charter, where [in which] their rights are boldly asserted.”
5. As the adverbs hence, thence, and whence, literally supply the place of a noun and preposition, there appears to be a solecism in employing a preposition in conjunction with them: “From whence it follows;” “He came from thence since morning.” Better, “whence it follows;” “He came thence.” The following phrases are also exceptionable: “The then ministry;” “The above argument;” “Ask me never so much dowry;” “Charm he never so wisely.” Better, “The ministry of that time or period;” “The preceding argument;” “Ever so much dowry;” “Ever so wisely.”
FALSE SYNTAX.
Note 1. It cannot
be impertinent or ridiculous therefore to
remonstrate.
He was pleasing not often, because he was vain.
These things should be never separated.
We may happily live, though our possessions are small.
RULE XXX.
Two negatives destroy one another, and are generally equivalent to an affirmative; as, “Such things are not uncommon;” i.e. they are common.
NOTE. When one of the two negatives employed is joined to another word, it forms a pleasing and delicate variety of expression; as, “His language, though inelegant, is not ungrammatical;” that is, it is grammatical.
But, as two negatives, by destroying each other, are equivalent to an affirmative, they should not be used when we wish to convey a negative meaning. The following sentence is therefore inaccurate: “I can_not_ by no means allow him what his argument must prove.” It should be, “I cannot by any means,” &c., or, “I can by no means.”
FALSE SYNTAX.
Note, 2d part. I don’t know nothing about it.
I did not see nobody there. Nothing never affects her.
Be honest, nor take no shape nor semblance of disguise.
There cannot be nothing more insignificant than vanity.
Precept nor discipline is not so forcible as example.
Prepositions govern the objective case; as, “He
went from Utica to
Rome, and then passed through Redfield.”
FALSE SYNTAX.
Each is accountable for hisself.
They settled it among theirselves.
It is not I who he is displeased with.
Who did you go with?
Who did you receive instruction from?
Home, and nouns signifying distance, time when, how long, &c. are generally governed by a preposition understood; as, “The horse ran a mile;” “He came home last June;” “My friend lived four years at college;” that is, ran through the space of a mile; or, ran over a space called a mile; to his home in last June; during four years, &c.
NOTE 1. The prepositions
to and for are often understood,
chiefly before the pronouns;
as, “Give [to] me a book; Get [for]
him some paper.”
2. To or unto, is, by some, supposed to be understood after like and unlike; as, “He is like [unto] his brother; She is unlike [to] him.” Others consider this mode of expression an idiom of the language, and maintain that like governs the objective following it.
3. Nouns signifying extension, duration, quantity, quality, or value, are used without a governing word; as, “The Ohio is one thousand miles long; She is ten years old; My hat is worth ten dollars.” These are sometimes considered anomalies. See page 163.
Conjunctions connect nouns and pronouns in the same case; as, “The master taught her and me to write;” “He and she are associates.”
FALSE SYNTAX.
My brother and him are grammarians.
You and me enjoy great privileges.
Him and I went to the city
in company; but John and him returned
without me.
Between you and I there is a great disparity of years.
Conjunctions generally connect verbs of like moods and tenses; as, “If thou sincerely desire, and earnestly pursue virtue, she will assuredly be found by thee, and prove a rich reward.”
NOTE 1. When different
moods and tenses are connected by
conjunctions, the nominative
must be repeated; as, “He may return,
but he will not tarry.”
2. Conjunctions implying
contingency or doubt, require the
subjunctive mood after them;
as, “If he study, he will improve.”
See pages 135, 145, and 155.
3. The conjunctions if,
though, unless, except, whether,
and lest, generally
require the subjunctive mood after them.
4. Conjunctions of a
positive and absolute nature, implying no
doubt, require the indicative
mood; as, “As virtue advances, so
vice recedes.”
FALSE SYNTAX.
Did he not tell me his fault, and entreated me to forgive him?
Professing regard, and to act differently, discovers a base mind.
Note 1. He has gone home, but may return.
The attorney executed the deed, but will write no more.
Note 2. I shall walk to-day, unless it rains.
If he acquires riches, they will corrupt his mind.
A noun or pronoun following the conjunction than, as, or but, is nominative to a verb, or governed by a verb or preposition, expressed or understood; as, “Thou art wiser than I [am.”] “I saw nobody but [I saw] him.”
NOTE 1. The conjunction as, when it is connected with such, many, or same, is sometimes, though erroneously, called a relative pronoun; as, “Let such as presume to advise others,” &c.; that is, Let them who, &c. See page 116.
2. An ellipsis, or omission of some words, is frequently admitted, which must be supplied in the mind in order to parse grammatically; as “Wo is me;” that is, to me; “To sleep all night;” i.e. through all the night; “He has gone a journey;” i.e. on a journey; “They walked a league;” i.e. over a space called a league.
3. When the omission
of words would obscure the sense, or weaken its
force, they must be expressed.
4. In the use of prepositions, and words that relate to each other, we should pay particular regard to the meaning of the words or sentences which they connect: all the parts of a sentence should correspond to each other, and a regular and clear construction throughout should be carefully preserved.
FALSE SYNTAX.
They are much greater gainers than me.
They know how to write as
well as him; but he is a better grammarian
than them.
They were all well but him.
None were rewarded but him and me.
Jesus sought none but they who had gone astray.
REMARKS ON THE TENSES.
1. In the use of verbs, and other words and phrases which, in point of time, relate to each other, a due regard to that relation should be observed.
Instead of saying, “The Lord hath given, and the Lord hath taken away;” we should say, “The Lord gave, and the Lord hath taken away.” Instead of, “I remember the family more than twenty years;” it should be, “I have remembered the family more than twenty years.”
2. The best rule that can be given for the management of the tenses, and of words and phrases which, in point of time, relate to each other, is this very general one; Observe what the sense necessarily requires.
To say, “I have visited Washington last summer; I have seen the work more than a month ago,” is not good sense. The constructions should be, “I visited Washington, &c.; I saw the work, &c.” “This mode of expression has been formerly much admired:”—“was formerly much admired.” “If I had have been there;” “If I had have seen him;” “Had you have known him,” are solecisms too gross to need correction. We can say, I have been, I had been; but what sort of a tense is, had have been? To place had before the defective verb ought, is an error equally gross and illiterate:—“had ought, hadn’t ought.” This is as low a vulgarism as the use of theirn, hern, and hizzen, tother, furder, baynt, this ere, I seed it, I tell’d him.
3. When we refer to a past action or event, and no part of that time in which it took place; remains, the imperfect tense should be used; but if there is still remaining some portion of the time in which we declare that the thing has been done, the perfect tense should be employed.
Thus, we say, “Philosophers made great discoveries in the last century;” “He was much afflicted last year;” but when we refer to the present century, year, week, day, &c. we ought to use the perfect tense; as, “Philosophers have made great discoveries in the present century;” “He has been much afflicted this year;” “I have read the president’s message this week;” “We have heard important news this morning;” because these events occurred in this century, this year, this week, and to-day, and still there remains a part of this century, year, week, and day, of which I speak.
In general, the perfect tense may be applied wherever the action is connected with the present time, by the actual existence either of the author of the work, though it may have been performed many centuries ago; but if neither the author nor the work now remains, the perfect tense ought not to be employed. Speaking of priests in general, we may say, “They have, in all ages, claimed great powers;” because the general order of the priesthood still exists; but we cannot properly say, “The Druid priests have claimed great powers;” because that order is now extinct. We ought, therefore, to say, “The Druid priests claimed great powers.”
The following examples may serve still farther to illustrate the proper use and application of the tenses. “My brother has recently been to Philadelphia.” It should be, “was recently at Philadelphia;” because the adverb recently refers to a time completely past, without any allusion to the present time. “Charles is grown considerably since I have seen him the last time.” Corrected, “Charles has grown, since I saw him,” &c. “Payment was at length made, but no reason assigned for its being so long postponed.” Corrected, “for its having been so long postponed.” “They were arrived an hour before we reached the city:”—“They had arrived.”
“The workmen will complete the building at the time I take possession of it.” It should be, “will have completed the building,” &c. “This curious piece of workmanship was preserved, and shown to strangers for more than fifty years past:”—“has been preserved, and been shown to strangers,” &c. “I had rather write than beg:”—“I would rather write than beg.”
“On the morrow, because he would have known the certainty whereof Paul was accused of the Jews, he loosed him from his bands.” It ought to be, “because he would know; or, being willing to know,” &c. “The blind man said, ‘Lord, that I might receive my sight;’” “If by any means I might attain unto the resurrection of the dead.” In both these examples, may would be preferable to might. “I feared that I should have lost the parcel, before I arrived:”—“that I should lose.” “It would have afforded me no satisfaction, if I could perform it.” It ought to be, “if I could have performed it;” or, “It would afford me no satisfaction, if I could perform it.” “This dedication may serve for almost any book that has, is, or shall be published:”—“that has been, or will be published.”
4. In order to employ the two tenses of the infinitive mood with propriety, particular attention should be paid to the meaning of what we express.
Verbs expressive of hope, desire, intention, or command, ought to be followed by the PRESENT tense of the Infinitive mood.
“Last week I intended to have written,” is improper. The intention of writing was then present with me; and, therefore, the construction should be, “I intended to write.” The following examples are also inaccurate; “I found him better than I expected to have found him;” “My purpose was, after spending ten months more in commerce, to have withdrawn my wealth to another country.” They should be, “expected to find him;” “to withdraw my wealth.”
“This is a book which proves itself to be written by the person whose name it bears.” It ought to be “which proves itself to have been written,” &c. “To see him would have afforded me pleasure all my life.” Corrected, “To have seen him;” or, “To see him would afford me pleasure,” &c. “The arguments were sufficient to have satisfied all who heard them:”—“were sufficient to satisfy.” “History painters would have found it difficult to have invented such a species of beings:”—“to invent such a species.”
5. General and immutable truths ought to be expressed in the present tense.
Instead of saying, “He did not know that eight and twenty were equal to twenty and eight;” “The preacher said very audibly, that whatever was useful, was good;” “My opponent would not believe, that virtue was always advantageous.;” The constructions should be, “are equal to twenty;” “whatever is useful, is good;” “virtue is always advantageous.”
EXAMPLES IN FALSE SYNTAX PROMISCUOUSLY ARRANGED.
We adore the Divine Being, he who is from eternity to eternity.
On these causes depend all
the happiness or misery which exist among
men.
The enemies who we have most to fear, are those of our own hearts.
Is it me or him who you requested to go?
Though great has been his
disobedience and his folly, yet if he
sincerely acknowledges his
misconduct, he shall be forgiven.
There were, in the metropolis, much to amuse them.
By exercising of our memories, they are improved.
The property of my friend,
I mean his books and furniture, were
wholly consumed.
Affluence might give us respect
in the eyes of the vulgar, but will
not recommend us to the wise
and good.
The cares of this world, they often choke the growth of virtue.
They that honor me, I will
honor; and them that despise me, shall be
lightly esteemed.
I intended to have called last week, but could not.
The fields look freshly and gayly since the rain.
The book is printed very neat, and on fine wove paper.
I have recently been in Washington,
where I have seen Gen. Andrew
Jackson, he who is now president.
Take the two first, and, if you please, the three last.
The Chinese wall is thirty foot high.
It is an union supported by an hypothesis, merely.
I have saw him who you wrote
to; and he would have came back with
me, if he could.
Not one in fifty of those
who call themselves deists, understand the
nature of the religion which
they reject.
If thou studiest diligently, thou will become learned.
Education is not attended to properly in Spain.
He know’d it was his duty; and he ought, therefore, to do it.
He has little more of the great man besides the title.
Richard acted very independent on the occasion.
We have done no more than it was our duty to have done.
The time of my friend entering on business, soon arrived.
His speech is the most perfect specimen I ever saw.
Calumny and detraction are
sparks which, if you do not blow, they
will go out of themselves.
Those two authors have each of them their merit.
Reasons whole
pleasure, all the joys of sense,
Lies in three
words, health, peace, and competence.
A great mass of rocks thrown
together by the hand of nature with
wildness and confusion, strike
the mind with more grandeur, than if
they were adjusted to one
another with the accuratest symmetry.
A lampoon or a satire do not carry in them robbery or murder.
The side A, with the sides B and C, compose the triangle.
If some persons opportunities
were never so favorable, they would be
too indolent to improve.
It is reported that the governor will come here to-morrow.
Beauty and innocence should be never separated.
Extravagance and folly may
reduce you to a situation where you will
have much to fear and little
to hope.
Not one in fifty of our modern
infidels are thoroughly versed in
their knowledge of the Scriptures.
Virtue and mutual confidence
is the soul of friendship. Where these
are wanting, disgust or hatred
often follow little differences.
An army present a painful sight to a feeling mind.
To do good to them that hate
us, and, on no occasion, to seek
revenge, is the duty of a
Christian.
The polite, accomplished libertine,
is but miserable amidst all his
pleasures: the rude inhabitant
of Lapland is happier than him.
There are principles in man,
which ever have, and ever will, incline
him to offend.
This is one of the duties which requires great circumspection.
They that honor me, them will I honor.
Every church and sect have opinions peculiar to themselves.
Pericles gained such an ascendant
over the minds of the Athenians,
that he might be said to attain
a monarchical power in Athens.
Thou, Lord, who hath permitted
affliction to come upon us, shall
deliver us from it in due
time.
That writer has given us an
account of the manner in which
Christianity has formerly
been propagated among the heathens.
Though the measure be mysterious,
it is not unworthy of your
attention.
In his conduct was treachery,
and in his words, faithless
professions. After I
visited Europe, I returned to America.
I have not, nor shall not, consent to a proposal so unjust.
I had intended yesterday to
have walked out, but I have been again
disappointed.
Five and eight makes thirteen; five from eight leaves three.
If he goes to Saratoga next
week, it will make eight times that he
has visited that renowned
watering place.
I could not convince him,
that a forgiving disposition was nobler
than a revengeful one.
I consider the first, one of the brightest
virtues that ever was or can
be possessed by man.
The college consists of one great, and several smaller edifices.
He would not believe, that honesty was the best policy.
The edifice was erected sooner than I expected it to have been.
Surely, goodness and mercy
shall follow me all the days of my life;
and I will dwell in the house
of the Lord for ever.
If a man have a hundred sheep,
and one of them be gone astray, doth
he not leave the ninety and
nine, &c.?
He might have completed his
task sooner, but he could not do it
better.
The most ignorant and the most savage tribes of men, when they have looked round on the earth, and on the heavens, could not avoid ascribing their origin to some invisible, designing cause, and felt a propensity to adore their Creator.
* * * * *
CRITICAL NOTES AND OBSERVATIONS.
OBSERVATION 1. The following absurd phrases so common in the sacred desk and elsewhere, should be carefully avoided by all who regard common sense:—“Sing the two first and three last verses.” Just as if there could be more than one first and one last. There may be a first two, a second two, &c.; a first three, a second three, a last three. “Within the two last centuries;” “The second syllable of the three first words;” “The three first of these orthoepists have no rule by which their pronunciation is regulated:”—“the last two centuries;” “the first three words;” “the first three of these orthoepists.”
2. Adjectives should not be used to express the manner of action. “The higher the river, the swifter it flows;” “James learns easier than Juliet; he sees deeper into the millstone than she:”—“the more swiftly it flows;” “learns more easily; farther into the millstone.” “He conducted the boldest of any:”—“the most boldly.”
3. More requires than after it. The following sentences are therefore improper: “He was more beloved, but not so much admired, as Cinthio;” “Richard is more active, but not so studious, as his companion.” The legitimate mode of supplying the ellipses in these constructions, will show their gross impropriety: thus, “He was more beloved as Cinthio;” “Richard is more active as his companion,” &c.
4. Adverbs, as illustrated on page 85, are generally substitutes for two or more words belonging to other parts of speech. “Will you accompany me to Europe next summer?” "Yes." “Do you believe that the voyage will restore your health?” "No." In these examples, the adverbs yes and no, are substitutes for whole sentences, and, therefore, do not qualify any words understood. Yes, in this instance, literally means, "I will accompany you to Europe next summer;" and no, "I do not believe that the voyage will restore my health." Many other adverbs are often employed in a similar manner.
"Firstly," is often improperly used instead of the adverb first; “a good deal,” instead of, much, or, a great deal.
5. A nice distinction should be observed in the use of such and so. The former may be employed in expressing quality; the latter, in expressing a degree of the quality; as, “Such a temper is seldom found;” “So bad a temper is seldom found.” In the following examples, so should be used instead of such: “He is such an extravagant young man, that I cannot associate with him;” “I never before saw such large trees.”
The affected use of cardinal, instead of ordinal numbers, ought not to be imitated. “On page forty-five;" “Look at page nineteen;”—forty-fifth, nineteenth.
6. In the choice and application of prepositions, particular regard should be paid to their meaning as established by the idiom of our language and the best usage. “In my proceedings, I have been actuated from the conviction, that I was supporting a righteous cause;” “He should have profited from those golden precepts;” “It is connected to John with the conjunction and;” “Aware that there is, in the minds of many, a strong predilection in favor of established usages;” “He was made much on at Argos;” “They are resolved of going;” “The rain has been falling of a long time;” “It is a work deserving of encouragement.” These examples may be corrected thus, “actuated by the conviction;” “by those golden precepts;” “by the conjunction and;” “predilection for;” “much of at Argos;” “on going;” “falling a long time;” “deserving encouragement.”
7. The preposition to is used before nouns of place, where they follow verbs or participles of motion; as, “I went to Washington.” But at is employed after the verb to be; as, “I have been at Washington;” “He has been to New York, to home,” &c. are improper. The preposition in is set before countries, cities, and large towns; “He lives in France, in London, in Philadelphia, in Rochester.” But before single houses, and cities and villages which are in distant countries, at is commonly used; as, “He lives at Park-place;” “She resides at Vincennes.” People in the northern states may say, “They live in New Orleans, or, at New Orleans.”
8. Passive agents to verbs in the infinitive mood, should not be employed as active agents. The following are solecisms: “This house to let;” “Horses and carriages to let;” “Congress has much business to perform this session;” because the agents, house, horses and carriages, and business, which are really passive, are, according to these constructions, rendered as active. The expressions should be, “This house to be let;” “Horses and carriages to be let;” “much business to be performed.”
9. AMBIGUITY.—“Nothing is more to be desired than wisdom.” Not literally correct, for wisdom is certainly more to be desired than nothing; but, as a figurative expression, it is well established and unexceptionable.
“A crow is a large black bird:”—a large, black—bird.
“I saw a horse—fly through the window:”—I saw a horsefly.
“I saw a ship gliding under full sail through a spy glass.” I saw, through a spy glass, a ship gliding under full sail.
“One may see how the world goes with half an eye.” One may see with half an eye, how the world goes.
“A great stone, that I happened to find, after a long search, by the sea shore, served me for an anchor.” This arrangement of the members and circumstances of this sentence, confines the speaker’s search to the sea shore; whereas, he meant, “A large stone, which, after a long search, I happened to find by the sea shore, served me for an anchor.”
“I shall only notice those called personal pronouns.” I shall notice only those called personal pronouns.
10. TAUTOLOGY.—Avoid words which add no thing to the sense; such as, “Now extant, free gratis, slow mope, cold snow, a hot sun, a flowing stream, a dull blockhead, wise sages.” “I am just going to go there;” I am about to go.
11. ABSURDITIES AND IMPROPRIETIES.—“I can learn him many things.”
It ought to be, “I can teach him.” To learn, is to acquire or receive information; to teach, means to communicate it.
“I don’t think it is so.” You do think, that it is not so.
Ever, always. “I have ever been of this mind.” I have always been. Ever and always are not synonymous. Ever refers to one indefinite period of time; as, “If he ever become rich:” always means at all times.
Excuse, pardon. The former signifies to release from an obligation which refers to the future; the latter, to forgive a neglect or crime that is past. “Excuse me for neglecting to call yesterday:” pardon me.
Remember, recollect. We remember a thing which we retain in our mind; we recollect it, when, though having gone from the mind, we have power to call it back.
Defect, deficiency. A thing which is incomplete in any of its parts, is defective; a total absence of the thing, is a deficiency.
This subject will be resumed in the appendix to this work.
* * * * *
CORRECTIONS IN ORTHOGRAPHY.
From among those words which are often erroneously spelled, the following are selected and corrected according to Johnson, and to Cobb’s Dictionary.
INCORRECT. CORRECT. Abridgement Abridgment abscision abcission achievment achievement adze addice agriculturalist agriculturist ancle ankle attornies attorneys baise baize bason basin bass base bombazin bombasin boose bouse boult bolt buccaneer bucanier burthen burden bye by calimanco calamanco camblet camlet camphire camphor canvas canvass carcase carcass centinel sentinel chace chase chalibeate chalybeate chamelion chameleon chimist chemist chimistry chemistry cholic colic chuse choose cimetar cimeter clench clinch cloke cloak cobler cobbler chimnies chimneys chesnut chestnut clue clew connection connexion corset corslet cypher cipher cyphering ciphering dactyl dactyle develope develop dipthong diphthong dispatch despatch doat dote drouth drought embitter imbitter embody imbody enquire inquire enquirer inquirer enquiry inquiry ensnare insnare enterprize enterprise enthral inthrall entrench intrench entrenchment intrenchment entrust intrust enwrap inwrap epaulette epaulet etherial etherealPage 188
faggot fagot fasset faucet fellon felon fie fy germ germe goslin gosling gimblet gimlet grey gray halloe halloo highth height hindrance hinderance honied honeyed impale empale inclose enclose inclosure enclosure indict endict indictment endictment indorse endorse indorsement endorsement instructor instructer insure ensure insurance ensurance judgement judgment laquey lackey laste last licence license loth loath lothsome loathsome malcontent malecontent maneuver manoeuvre merchandize merchandise misprison misprision monies moneys monied moneyed negociate negotiate negociation negotiation noviciate novitiate ouse ooze opake opaque paroxism paroxysm partizan partisan patronize patronise phrenzy phrensy pinchers pincers plow plough poney pony potatoe potato quere query recognize recognise reindeer raindeer reinforce re-enforce restive restiff ribbon riband rince rinse sadler saddler sallad salad sceptic skeptic sceptical skeptical scepticism skepticism segar cigar seignor seignior serjeant sergeant shoar shore soothe sooth staunch stanch streight straight suitor suiter sythe scythe tatler tattler thresh thrash thwak thwack tipler tippler tranquility tranquillity tripthong triphthong trissyllable trisyllable valice valise vallies valleys vise vice vollies volleys waggon wagon warrantee warranty whoopingcough hoopingcough woe wo yeast yest
The following words being often erroneously pronounced by polite people, as well as by the vulgar, their correction, in this place, agreeably to Cobb’s Dictionary, it is presumed, will be useful to many. Some of the mispronunciations given are provincial.
1 2 3 4 1 4 1 4 1
3 5 6 1 4
Fate, far, fall, fat—me, met—pine,
pin—no, nor, not, move—tube,
tub,
7 34 37
bull—oil—found—–thin—THIS.
ORTHOGRAPHY. IMPROPER.
PRONOUNCED.
4
1 4 4
Again a-gane’ a-gen’
4
1 4 4
Against a-ganste’ a-genst
4
1 4 1
Ally al’le al’li’
1
2
Are are ar
4
4 1 1
Azure azh’ur a’zhure
1
1
Bade bade bad
1
11
Beard bard beerd
4
11 4
Been ben or been bin
22
11
Bleat blaat bleet
1
34
Boil bile boil
4
4 5 4
Bonnet bun’net bon’nit
2
66
Brooch brotsh brootsh
4
3 4 4
Canal ka-nawl’ ka-nal’
4
4
Catch ketsh katsh
4
1 3 1
Causeway kros’wa kawz’wa
4
4 1 4
Chalice kal’is tshal’is
4
1
Chasten tshas’tn tshase’sn
4
1 4 1
Chimney tshim’ble tshim’ne
3
1
Chine tshime tshine
34
1
Choir koir kwire
4
4 1 1
Clevy klev’is klev’ve
4
4
Clinch klensh klinsh
5
4 5 4
Column kol’yum kol’lum
5
4 4 4
Combat kom’bat kum’bat
5
1 5 4
Comma kom’me kom’ma
1
4 3 4
Coquet ko-kwet’ ko-ket’
3
1
Corps korps kore
4
4 4 4
Cover kiv’ur kuv’ur
11
4
Deaf deef def
1
4 4 1 1 4
NOTE 1.—When the words learned, blessed, loved, &c. are used as participial adjectives, the termination ed should generally be pronounced as a separate syllable; as, “A learn-ed man; The bless-ed Redeemer;” but when they are employed as verbs, the ed is contracted in pronunciation; as, “He learn’d his lesson; They are lov’d; I have walk’d.”
2. The accent of the following words falls on those syllables expressed in the italic characters: Eu ro pe an, hy me ne al, Ce sa re a, co ad ju tor, ep i cu re an, in ter est ed, in ter est ing, rep a ra ble, rec og nise, leg is la ture, ob li ga to ry, in com pa ra ble, ir rep a ra ble, in ex o ra ble. In a large class of words, the vowels a, e, and ai, should be pronounced like long a in late; such as, fare, rare, there, their, where, air, chair, compare, declare, &c. In the words person, perfect, mercy, interpret, determine, and the like, the vowel e before r, is often erroneously sounded like short u. Its proper sound is that of e in met, pet, imperative.
3. With respect to the pronunciation
of the words sky, kind,
guide, &c. it appears that a mistake extensively
prevails. It is
believed that their common pronunciation by the
vulgar, is the
correct one, and agreeable to the pronunciation
intended by Mr.
John Walker. The proper diphthongal sounds
11 1 1
in skei, kyind, gyide, are adopted by the common
mass, and
perverted by those who, in their unnatural
and affected
pronunciation of these words, say,
1 1 1 1 1 1
ske-i; ke-inde, ge-ide. This latter mode
of pronouncing them in two
syllables, is as incorrect and ridiculous as to
pronounce the words
boil, toil, in two
3 4 3 4
syllables; thus, bo-il, to-il.
4. My, wind. When
my is contrasted with thy, his,
her, your,
1
1
&c, it is pronounced, mi: in all other situations,
it is pronounced, me; as, “My [me] son,
give ear to my [me] counsel.” When
wind ends a line in poetry, and is made to
rhyme with mind, bind, kind_, &c. it
is
1
4
pronounced, wind; but, in other situations, it is
pronounced, wind.
“Lo, the poor Indian! whose
untutored mind
Sees God in clouds, or hears him in the wind.”
CONTRACTIONS, VULGARISMS, AND OTHER IMPROPRIETIES.
As each of the following provincialisms and vulgarisms, has its locality in some one section or other of our country, it is hoped that these corrections will be found useful in the districts to which the various phrases respectively belong.
IMPROPER. CORRECT.
Aint Are not haint have not taint ’tis not haint are not maint may not wont will not wer’nt were not waunt was not woodent would not mussent must not izzent is not wazzent was not hezzent has not doozzent does not tizzent ’tis not whool who will don’t can’t i’ll ’tis
4 Akst askt 4 4 ben bin 4 2 hul hole 4 1 hum home 4 1 stun stone 66 4 dooz duz 2 4 glass glass 2 4 mass mass 2 4 brass brass 2 4 pass pass 3 2 flawnt flant 4 4 hiz’zn hiz 37 37 4 hou’zn houz’iz 1 4 1 4 an’shent ane’tshent 1 4 1 1 an’jel ane’jel 4 4 1 4 dan’jur dane’jur 4 4 1 4 stran’jur strane’jur 2 4 1 4 tscham’bur tshame’bur 1 4 1 1 na’tur na’tshure 4 4 4 4 1 4 nat’ur-el natsh’u-ral 3 4 3 1 for’tin for’tshune 3 1 1 3 1 1 for’tew-nate for’tshu-nate 4 1 4 1 vur’tew ver’tshu 4 1 4 4 1 4 vur’tew-us ver’tshu-us 1 1 4 4 1 4 ak’tew-el ak’tschu-al 4 1 1 4 1 1 ed’ew-kate ed’ju-kate 4 4 2 4 faTH’ur fa’THur heft weight stoop porch stent task helve handle muss disorder dump unload scup swing shay gig or chaise cutter one-horse sleigh staddle sapling foxy reddish suple spry or supple
IN PENNSYLVANIA.
Strenth strength lenth length brenth breadth ort ought nan what wisht wish wunst once ouch oh cheer chair spook ghost furnentz opposite wanity vanity in wain in vain ornary ordinary for by to spare we bit small piece disremember do not remember
IRISH.
66 1 Door dore 66 1 floor flore 5 4 ond and 5 55 loss looz 66 1 koorse korse 66 1 soorse sorse 4 66 till too 4 7 put put 4 7 fut fut 4 66 4 54 a-koont’ ak-kount’ 4 4 7 4 pul’pit pul’pit 1 4 3 pare’sun par’sn
IMPROPER. CORRECT.
MD. VA. KY. MISS. &c.
2 1 THar THare 2 1 whar hware 2 1 bar [bear] bare 2 4 war wer 37 1 mout mite [might] 1 1 4 gwine go’ing 4 4 4 shet or shut rid 1 5 1 1 4 4 tote or fotch kar’re, fetsh, or bring 1 4 hop’d helpt 4 66 2 4 4 ca-hoot’ part’nur-ship 3 66 5 mar’bl moov off
NOTE, Clever, pretty, ugly, curious, expect, guess, and reckon, though correct English words, have, among the common people of New England and New York, a provincial application and meaning. With them, a clever man, is one of a gentle and obliging disposition; instead of, a man of distinguished talents and profound acquirements. Pretty and ugly, they apply to the disposition of a person, instead of, to his external appearance. In these states, one will often hear, “I guess it rains,” when the speaker knows this to be a fact, and, therefore, guessing is uncalled for. “I expect I can go;” or, “I reckon I can;” instead of, “I suppose or presume.” In New England, a clergyman is often called a minister, in New York, a priest, and south of N.Y. a parson. The last is preferable.
NEW ENGLAND OR NEW YORK. CORRECTED.
I be goin. He lives to hum.
I am going. He lives at home.
Hese ben to hum this two weeks. He has
been at home these
2
weeks.
You haddent ought to do it. Yes You ought not to do it. had ought. Certainly I ought.
Taint no better than hizzen. ’Tis no better than his.
Izzent that are line writ well? Is not that line well written?
Tizzent no better than this ere. It is
no better, or it is
not
any better than his.
The keows be gone to hum, neow, The cows are gone home, and and I’mer goin arter um. I am going after them.
He’ll be here, derights, and, bring He will here, directly, and bring yourn and thairn. yours and theirs.
He touched the stun which I shew He touched the stone which I him, an di guess it made him sithe, showed him and it made him for twas cissing hot. sigh, for it was hissing hot.
Run, Thanel, and cut a staddle, for Go, Nathaniel,
and cut a sapling, to make a lever on.
Ize jest agoneter to make a lever of.
I was about go, daddy.
to go, or intending to go
immediately,
father.
Where shell I dump my cart, square? Where shall I unload my cart? Dump it yender. Whats the heft of Yonder. What is the weight your load? of your load?
When ju git hum from Hafford? When
did you return from
A fortnit ago. You diddent, did ye?
Hartford? A fortnight ago. It
Ju see my Danel, whose sot up a is possible!
Didyou see my son
tarvern there? No. Hede gone afore
Daniel, who has opened a public
I got there. O, the pesky criter! house
there? No. He had left
Hele soon be up a stump. before
I arrived there. O, the
paltry
fellow! He will soon come
to
naught.
My frinds supurb mansion is My friend’s
superb mansion is delightfully sitewated on a nate-eral
delightfully situated on a mound of considerable
hithe. It hez natural mound of considerable
a long stoop in front; but it is furder height.
It has a long porch from the city than
I’de like my hum. in front; but it is farther
from
the
city than I would like to
reside.
I know’d the gal was drownded, and I knew
the girl had been I tell’d the inquisitdoners,
that ize drowned, and I told the jury
nither geestin nor jokin about it; but of inquest,
that I was if they’d permit me to give
em my not jesting about it; but, by
ideze, they’d obleege me. So I
permitting me to give them my parsevered,
and carried my pinte. You view of the subject,
they would don’t say so. Be you from
Barkshire? oblige me. So, I persevered,
I be. Neow I swan! if I aint clean and gained
my point. Indeed! beat.
Are you from Berkshire?
I am.
Really!I
am surprised.
You baint from the Jarseys, be ye? Are you from New Jersey? Yes, Yes. Gosh! then I guess you kneow Then I presume you know how heow to tend tarvern. to tend a tavern.
I seen him. Have you saw him I saw him. Have you seen him? Yes, I have saw him wunst; and that Yes, once; and that was before was before you seed him. you saw him.
I done my task. Have you did I have done my task. Have you yours? No, but I be to do it. done yours? No, but I must.
I be to be there. He know’d me.
I shall be there; or, I must
be
there. He knew me.
Leave me be, for Ime afear’d. Let me be, for I am afraid.
I never took notice to it. I never
took notice of it: or,
better
thus, I never noticed it.
I wish I haddent did it; howsumever, I wish I had
not done it:
I don’t keer: they cant skeer me.
however, I disregard them. They
cannot
scare me.
Give me them there books. Give me those books.
He ort to go; so he ort. He ought to go, really.
No he orten. He ought not.
Dont scrouge me. Don’t crowd me.
I diddent go to do it. I did not intend to do it.
Aint that a good hand write? Is not that beautiful writing?
Nan? I know’d what he meant, but
What? I knew what he meant, but
I never let on. I kept
that to myself.
It is a long mile to town. Ah! I
It is a little over a mile to
thought ’twas unle a short mile. town.
Ah! I supposed it to be less
than
a mile.
Not here the day; he went till He is
not here to-day. He went
Pittsburg. to
Pittsburg.
Let us be after pairsing a wee bit. Let us parse a little.
Where did you loss it? Where did you lose it?
Carry the horse to water. Lead
the horse to water; or,
water
the horse.
Tote the wood to the river. Carry the wood to the river.
Have you focht the water? Have
you fetched, or brought,
the
water?
I’ve made 200 bushels of corn this I have raised 200 bushels of corn year. this year.
He has run against a snag. He has got into difficulty.
Is that your plunder, stranger? Is that your baggage, sir?
He will soon come of that habit. He will
soon overcome, or get
rid
of, that habit.
I war thar, and I seen his boat was I was there,
and I saw that his
loadend too heavy. boat was too
heavily laden, or
loaded.
Whar you gwine. Where are you going?
Hese in cohoot with me. He is in partnership with me.
Did you get shet of your tobacca? Did you
get rid, or dispose
of,
your tobacco?
Who hoped you to sell it? Who helped you to sell it?
PROSODY treats of the modulations of the voice according to the usages of the language we speak, and the sentiments we wish to express: hence, in its most extensive sense, it comprises all the laws of elocution.
Prosody is commonly divided into two parts: the first teaches the true pronunciation of words, comprising accent, quantity, emphasis, pause, and tone; and the second, the laws of versification.
Accent. Accent is the laying of a peculiar stress of the voice on a particular letter or syllable in a word, that it may be better heard than the rest, or distinguished from them; as, in the word presume, the stress of the voice must be on the letter u and the second syllable, sume, which syllable takes the accent.
Every word of more syllables than one, has one accented syllable. For the sake of euphony or distinctness in a long word, we frequently give a secondary accent to another syllable besides the one which takes the principal accent; as, ’tes ti mo’ ni’al, a ban’don ’ing.
Quantity. The quantity of a syllable is that time which is occupied in pronouncing it. It is considered as long or short.
A vowel or syllable is long, when the accent is on the vowel; which causes it to be slowly joined in pronunciation with the following letters; as, “Fall, bale, mood, house, feature.”
A syllable is short, when the accent is on the consonant; which causes the vowel to be quickly joined to the succeeding letter; “as, ant, bonnet, hunger.”
A long syllable generally requires double the time of a short one in pronouncing it; thus, “mate” and “note” should be pronounced as slowly again as “mat” and “not.”
Emphasis. By emphasis is meant a stronger and fuller sound of the voice, by which we distinguish some word or words on which we design to lay particular stress, and to show how they affect the rest of the sentence. Sometimes the emphatic words must be distinguished by a particular tone of voice, as well as by a greater stress.
Emphasis will be more fully explained under the head of Elocution.
Pauses. Pauses or rests, in speaking and reading, are a total cessation of the voice during a perceptible, and, in many cases, a measurable space of time.
Tones. Tones are different both from emphasis and pauses; consisting in the modulation of the voice, or the notes or variations of sound which we employ in the expression of our sentiments.
Emphasis affects particular words and phrases; but tones affect sentences, paragraphs, and sometimes a whole discourse.
PUNCTUATION is the art of dividing written composition into sentences or parts of sentences, by points or stops, in order to mark the different pauses which the sense and an accurate pronunciation require.
The Comma represents the shortest pause; the Semicolon, a pause double that of the comma; the Colon, double that of the semicolon; and the Period, double that of the colon.
Punctuation is a modern art. The ancients were entirely unacquainted with the use of points; and wrote, not only without any distinction of members and periods, but also without any distinction of words. This custom continued till the year 360 before Christ. How the ancients read their works, written in this manner, it is not easy to conceive. After the practice of joining words together had ceased, notes of distinction were placed at the end of every word. This practice continued a considerable time.
As it appears that the present usage of points did not take place while manuscripts and monumental inscriptions were the only known methods of conveying knowledge, we must conclude, that it was introduced with the art of printing. The introduction was, however, gradual: all the points did not appear at once. The colon, semicolon, and note of admiration, were produced some time after the others. The whole set, as they are now used, became established, when learning and refinement had made considerable progress.
As the rules of punctuation are founded altogether on the grammatical construction of sentences, their application pre-supposes, on the part of the student, a knowledge of Syntax. Although they admit of exceptions, and require a continual exercise of judgment and literary taste in applying them properly, they are of great utility, and justly merit our particular attention.
The great importance of acquiring a thorough knowledge of punctuation, and of attending strictly to the application of its rules, is established by the single fact, that the meaning of a sentence is often totally perverted by the omission or misapplication of points. To illustrate the correctness of this remark, numerous example might be selected. The following border on the ridiculous: “Mr. Jared Hurton having gone to sea his wife, desires the prayers of this church:” “Tryon, who escaped from the jail on Friday last, is 22 years of age, has sandy hair, light eyes, thin visage, with a short nose turned up about six feet high, &c.” Corrected; “Mr. Jared Hurton having gone to sea, his wife desires the prayers of this church;” “thin visage, with a short nose turned up, about six feet high, &c.”
Before one enters upon the study of punctuation, it is necessary for him to understand what is meant by an adjunct, a simple sentence, and a compound sentence.
An adjunct or imperfect phrase contains no assertion, or does not amount to a proposition or sentence; as, “Therefore;” “studious of praise;” “in the pursuit of commerce.”—For the definition of a sentence, and a compound sentence, turn to page 119.
When two or more adjuncts are connected with the verb in the same manner, and by the same preposition or conjunction, the sentence is compound, and may be resolved into as many simple ones as there are adjuncts; as, “They have sacrificed their health and fortune, at the shrine of vanity, pride, and extravagance.” But when the adjuncts are connected with the verb in a different manner, the sentence is simple; as, “Grass of an excellent quality, is produced in great abundance in the northern regions of our country.”
RULE 1. The members of a simple sentence should not, in general, be separated by a comma; as, “Every part of matter swarms with living creatures.”
Exercises in Punctuation.—Idleness is the great fomenter of all corruptions in the human heart. The friend of order has made half his way to virtue. All finery is a sign of littleness.
RULE 2. When a simple sentence is long, and the nominative is accompanied with an inseparable adjunct of importance, it may admit a comma immediately before the verb; as, “The good taste of the present age, has not allowed us to neglect the cultivation of the English language;” “Too many of the pretended friendships of youth, are mere combinations in pleasure.”
Exercises.—The indulgence of a harsh disposition is the introduction to future misery. To be totally indifferent to praise or censure is a real defect in character. The intermixture of evil in human society serves to exercise the suffering graces and virtues of the good.
RULE 3. When the connexion of the different parts of a simple sentence, is interrupted by an adjunct of importance, the adjunct must be distinguished by a comma before and after it; as, “His work is, in many respects, very imperfect. It is, therefore, not much approved.” But when these interruptions are slight and unimportant, it is better to omit the comma; as, “Flattery is certainly pernicious;” “There is surely a pleasure in beneficence.”
Exercises.—Charity like the sun brightens all its objects. Gentleness is in truth the great avenue to mutual enjoyment. You too have your failings. Humility and knowledge with poor apparel excel pride and ignorance under costly attire. The best men often experience disappointments. Advice should be seasonably administered. No assumed behavior can always hide the real character.
RULE 4. The nominative case independent, and nouns in apposition when accompanied with adjuncts, must be distinguished by commas; as, “My son, give me thy heart;” “Dear Sir, I write to express my gratitude for your many kindnesses;” “I am obliged to you, my friends, for your many favors;” “Paul, the apostle, of the Gentiles, was eminent for his zeal and knowledge;” “The butterfly, child of the summer, flutters in the sun.”
But if two nouns in apposition are unattended with adjuncts, or if they form only a proper name, they should not be separated; as, "Paul the apostle, suffered martyrdom;” “The statesman Jefferson, wrote the declaration of Independence.”
Exercises.—Lord thou hast been our dwelling place in all generations. Continue my dear child to make virtue thy chief study. Canst thou expect thou betrayer of innocence to escape the hand of vengeance? Death the king of terrors chose a prime minister. Hope the balm of life sooths us under every misfortune. Confucius the great Chinese philosopher was eminently good as well as wise. The patriarch Joseph is an illustrious example of true piety.
RULE 5. The nominative case absolute and the infinitive mood absolute with their adjuncts, a participle with words depending on it, and, generally, any imperfect phrase which may be resolved into a simple sentence, must be separated from the rest of the sentence by commas; as, “His father dying, he succeeded to the estate;” “To confess the truth, I was in fault;” “The king, approving the plan, put it in execution;” “He, having finished his academical course, has returned home, to prosecute his professional studies.”
Exercises.—Peace of mind being secured we may smile at misfortune. To enjoy present pleasure he sacrificed his future ease and reputation. His talents formed for great enterprises could not fail of rendering him conspicuous. The path of piety and virtue pursued with a firm and constant spirit will assuredly lead to happiness. All mankind compose one family assembled under the eye of one common Father.
RULE 6. A compound sentence must be resolved into simple ones by placing commas between its members; as, “The decay, the waste, and the dissolution of a plant, may affect our spirits, and suggest a train of serious reflections.”
Three or more nouns, verbs, adjectives, participles, or adverbs, connected by conjunctions, expressed or understood, must be separated by commas; as, “The husband, wife,[11] and children,[12] suffered extremely;” “In a letter, we may advise, exhort, comfort, request, and discuss;” “David was a brave, wise, and pious man;” “A man, fearing, serving, and loving his Creator, lives for a noble purpose;” “Success generally depends on acting prudently, steadily, and vigorously, in what we undertake.”
[11] The correctness and importance of this rule appear to be so obvious, as to render it not a little surprising, that any writer, possessing the least degree of rhetorical taste, should reject it. I am bold to affirm, that it is observed by every correct reader and speaker; and yet, strange as it may seem, it is generally violated by those printers who punctuate by the ear, and all others who are influenced by their pernicious example; thus, “The head, the heart and the hands, should be constantly and actively employed
[12] As a considerable pause in pronunciation is necessary between the last noun and the verb, a comma should be inserted to denote it; but as no pause is allowable between the last adjective and the noun, or between the last adverb and the verb, the comma, in such instances, is properly omitted; thus, “David was a brave, wise, and pious man.”
Two or more nouns, verbs, adjectives, participles, or adverbs, occurring in the same construction, with their conjunctions understood, must be separated by commas; as, “Reason, virtue, answer one great aim;” “Virtue supports in adversity, moderates in prosperity;” “Plain, honest truth, needs no artificial covering;” “We are fearfully, wonderfully framed.”
Exercises.—We have no reason to complain of the lot of man nor of the mutability of the world. Sensuality contaminates the body depresses the understanding deadens the moral feelings of the heart and degrades man from his rank in creation.
Self-conceit presumption and obstinacy blast the prospects of many a youth. He is alternately supported by his father his uncle and his elder brother. The man of virtue and honor will be trusted relied upon and esteemed. Conscious guilt renders one mean-spirited timorous and base. An upright mind will never be at a loss to discern what is just and true lovely honest and of good report. Habits of reading writing and thinking are the indispensable qualifications of a good student. The great business of life is to be employed in doing justly loving mercy and talking humbly with our Creator. To live soberly righteously and piously comprehends the whole of our duty.
In our health life possessions connexions pleasures there are causes of decay imperceptibly working. Deliberate slowly execute promptly. An idle trifling society is near akin to such as is corrupting. This unhappy person had been seriously affectionately admonished but in vain.
RULE 7. Comparative sentences whose members are short, and sentences connected with relative pronouns the meaning of whose antecedents is restricted or limited to a particular sense, should not be separated by a comma; as, “Wisdom is better than riches;” “No preacher is so successful as thee;” “He accepted what I had rejected;” “Self-denial is the sacrifice which virtue must make;” “Subtract from many modern poets all that may be found in Shakspeare, and trash will remain;” “Give it to the man whom you most esteem.” In this last example, the assertion is not of “man in general,” but of “the man whom you most esteem.”
But when the antecedent is used in a general sense, a comma is properly inserted before the relative; as, “Man, who is born of a woman, is of few days and full of trouble;” “There is no charm in the female sex, which can supply the place of virtue.”
This rule is equally applicable to constructions in which the relative is understood; as, “Value duly the privileges you enjoy;” that is, “privileges which you enjoy.”
Exercises.—How much better it is to get wisdom than gold! The friendships of the world can exist no longer than interest cements them. Eat what is set before you. They who excite envy will easily incur censure. A man who is of a detracting spirit will misconstrue the most innocent words that can be put together. Many of the evils which occasion our complaints of the world are wholly imaginary.
The gentle mind is like the smooth stream which reflects every object in its just proportion and in its fairest colors. In that unaffected civility which springs from a gentle mind there is an incomparable charm. The Lord whom I serve is eternal. This is the man we saw yesterday.
RULE 8. When two words of the same sort, are connected by a conjunction expressed, they must not be separated; as, “Libertines call religion, bigotry or superstition;” “True worth is modest and retired;” “The study of natural history, expands and elevates the mind;” “Some men sin deliberately and presumptuously.” When words are connected in pairs, the pairs only should be separated; as, “There is a natural difference between merit and demerit, virtue and vice, wisdom and folly;” “Whether we eat or drink, labor or sleep, we should be temperate.”
But if the parts connected by a conjunction are not short, they may be separated by a comma; as, “Romances may be said to be miserable rhapsodies, or dangerous incentives to evil.”
Exercises.—Idleness brings forward and nourishes many bad passions. True friendship will at all times avoid a rough or careless behavior. Health and peace a moderate fortune and a few friends sum up all the undoubted articles of temporal felicity. Truth is fair and artless simple and sincere uniform and consistent. Intemperance destroys the strength of our bodies and the vigor of our minds.
RULE 9. Where the verb of a simple member is understood, a comma may, in some instances, be inserted; as, “From law arises security; from security, curiosity; from curiosity, knowledge.” But in others, it is better to omit the comma; “No station is so high, no power so great, no character so unblemished, as to exempt men from the attacks of rashness, malice, and envy.”
Exercises.—As a companion he was severe and satirical; as a friend captious and dangerous. If the spring put forth no blossoms in summer there will be no beauty and in autumn no fruit. So if youth be trifled away without improvement manhood will be contemptible and old age miserable.
RULE 10. When a simple member stands as the object of a preceding verb, and its verb may be changed into the infinitive mood, the comma is generally omitted; as, “I suppose he is at rest;” changed, “I suppose him to be at rest.”
But when the verb to be is followed by a verb in the infinitive mood, which, by transposition, may be made the nominative case to it, the verb to be is generally separated from the infinitive by a comma; as, “The most obvious remedy is, to withdraw from all associations with bad men;” “The first and most obvious remedy against the infection, is, to withdraw from all associations with bad men.”
Exercises.—They believed he was dead. He did not know that I was the man. I knew she was still alive. The greatest misery is to be condemned by our own hearts. The greatest misery that we can endure is to be condemned by our own hearts.
NOTES.
1. When a conjunction is separated by a phrase or member from the member to which it belongs, such intervening phrase appears to require a comma at each extremity; as, “They set out early, and, before the close of the day, arrived at the destined place.” This rule, however, is not generally followed by our best writers; as, “If thou seek the Lord, he will be found of thee; but if thou forsake him, he will cast thee off for ever;” “But if the parts connected are not short, a comma may be inserted.”
2. Several verbs succeeding each other in the infinitive mood, and having a common dependance, may be divided by commas; as, “To relieve the indigent, to comfort the afflicted, to protect the innocent, to reward the deserving, are humane and noble employments.”
3. A remarkable expression, or a short observation, somewhat in the form of a quotation, may be properly marked with a comma; as, “It hurts a man’s pride to say, I do not know;” “Plutarch calls lying, the vice of slaves.”
4. When words are placed
in opposition to each other, or with some
marked variety, they must
be distinguished by a comma; as,
“Tho’
deep, yet clear; tho’ gentle,
yet not dull;
Strong,
without rage; without o’erflowing,
full.”
“Good men, in this frail,
imperfect state, are often found, not only
in union with, but
in opposition to, the views and conduct of
each other.”
Sometimes when the word with
which the last preposition agrees, is
single, the comma may be omitted;
as, “Many states were in alliance
with, and under the
protection of Rome.”
The same rule and restrictions apply, when two or more nouns refer to the same preposition; as, “He was composed both under the threatening, and at the approach, of a cruel and lingering death;” “He was not only the king, but the father of his people.”
5. The words, “as, thus, nay, so, hence, again, first, secondly, formerly, now, lastly, once more, above all, on the contrary, in the next place, in short,” and all other words and phrases of a similar kind, must generally be separated from the context by a comma; as, “Remember thy best friend; formerly, the supporter of thy infancy; now, the guardian of thy youth;” “He feared want; hence, he overvalued riches;” “So, if youth be trifled away,” &c. “Again, we must, have food and clothing;” “Finally, let us conclude.”
The foregoing rules and examples are sufficient, it is presumed, to suggest to the learner, in all ordinary instances, the proper place for inserting the comma; but in applying these rules, great regard must be paid to the length and meaning of the clauses, and the proportion which they bear to one another.
The semicolon is used for dividing a compound sentence into two or more parts, not so closely connected as those which are separated by a comma, nor yet so little dependant on each other, as those which are distinguished by a colon.
RULE 1. When the preceding member of the sentence does not of itself give complete sense, but depends on the following clause, and sometimes when the sense of that member would be complete without the concluding one, the semicolon is used; as in the following examples: “As the desire of approbation, when it works according to reason, improves the amiable part of our species; so, nothing is more destructive to them, when it is governed by vanity and folly;” “The wise man is happy, when he gains his own approbation; the fool, when he gains the applause of those around him;” “Straws swim upon the surface; but pearls lie at the bottom.”
Exercises.—The path of truth is a plain and safe path that of falsehood a perplexing maze. Heaven is the region of gentleness and friendship hell of fierceness and animosity. As there is a worldly happiness which God perceives to be no other than disguised misery as there are worldly honors which in his estimation are reproach so there is a worldly wisdom which in his sight is foolishness.
But all subsists by elemental strife
And passions are the elements of life.
RULE 2. When an example is introduced to illustrate a rule or proposition, the semicolon may be used before the conjunction as; as in the following instance: Prepositions govern the objective case; as, “She gave the book to him.”
NOTE. In instances like
the foregoing, many respectable punctuists
employ the colon, instead
of the semicolon.
The Colon is used to divide a sentence into two or more parts less connected than those which are separated by a semicolon; but not so independent as separate, distinct sentences.
RULE 1. When a member of a sentence is complete in itself, but followed by some supplemental remark, or farther illustration of the subject, the colon may be properly employed; as, “Nature felt her inability to extricate herself from the consequences of guilt: the gospel revealed the plan of divine interposition and aid.” “Great works are performed, not by strength, but by perseverance: yonder palace was raised by single stones; yet you see its height and spaciousness.”
Exercises.—The three great enemies to tranquillity are vice superstition and idleness vice which poisons and disturbs the mind with bad passions superstition which fills it with imaginary terrors idleness which loads it with tediousness and disgust.
When we look forward into the year which is beginning what do we behold there? All my brethren is a blank to our view a dark unknown presents itself.
RULE 2. When a semicolon has preceded, or more than one, and a still greater pause is necessary, in order to mark the connecting or concluding sentiment, the colon should be applied; as, “A divine legislator, uttering his voice from heaven; an almighty governor, stretching forth his arm to punish or reward; informing us of perpetual rest prepared for the righteous hereafter, and of indignation and wrath awaiting the wicked: these are the considerations which overawe the world, which support integrity, and check guilt.”
When a sentence is complete, and so independent as not to be connected with the one which follows it, a period should be inserted at its close; as, “Fear God.” “Honor the patriot.” “Respect virtue.”
In the use of many of the pauses, there is a diversity of practice among our best writers and grammarians. Compound sentences connected by conjunctions, are sometimes divided by the period; as, “Recreations, though they may be of an innocent kind, require steady government to keep them within a due and limited province. But such as are of an irregular and vicious nature, are not to be governed, but to be banished from every well-regulated mind.”
The period should follow every abbreviated word; as, “A.D. N.B. U.S. Va. Md. Viz. Col. Mr.”
DASH.
The Dash, though often used improperly by hasty and incoherent writers, may be introduced with propriety, where the sentence breaks off abruptly; where a significant pause is required; or where there is an unexpected turn in the sentiment; as, “If thou art he, so much respected once—but, oh! how fallen! how degraded!” “If acting conformably to the will of our Creator;—if promoting the welfare of mankind around us;—if securing our own happiness;—are objects of the highest moment: then we are loudly called upon to cultivate and extend the great interests of religion and virtue.”
A dash following a stop, denotes that the pause is to be greater than if the stop were alone; and when used by itself, requires a pause of such length as the sense only can determine.
“Here lies the great—False
marble, where?
“Nothing but sordid dust lies here.”
The note of interrogation is used at the end of an interrogative sentence; as, “Who adorned the heavens with such exquisite beauty?”
NOTE. The interrogative
point should not be employed in cases where
it is only said, that a question
has been asked; as, “The Cyprians
asked me, why I wept.”
The note of exclamation is applied to expressions of sudden emotion, surprise, joy, grief, &c. and sometimes to invocations and addresses; as, “How much vanity in the pursuits of men!” “What is more amiable than virtue!” “My friend! this conduct amazes me!” “Hear me, O Lord! for thy loving kindness is great!”
A parenthesis is a clause containing some useful remark, which may be omitted without injuring the grammatical construction; as, “To gain a posthumous reputation, is to save a few letters (for what is a name besides?) from oblivion.”
“Know then this truth, (enough for
man to know,)
“Virtue alone is happiness below.”
NOTE. The parenthesis generally denotes a moderate depression of the voice; and, as the parenthetical marks do not supply the place of a point, the clause should be accompanied with every stop which the sense would require, if the parenthetical characters were not used. It ought to terminate with the same kind of point which the member has that precedes it; as “He loves nobly, (I speak of friendship,) who is not jealous when, he has partners of love.”
“Or why so long (in life if long
can be)
“Lent Heav’n a parent to the
poor and me?”
Parentheses, however, containing interrogations or exclamations, form an exception to this rule; as, “If I grant his request, (and who could refuse it?) I shall secure his esteem and attachment.”
The Apostrophe is used to abbreviate a word, and also to mark the possessive case of a noun; as, “’tis, for it is; tho,’ for though; o’er, for over;” “A man’s poverty.”
A Quotation marks a sentence taken in the author’s own language; as, “The proper study of mankind is man.”
When an author represents a person as speaking, the language of that person should be designated by a quotation; as, At my coming in, he said, “You and the physician are come too late.” A quotation contained within another, should be distinguished by two single commas; as, “Always remember this ancient maxim ‘Know thyself.’”
It is proper to begin with a capital,
1. The first word of every sentence.
2. Proper names, the appellations of the Deity, &c.; as, “James, Cincinnati, the Andes, Huron;” “God, Jehovah, the Almighty the Supreme Being, Providence, the Holy Spirit.”
3. Adjectives derived from proper names, the titles of books, nouns which are used as the subject of discourse, the pronoun I and the interjection O, and every line in poetry; as, “American, Grecian, English, French; Irving’s Sketch Book, Percival’s Poems; I write; Hear, O earth!”
VERSIFICATION.
POETRY is the language of passion, or of enlivened imagination.
VERSIFICATION, in English, is the harmonious arrangement of a particular number and variety of accented and unaccented syllables, according to particular laws.
RHYME is the correspondence of the sound of the last syllable in one line, to the sound of the last syllable in another; as,
“O’er the glad waters of the
dark-blue sea,
“Our thoughts as boundless and our
souls as free.”
BLANK VERSE consists in poetical thoughts expressed in regular numbers, but without the correspondence of sound at the end of the lines which constitutes rhyme.
POETICAL FEET consist in a particular arrangement and connexion of a number of accented and unaccented syllables.
They are called feet, because it is by their aid that the voice, as it were, steps along through the verse in a measured pace.
All poetical feet consist either of two, or of three syllables; and are reducible to eight kinds; four of two syllables, and four of three, as follows:
DISSYLLABLE. TRISYLLABLE.
A Trochee — u A Dactyle — u u
An Iambus u — An Amphibrach u —
u
A Spondee — — An Anapaest u u
—
A Pyrrhic u u A Tribrach u u u
A Trochee has the first syllable accented, and the
last unaccented; as,
Hateful, pettish:
Restless mortals toil for naught.
An Iambus has the first syllable unaccented, and the
last accented; as,
Betray, consist:
The seas shall waste, the skies in smoke decay.
A Dactyle has the first syllable accented, and the two latter unaccented; as, Laborer, possible:
From the low pleasures of this fallen nature.
An Anapaest has the first two syllables unaccented, and the last accented; as, Contravene, acquiesce:
at the close of the day when the hamlet is still.
A Spondee; as, The pale moon: a Pyrrhic; as, on the tall tree: an Amphibrach; as, Delightful: a Tribrach; as, Numerable.
GRAMMAR instructs us how to express our thoughts correctly.
RHETORIC teaches us to express them with force and elegance.
The former is generally confined to the correct application of words in constructing single sentences. The latter treats of the proper choice of words, of the happiest method of constructing sentences, of their most advantageous arrangement in forming a discourse, and of the various kinds and qualities of composition. The principles of rhetoric are principally based on those unfolded and illustrated in the science of grammar. Hence, an acquaintance with the latter, and, indeed, with the liberal arts, is a prerequisite to the study of rhetoric and belles-lettres.
It may be laid down as a maxim of eternal truth, that good sense is the foundation of all good writing. One who understands a subject well, will scarcely write ill upon it.
Rhetoric, or the art of persuasion, requires in a writer, the union of good sense, and a lively and chaste imagination. It is, then, her province to teach him to embellish his thoughts with elegant and appropriate language, vivid imagery, and an agreeable variety of expression. It ought to be his aim,
“To mark the point where sense and dulness meet.”
STYLE.—PERSPICUITY AND PRECISION.
STYLE is the peculiar manner in which we express our conceptions by means of language. It is a picture of the ideas which rise in our minds, and of the order in which they are produced.
The qualities of a good style, may be ranked under two heads. perspicuity and ornament.
PERSPICUITY, which is considered the fundamental quality of a good style, claims attention, first, to single words and phrases; and, secondly, to the construction of sentences. When considered with respect to words and phrases, it requires these three qualities, purity, propriety, and precision.
Purity of language consists in the use of such words and such constructions as belong to the language which we speak, in opposition to words and phrases belonging to other languages, or which are obsolete or new-coined, or employed without proper authority.
Propriety is the choice of those words which the best usage has appropriated to the ideas which we intend to express by them. It implies their correct and judicious application, in opposition to low expressions, and to words and phrases which would be less significant of the ideas which we wish to convey. It is the union of purity and propriety, which renders style graceful and perspicuous.
Precision, from praecidere, to cut off, signifies retrenching all superfluities, and pruning the expression in such a manner as to exhibit neither more nor less than an exact copy of the ideas intended to be conveyed.
A proper construction of sentences is of so great importance in every species of composition, that we cannot be too strict or minute in our attention to it.
Elegance of style requires us generally to avoid, many short or long sentences in succession; a monotonous correspondence of one member to another; and the commencing of a piece, section, or paragraph, with a long sentence.
The qualities most essential to a perfect sentence, are Unity, Clearness, Strength, and Harmony.
UNITY is an indispensable property of a correct sentence. A sentence implies an arrangement of words in which only one proposition is expressed. It may, indeed, consist of parts; but these parts ought to be so closely bound together, as to make on the mind the impression, not of many objects, but of only one. In order to preserve this unity, the following rules may be useful.
1. In the course of the sentence, the scene should be changed as little as possible. In every sentence there is some leading or governing word, which, if possible, ought to be continued so from the beginning to the end of it. The following sentence is not constructed according to this rule: “After we came to anchor, they put me on shore, where I was saluted by all my friends, who received me with the greatest kindness.” In this sentence, though the objects are sufficiently connected, yet, by shifting so frequently the place and the person, the vessel, the shore, we, they, I and who, they appear in so disunited a view, that the mind is led to wander for the sense. The sentence is restored to its proper unity by constructing it thus: “Having come to anchor, I was put on shore, where I was saluted by all my friends, who received me with the greatest kindness.”
2. Never crowd into one sentence things which have so little connexion, that they would bear to be divided into two or more sentences. The violation of this rule produces so unfavorable an effect, that it is safer to err rather by too many short sentences, than by one that is overloaded and confused.
3. Avoid all unnecessary parentheses.
CLEARNESS. Ambiguity, which is opposed to clearness, may arise from a bad choice, or a bad arrangement of words.
A leading rule in the arrangement of sentences, is, that those words or members most nearly related, should be placed in the sentence as near to each other as possible, so as thereby to make their mutual relation clearly appear. This rule ought to be observed,
1. In the position of adverbs. “By greatness,” says Mr. Addison, “I do not only mean the bulk of any single object, but the largeness of a whole view.” The improper situation of the adverb only, in this sentence, renders it a limitation of the verb mean, whereas the author intended to have it qualify the phrase, a single object; thus, “By greatness, I do not mean the bulk of any single object only, but the largeness of a whole view.”
2. In the position of phrases and members. “Are these designs which any man who is born a Briton, in any circumstances, in any situation, ought to be ashamed or afraid to avow?” Corrected: “Are these designs which any man who is born a Briton, ought to be ashamed or afraid, in any circumstances, in any situation, to avow?”
3. In the position of pronouns. The reference of a pronoun to its noun, should always be so clear that we cannot possibly mistake it: otherwise the noun ought to be repeated. “It is folly to pretend to arm ourselves against the accidents of life, by heaping up treasures, which nothing can protect us against but the good providence of our Heavenly Father.” Which, in this sentence, grammatically refers to treasures; and this would convert the whole period into nonsense. The sentence should have been thus constructed, “It is folly to pretend, by heaping up treasures, to arm ourselves against the accidents of life, against which nothing can protect us but the good providence of our Heavenly Father.”
STRENGTH. By the strength of a sentence is meant such an arrangement of its several words and members, as exhibits the sense to the best advantage, and gives every word and member its due weight and force.
1. The first rule for promoting the strength of a sentence, is, to take from it all redundant words and members. Whatever can be easily supplied in the mind, should generally be omitted; thus, “Content with deserving a triumph, he refused the honor of it,” is better than to say, “Being content with deserving a triumph.” &c. “They returned back again to the same city from whence they came forth.” If we expunge from this snort sentence five which are were expletives, it will be much more neat and forcible thus, “They returned to the city whence they came.” But we should be cautious of pruning so closely as to give a hardness and dryness to the style. Some leaves must be left to shelter and adorn the fruit.
2. Particular attention to the use of copulatives, relatives, and all the particles employed for transition and connexion, is required. In compositions of an elevated character, the relative should generally be inserted. An injudicious repetition of and enfeebles style; but when enumerating objects which we wish to have appear as distinct from each other as possible, it may be repeated with peculiar advantage; thus, “Such a man may fall a victim to power; but truth, and reason, and liberty, would fall with him.”
3. Dispose of the capital word or words in that part of the sentence in which they will make the most striking impression.
4. Cause the members of a sentence to go on rising in their importance one above another. In a sentence of two members, the longer should generally be the concluding one.
5. Avoid concluding a sentence with an adverb, a preposition, or any inconsiderable word, unless it be emphatical.
6. Where two things are compared or contrasted with each other, a resemblance in the language and construction should be observed.
* * * * *
FIGURES OF SPEECH.
Figures of Speech may be described as that language which is prompted either by the imagination, or by the passions. They generally imply some departure from simplicity of expression; and exhibit ideas in a manner more vivid and impressive, than could be done by plain language. Figures have been commonly divided into two great classes; Figures of Words, and Figures of Thought.
Figures of Words are called Tropes, and consist in a word’s being employed to signify something that is different from its original meaning; so that by altering the word, we destroy the figure.
When we say of a person, that he has a fine taste in wines, the word taste is used in its common, literal sense; but when we say, he has a fine taste for painting, poetry, or music, we use the word figuratively. “A good man enjoys comfort in the midst of adversity,” is simple language; but when it is said, “To the upright there ariseth light in darkness,” the same sentiment is expressed in a figurative style, light is put in the place of comfort, and darkness is used to suggest the idea of adversity.
The following are the most important figures:
1. A METAPHOR is founded on the resemblance which one object bears to another; or, it is a comparison in an abridged form.
When I say of some great minister, “That he upholds the state like a pillar which supports the weight of a whole edifice,” I fairly make a comparison; but when I say of such a minister, “That he is the pillar of the state,” the word pillar becomes a metaphor. In the latter construction, the comparison between the minister and a pillar, is made in the mind; but it is expressed without any of the words that denote comparison.
Metaphors abound in all writings. In the scriptures they may be found in vast variety. Thus, our blessed Lord is called a vine, a lamb, a lion, &c.; and men, according to their different dispositions, are styled wolves, sheep, dogs, serpents, vipers, &c.
Washington Irving, in speaking of the degraded state of the American Aborigines who linger on the borders of the “white settlements,” employs the following beautiful metaphor: “The proud pillar of their independence has been shaken down, and the whole moral fabric lies in ruins.”
2. AN ALLEGORY may be regarded as a metaphor continued; or it is several metaphors so connected together in sense, as frequently to form a kind of parable or fable. It differs from a single metaphor, in the same manner that a cluster on the vine differs from a single grape.
The following is a fine example of an allegory, taken from the 60th psalm; wherein the people of Israel are represented under the image of a vine. “Thou hast brought a vine out of Egypt: thou hast cast out the heathen and planted it. Thou preparedst room before it; and didst cause it to take deep root, and it filled the land. The hills were covered with the shadow of it, and the boughs thereof were like the goodly cedars. She sent out her boughs into the sea, and her branches into the river.”
3. A SIMILE or COMPARISON is when the resemblance between two objects, whether real or imaginary, is expressed in form.
Thus, we use a simile, when we say, “The actions of princes are like those great rivers, the course of which every one beholds, but their springs have been seen by few.” “As the mountains are round about Jerusalem, so the Lord is round about his people.” “The music of Caryl was like the memory of joys that are past, pleasant and mournful to the soul.” “Our Indians are like those wild plants which thrive best in the shade, but which wither when exposed to the influence of the sun.”
“The Assyrian came down, like the
wolf on the fold,
And his cohorts were gleaming with purple
and gold;
And the sheen of their spears was like
stars on the sea,
When the blue wave rolls nightly on deep
Galilee.”
4. A METONYMY is where the cause is put for the effect, or the effect for the cause; the container for the thing contained; or the sign for the thing signified.
When we say, “They read Milton,” the cause is put for the effect, meaning “Milton’s works.” “Gray hairs should be respected;” here the effect is put for the cause; meaning by “gray hairs,” old age, which produces gray hairs. In the phrase, “The kettle boils,” the container is substituted for the thing contained. “He addressed the chair;” that is, the person in the chair.
5. A SYNECDOCHE OR COMPREHENSION. When the whole is put for a part, or a part for the whole; a genus for a species, or a species for a genus; in general, when any thing less, or any thing more, is put for the precise object meant, the figure is called a Synecdoche.
Thus, “A fleet of twenty sail, instead of, ships.” “The horse is a noble animal;” “The dog is a faithful creature:” here an individual is put for the species. We sometimes use the “head” for the person, and the “waves” for the sea. In like manner, an attribute may be pat for a subject; as “Youth” for the young, the “deep” for the sea.
6. PERSONIFICATION or PROSOPOPOEIA is that figure by which we attribute life and action to inanimate objects. When we say, “The ground thirsts for rain,” or, “the earth smiles with plenty;” when we speak of “ambition’s being restless,” or, “a disease’s being deceitful;” such expressions show the facility, with which the mind can accommodate the properties of living creatures to things that are inanimate.
The following are fine examples of this figure:
“Cheer’d with the grateful smell, old Ocean smiles;”
“The wilderness and
the solitary place shall be glad for them; and
the desert shall rejoice and
blossom as the rose.”
7. AN APOSTROPHE is an address to some person, either absent or dead, as if he were present and listening to us. The address is frequently made to a personified object; as, “Death is swallowed up in victory. O death! where is thy sting? O grave! where is thy victory?”
“Weep on the rock of
roaring winds, O maid of Inistore; bend thy
fair head over the waves,
thou fairer than the ghost of the hills,
when it moves in a sun-beam
at noon over the silence of Morveu.”
8. ANTITHESIS. Comparison is founded on the resemblance, antithesis, on the contrast or opposition, of two objects.
Example. “If you wish to enrich a person, study not to increase his stores, but to diminish his desires."
9. HYPERBOLE or EXAGGERATION consists in magnifying an object beyond its natural bounds. “As swift as the wind; as white as the snow; as slow as a snail;” and the like, are extravagant hyperboles.
“I saw their chief,
tall as a rock of ice; his spear, the blasted
fir; his shield, the rising
moon; he sat on the shore, like a cloud
of mist on the bills.”
10. VISION is produced, when, in relating something that is past, we use the present tense, and describe it as actually, passing before our eyes.
11. INTERROGATION. The literal use of an interrogation, is to ask a question; but when men are strongly moved, whatever they would affirm or deny with great earnestness, they naturally put in the form of a question.
Thus Balaam expressed himself to Balak: “The Lord is not man, that he should lie, nor the son of man, that he should repeat. Hath he said it? and shall he not do it? Hath he spoken it? and shall he not make it good?” “Hast thou an arm like God? or canst thou thunder with a voice like him?”
12. EXCLAMATIONS are the effect of strong emotions, such a surprise, admiration, joy, grief, and the like.
“O that I had in the
wilderness a lodging place of way-faring men!”
“O that I had wings
like a dove! for then would I fly away, and be
at rest!”
13. IRONY is expressing ourselves in a manner contrary to our thoughts; not with a view to deceive, but to add force to our remarks. We can reprove one for his negligence, by saying, “You have taken great care, indeed.”
The prophet Elijah adopted this figure, when he challenged the priests of Baal to prove the truth of their deity. “He mocked them, and said. Cry aloud for he is a god: either he is talking, or he is pursuing, or he is on a journey, or, peradventure, he sleepeth, and must be waked.”
14. AMPLIFICATION or CLIMAX consists in heightening all the circumstances of an object or action, which we desire to place in a strong light.
Cicero gives a lively instance of this figure, when he says, “It is a crime to put a Roman citizen in bonds: it is the height of guilt to scourge him; little less than parricide to put him to death: what name, then, shall I give to the act of crucifying him?”
Corrections of the False Syntax arranged under the Rules and Notes.
RULE 4. Frequent commission of sin hardens men in it. Great pains have been taken, &c.—is seldom found. The sincere are, &c.—is happy. What avail, &c.—Disappointments sink—the renewal of hope gives, &c.—is without limit, has been conferred upon us.—Thou canst not heal—but thou mayst do, &c.—consists the happiness, &c.—Who touchedst, or didst touch Isaiah’s hallowed lips with fire.
Note 1. And wilt thou never be to Heaven resigned?—And who had great abilities, &c.
Note 2. Are peace and honor.—was controversy.
RULE 7. Them that you visited.—him that was mentioned.—he who preached repentance, &c.—they who died.—he who succeeded.
RULE 8. Time and tide wait, &c.—remove mountains.—are both uncertain.—dwell with, &c.—affect the mind, &c.—What signify the counsel and care, &c.—are now perished.—Why are whiteness and coldness, &c.—bind them continually, &c.—render their possessor, &c.—There are error and discrepance—which show, &c.
RULE 9. Is the same in idea.—is in the porphyry.—is remarkable, &c.—which moves merely as it is moved.—affects us, &c.—Man’s happiness or misery is, in a great measure, &c.—for it may be, &c.—was blameworthy.
RULE 10. The nation is powerful.—The fleet was seen, &c.—The church has, &c.—is, or ought to be, the object, &c.—it is feeble.
RULE 11. My people do, &c.—The multitude eagerly pursue pleasure as their, &c.—were divided in their sentiments, and they have referred, &c.—The people rejoice—give them sorrow.
RULE 12. Homer’s works are, &c.—Asa’s heart. James Hart’s book.
Note 1. It was the men, women, and children’s lot, &c. or, It was the lot of the men, women, and children.—Peter, John, and Andrew’s, &c.
Note 2. This is Campbell the poet’s production; or, The production of Campbell, &c.—The silk was purchased at Brown’s the mercer and haberdasher.
Note 4. The pupil’s composing, &c.—rule’s being observed.—of the president’s neglecting to lay it before the council.
RULE 13. Of his audience.—put it on Jacob.—sprinkle them—and they shall, &c.—of his reputation.
Note. You were blamed; you were worthy.—where were you?—how fat were you?
RULE 14. Who hast been, &c.—who is the sixth that has lost his life by this means.
Who all my sense confinedst; or, didst confine.
Note. And who broughtest him forth out of Ur.
RULE 15, Who shall be sent, &c.—This is the man who, &c.
RULE 16. They to whom much is given, &c.—with whom you associate &c.—whom I greatly respect, &c.—whom we ought to love, and to whom, &c—They whom conscience, &c.—With whom did you walk?—Whom did you see?—To whom did you give the book?
RULE 17. Who gave John those books? We.—him who lives in Pearl street—My brother and he.—She and I.
RULE 18: Note 2. Thirty tuns.—twenty feet—one hundred fathoms.
Note 6. He bought a pair of new shoes—piece of elegant furniture.—pair of fine horses—tract of poor land.
Note 7. Are still more difficult to be comprehended.—most doubtful, or precarious way, &c.—This model comes nearer perfection than any I, &c.
RULE 19: Note. That sort.—these two hours.—This kind, &c.—He saw one person, or more than one, enter the garden.
Note 2. Better than himself.—is so small.—his station may be, is bound by the laws.
Note 3. On each side, &c.—took each his censer.
RULE 20. Whom did they, &c.—They whom opulence,—whom luxury, &c.—Him and them we know, &c.—Her that is negligent, &c.—my brother and me &c.—Whom did they send, &c.—Them whom he, &c.
RULE 21. It is I.—If I were he.—it is he, indeed.—Whom do you, &c.—Who do men say, &c.—and who say ye, &c.—whom do you imagine it to have been?—it was I; but you knew that it was he.
RULE 25. Bid him come—durst not do it.—Hear him read, &c.—makes us approve and reject, &c.—better to live—than to outlive, &c.—to wrestle.
RULE 26: Note. The taking of pains: or, without taking pains, &c.—The changing of times,—the removing and setting up of kings.
RULE 28: Note 3. He did me—I had written—he came home.—befallen my cousin—he would have gone.—already risen.—is begun.—is spoken.—would have written—had they written, &c.
RULE 29: Note 1. It cannot, therefore, be, &c.—he was not often pleasing.—should never be separated.—We may live happily, &c.
RULE 30: Note. I don’t know any thing; or, I know nothing, &c.—I did not see anybody; or, I saw nobody, &c.—Nothing ever affects her.—and take no shape or semblance, &c.—There can be nothing, &c.—Neither precept nor discipline is so forcible as example.
RULE 31. For himself.—among themselves.—with whom he is, &c.—With whom did, &c.—From whom did you receive instruction?
RULE 33. My brother and he, &c.—You and I, &c. He and I—John and he, &c.—Between you and me, &c.
RULE 34. And entreat me, &c.—and acting differently, &c.
Note 1. But he may return—but he will write no more.
Note 2. Unless it rain.—If he acquire riches, &c.
RULE 35. Than I—as well as he, than they.—but he.—but he and I.—but them who had gone astray.
Promiscuous Examples.—Him who is from eternity, &c.—depends all the happiness,—which exists, &c.—the enemies whom, &c.—Is it I or he whom you requested?—Though great have been,—sincerely acknowledge.—There was, in the metropolis.—exercising our memories.—was consumed.—Affluence may give—but it will not.—of this world often choke.—Them that honor,—and they that despise.—I intended to call last week.—the fields look fresh and gay.—very neatly, finely woven paper.—where I saw Gen. Andrew Jackson, him who.—Take the first two,—last three.—thirty feet high.—a union,—a hypothesis.—I have seen him to whom you wrote, he would have come back, or returned.—understands the nature,—he rejects.—If thou study,—thou wilt become.—is not properly attended to.—He knew.—therefore, to have done it,—than the title.—very independently.—duty to do.—my friend’s entering.—is the best specimen, or it comes nearer perfection than any, &c.—blow them, will go, &c.—Each of those two authors has his merit.—Reason’s whole,—lie in.—strikes the mind,—than if the parts had been adjusted,—with perfect symmetry.
Satire does not carry in it.—composes the triangle.—persons’ opportunities were ever.—It has been reported.—should never be.—situation in which.—is thoroughly versed in his.—are the soul,—follows little.—An army presents.—are the duties of a christian.—happier than he.—always have inclined, and which always will incline him to offend.—which require great.—Them that honor me, will I.—has opinions peculiar to itself.—that it may be said he attained monarchical.—hast permitted,—wilt deliver.—was formerly propagated.—the measure is,—unworthy
COMMA.
Corrections of the Exercises in Punctuation.
RULE 1. Idleness is the great fomenter of all corruptions in the human heart. The friend of order has made half his way to virtue. All finery is a sign of littleness.
RULE 2. The indulgence of a harsh disposition, is the introduction to future misery. To be totally indifferent to praise or censure, is a real defect in character. The intermixture of evil in human society, serves to exercise the suffering graces and virtues of the good.
RULE 3. Charity, like the sun, brightens all its objects. Gentleness is, in truth, the great avenue to mutual enjoyment. You, too, have your failings. Humility and knowledge, with poor apparel, excel pride and ignorance, under costly attire. The best men often experience disappointments. Advice should be seasonably administered. No assumed behavior can always hide the real character.
RULE 4. Lord, thou hast been our dwelling place in all generations. Continue, my dear child, to make virtue thy chief study. Canst thou expect, thou betrayer of innocence, to escape the hand of vengeance? Death, the king of terrors, chose a prime minister. Hope, the balm of life, sooths us under every misfortune. Confucius, the great Chinese philosopher, was eminently good, as well as wise. The patriarch Joseph is an illustrious example of true piety.
RULE 5. Peace of mind being secured, we may smile at misfortune. To enjoy present pleasure, he sacrificed his future ease and reputation. His talents, formed for great enterprises, could not fail of rendering him conspicuous. The path of piety and virtue, pursued with a firm and constant spirit, will assuredly lead to happiness. All mankind compose one family, assembled under the eye of one common Father.
KEY TO THE EXERCISES.
RULE 6. We have no reason to complain of the lot of man, nor of the mutability of the world. Sensuality contaminates the body, depresses the understanding, deadens the moral feelings of the heart, and degrades man from his rank in creation.
Self-conceit, presumption, and obstinacy, blast the prospect of many a youth. He is alternately supported by his father, his uncle, and his elder brother. The man of virtue and honor, will be trusted, relied upon, and esteemed. Conscious guilt renders one mean-spirited, timorous, and base. An upright mind will never be at a loss to discern what is just and true, lovely, honest, and of good report. Habits of reading, writing, and thinking, are the indispensable qualifications of a good student. The great business of life is, to be employed in doing justly, loving mercy, and walking humbly with our God. To live soberly, righteously, and piously, comprehends the whole of our duty.
In our health, life, possessions, connexions, pleasures, there are causes of decay imperceptibly working. Deliberate slowly, execute promptly. An idle, trifling society, is near akin to such as is corrupting. This unhappy person had been seriously, affectionately admonished, but in vain.
RULE 7. How much better it is to get wisdom than gold. The friendships of the world can exist no longer than interest cements them. Eat what is set before you. They who excite envy, will easily incur censure. A man who is of a detracting spirit, will misconstrue the most innocent words that can be put together. Many of the evils which occasion our complaints of the world, are wholly imaginary.
The gentle mind is like the smooth stream, which reflects every object in its just proportion, and in its fairest colors. In that unaffected civility which springs from a gentle mind, there is an incomparable charm. The Lord, whom I serve, is eternal. This, is the man we saw yesterday.
RULE 8. Idleness brings forward and nourishes many bad passions. True friendship will, at all times, avoid a rough or careless behavior. Health and peace, a moderate fortune, and a few friends, sum up all the undoubted articles of temporal felicity. Truth is fair and artless, simple and sincere, uniform and consistent. Intemperance destroys the strength of our bodies and the vigor of our minds.
RULE 9. As a companion, he was severe and satirical; as a friend, captious and dangerous. If the spring put forth no blossoms, in summer there will be no beauty, and in autumn, no fruit. So, if youth be trifled away without improvement, manhood will be contemptible, and old age, miserable.
RULE 10. They believed he was dead. He did not know that I was the man. I knew she was still alive. The greatest misery is, to be condemned by our own hearts. The greatest misery that we can endure, is, to be condemned by our own hearts.
SEMICOLON.
RULE 1. The path of truth is a plain and safe path; that of falsehood is a perplexing maze. Heaven is the region of gentleness and friendship; hell, of fierceness and animosity. As there is a worldly happiness, which God perceives to be no other than disguised misery; as there are worldly honors, which, in his estimation, are a reproach; so, there is a worldly wisdom, which, in his sight, is foolishness.
But all subsists by elemental strife;
And passions are the elements of life.
COLON.
RULE 1. The three great enemies to tranquillity, are vice, superstition, and idleness: vice, which poisons and disturbs the mind with bad passions; superstition, which fills it with imaginary terrors; idleness, which loads it with tediousness and disgust.